Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0014
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/30/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/06/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Dimentions of the enclosure does not meet the requirements of the development standards. Dumpster encosure require a 10' clear area between the wall protection. (The dimensions from the details shown calulates the size of the enclosures to be 24'-4" x 11'-6" for the double and 13'-0" x 11'-6" for the single enclosure.) * No mention of recycling or how recycling will be handled. (Bldg. 13 only shows a single enclosure. For a resturant a double enclosure is usually required.) * General comment. If the refuse is controlled by the complex oiwner then the two double enclosures may be sufficient. If the complex owner wants the individual bussinesses to control their refuse then the enclosures as shown may not be sufficient. |
| 04/07/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: CORNER RETAIL, LOT 9 D06-0014 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 30, 2006. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Ms. Mary Boice, Project Manager Design/Build - DB 101 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 (520) 917-8732 Please call the area designer, Warren McElyea at 918-8268, should you have any technical questions. My phone number is 918-8297. Sincerely, Denise Tellez Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build dt Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen/F. Rodriguez, City of Tucson (by e-mail) Denise Tellez 918-8297 DB102 |
| 04/11/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D06-0014 SAYLER-BROWN BOLDUC LARA ARCHITECTS, LLC CORNER RETAIL, LOT 9 -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 04/11/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | For future reference.... Tucson Fire Code Section 10.302, 10.207, etc. has been replaced by the IFC 2003, and C.O.T. modifications. |
| 04/13/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 12, 2006 TO: Thomas Sayler-Brown, A.I.A. Sayler-Brown Bolduc Lara Architects, LLC THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Corner Retail Center, Lot 9 Development Plan – 1st Submittal D06-0014 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D06-0014, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET DP1. Revise General Note 12 as follows and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEETS DP2 & DP3. Revise the entire sewer design layout so that: All existing sewers match the symbol used for existing sewers in the legend. It is acceptable (but not required) to use different symbols for existing public sewers and existing private sewers All existing sewers, public and private, are clearly differentiated by using different symbols or by clearly labeling them. All existing public sewers shall show the size and Pima County plan number. Show the length size and slope of all newly proposed sewers (sheet DP3 only). For reference purposes, please assign a number to all newly proposed manholes/cleanouts. Show the on-site sewers all the way to their point of connection with the existing public sewer network. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 04/14/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0014 Corner Retail Lot 9 04/13/06 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: SE-03-06, D03-0035, & C9-82-48 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: North Stone Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway Route COMMENTS DUE BY: 4/27/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 4/10/06 Urban Planning and Design D06-0014 – Corner Retail, Lot 9 April 10, 2006 The subject property is located in the North Stone Neighborhood Plan. The General Plan, North Stone Neighborhood Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual provide guidance for the review of this development plan along with conditions imposed by Special Exception (SE) 03-06. Location of the required “Public Art” or “Public Amenities” could not be determined on the development plan nor the landscape plan. Please identify their location on the development plan as required by SE condition 9. The plans promote five-sided architecture to lessen the visual impact on adjacent properties and to create distinguishable storefronts. SE condition 31 states building parapet shall screen all roof equipment. Please submit the proposed building elevations that will demonstrate architectural detail and color patterns for all four sides of the proposed structures and rooflines. Also, please demonstrate how the structures will be compatible in architectural design with, or complementary to, the design characteristics of those existing uses located along the same block frontage. |
| 04/14/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0014 CORNER RETAIL, LOT 9/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 4/14/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ES |
