Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0024
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/30/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/02/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/03/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 3 JUNE 2008 D06-0024/HEMISPHERE CORPORATE CENTER: REVISION REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW I. SHEET 1 of 14 A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAYS. B. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT. II. SHEET 2 of 14: A. DETAIL B: 1. DENOTE 7' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE TO BOTTOM OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN. 2. RELOCATE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNS TO INSIDE EDGE OF CURB 3. PROVIDE 4' WIDE MINIMUM ACCESSIBLE ROUTE BEHIND DETECTABLE WARNING III. SHEET 3, 4, 5 AND 6 of 14: A. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER 2066 IBC, SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1, SECTION 402. 1. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT. B. KEYED NOTES: 1. NUMBER 3: CHANGE "SD-207" TO "2006 IBC/ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406". CHANGE "ADA" TO "2006 IBC/ICC 117.1". 2. NOTE 17: ADD "MARKED CROSSING" AFTER THE WORD PEDESTRIAN. 3. NOTE 18: CHANGE "ADA" TO "2006 IBC/ICC 117.1". 4. DELETE NOTE 3 AT THE HEMISPHERE LOOP ENTRANCE AND ADD A NEW NOTE REFERENCING RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARD DETAIL 207 FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAYS. C. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF ALL TYPES OF INTERIOR CURB AND SIDE WALK RAMPS SHOWING SIZES, DIMENSIONS, ALL SLOPES, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED AND COMPLYING WITH 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406. D. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF ALL TYPES OF R.O.W. CURB AND SIDE WALK RAMPS SHOWING SIZES, DIMENSIONS, ALL SLOPES, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED AND COMPLYING WITH COT DOT STANDARDS 207. E. REFERENCE ALL GROUPED ACCESSIBILITY PARKING TO THE MODIFIED DETAIL B ON PAGE 2. F. ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING APPEARS TO BE GROUPED AT THE MAIN ENTRANCES OF THE BUILDINGS. RECONSIDER PROVIDING SOME ACCESSIBLE PARKING AT THE OTHER ENTRANCE OF THE BUILDINGS. G. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF ALL TYPES OF ISLAND CROSSINGS AND CUT THROUGH MEDIANS SHOWING SIZES, DIMENSIONS, ALL SLOPES, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED AND COMPLYING WITH 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1, SECTION 406. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/09/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved development plan is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. |
| 06/09/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/12/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: D06-0024 Hemisphere Corporate Center Development Plan (Revision) TRANSMITTAL: June 12, 2008 DUE DATE: June 27, 2008 COMMENTS: The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. Sheet 5 of 14 Provide the building information Building number, height etc. on the plan. Following discussions with Ron Brown, Structural Review, City of Tucson, Development Services Department in regards to the ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 and the requirements for detectable warnings (truncated domes), it has been determined that some locations previously requiring truncated domes may no longer require them. The following comments are a direct result of these discussions. If you have any questions in regards to the requirements for truncated domes contact Ron Brown @837-4908. Sheet 4 of 14 The truncated domes shown at the handicapped vehicle parking spaces adjacent to buildings 3 & 4 and not required. Also the truncated domes shown where the concrete is flush with the pavement near the main entrance of buildings 3 & 4 are not required. Sheet 5 of 14 The truncated domes shown at the handicapped vehicle parking spaces adjacent to building 2 and not required. Also the truncated domes shown where the concrete is flush with the pavement near the main entrance of building 2 are not required. Sheet 5 of 14 Remove the truncated domes shown at the loading spaces located along the east end of the building. As the sidewalk is flush the pavement in this area provide some type of barrier to prevent parking vehicles from encroaching onto the sidewalk. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. SHS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0024dp-R.doc |
| 06/18/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Sheet 2, trash enclosure detail - Call out a 2 ft dimension for the spacing between the rear outside wall protector (bollard) and the CMU wall. 2. Enclosure gate must be equipped with the ability to be secured in the open and closed positions. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4 Annotate and show within detail. Recommend "Positive locking and (Bayonet) anchors, Qty-4 1in. dia. x 6 in. long galvanized pipe flush with concrete/foundation. 3. Double enclosure must provide a minimum 10 ft inside clear service area between the side bollard and the center gates/post. DS 6-01.4.1.B. 4. Identifying existing solid waste services for building 1. Please correct on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/24/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: June 24, 2008 SUBJECT: Hemisphere Corporate Center Development Plan- 1st Revision Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 6300 S Palo Verde Road, T15S R14E Sec09 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D06-0024 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received the revised development plan (Sheets 1 through 14) and the drainage letter (Arroyo Engineering 04JUN08). Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted revised development plan and recommends approval of the development plan at this time. · DS Sec.11-01.2.1: The revised grading permit application (T07BU01992) is required for this project, prior to building plan approval. The grading plan will be reviewed and approved separately. · Please ensure the grading plan is consistent with the development plan and drainage report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf · Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development have been submitted with the grading plan submittal and will be reviewed for AZDES requirements. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. If you have any questions call me at (520) 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 06/24/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 24, 2008 Tri Miller Rick Engineering Company 1745 East River Road, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D06-0024 Hemisphere Corporate Center Revised Development Plan Dear Tri: Your submittal of May 30, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Development Plan (ADA, ESD, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 322-6956 |