Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0020
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/28/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: JACK IN THE BOX D06-0020 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted April 20, 2006. It appears that there are no apparent conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development, however if any conflicts do exist all relocation costs are billable to the developer. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build kc Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power Company Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build 520-918-8271 kclark@tep.com |
| 04/28/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 27, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: D06-0020 Jack in the Box: Development Plan(4-20-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 04/28/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0020 JACK IN THE BOX/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: April 27, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete all adjacent information relating to Parcel numbers and/or ownership on sheets 1 and 2. jg |
| 05/01/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * The enclosure that the new development is proposing to utilize does not meet the Development Standards. There are no doors on the enclosure and there is no side wall protection. * No provisions shown or mentioned for recycling. * The fast food greese container is not allowed to be stored with in the refuse enclosure. * Note: If the enclosure is to be utilized as is, then a varience through the CRDC review will be required. |
| 05/02/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D06-0020 LARRY J. CLICK & ASSOCIATES JACK IN THE BOX -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 05/05/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0020 Jack in the Box 05/05/06 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-95-19 & S00-22 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Patano Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Golf Links – Gateway Route COMMENTS DUE BY: 05/18/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 05/01/06 |
| 05/10/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Indicate the location of screening described in general landscape note 11. Label the required 30-inch screen along the MS&R (Golf Links Road) street landscape border and indicate required screen wall for loading zone on the landscape plan. A 6-foot high masonry wall is required for screening of the loading zone from adjacent residentially zoned property to the east. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3LUC Table 3.7.2-I 2. Add the CDRC case number (D06-020) and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 3) Gated openings of refuse enclosures are required to meet the screening standards of LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Include details or other information regarding refuse screening. |
| 05/10/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 9, 2006 TO: Larry Click Larry J Click & Associates THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Safeway Plaza Lot 2 Development Plan – 1st Submittal D06-0020 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D06-0020, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET 2. Revise the proposed sewer design to show a grease trap. SHEET 2. Revise the plan number for the existing private sewer to show the correct plan number. G-2001-022 is an existing public sewer plan, while this existing sewer is private. SHEET 2. The proposed private sewer is shown connecting to an existing private sewer. Please show the sewers all the way to their point of connection to the existing public sewer network, showing the size, Pima County plan number for the existing public sewer. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 05/12/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/16/2006 | ANY | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: May 16, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Jack in the Box, 6380 E. Golf Links Rd. Development Plan D06-0020 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 30 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. The truncated domes on the HC ramps west of the building shall be placed on the landing area or in the area adjacent to the pavement instead of on the slopes of the HC ramps. 3. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size per D.S. 2-05.2.1.A. 4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles on Golf Links Road per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 5. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. The new HC ramp located SE of the building shall be orientated to face the existing HC ramp to the west as well as the new sidewalk and pedestrian striping. A striped ped. crosswalk shall be added between the new ramp and the existing ramp. 6. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 7. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 8. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP. 9. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 10. Clarify the basis of bearings. It appears that two are being used. Also the note on sheet 1 calls for the basis of bearing to be the east line of the plat then indicates that the line is a centerline. Revise as necessary. 11. Show the Development plan number (D06-0020) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 12. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Provide documentation indicating permission to use the existing dumpster on site. 13. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 14. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 15. Call out the depressed areas that will used for water harvesting on the plan view. 16. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) may be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. Add a statement in the DS that you have reviewed the Drainage Report by Stantec consulting and you agree to that data. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/6380 E. Golf Links Rd. CDRC |
| 05/16/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Kristen Zimmerman, Data Services 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org D06-0020 Jack in the Box 5/11/2006 This analysis is designed to allow jurisdictional planning departments to further assess the traffic impacts of planned residential and commerical developments that PAG expects will generate more than 500 average daily trips. Nearby roadway data include planned improvements, existing and future volumes and capacities, and bus and bike accessibility. 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is a street improvement planned as part of PAG's 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program? See http://www.pagnet.org/tip/ for more information on the TIP planning process. Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing (2005) Daily Traffic Volume (reported in ADT) See http://www.pagnet.org/TPD/DataTrends/ for more information. 4. Existing (2005) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) 5. Existing (2005) Number of Lanes 8. Future (2030) Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2, if applicable. Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future (2030) Daily Volume (reported in ADT) (Assuming planned transportation improvement projects are completed.) 7. Future (2030) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) Golf Links (Wilmot to Kolb) No 0 32,500 64,140 6 64,140 46,320 6 1,323 Rte 17, 30 min, 0 miles, Express Rte 83, 1 AM and 1 PM trip, 0 miles Planned improvement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9. Average daily traffic (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development |