| 04/20/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plan to provide at least one tree for every thirty-three feet along Wetmore Road. LUC 3.7.2.4 2) Provide a detail for the rectangular tree planter in the parking lot north of Building 13 on sheet L4. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2 3) A portion of the row of parking immediately north of Building 13 on sheet L4 does not include sufficient canopy trees. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a 4) Include the development plan number on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2 5) Revise the landscape plans to comply with DS 2-06.3.4.C.2. "In situations where the street landscape border is wider than the minimum ten (10) foot requirement, the landscape border width needs to be determined for the purposes of calculating the fifty (50) percent vegetative coverage requirement, Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC. The width is that area between the required screen and the property line. Resubmittal of the landscape/development plan is required. |
| 04/27/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | April 27, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0014 PROJECT NAME: Corner Retail Center, Lot 9 PROJECT ADDRESS: Oracle Rd/Wetmore Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Civil Engineer Resubmittal Required: Development Plan, Drainage Report The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. If the development plan consists of more than one (1) sheet, a small index drawing of the site showing the area represented on each sheet is to be placed on the first sheet. Exception: The project location map required in Sec. 2-05.2.1.D may be used, in lieu of a separate index map, on plans having two (2) or more sheets. DS 2-05.2.1.E 3. Provide site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. Provide this information to all property lines on sheet DP 3. DS 2-05.2.3.A 4. The intersection of Wetmore Road and Oracle Road is a Major Streets & Route intersection, and is subject to right of way widening. Please provide future right of way dimensions with consideration to MS&R intersection widening. 5. If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. DS 2-05.2.3.B 6. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. DS 2-05.2.3.C. Please provide all required right of way dimensions off of Wetmore Road onto Sheet DP2. 7. For land that slopes less than approximately one (1) percent, contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than one (1) foot. Spot elevations shall be provided at all breaks in grade and along all drainage channels or swales and at selected points not more than one hundred (100) feet apart in all directions. DS 2-05.2.3.E.1 8. If applicable, existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown. DS 2-05.2.3.F 9. Conditions on adjacent land significantly affecting the design of the project will be shown, such as the approximate direction and gradients of ground slope; character and location of adjacent development; and drainageways, arroyos, ditches, and channels, including their existing conditions. DS 2-05.2.3.H 10. Identify and label the limits of work. 11. A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Initially submit 2 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to the development plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans. At the time of approval to the grading plan 4 sets of the grading plans and SWPPP's are required for Engineering stamps of approval. 12. As per Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the Truncated Domes instead of the standard grooves, which are shown on City of Tucson Standard Detail 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, the wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with the Standard Detail 207. 13. Provide a manhole or clean out for the bend in the 30" smooth stormdrain pipe. 14. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated into the development by conveying rooftop drainage to designated water harvesting areas. Please address how water-harvesting techniques will be incorporated into the development. Refer to the newly adopted City of Tucson Water Harvesting Guidance Manual for design considerations. 15. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standard Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM.14.3 must be included on the Development Plan. 1. The responsibility of operating and maintaining a local detention basin rests with the owner of the facility. However, the City of Tucson reserves the right to periodically inspect or review any private-maintenance actions that would help to ensure that private maintenance, related to facility operation and safety, is being adequately provided. 2. The Covenants, Conditions and Restriction (CC&Rs), Development Plans shall have a note stating (a) that the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at least once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and detention/retention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with maintaining the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities. 3. The certified annual inspection report shall contain the following summaries: (a) either a statement that no maintenance work is needed at that time, or a list of repairs and work to be done to correct deficiencies or potential problems and/or to restore the aesthetics, followed by a letter of certification from an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer stating that the recommended work has been satisfactorily completed; and (b) a statement either indicating that watershed conditions have not changed since the previous inspection report, or stating that specific changes have occurred which alter or eliminate some of design features and affect the level of service of the drainage and detention/retention systems. The City Engineer is to be notified if watershed conditions have changed to the extent that drainage and detention/retention systems no longer satisfy the requirements of