Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: D06-0014
Parcel: 105110700

Address:
4328 N ORACLE RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN

Permit Number - D06-0014
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/23/2008 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
05/16/2008 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approv-Cond Update the CDRC Case Number on the landscape plans.
05/19/2008 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D06-0014 Corner Retail Lot 9 Revision 05/14/08

( ) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan (Revised)
( ) Landscape Plan
( ) Revised Plan/Plat
( ) Board of Adjustment
( ) Other (NPPO)

CROSS REFERENCE: SE-03-06 & D03-0035

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: North Stone Neighborhood Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Oracle Rd. is Gateway Route

COMMENTS DUE BY: 5/21/08

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
( ) See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - complies with Planning comments submitted on: 8/30/07
( ) No Resubmittal Required
( ) Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
( ) Landscape Plan
( ) Other

REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 5/9/08
05/19/2008 ANDY VERA ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved
05/20/2008 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner

PROJECT: D06-0014, Corner Retail Lot 9
Revision to parking, building positions and patio dining
Development Plan, 1st review of proposed revision - ADDENDUM

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 5, 2008

DUE DATE: May 21, 2008

COMMENTS:ADDENDUM TO MAY 21, 2008 COMMENTS -
SEE NOTES IN BOLD IN COMMENT 3


1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is April 23, 2009.

2. Per DS 2-05.2.4.D.3, regarding PAALs
A) due to new dumpster location between bldgs 10 and 9, dimension PAAL width from edge of dumpster across PAAL to ensure 24' clear.

3. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K, regarding sidewalks:
A) per LUC 3.5.9.7.A.5, this site is subject to Large Retail Establishment Requirements of Special Exception case SE-03-06 because the area of work is on the Home Depot site. Sidewalks shall be at least eight (8) feet wide and unobstructed and shall connect the public street sidewalks, the main entrances to the stores, transit stops on- or off-site, and other buildings on the site, in addition to providing convenient access to adjacent residential neighborhoods. Sidewalks shall be provided along the full length of any building where it adjoins a parking lot.
B) given the above, the proposed locations of bicycle parking and canopies to buildings 10 and 11 will impede the 8' wide unobstructed requirement. Please dimension and re-design the proposed locations of the bike parking and building posts for any canopies/outdoor dining to allow adjacent sidewalks to meet LUC 3.5.9.7.A.5.
C) dimension width of sidewalk on east side of building 13, from class 1 bike parking.
D) at sidewalk just north of loading entry between buildings 13 and 14, is it in flush with parking? Provide symbol. There's a ramp in the middle of the sidewalk -intended?
E) dimension the distance between the post for the covered walkway and the face of buildings to ensure 8' clear of obstruction per LUC 3.5.9.7.A.5

F) NEAR BLDG 12, RELOCATE CROSSWALK FROM FRONT OF DUMPSTER, DS 2-08.4.1.A. CONSIDER RELOCATING DUMPSTERS.
G) . CLARIFY WHICH BUILDING IS SERVED BY THIS DUMPSTER. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE TO FAR EAST DUMPSTER NEAR BLDG 6 TO THE BUILDING(S) SERVED BY IT.


REGARDING ACCESSIBILITY - REVIEWED WITH RON BROWN, 837-4908:

4. Per ANSI:
A) near building 9, on concrete at top of accessible parking access aisle, provide 2' wide strip of truncated domes
B) near building 13, indicate manhole cover in flush with concrete
C) flared ramp not necessary in middle of sidewalk near building 12, provide regular sidewalk ramp with slope not to exceed 1:12

5. Per DS 2-05.2.4.N, regarding structures:
A) provide clear delineated area for outdoor dining patio - with dimensions and note fencing
B) dimension covered walkways for permitting purposes
C) note vertical clearance of covered walkways to sidewalks

6. Per DS 2-05.2.4.O, regarding loading zones;
A) the maneuverability of all 3 loading zones between buildings 12 and 13 does not appear to work due to the width near the entry to the loading zone. Widen area near entry to accommodate maneuvering for all spaces.

7. Per DS 2-05.2.4.P, regarding parking:
A) sht 1, in shopping center parking, note "shopping center S.F., includes dining patio"
B) revise total SF of shopping center, including patio to 228,490. (503 sf. added this DP)
C) parking spaces along Bldg. 11 have been shortened to 15.5' - with overhang on the adjacent sidewalk. Please dimension and note with dashed line the 2.5' overhang needed on adjacent sidewalk.

8. Per DS 2-05.2.4.Q, regarding bicycle parking: As the facility is not yet built and the Development Standards 2-09 has been updated before this revision was submitted, the following comments are based upon the updates:
A) class 2 bike parking for building 9 is shifted farther west on concrete walkway, call out building entries to ensure class 2 bike parking is within 50' of the entry
B) class 1 bike parking is noted with arrow along east side of building 10, but not shown.
C) class 2 bike parking for building 11 is shifted east on concrete walkway, call out building entries to ensure class 2 bike parking is within 50' of the entry.
D) appears to be some type of bike parking behind building 12 to west, keynote and advise how accessed
E) provide an elevation view of class 2 bike parking on sheet 4 - in keeping with DS 2-09 updated figures of permitted types of bike racks

9. Please note, further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon responses provided. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951.

C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0014 corner retail lot 9 revision.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan
05/21/2008 BIANCA RAMIREZ ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
05/22/2008 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

May 22, 2008

Thomas Saylor Brown, AIA
Sayler-Brown Bolduc, Lara Architects, LLC
1001 North Alvernon Way, Suite 105
Tucson, Arizona 85711-1019

Subject: D06-0014 Corner Retail, Lot 9 Revised Development Plan

Dear Thomas:

Your submittal of April 24, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval of the Development Plan is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed.

ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED

2 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, DSD)





Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919.

Sincerely,


Patricia Y. Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/
Via fax: 620-0535