| 05/23/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 05/26/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/03/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/23/2006 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: D06-0020 Jack in the Box Restaurant, 6380 E. Golf Links Road Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 22, 2006 DUE DATE: May 18, 2006 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is April 19, 2007. 2. This plan was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standard (DS), American National Standard Institute (ANSI), and International Building Code 2003 (IBC). Specifically, this plan was reviewed for content requirements under DS 2-05. 3. Per DS 2-05.2.1.C, please revise all lettering to a minimum of 12 point (typical detail drawings). 4. Per DS 2-05.2.1.K, please list all rezoning conditions of case C9-95-19 on the plan. 5. Per DS 2-05.2.2.A.1, please provide the telephone number for the owner/developer. 6. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.8, please provide the Development Plan case number "D06-0020" in the lower right hand corner of the plan. 7. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.10, please provide notes on the plan that the property is designed to meet requirements of the Major Streets and Routes Overlay Zone - LUC 2.8.3, and the Gateway Corridor Overlay Zone - LUC 2.8.4. 8. Per DS 2-05.2.3.B, please depict the access easement noted in general note 18 on the plan. 9. Per DS 2-05.2.3.C, please call out the future curb location for Golf Links Road. (Staff acknowledges the building setbacks are not an issue, this information is for records.) 10. Per DS 2-05.2.3.D.3, with regards to Parking Area Access Lanes: A) In the drive-through, clarify width of lane at pick up window. B) In the drive-through, clarify location of order and pick up windows C) In the drive-through, provide directional arrows (where to be placed on site) D) In the drive-through, provide visual depiction that 6 cars can be stacked within the drive through areas -from order station to pick up window -and not interfere with PAALs for parking (DS 3-05) E) Per 3-05.2.2.4, provide a 1' separation between the building and drive through lane F) Per 3-05, the minimum width of a two way PAAL is 24', please revise the landscape plan to match the development site plan 11. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K, with regards to sidewalks: A) please provide width of the sidewalk between the drive-through lane and the building. B) Please provide width of sidewalks to west and north side of building for records info. C) demonstrate how sidewalks connect to rest of pedestrian circulation system on site. D) Provide note that sidewalks are raised from asphalt (a physical separation of the two is required) 12. Per DS 2-05.2.4.N, dimension entire exterior footprint of building. 13. Per DS 2-05.2.4.N, clarify if bldg ht. of 23 feet is measurement from design grade to top of roof - and includes any parapets. Provide parapet height separate please. 14. Per DS 2-05.2.4.O, staff concurs the loading zone size and striping meet code. Please provide visual aide to determine maneuvering of loading zone will not interfere with parking spaces. 15. Per DS 2-05.2.4.P, with regards to parking/handicapped accessible parking: A) move truncated domes by handicapped parking area to the area of the sidewalk where the sidewalk and handicapped access aisle meet. B) Per 3-05.2.3.C.1, please modify the parking space length and provide wheel stop barriers to the parking on the west and north sides of the site along the proposed landscape borders. This will ensure the landscape areas will not be disturbed by overhanging vehicles. Note, Per 3.7.2.3.A.1.c, the minimum width needed for canopy tree landscape islands (west side)- between surrounding curbs - is 4 feet. Thus the landscape island can be reduced in width to ensure the proper 24 PAAL width and parking space length can be accommodated. The minimum width for the street landscape border is 10 feet, thus this landscape border too can be reduced. C) General note 14 should be changed to read that the height of the handicapped sign from grade to the bottom of the sign is 7 feet. 16. Per DS 2-05.2.4.T, show refuge container area with dimensions. See Waste Management for further comments. 17. Per DS 2-05.2.4.U, indicate graphically, when possible, compliance with all conditions of rezoning case C9-95-19. In addition, please provide a separate response letter commenting to staff how conditions of the rezoning case have been met. 18. Per DS 2-05.2.4.V, indicated how postal service is provided. 19. Per DS 2-05.2.4.W, staff acknowledges the general note provided advising that at this time no free-standing lighting or signage is planned. Should that change in the course of the next submittal, please provide specifications and dimensions of those elements. 20. Please provide a copy of the last approved Safeway development plan/tentative plat. This will ensure it is clear how the proposed restaurant use will become integrated into the existing development. 21. With regards to general notes: A) please correct the required minimum building setback from Golf Links to read "the greater of 21 feet or the height of the exterior building wall, as measured from back of future curb". Staff acknowledges setbacks are not an issue. This note is for records. 22. With regards to typical detail drawings: A) increase all typeface to 12 point minimum B) provide fine amount on handicapped sign at $518 for illegal parking 23. Depending upon the responses provided, further review comments may be forthcoming. Please contact me at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-791-4541x1156 should you have any questions on this review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0020 6380 e golf links.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents. |
| 06/24/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 24, 2006 Larry Click Larry Click & Associates 3444 North Country Club Road, Suite 105 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Subject: D06-0020 Jack in the Box Development Plan Dear Larry: Your submittal of April 20, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Development Plan (Addressing, Wastewater, Engineering, ESD, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 327-2081 |