Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0009
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/21/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/29/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | The Landscape Section recommends approval of the development plan subject to the following conditions: Note the Case number and date of approval of related reviews, such as the WASH application. Revise the landscape plan keynotes to designate the correct tree planters. Revise the plans as necesary to correct any inconsistencies and meet the requirements of other sections and provide a letter indicating the completed revisions. The Landscape Section may review the revisions on the mylars submitted for formal approval if requested. |
| 08/30/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/11/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | September 8, 2006 TO: Brent Steffenhagen Stantec Consulting, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Tucson Spectrum Phase 2 Development Plan – 3rd Submittal D06-0009 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. SHEET 2. Delete Note 1, and revise note 3 to read: An on-site and off-site portion of existing public sewer line G-79-03 will be relocated to accommodate this project. SHEET 2. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES: Add a note that reads: Construction authorization from the PDEQ is required before beginning any work on this project. Approval of this development plan does not constitute construction authorization. SHEET 2. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES. Add a note that reads: No permits for permanent structures (i.e., masonry walls, fences, etc.) on or through the public sewer easement will be issued without separate written authorization from the PCWMD.. SHEET 2. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES: Add a note that reads: The landscaping within all public sewer easements shown hereon shall be in accordance with the planting guidelines of PC/COT standard detail WWM A-4. 5. SHEET 2. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES: Add a note that reads: Maintenance and operation of the private sanitary sewer to its point of connection to the public sewer is the responsibility of the property owner. 6. The existing easement for the existing public sewers that are going to be removed will need to be vacated or released by a separate instrument. 7. SHEET 3. Show the HCS for SHOPS 4. 8 SHEET 9. Show the HCS for shops. 9. SHEET 11, 14 & 17. Label the 12-inch sewers as public (if so) and use the line symbol as shown in the legend for this type of sewer. 10. All SHEETS. Show the flow direction arrows for all sewers-proposed and existing. 11. On an overall site plan, similar to the one on sheet 21, show: existing sewers, proposed public sewers, proposed private sewers, and the existing public sewers to be removed. 12. Please be aware that the removal of existing public sewers will need prior approval from PCWMD and approval for the flow management plan. 13. SHEET 8. An unidentified sewer line has been shown on the adjacent property to the North, which does not appear in PCWMD’s records, and it is in an area known to be a detention basin. If this sewer line truly exists, identify as public or private and show its size, plan no. and show where it goes. 14. SHEET 8. Public sewer line G-79-03 does not appear to have shown properly on this sheet. The PCWMD has no record of this sewer line entering the interstate 19 ROW. 15. SHEET 8. Show the existing public sewer easement all the way to the property line. 16.SHEET 8. MH A1 must be outside of the flood plain limit, and in a paved area where it can be readily reached by PCWMD’s sewer maintenance vehicles in all weather conditions9 i.e., in a PAAL) 17, SHEET 8. MH A2 must also be in a PAAL. 18. SHEET3. Show the sewer reach no. and the downstream manhole information for the existing sewer in Calle Santa Cruz. 19. SHEET Show on this sheet the existing sewer extending form the one shown on sheet no 8 as this is a match sheet for sheet no.8, 20. SHEET 5. Label the manhole B4. 21, SHEET 5….In the Sewer Manhole Table, the inverts shown for manholes B3 and B4 are the same as each other. How does the sewage flow? Make corrections as necessary. 22. SHEET6. In the Sewer Manhole Table, the directions for inverts are not shown correctly. e.g., for MH B6, the (S) should be (E), etc. 23. SHEET 8. In the Sewer Manhole Table, are the invert elevations shown for MH no. A1-2 existing ones or proposed ones ? Please clarify. 24. SHEET 8. The flow from MH no. A1-1coming into MH no. A1 is meeting the existing sewer flow at less than 90 degrees. Alignment adjustment is necessary. 25. SHEET 8. Show the abandonment of a section of the public sewer line G-79-03 that you will need to serve your project. 26. SHEET 8. The existing public sewer line G-79-03 is not shown accurately. 27. There are more comments on the rest of the sheets , but we are not writing them here. 28. We have identified enough other concerns about the proposed sewer design, and the relocation of existing sewer G-79-03, that the PCWMD staff has requested a meeting with Santec regarding this project. Please contact Mr. Tim Rowe, P.E. of the PCWMD at 740-6547 to schedule a meeting regarding this matter. Please do not resubmit this development plan until after this meeting has been held, and the proposed sewer design has been revised in accordance with the direction developed during this meeting. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E.. Telephone: (520) 740-6563 Copy: Project File |
