Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0018
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/16/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/21/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | Fire Department requires 20' wide unobstructed access. Hinged post indicated on detail for gate must be removable. |
| 06/22/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Shrubs in areas of required landscaping other than for opaque screening will be a minimum one (1) gallon container size, with twenty (20) percent of the required number to be five (5) gallon container size or larger. Revise the plan. 2) Dimension the length and width of landscape borders on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f. 3) Revise the plant symbols for groundcover plantings to reflect the ultimate size of the plants. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.c 3) Cissus trifoliata is a vine that will not provide the form or extent of groundcover shown on the landscape plan. Revise as necessary. 4) Revise the plant coverage calcs calculations on the landscape plan. Trees are not included in the groundcover calculations, only shrubs, accent plants, and groundcover plants. Correct the percentage. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 06/23/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | June 22, 2006 TO: Joe Locke Landlocked Properties THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Roofsavers Yard Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D06-0018 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project is hereby approved as submitted. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 06/26/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends approval of the proposed development plan. |
| 06/28/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D06-018 Roofsavers Yard 3872 E. 34th Street Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: June 28, 2006 DUE DATE: July 17, 2006 1. Place the development plan number (D06-018) on each sheet of the development plan, including sheet A1.1. 2. Add a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to the development plan. The FAR calculation should state the proposed as weel as the maximum allowed FAR. LUC 3.2.11 3. All lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of equivalent of twelve (0.12") point in size. Revise all text on sheet A 1.1 that does not meet this minimum standard along with the numbers in the scale on the development plan sheet. DS 2-05.2.1.C 4. This plan does not meet the criteria for pedestrian circulation. Refer to DS 2-08 for pedestrian circulation requirements. An accessible pedestrian sidewalk must connect the building to adjacent rights-of-way. Revise to show pedestrian connections correctly. Dimension width of pedestrian sidewalks clearly and accurately on the drawing. A minimum 5-foot pedestrian refuge area is required between any building and PAAL. DS 2-08 DS 3-05 5. All dimensions must be correct and to scale on the plan. Revise the loading zone, parking spaces, handicap parking space, sight visibility triangles, PAAL widths, right-of-way and curb dimensions, entrance drive widths, setback dimensions, easement widths, building dimensions and all other features on the plan to be drawn correctly and to scale. Dimension the width of the entrance drive along the west side of the property. from The dimensions on the parking detail on sheet A1.1 and the dimensions called out on the development plan drawing must be consistent. Dimension PAAL widths. Indicate any one-way/do not enter signage. Revise concrete wheelstops to be dimensioned at 2-1/2 feet from the front of parking spaces. Refer to LUC 3.3.7.2 for motor vehicle and PAAL dimensions required. Provide the angle for the handicap parking space. The handicap parking shown in the detail is at 90 degrees which is not the same as the angled h/c parking shown on the drawing. Revise to provide a h/c parking detail and show truncated domes where required. The dimensions of the trash enclosure detail do not match the d.p. drawing. Revise all dimensions to be accurate. DS 2-05.2.1.B DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 ANS/ IBC 6. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan. |
| 06/30/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0018 ROOFSAVERS YARD/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: June 28, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 06/30/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0018 Roofsavers Yard 06/19/06 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-75-59 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arroyo Chico Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway (Palo Verde Blvd.) COMMENTS DUE BY: July 17, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (X) No Additional Comments – City Attorney’s Office (Michael McCrory) reviewed rezoning condition pending and determined it does not apply anymore, therefore, DP Complies Submitted on: May 25, 2006 |
| 07/04/2006 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: July 4, 2006 TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Roofsavers Yard Development Plan resubmittal Engineering Review LOCATION: T14S R14E Section 21 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0018 SUMMARY: The revised Development Plan sheets, landscape plan, setback documentation, and response letter and were received and reviewed by Engineering. Engineering has reviewed the received items and recommends approval of the Development Plan. A Site Plan application and any other building permits required by other departments or sections will be necessary for construction activity. After final approval of the Development Plan, this project will need to be walked through for yellow card / site plan approval. If you have any questions, please call me at 791-5550 extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 07/14/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 14, 2006 Joe Locke Landlocked Properties 7540 East La Cienega Drive Tucson, Arizona 85715 Subject: D06-0018 Roofsavers Yard Development Plan Dear Steve: Your submittal of June 19, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Development Plan (Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Landscape, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 628-3705 |