Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0008
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
06/16/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
06/16/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
06/21/2006 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 21, 2006 TO: Steven J. Gregor, P.E. Gregor Engineering, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: St. Joseph's Hospital Development Plan - 2nd Submittal D06-008 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. As previously requested on March 16, 2006, please provide a letter from PC WMD Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. While the response letter indicated that the capacity response letter was attached, said letter was not found. 1. A Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents has been sent to your office. After three original Sewer Service Agreements have been signed by the Owner of Record, the three originals should be returned to Pima County Wastewater Management in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve of the development plan. 1. SHEET 1. Delete General Note 8. 1. SHEET 2. Show how the existing private sewer connects from existing private manhole 6765-01 to the existing public sewer network. Include size, Pima County plan number and six-digit Pima County manhole number for the public sewer. 1. SHEET 7. This sheet shows a three story tall building which is assumed has existing private sewers, however the sewers are not shown. Please clarify as necessary. 1. SHEET 10. Accurately show the existing public sewers on the northeast corner of this sheet, including size, Pima County plan number(s) and any associated six-digit Pima County manhole numbers. 1. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $156.00 per sheet made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
06/23/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
07/10/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0008 St. Joseph’s Hospital 07/07/06 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (NPPO) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-20, PAD-13 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Sewell/Hudlow Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: July 17, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other (Letter from ARB) () Other (Letter & New Cross Section B-B) REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 7/10/2006 This development plan is required to meet development regulations as set forth by C9-05-20, St. Joseph’s Hospital PAD. Those regulations not covered by the PAD document shall default to the current City of Tucson Land Use Code and Development Standards. PAD-13 requires a letter of approval to the City at the time of plan submittal from the St. Joseph’s Hospital Architectural Review Board. This must be provided prior to approval of this development plan. Did not find letter attached. Per DS 2-08.4.1.B & C, a sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located; and a sidewalk will be provided adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no parking spaces or PAALs intervene. This would pertain to the west side of the proposed Women’s Pavilion on sheet 5 of 13 and also along the new PAAL being proposed between the O’Reilly Care Center and Hospital Records Storage Building on sheet 4 of 13. The Sidewalk on the west side of the Women’s Pavilion may require a scupper to allow water to cross from the valley gutter. All new sidewalks are required to be five (5) feet in width by PAD Sec. 3.3.5.b. The Development Plan shows this completed; but details 1, 2, 4, and 5 do not appear to be revised or any different from what was previously submitted. The applicant’s Development Plan does not comply with the cross section found in Figure 22, Section B-B of the PAD. The applicant needs to revise cross-section 10/12 to closely match Figure 22, Section B-B of the PAD for shy area and sidewalk width and wall placement and show this on both the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. Or, to determine if this change is a minor or major amendment to the PAD, the applicant needs to provide a letter and new cross section to the Development Services Director outlining that the new cross section meets and implements the goals and vision of the PAD with the removal of the 6-foot high undulating wall and wider landscape border. |
07/11/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | July 11, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0008 PROJECT NAME: St. Joseph's Hospital PROJECT ADDRESS: 350 N Wilmot Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Traffic Engineering recommends approval of the Development Plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
07/13/2006 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 07/13/2006, SUBJECT: St. Joseph's Hospital D06-0008, T14S, R15E, SECTION 07 RECEIVED: Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on June 16, 2006 The subject project has been reviewed. The Drainage Report is acceptable for Development Plan purposes. Additional drainage information may be required for the Grading Plan review. The Landscape Plan is acceptable pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain. Development Plan: Address the following comment: 1. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.T.). Elimination of this requirement requires an approved Development Standard Modification Request. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan |
07/14/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0008 ST. JOSEPH’S HOSPITAL/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 7/14/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Approved with the following condition: 1.) Label Building 3 on Sheet 4 on approved mylar. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. es |
08/03/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: August 03, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov CC: SUBJECT: D06-0008 St Joseph’s Hospital: Development Plan(6-16-06) Approved. |
08/16/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D06-0008 St. Joseph's Hospital Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 16, 2006 DUE DATE: July 17, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The information provided in parking table on sheet one for employee day care does not match that what is shown in the PAD, Table 3. Square footage in the PAD is shown as 7,432 sq. ft while the DP (development plan) indicates 7,342 sq. ft. Please revise. 2. The estimated parking required for the day care in the PAD is indicated as zero (0) while the DP shows three (3) spaces required. The PAD provides for minimum requirements only. The applicant may choose to revise the DP to match those numbers provided in the PAD or provide additional parking as desired 3. Bicycle parking provided on the DP does not meet the requirements of revised DS (Development Standard) 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that have entrance. Multiple rack bicycle parking require a minimum thirty (30 inches between outer spaces of posts or racks (DS 2-09.5.1.A) and a minimum of thirty (30) inches provided between a bicycle parking space and a parallel wall as measured from the side of the bicycle rack to the parallel wall (DS 2-09.5.1.B). Please review the revised DS 2-09 and provide the necessary corrections to the DP as required. The revised DS may be found on the web at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550. KAA C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0008dpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
08/21/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 21, 2006 Steve Gregor Gregor Engineering Inc. 5232 East Pima Street, Suite A Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D06-0008 St. Joseph's Hospital Development Plan Dear Steve: Your submittal of June 16, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (Community Planning, Wastewater, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape and Irrigation Plans (Zoning, Community Planning, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 319-1181 |