Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0010
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/07/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/10/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit photos of areas where existing vegetation is to be removed from the site with the native plant preservation application for exception. LUC 3.8.4.2 2) Include note 6 on the landscape plan as indicated in the response letter regarding modifications in the right-of-way. 3) The required landscape border coverage along Alvernon Road is calculated using the distance from the property line to the required screen or building. Revise to include the additional area per DS 2-06.3.4.C.2 RESUBMITAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 07/12/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | July 12, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0010 PROJECT NAME: Realty Executive Office PROJECT ADDRESS: 60 N Alvernon Way PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Traffic Engineering recommends approval of the Development Plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/13/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/19/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 18, 2006 TO: David Johns Omni Architecture Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Office Building for Realty Executives Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D06-0010 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Only one of the two sheets has been received, thus the review will be completed based on the submittal of this single sheet. SHEET DP-1. As previously requested on April 5, 2006, please add the following General Note and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET DP-2. As previously requested on April 5, 2006, please revise general note 2 to read as follows, and move it to sheet DP-1. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. SHEET DP-1. As previously requested on April 5, 2006, please add the following Permitting Note A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. SHEET DP-1. As previously requested on April 5, 2006, please show all proposed private cleanouts and assign a number to each one for reference purposes. Additionally, show the rim and invert elevation for each proposed private cleanout. SHEET DP-1. As previously requested on April 5, 2006, please show the size of the existing private sewers. SHEET DP-1. As previously requested on April 5, 2006, please use a different symbol for existing public sewers and for proposed private sewers. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 07/19/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0010 Realty Executives Office Bldg. 07/18/06 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Alvernon-Broadway GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 08/04/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (XXXX) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 04/11/06 () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 07/14/06 |
| 07/31/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: July 31, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Office Building for Realty Executives Development Plan. The activity number is D06-0010. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on July 7th, 2006. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Remove the verbiage site from "site plan" and replace with the word, "development." The above comment is from the first review and has not been addressed. 2. Provide the following note "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0." DS 2-05.2.2.D.2. It is acknowledged the above comment is shown on sheet DP-2. It is preferred to have this note on the first sheet. Revise appropriately. 3. It is still not clear if there is existing curb along Whitman Street. If there is no existing curb indicate with a general note on the development plan and show the edge of pavement (asphalt) from the centerline of Whitman Street.. DS 2-05.2.3.C. 4. Remove the verbiage, "Alley Centerline," from Whitman Street. 5. Provide the City of Tucson Datum used for the contours shown on the development plan, include the City of Tucson field book number and page. DS 2-05.2.3.E. This comment is from the first review and has not been addressed. 6. Include on the development plan estimated cut and fill quantities. If cut and fill quantities equal zero, please note on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. The response to the above comment was, "Balanced, noted." This office acknowledges the site will be balanced however estimated cut and fill quantities are required to be shown on the development plan. Provide the cut and fill quantities on cubic yards on the development plan. 7. Provide the DSMR case number on the development plan with any applicable conditions that apply. 8. Alvernon Way is designated as an arterial road per the MS&R ROW map and is subject to future widening and intersection widening. Dimension and label from street centerline the future curb and sidewalk location. Indicate the width of the sidewalk. DS2-05.2.4.F. This comment has not been completely addressed from the previous review. It is acknowledged keynote 10 shows the location of the future curb in the tapered location. However the property line does not show the taper from 150' to 120'. The taper of the MS&R ROW line (property line) must be shown on the development plan. Refer to the diagram located on the lower left hand corner of the MS & R Map found on the following web page, http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/maps/city/msr.pdf. Label the development plan accordingly and show dimensions. 9. Label the 60' dimension for the ½ ROW width for Alvernon Way, "MS&R Future ROW." DS2-05.2.4.F. It is acknowledged the above comment has been provided, however due to the intersection widening (see above comment) the MS&R ROW line is wider than 60' at the location shown on the plan. Show the 60' dimension for the ½ ROW width for Alvernon Way at the end of the 600' taper. 10. Place a note on the plan, "All roof downspouts shall be routed under any adjacent sidewalk". Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the ten year event. DS 2-08.4.1.E. This comment is from the first review and has not been addressed. 11. Call out the location of the screen wall for the loading zone (keynote 6). |
