Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0022
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/12/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/22/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/23/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 23, 2006 TO: Pattie Davis MMLA-Psomas THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: El Con Mall, Ross Store and Building G Development Plan – 1st Submittal D06-0022 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D06-0022, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 44 as follows and fill in the blanks appropriately. It is highly unlikely that El Con Mall has zero existing wastewater fixture unit equivalents. The purpose of this note is to keep an accurate count of all existing and all proposed wastewater fixture unit equivalents. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). For reference purposes, please assign a number to all newly proposed cleanouts/manholes. SHEET SP 1.4. Keynote 16 refers to an abandoned sewer that is to be removed, however this keynote is not found on the layout. Please clarify. SHEET SP 1.5. Keynotes 13 and 16 refer to abandoned sewers, however these keynotes are not found on the layout. Please clarify. SHEET SP 1.7. The sewer layout shown on this sheet shall be such that streets, PAALs, buildings and landscaped areas are all shown as well, in order to verify accurate location of sewer lines and geographical position of these in relation to the proposed project. Revise accordingly. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $200.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 05/26/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: EL CON - ROSS AND SPAGE G D06-0022 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted May 12, 2006. Pad mounted transformer ELC-42 (unit #178) and associated underground primary cable will be in way of new building. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build kc Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power Co. Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build 520-918-8271 kclark@tep.com |
| 05/26/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-022 El Con – Ross and Space “G” 05/26/06 ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-56-01, C9-74-34, C9-88-12 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Alvernon-Broadway Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Broadway (Gateway) COMMENTS DUE BY: June 12, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 05/25/06 Please provide pedestrian crossing for area that crosses the trash compactor and loading dock on the western portion of the site ( see sheets SP1.2 and LS-1). Pedestrian crossing to be textured, scored or patterned colored concrete. Pedestrian crossing to align with the two curb access cuts. Please align pedestrian crossing from 6’ minimum sidewalk pedestrian access to mall entry from bus stop with the curb access cut. Pedestrian crossing to be textured, scored or patterned colored concrete. Please provide landscaping for the area on the western portion of the site that abuts the trash compactor and loading dock. This area is a mall entry and a pedestrian walkway. Landscaping to be similar and in keeping with what is already proposed for the development. (see sheet LS-1) |
| 05/31/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/05/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Assumed building G refuse is with Ross's refuse. |
| 06/09/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering Approves the proposed Development plan. |
| 06/12/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | June 13, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-022 PROJENT NAME: El Con Mall-Ross & BLDG G. PROJECT ADDRESS: El Con Mall PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Civil Engineer Resubmittal Required: Development Plan The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The project site needs to be tied downed and dimensioned from an established Basis of Bearing, or from two physically established points. Provide site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. DS 2-05.2.3.A 3. Provide additional dimensions to all proposed improvements (i.e. call out sidewalk improvements with adequate dimensioning.) 4. Call out various hatching patterns in the legend 5. If applicable, existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown. DS 2-05.2.3.F 6. Conditions on adjacent land significantly affecting the design of the project will be shown, such as the approximate direction and gradients of ground slope; character and location of adjacent development; including their existing conditions to ensure positive drainage. DS 2-05.2.3.H 7. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. 8. Sheet SP1.5, there is a sewer manhole within the boundaries of work. Is this manhole new, existing to be replaced, or to be protected in place? 9. The proposed work may not exceed an acre of disturbance but due to the fact that this project is in a high profile area please provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP's) for this project. Initially submit 2 sets SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to development plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. At the time of approval to the grading plan 4 sets of the grading plans and SWPPP's are required for Engineering stamps of approval. 10. If possible, water-harvesting techniques should be incorporated into the development by conveying rooftop drainage to designated water harvesting areas(landscape locations) . If possible please address how water-harvesting techniques will be incorporated into the development. Refer to the newly adopted City of Tucson Water Harvesting Guidance Manual for design considerations. 11. All curb access ramps abutting the PAAL pavement will require truncated domes including the large ramp in front of the main entrance to the mall. 12. Cross reference detail 2 and the POLE BASE DETAIL on SP1.7 If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5640 x1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/14/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0022 EL CON-ROSS AND SPACE “G”/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 6/14/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Approved with the following condition: 1.) Correct Bldg. 6 to Shop Space on mylar. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. es |
| 06/16/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department FROM: Patricia Gehlen Plans Coordination Office Zoning Manager PROJECT: Southwest Uplink Facility D06-0021 Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: June 16, 2006 DUE DATE: June 12, 2006 COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. An applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application. This development plan must be approved on or before May 11, 2007. Land Use Code Sec. 5.3.8.2.A 2. The loading zone calculations must be revised to include the loading zones proposed for this development. DS 2-05.2.4.O 3. The math for the number of handi-cap parking spaces required does not work. Please revise. 4. Add the new development plan number to the lower right hand corner of each sheet of the development and landscape plans. In addition, please add the number to general note 5. 5. Please revise the FAR calculations found on SPT.1A as required. DS 2-05.2.4.M 6. Provide height of proposed building. DS 2-05.2.4.N 7. Truncated domes are also required along the two wide handi-cap ramps shown on the development plan. If the one south of the mall entrance is existing it does not need to be modified. 8. The electrical easement detailed in keynote 11 on sheet SP 1.5 must be abandoned prior to issuance of a building permit (prior to approval of this development plan). 9. Keynote 13 could not be located on sheet SP 1.5. DS 2-05.2.3.B 10. All revision made to the development plan must also be made to the landscape, irrigation, NPPO and grading plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Patricia Gehlen, (520)791-5608. I:pgehlen1/cdrc/d0017/d0017hda.doc |
| 06/24/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 24, 2006 Pattie Davis MMLA Psomas 800 East Wetmore Road, Suite 110 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Subject: D06-0022 El Con - Ross and Space G Development Plan Dear Pattie: Your submittal of May 12, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, DUPD, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, DUPD, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 292-1290 |