Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0010
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/30/2006 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/06/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * Dumpster enclosure cannot be serviced at the angle of the enclosure shown. The required 14' x 40' clear area required in front of the dumpster enclosure is in conflict with the adjacent property. (Recommend that the angle of the enclosure be at 15 degrees to the alley for direct service. Trucks still will be required to back up with the container attached because of the overhead wires.) * Dumpster enclosure require side and rear walll protection. (10' clear area required between the protection.) * General comment. Pipe bollard protection does not seem compatable with the wall foundation. |
| 04/11/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D06-0010 OMNI ARCHITECTURE INC REALTY EXECUTIVES OFFICE BLDG -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 04/11/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/12/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: REALTY EXECUTIVES OFFICE BUILDING D06-0010 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 28, 2006. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build kc Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power Company Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build 520-918-8271 kclark@tep.com |
| 04/13/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0010 REALTY EXECUTIVES OFFICE BLDG/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: APRIL 26, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Elmwood Avenue to Elmwood Street. Delete 60 N. Alvernon Way from Title Block. An address will be assigned to the new office Building when this project is approved. Add following legal description: Lots 3, 4 and 5, Block 13 of Country Club Heights, recorded in Maps and Plats Bk 5, Pg 1. jg |
| 04/14/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0010 Realty Executives Office Bldg. 04/14/06 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Alvernon-Broadway GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 4/26/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other – Elevations & Colors REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 4/11/06 URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS D06-0010 - Realty Executives Office Building April 11, 2006 The subject property is located in the Alvernon-Broadway Area Plan. The General Plan, Alvernon-Broadway Area Plan, and the Design Guidelines Manual provide guidance for the review of this development plan The plans promote five-sided architecture to lessen the visual impact on adjacent properties and to create distinguishable storefronts. Please submit the proposed building elevations that will demonstrate architectural detail and color patterns for all four sides of the proposed structure and rooflines. Also, please demonstrate how the structure will be compatible in architectural design with, or complementary to, the design characteristics of those existing uses along the same block frontage, the block frontage across the street, and/or development on the opposite lot corners. The Design Guidelines Manual states that dumpsters shall be screened with masonry walls and landscaping. Additionally, it states that the landscape screen around dumpsters shall consist of plantings up to six-feet in height. On the landscape plan, please show what type of vegetation screening will be used around the dumpsters. |
| 04/20/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The provisions of LUC 3.7 apply to: A. All new development. B. Expansion of existing development. 1. On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows. a. If the expansion is less than twenty-five (25) percent, the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. b. If the expansion is twenty-five (25) percent or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a twenty-five (25) percent or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site. Provide calculations for expansions of gross floor area. Include the approved gross floor area as of Feb. 15, 1991 and list subsequent expansions. If the expansion calculation exceeds 25% a landscape plan is required for the entire site and major site modifications may be required. DS 2-02.2.2.A.2 2) If the requirements of LUC 3.7 are determined to apply only to the new development and expansion areas, the landscape plan will require modification to include all such areas, including the parking areas east of the proposed new property line, the new parking spaces added south of the Alvernon ingress/egress location, and the spaces added near the corner of Alvernon and Elmwood Avenue. 3) Street landscape borders are required adjacent to all new development and expansion areas on the site. The border is required to be a minimum of ten feet wide at all locations, new parking spaces may not be located in the required landscape borders. LUC 3.7.2.4 Also, based on comment 1 street landscape borders may be required along all adjacent street frontages, even Whitman Street. 4) A minimum two (2) inch layer of organic or inorganic material (i.e., decomposed granite, rock mulch, or other material) will be used as ground cover under and around the vegetation in landscaped areas to help cool soil areas, reduce evaporation, and retard weed growth per DS 2-06.5.2.C. Revise landscape note 5 to comply with the 2" requirement. 5) The addition or removal of landscaping or other construction in the Alvernon Road right-of-way area is subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. LUC 3.7.2.9 A note indicating that City Engineer approval and permits will be required. 