Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0014
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/02/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/06/2007 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 6, 2007 TO: Thomas Sayler-Brown, A.I.A. Sayler-Brown Bolduc Lara Architects LLC THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Corner Retail Center, Lot 9 Development Plan -1st Submittal, D06-0014 revision The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2. Sheet 2 and 3: : Revise the site plan so that it shows all public sewer elements (sewer mains and manholes), that are located on this project or are less than 100' from this project, identified with the wastewater improvement plan and manhole IMS numbers. The improvement plan and IMS numbers may be found at the PCWMD Maps and Records Section office (5th floor), or on PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites. Include the rim and invert elevations for all public manholes. The sewer line pipe size should also be shown. 3. Sheet 2 and 3: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 2 4. Sheet 2 and 3: Show rim and invert elevations for all private manholes on plan. Also each existing private manhole should be numbered in sequence with the lowest numbered manhole as the furthest downstream. 5. Sheet 2 and 3: Show the pipe size for the existing private sewer line. 6. Sheet 3: Change any references to HCS to BCS. Also show symbol for BCS in the legend. 7. Sheet 3: Include the rim inverts for proposed manholes. 8. Sheet 3: The inverts as shown for MH 14 and MH 15 does not appear to work as gravity flow system. 9. Sheet 3: Show the size/length and material for all BCS. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any question regarding the above comments , please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Tom Porter, Sr. CEA Phone: 520-740-6579 Copy: Project File |
| 08/15/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the plans to include screening for the loading areas in conformance with LUC Table 3.7.2-I. |
| 08/23/2007 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: August 31, 2007 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Corner Retail lot 9 Development Plan. The activity number is D06-0014. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on August 2nd, 2007. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 2. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. Development Standards 11-01.4.1.C. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 3. Proposed developments exceeding 1 acre of disturbance are subject to AzPDES requirements. The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Complete general note 32. 2. It does not appear the required 8' pedestrian area per SE 8 is being met behind the solid waste enclosure for building 10. Review and clarify with dimension. 3. Provide future sight visibility triangles for all entrance/exit drives for the proposed development. DS 3-01.5.0. 4. The solid waste enclosure for building 10 is in view of Limberlost Drive. Per SE 24 trash facilities shall not be visible from public streets. Clarify in the response letter how this condition is being met or revise the plan. 5. Provide cut and fill quantities on the plan. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENT 1. Provide an addendum to the submitted report providing assurance the proposed development will not impact the current drainage scheme. |
| 08/27/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | >>> David Mann 08/27/2007 10:52 AM >>> Fire has approved D06-0014, 4328 N. Oracle. |
| 08/28/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0014 CORNER RETAIL, LOT 9/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 8/28/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ES |
| 08/30/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. DP3.0, Does not appear to provide adequate number of enclosures to accomodate for both refuse and recycling. Recommend minimum two single or 1 double enclosure each, for bldgs 9 & 10. 2. Clarify user type for bldg 11. Recommend minimum one single enclosure in front for sensible user access. 3. Enclosure east of bldg 9 requires backing into PAAL/moving traffic. Not adequate per DS 6-01.4.1.I. 4. DP4.0, Show cane bolt sleeves within detail, positioned within concrete/foundation, for securing gates in open position and annotate. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4. 5. Double enclosure does not meet minimum required 10 ft inside clear service area between the side wall protectors (bollards) and the center gate post. DS 6-01.4.1.B. Please make corrections on resubmittal. |
| 08/30/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/30/2007 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D06-0014 Corner Retail Lot 9 Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 30, 2007 DUE DATE: August 30, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Please provide a separate response letter detailing compliance with special exception conditions that specifically pertain to Lot 9. 2. Per SE condition 7 all pedestrian crossings of PAALs shall be brick, concrete pavers, scored pattern color concrete, or similar texture material. Please revise material or cross walks between buildings 9 and 10, and 12 and 13. 3. Per SE condition 24 loading docks shall not be visible from public streets and sidewalks and internal pedestrian ways. The plan is not clear in depicting this. Please verify that this condition has been met for both loading areas provided. 4. Access to the trash dumpster east of building 10 is within the entrance PAAL. Please verify with Engineering and Environmental Services if this configuration will be acceptable and provide response with next submittal. 5. Please dimension wheel stop curbing in detail ¼. Wheel-stop curbing is to be two and one-half (2 ½) feet from the front of the parking space. DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 6. The parking space abutting the dumpster north of building 13 must be a minimum of ten (10) feet in width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. Please revise. DS 3-05.2.1.B.3 7. Please provide dimensions of sidewalk area between planters and structures in front of building 9 and 10. Sidewalks must be a minimum width of eight (8) feet in width and be unobstructed. SE Condition 8 & 10 8. Please revise detail 8b/4. Spacing between bicycle spaces is to be a minimum of thirty (30) inches. DS 2-09.5.1.A & Figure 9 If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 837-4960. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0014dprev.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 09/05/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0014 Corner Retail ( ) Tentative Plat (ü) Development Plan (Revised) ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other (NPPO) CROSS REFERENCE: SE-03-06 & D03-0035 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: North Stone Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Oracle Rd. is Gateway Route COMMENTS DUE BY: 08/30/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (ü) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - complies with Planning comments submitted on: (ü) No Resubmittal Required ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 8/31/07 |
| 09/11/2007 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#160109 September 11, 2007 SBBL Architecture + Planning Attn: Thomas Sayler-Brown 1001 N. Alvernon Way, 105 Tucson, Arizona 85711 Dear Mr. Sayler-Brown: SUBJECT: Corner Retail Lot 9 D06-0014 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted August 2, 2007. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. All above ground equipment is not indicated on the development plan. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact the area Designer, Warren McElyea, at 918-8268 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Specialist lm Enclosure cc: DSD_CDRC@Tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson W. McElyea, Tucson Electric Power |
| 09/11/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> "Maria Deal" <MDeal@azdot.gov> 09/11/2007 11:27 AM >>> Patricia, ADOT has "no comment" regarding the referenced development. Thanks, Maria |
| 09/13/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 13, 2007 Thomas Saylor Brown, AIA Sayler-Brown Bolduc, Lara Architects, LLC 1001 North Alvernon Way, Suite 105 Tucson, Arizona 85711-1019 Subject: D06-0014 Corner Retail, Lot 9 Revised Development Plan Dear Thomas: Your submittal of August 2., 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval of the Development Plan is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed. ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, ESD, TEP, Landscape, Engineering, Wastewater, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 620-0535 |