| 09/13/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D06-0009 Tucson Spectrum / I-19 and Irvington Road Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 14, 2006 DUE DATE: September 14, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. The following items must be addressed. a. Under the vehicle parking calculations text block please revise the number of required parking spaces from 94 to 89. The building square footage of the Shops four building is listed as 17,774 divided by 200 equals 88.87 or 89 spaces. b. Under the accessible parking space text block, revise the number of required van spaces from six to eight spaces. Under the number of handicapped parking spaces provided revise the number of van spaces provided from eight to sixteen. c. On sheet 5, dimension the PAAL areas behind the Minor 1 - 3 and Major 1 - 3 buildings. This area has been redesigned but was not updated with PAAL dimensions. d. Please ensure that any relocation of bicycle parking facilities are drawn and labeled on both the development plan and the landscape plans. e. The crosswalk in front of the loading zone next to Pad 1 has not been revised as requested per the previous zoning comments. Please revise as requested and ensure that the continuos pedestrian is provided. (A crosswalk is not permitted anywhere in a drive-through lane.) f. Draw and label the required bicycle parking for Pad 3. Review the development plan sheets and ensure that the required bicycle parking facilities are drawn and labeled for each pad/building. In addition all class two parking spaces must be within close proximity to the entrance of the building it serves. The front door of the buildings are not drawn on all of the buildings therefore it is not clear if this requirement has been met. Please review all plan sheets as noted to ensure not only that both class one and two facilities are drawn and labeled for each pad/building but that the class two facilities are within close proximity to the front door. (Class two facilities are for customer parking, short term.) Please demonstrate on the detail sheet plan that three bicycles can be safely parked and locked on the proposed loop rack. It appears that the rack is to small to support three bicycles especially if the location is confined. g. Please ensure that all changes that are made to the development plan are also made on the landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06009dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan |
| 09/13/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 09/14/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: September 14, 2006 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Tucson Spectrum Development Plan D06-0009 (Third Review) T15S, R13E, Section 2 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: None, 1. The Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan and Drainage Report recommends approval at this time. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 09/14/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: Sept. 14, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: D06-0009 Tucson Spectrum: Development Plan(8-18-06) Approved. |
| 09/15/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0009 Tucson Spectrum 09/14/06 () Tentative Plat (x) Development Plan (x) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-23 – Harkins Theaters – Calle Santa Cruz NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: September 14, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (X) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: July 8, 2006 REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: September 14, 2006 |
| 09/15/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | September 15, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0009 PROJECT NAME: Tucson Spectrum PROJECT ADDRESS: 5201 S Calle Santa Cruz PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan. In coordination with ADOT Traffic Engineering will provide final approval to this Development Plan upon receiving a revised Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) which provides acceptable recommended improvements to address the proposed future traffic impacts along I-19. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/18/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 18, 2006 Brent Steffenhagen Stantec Consulting, Inc. 8211 South 48th Street Phoenix, Arizona 85044 Subject: D06-0009 Tucson Spectrum Development Plan Dear Brent: Your submittal of August 18, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval of the Development Plan is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed. ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Landscape, Zoning, Traffic, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Landscape, DSD), 2 Copies Revised TIA (Traffic, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (602) 431-9562 |