6) Note 1 of the landscape plan indicates that part of the landscape border planting requirements are located in the right-of-way. Provide written verification of City Engineer approval to locate a portion of the code required landscaping in the right of way areas. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3 7) All new development and expansion areas are required to include screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise the landscape plan as necessary. Based on resolution of comment 1, additional screening may be required. 8) Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. Include calculations for the square footage of all landscape borders and the percentage of vegetative coverage. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.G The plants included in the calculation are only those located within the designated border. 9) Ulmus parviflora is not on the City' Drought Tolerant Plant List. As such, the use of this tree is restricted to oasis areas as defined in LUC 3.7.2.2.A.3. Revise the landscape plan to provide the square footage of the oasis allowance area and calculation. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.b 10) Submit a native plant preservation plan or application for exception. LUC 3.8.4.2 The extent of the project's impact may change, subject to resolution of comment 1. 11) List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 12) Revise the landscape plan to include the location and purpose of utility easements. DS 2-07.2.2.E.1 13) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B RESUBMITAL OF ALL PLAN IS REQUIRED. A native plant preservation submittal is also required. |
| 04/26/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: April 24, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Office Building for Realty Executives Development Plan. The activity number is D06-0010. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on March 30th, 2006. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN GENERAL COMMENTS 1. A Grading Plan and Permit may be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. Development Standard 11-01.4.C. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 2. Proposed fills in excess of two feet above existing grade at any location in the outer one hundred feet of the developing site adjacent to residentially zoned property require the procedure outlined in Development Standards 11-01.8.1. This process must be complete prior to Grading Plan approval. The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Provide the scale for the location map. The location map must be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile. DS 2-05.2.1.D.3. 2. Provide the following information in the lower right hand corner of the sheet; the proposed name of the project, address and a brief legal description. It is acknowledged the name of the project and the address has been provided however it is preferred to have the information location in the lower right hand corner of the plan. DS 2-05.2.1.G. 3. Show the north arrow, contour interval, and scale together on each sheet in the upper right corner of the plat. Revise appropriately. DS 2-05.2.1.H. 4. Provide a legend which shows and describes all symbols used on the plan. DS 2-05.2.1.J. 5. Describe in the legend what DK represents. DS 2-05.2.1.J. 6. Provide the development plan case number D06-0010 in the lower right hand corner of the plan view. DS 2-05.2.1.K. 7. Remove the verbiage site from "site plan" and replace with the word, "development." 8. List in the lower hand corner the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the primary property owner of the site and developer of the project. DS 2-05.2.2.A.1. 9. Provide the following note "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0." DS 2-05.2.2.D.2. 10. Provide site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot. DS 2-05.2.3.A. 11. All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. Revise the plan appropriately. DS 2-05.2.3.B. 12. The following information regarding Whitman Street must be provided: right-of-way width, recordation data, dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. From street centerline label and dimension the ½ ROW width, the existing curb and sidewalk location. Provide the recordation (book and page) data for the street. Show location of any curb cuts. Be advised any curb cut location not in use must be closed. Revise the development plan to show the requested information on the plan view. DS 2-05.2.3.C. 13. If applicable the following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided on the plan: the location and size of water wells, locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction. DS 2-05.2.3. D. 14. After reviewing an aerial photo there appears to be a utility box in the southwest corner of the development. The plan appears to have the utility box drawn on the plan view, however it is not called out. Indicate either by callout or keynote. If there is an easement so indicate, provide docket and page. DS 2-05.2.3.B., DS 2-05.2.3. D., 15. Provide the City of Tucson Datum used for the contours shown on the development plan, include the City of Tucson field book number and page. DS 2-05.2.3.E. 16. If applicable, show on the development plan the existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site. DS 2-05.2.3.F. 17. Indicate if Alvernon Way and Whitman Street is a public or private street. Indicate the line weight and/or symbol in the legend. DS 2-05.2.4.D.2. 18. Provide the width of the sidewalk for Alvernon Way and Whitman Street. DS 2-05.2.4.D.2. 19. Provide the utility locations within the ROW for Alvernon Way and Whitman Street. DS 2-05.2.4.D.2. 