the Floodplain Regulations found in the Tucson Zoning Code. DRAINAGE REPORT The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 1. As part of the drainage report submitted in conjunction with the Development Plan a detailed inspection list and basin-performance criteria shall be included for subsequent reference by the Engineer responsible for annual and as-needed maintenance inspections of the basins and drainageways. SMDDFM 1.5.2 2. Address the maintenance responsibility for all drainage facilities (including basins) in the Drainage Report and provide a maintenance checklist. SMDDFM 14.03 3. See comment 15 above and include into the drainage report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5640 x1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/28/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 27, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: D06-0014 Corner Retail Lot 9: Development Plan(3-30-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 05/02/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | If any right of way needs to be dedicated per Special Exception conditions No. # 2 and 3, please submit to the Real Estate Division a legal description with sketch for the area of dedication. Jim Stoyanoff Real Estate Division, 6th Floor Public Works Building 201 N. Stone Avenue |
| 05/11/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/15/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/15/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Kristen Zimmerman, Data Services 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org D06-0014 Corner Retail, Lot 9 4/21/2006 This analysis is designed to allow jurisdictional planning departments to further assess the traffic impacts of planned residential and commerical developments that PAG expects will generate more than 500 average daily trips. Nearby roadway data include planned improvements, existing and future volumes and capacities, and bus and bike accessibility. 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is a street improvement planned as part of PAG's 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program? See http://www.pagnet.org/tip/ for more information on the TIP planning process. Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing (2005) Daily Traffic Volume (reported in ADT) See http://www.pagnet.org/TPD/DataTrends/ for more information. 4. Existing (2005) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) 5. Existing (2005) Number of Lanes 8. Future (2030) Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2, if applicable. Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future (2030) Daily Volume (reported in ADT) (Assuming planned transportation improvement projects are completed.) 7. Future (2030) Daily Capacity (reported in ADT) Oracle (Wetmore to Limberlost) No 0 41,960 64,140 6 64,140 52,284 6 3,455 Rte 16, 15 min, 0 miles None Wetmore (Oracle to Stone) No 0 18,665 42,760 4 35,190 42,760 4 Rte 61, 30 min, 0 miles Bike route with striped shoulder 9. Average daily traffic (ADT) forecasted as a result of the proposed development |
| 05/23/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D06-014 Corner Retail Center, Lot 9 Oracle and Wetmore Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: May 22, 2006 DUE DATE: April 17, 2006 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one year expiration date for this development plan is March 29, 2007. 2. Place the development plan number (D06-0014) on each sheet of the development plan, landscape plan and NPPO plans in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.1.K 3. With the next submittal include a copy of the approved development plan (D03-0035) for the adjacent existing shopping center. 4. Add to sheet DP2 the existing adjacent zoning for the Home Depot shopping center to the south and east of lot 9. 5. Label the proposed bicycle class 2 parking located immediately to the south of buildings 8 and 9 on sheet DP3 as was done for the other bicycle parking areas. DS 2-05.2.4.Q DS 2-08 6. It is not clear what the 7-foot dimensions are intended to measure at the west side and near the southwest corner of Bldg. 12 on sheet DP2. Clarify or revise. Is there a proposed sidewalk here? If so it should be a minimum of 8-feet wide per Special Exception #8 7. Show the MS&R intersection widening dimensions at the intersection of Oracle Road and Wetmore Road. 8. The loading zone associated with bldg. 13 dimensions to be larger than 12' x 35' on the plan sheet . Revise to state the correct dimensions. DS 2-05.2.4.O 9. Revise Special Exception condition #11 to read correctly. 10. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan, previously approved development plan for shopping center. |
| 05/25/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 25, 2006 Thomas Saylor Brown, AIA Sayler-Brown Bolduc, Lara Architects, LLC 1001 North Alvernon Way, Suite 105 Tucson, Arizona 85711-1019 Subject: D06-0014 Corner Retail, Lot 9 Development Plan Dear Thomas: Your submittal of March 30, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval of the Development Plan is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed. ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Environmental Services, Real Estate, Wastewater, Landscape, Community Planning, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Landscape, Community Planning, Engineering, Zoning, DSD), 2 Copies Colors and Elevations (Community Planning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 620-0535 |