| 07/31/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0010 REALTY EXECUTIVES OFFICE BLDG/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 7/31/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Add legal description, Lots 3, 4 & 5, Block 13 of Country Club Heights, Book 5, Pg 1, to Title Block. es |
| 08/16/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D06-0010 Realty Executives Office Building Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 7, 2006 DUE DATE: August 4, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. List as reference the rezoning case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-05.2.1.K 2. Please add to Note 5 the perimeter yard indicator "DD" and "Subject to 3.5.13.5" for both Food Service and Administrative and Professional Office as previously requested by the first review. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 3. If DSMR is approved for this project, please add the DSMR number and any conditions of approval on the development plan (DP) DS 2-05.2.2.B.6 4. Please correct General Note 5 to read This project has been designed to meet the criteria of the "Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone LUC section 2.8.3", and "Gateway Corridor Zone LUC section 2.8.4". DS 2-05 2.2.B.10 5. Keynote 28 indicates a 10'x10' Electrical/Communication Easement per Docket 7042, Page 713. The location of this easement is not clearly shown on the DP. Please provide location of easement. DS 2-05.2.3.B and Ds 2-05.2.4.G 6. Alvernon Way is designated a Major street on the MAS&R map. The future full mid-block width is 120 feet (60-foot half R/W). In addition it appears that the property is within the 600-foot intersection widening section, more specific the taper section. The taper indicated on the DP does not appear to be drawn correctly. The future half R/W for Alvernon is sixty (60) feet. The taper is half R/W of seventy-five (75) feet in width for a length of three hundred (300) feet measured from the centerline Broadway, then tapers for three hundred (300) feet to meet the future half R/W of Alvernon. Please draw, label, and dimension the future taper on the plan. The future curb and sidewalk based on the future intersection widening must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned. Please refer to the Major Streets and Routes Plan. At this time it appears that the southwest corner of the building will be eighteen (18) feet from back of curb and will not meet the current setback requirement. The intersection widening appears to affect the site, please redesign the site to meet code based on the future widening. 7. Prior to approval of the development plan a lot split application must be processed and approved. A separate application, fees, review, and approval by DSD is required for the lot split. Please call David Rivera if you have any questions related to the lot split process. If the lot split has been processed and approved by DSD, submit copies of the approved survey drawing along with the recorded legal descriptions (with docket and page stamped) with the next submittal. DS 2-05.2.4.A 8. The direction provided for the one-way PAAL appears to be pointing in the wrong direction. The natural traffic flow would indicate the one-way to be counterclockwise as opposed to clockwise. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 9. The wall heights to allow setback verification have been provided, but actual building height needs to be added to each of the building footprints. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.7.2 the vertical distance of a building is measured from the design grade elevation, at any individual point within the building footprint, to the highest point of a flat roof. 10. This development will function as one or as a mixed-use development therefore the pedestrian circulation must connect both developments not only from all street frontages but internal to the site. It is not clear where the four (4) foot wide pedestrian connection is made to Elmwood. Please clarify. 11. A detail drawing of off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to revised Development Standard 2-09.0. The web address for this standard is: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/codes___ordinances.html The bicycle parking facility is not visible from the street frontage and therefore directional signage must be provided. Draw and label the required signage. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 12. Please revise existing and future sight visibility triangles all driveway and corners, on a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. DS 2-05.2.4.R 13. Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. If the postal service is to be provided inside the building add a note stating so. 14. Submit copies of the recorded document providing for cross access, parking, and pedestrian circulation. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550. KAA C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0010dpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents. |
| 08/23/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 23, 2006 David Johns Omni Architecture Inc., 2910 North Swan Road, Suite 105 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D06-0010 Realty Executives Office Building Development Plan Dear David: Your submittal of July 7, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval of the Development Plan is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed. ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Wastewater, Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD), 2 Copies NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD), Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 326-0528 |