20. Include on the development plan estimated cut and fill quantities. If cut and fill quantities equal zero, please note on the plan. DS 2-02.2.1.A.17. 21. Label and dimension the 3' radii for both back up spurs located along the southern property line. DS 3-05.2.2.D. 22. Alvernon Way is designated as an arterial road per the MS&R ROW map and is subject to future widening and intersection widening. Dimension and label from street centerline the future curb and sidewalk location. Indicate the width of the sidewalk. DS2-05.2.4.F. 23. Label the 60' dimension for the ½ ROW width for Alvernon Way, "MS&R Future ROW." DS2-05.2.4.F. 24. All proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. (See comment 14 and 19). Revise appropriately. DS 2-05.2.4.G. 25. Proposed drainage, such as where the drainage is entering the site, direction (drainage arrows), destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow (water harvesting) must be shown on the plan. Show the requested information on the plan. Indicate any symbols used in the legend (comment 4). Revise appropriately. DS 2-05.2.4.H.2. 26. Place a note on the plan, "All roof downspouts shall be routed under any adjacent sidewalk". Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the ten year event. DS 2-08.4.1.E. 27. Show roof drainage (flow arrows) or indicate the roof slope. Show the location of rain gutters, scuppers, etc. DS 2-02.2.1.A.16, DS 2-05.2.4.H.3. 28. It is acknowledged keynote 25 indicates curb openings to accept stormwater to the landscaped areas to promote water harvesting. There are several landscape areas within the PAAL that do not show curb openings. How will the stormwater enter these landscape areas? Provide curb opening to allow stormwater to provide water harvesting. It is recommended to provide larger rock to be located adjacent to the curb opening within the landscaped areas. This prevents the required decomposed granite from entering the parking lot and creates dispersed flow into the landscaped area. DS 2-05.2.4.H.3. 29. Proposed ground elevations at different points that provide reference to future grading and site drainage must be provided on the plan. Show the direction of drainage on the plan view, either by grades or drainage arrows. Positive drainage for paved surfaces to the water harvesting areas must be provided. DS 2-05.2.4.H.4., Detention/Retention Manual 4.2.2. 30. Please refer to the following web page to assist with comment 28 and 29; http://dot.ci.tucson.az.us/stormwater/education/waterharvest.cfm. 31. Is there existing sidewalk within the ROW along Whitman Street. All new development must provide a 5' sidewalk along the entire street frontage of the property. Clarify in detail in a response letter and on the plan view. If there is existing sidewalk show the width on the plan. If there is not sidewalk within the ROW for Whitman Street, show a new (proposed) 5' sidewalk along the entire length of the development for Whitman Street. Label appropriately. DS 2-05.2.4.L. 32. Keynote 23 indicates existing handi cap ramps. Per recent a Federal ADA requirement, handicap curb access ramps are required to be constructed with truncated domes. Revise keynote 23 to show the addition of truncated domes on all existing handi cap ramps. DS 2-05.2.4.L. 33. Show a detail or add a general note to the development plan indicating all new public and private handicap curb access ramps will have truncated domes. DS 2-05.2.4.L. 34. A minimum of a 25' curb return is required on all driveway/PAALs to an arterial road. Show and label on the plan a 25' curb return for the driveway located along Alvernon. TAMG Table 5-2. 35. A minimum of an 18' curb return is required on all driveway/PAALs to a local road. Show and label on the plan a 18' curb return for the driveway located along Whitman Street. TAMG Table 5-2. 36. Provide future sight visibility triangles for the driveway located on Alvernon Way. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R future curb location. Revise appropriately. DS 2-05.2.4.R. 37. Provide a far side sight visibility triangle for the driveway off of Whitman Street. DS 2-05.2.4.R. 38. Steel pipes are required between the container and the side walls of the solid waste enclosure. Revise detail 1 on sheet DP-2 to show steel pipes along the side wall of the solid waste enclosure. DS 6-01.4.2.C.2, DS 2-05.2.4.T. 39. Solid waste enclosures are to be placed so the collection vehicle does not back up into moving traffic. Revise the plan to show the solid waste enclosure in a different location. DS 6-01.4.1.I., DS 2-05.2.4.T. 40. The specific maintenance notes applicable to this project specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3 must be included on the Development Plan. |
| 04/28/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 27, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: D06-0010 Realty Executives Office Building: Development Plan(3-30-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 04/28/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 05/10/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 5, 2006 TO: David Johns Omni Architecture Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Office Building for Realty Executives Development Plan – 1st Submittal D06-0010 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D06-0010, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET DP-1. Add the following General Note and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET DP-2. Revise general note 2 to read as follows: MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. SHEET DP-1. Add the following Permitting Note A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. SHEET DP-1. Show length, size and slope of the proposed private sewers. SHEET DP-1. Show the size and Pima County plan number of the existing public sewers shown on this sheet. SHEET DP-1. Show all proposed private cleanouts and assign a number to each one for reference purposes. Additionally, show the rim and invert elevation for each proposed private cleanout. SHEET DP-1. The proposed private sewer may not connect to an existing public cleanout. Said cleanout may be replaced with a proposed public manhole, and then the proposed private sewer may connect to the newly installed public manhole. SHEET DP-1. Show the existing private sewers for the remainder of the project site and label them as existing or use a different symbol than that used for proposed private sewers and existing public sewers. Show all existing private sewers all the way to their point of connection to the existing public sewer network. SHEET DP-1. Show the size of the existing private sewers. SHEET DP-1. Use a different symbol for existing public sewers and for proposed private sewers. SHEET DP-1. List the project owner with its corresponding address, telephone number and a contact name. SHEET DP-2. Move all general notes to sheet DP-1. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 05/11/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. While some SVTs are shown, there is only a near side SVT shown at the access point and it is not identified as being existing or future or both. There is some line work that might be a far side SVT at the access but it is not labeled. 2. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) There is no recordation data for Alvernon, Elmwood or Whitman. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/15/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/15/2006 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 05/21/2006 | WMARUM1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D06-0010 Realty Executives Office Building Development Plan - C-2 Professional and Administrative Office use TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 21, 2006 DUE DATE: April 26, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is March 29, 2007. 2. Revise the location map per the following development standards. A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. a. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. b. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses. c. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. DS 2-05.2.1.D.1 through .3 3. Add in the title block a brief legal description based on section, township, and range, i.e. sw qtr, sw qtr section 10 t14, r14 or new legal description based on the description of the lot split. DS 2-05.2.1.G.2 4. A legend, which shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing, is to be placed on the plan, preferably on the first sheet. DS 2-05.2.1.J 5. List as reference the rezoning case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-05.2.1.K 6. List the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the primary property owner of the site and developer of the project. DS 2-05.2.2.A.1 7. This project has been assigned the development plan case number D06-0010. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all the development plan sheets including the landscape and NPPO sheets. Include with the next submittal a copy of the rezoning case file documents (authorized letter with the rezoning conditions). DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 8. Add the following as general notes for the existing and proposed uses. a. Existing use: Food Service DD "30", Subject to LUC section 3.5.13.5 b. Proposed use: Administrative and Professional Office DD "31" subject to LUC section 3.5.13.5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 9. If applicable add the following note. "List zoning variances or modifications that are applicable to the project, such as a Board of Adjustment (B/A) variance, a Lot Development Option (LDO) modification, or a Project Design Option (PDO) modification, by case number, date of approval, what was approved, and conditions of approval." DS 2-05.2.2.B.6 10. This property is subject to compliance with the requirements of the Major streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. Add a note stating that this project has been designed to meet the criteria of the "Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone LUC section 2.8.3", and "Gateway Corridor Zone LUC section 2.8.4". DS 2-05 2.2.B.10 11. Add the following information on sheet one: The overall site area, which includes both lots, the specific lot areas for both the restaurant and office. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 12. Label the distance bearings of all property lines for both lots. DS 2-05.2.3.A 13. If applicable, draw, label, and dimension all existing and proposed easements. The recordation (docket and page) for each easement must be labeled. DS 2-05.2.3.B and Ds 2-05.2.4.G 14. Alvernon Way is designated a Major street on the MAS&R map. The future full mid-block width is 120 feet (60-foot half R/W). In addition it appears that the property is within the 600-foot intersection widening section, more specific the taper section. Please draw, label, and dimension the future taper on the plan. The future curb and sidewalk based on the future intersection widening must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned. This is an important item that must be depicted on the plan top ensure compliance with building setbacks and possible loss of existing land that may affect the design of the project. If the intersection widening will affect the site, please redesign the site to meet code based on the future widening. Label the distance from the existing centerline and curb to property line from all street frontages. DS 2-05.2.3.C 15. It is apparent that a lot split is proposed. Prior to approval of the development plan a lot split application must be processed and approved. A separate application, fees, review, and approval by DSD is required for the lot split. Please call me if you have any questions related to the lot split process. If the lot split has been processed and approved by DSD, submit copies of the approved survey drawing along with the recorded legal descriptions (with docket and page stamped) with the next submittal. DS 2-05.2.4.A 16. Label all existing PAAL widths including the area between the island and the sidewalk next to the restaurant. Indicate if the PAAL area between the island and the sidewalk is one or two-way. Indicate directional arrows. Label the width of the all driveway entrances. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 17. If applicable indicate any required dedication of right-of-way for Alvernon Way. DS 2-05.2.4.E 18. List on the plan the building setbacks as follows. a. The setbacks from Alvernon Way are based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure from the existing and future back of curb. b. The setbacks from Elwood Street are to be based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure from the nearest edge of travel lane. c. The setbacks from Whitman Street are based on the greatest of five feet as measured from the back of existing or future curb location, or half the height of the structure as measured from the back of existing or future curb location, or one foot as measured from the property line. The height of the buildings has not been labeled and therefore building setbacks cannot be verified. Additional comments will be forthcoming on the next review related to this issue based on the proposed and existing building heights. List the building height for both the existing and new building and label the setbacks as requested. DS 2-05.2.4.I 19. All sidewalks must be a minimum of four feet in width and must be physically separated from the vehicular use areas. Per the plans it appears that the parking spaces have not been provided with wheel stops, which are to be placed two and one-half feet from the front of the parking spaces. If the parking spaces that abut sidewalks will not be provided with wheel stops, the sidewalks must be designed to a six and one-half width. The additional width of the sidewalk allows for a two and one-half foot vehicle overhang onto the sidewalk while providing the required four-foot width for pedestrian access. This development will function as one or as a mixed-use development therefore the pedestrian circulation must connect both developments not only from all street frontages but internal to the site. Demonstrate on site pedestrian circulation/connection from the street frontages and between both buildings. Add access ramps and painted crosswalks where necessary to provide the continuous pedestrian circulation. All access ramps and sidewalks that are flush with the vehicular use area, which includes parking spaces or H.C. access aisles must be provided with truncated domes where the access ramp or the flush sidewalk transitions onto vehicular use areas. Revise the access ramp detail drawing to correctly depict the location of the truncated domes. Show on the plan the required truncated domes. DS 2-05.2.4.K 20. Label on the building footprint the existing and proposed building square footages and building heights. DS 2-05.2.4.M and .N 21. Show, on the drawing, a detail drawing of off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. The bicycle parking facility is not visible from the street frontage and therefore directional signage must be provided. Draw and label the required signage. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 22. Show existing and future sight visibility triangles all driveway and corners, on a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. DS 2-05.2.4.R 23. Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. If the postal service is to be provided inside the building add a note stating so. 24. See the landscape reviewer comments related to landscape border, screening, and NPPO requirements. 25. Submit copies of the recorded document providing for cross access, parking, and pedestrian circulation. 26. The development criteria for both uses should be listed separately due to different development designators. The criteria should include but limited to the following a. Required and proposed lot size b. Allowed and proposed floor area ratio c. Allowed and proposed building heights d. Required and proposed vehicle and bicycle parking e. Required and proposed number of loading zones If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D060010dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, if applicable CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 05/24/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 24, 2006 David Johns Omni Architecture Inc., 2910 North Swan Road, Suite 105 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D06-0010 Realty Executives Office Building Development Plan Dear David: Your submittal of March 30, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval of the Development Plan is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed. ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Traffic, Environmental Services, Wastewater, Landscape, Community Planning, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Landscape, Community Planning, Engineering, Zoning, DSD), 2 Copies NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD), 2 Copies Colors and Elevations (Community Planning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 326-0528 |