Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0007
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/24/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/26/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Calculate the percentage of oasia area and note on the plan. PAD 11 3.5.3.1.b 2) There is an inaccessible dumpster shown in water harvesting basin near the southeast corner of the project area. Revise landscape and NPP plans. 3) Revise the NPPP to clarify the limits of grading. The lines on the plan do not correspond with the line legend. DS 2-15.3.4.A 4) Revise the NPPP to incorporate the new sewer line and asphalt path shown on the development plan. These were not included in the NPPP for the adjacent UMC site. DS 2-15.3.4.A 5) The minimum required text size is 12 point (12"). Revise the right-of-way dimensions in the aerial photo on sheet N-1 to meet this minimum standard. DS 2-03.2.1.C 6) Per UMC PAD document section 3.5.3.5.b, a 6-foot screen is required to screen the loading zone from adjacent street frontage. 7) It is not clear on the landscape plan what the enclosure is intended for at the end of the truck turnaround spur near the southeast corner of the site. This enclosure does not appear on the development plan. Clarify, revise or remove this feature. The landscape plan should match the development plan as far as all structural elements, including buildings, vehicluar use area, walls and fences, being shown. Revise where necessary. 8) Reference the previous development plan (D05-0035) on all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan and NPP Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.B.h |
| 05/31/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 31, 2006 TO: Ray Allan Brown, P.E. Tetra Tech, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: The Ronald McDonald House Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D06-007 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. A Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents has been sent to your office. After three original Sewer Service Agreements have been signed by the Owner of Record, the three originals should be returned to Pima County Wastewater Management in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve of the development plan. SHEETS 3 & 4. Show the rim and invert elevations for all newly proposed cleanouts/manholes. SHEETS 3 & 4. Revise the proposed private sewer design so that the distance between proposed cleanouts does never exceed one hundred feet. SHEETS 3 & 4. Show the size, six-digit Pima County manhole numbers and Pima County plan number for the existing public sewer in a clear and large enough font so it can be easily read. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 06/05/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | * THe enclosure location can be serviced. The conditional comment is because the enclosure does not have ten feet of clear area between the wall protection. No wall protection is shown for the side walls. |
| 06/16/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends approval of this Development plan. |
| 06/22/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | June 22, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0007 PROJECT NAME: Ronald McDonald PROJECT ADDRESS: 3838 N CAMPBELL AVE PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Civil Engineer Engineering recommends a CONDITIONAL APPROVAL for this project. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Sheet 3: Curb and Gutter should be used along Allen Road versus the proposed vertical curb called out in keynote 17. 2. Sheet 3: Cannot locate keynotes 5, 7, and 8 in plan view. 3. To prevent delay with the approval of the Development Plan and confusion during construction remove the Grading Plan and SWPPP sheets from this set. The Grading Plans and SWPPP will be reviewed under activity number T06BU01321. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5640 x1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/26/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0007 Ronald McDonald House 06/22/06 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: UMC North Medical Park (PAD-11) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Northside Area Plan GATEWAY-ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: 6/22/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (X) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 3/06/06 REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 6/22/06 |
| 06/27/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D06-007 Ronald McDonald House A portion of the UMC Medical Park PAD District 2nd review TRANSMITTAL: June 27, 2006 DUE DATE: June 22, 2006 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Label the location of bicycle parking clearly on the plan with a keynote and dimension the bicycle parking fully with a detail per DS 2-09. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 2. In situations where required parking is to be located off-site, a site plan of the off-site parking area, a lease agreement for the parking and a letter of intent (Parking Agreement) are required. The site plan must contain calculations to indicate compliance for the adjacent existing project/development. The off-site parking spaces may be applied towards meetinf required parking only if there is a sufficient surplus on the adjacent site to allow these spaces to be used for the new proposal. Submit plan w/parking calculations demonstrating compliance along with the required lease agreement and parking agreement. DS 2-05.2.1.K 3. All lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of twelve point (0.12 inches) in size. Revise all text in the maps on sheet 1 of 7 to meet this minimum archiving standard DS 2-05.2.1.C 4. The building area stated on the drawing on sheet 3 of 7 read 10,246 square feet but general note 6 on sheet 2 of 7 reads 24,250 square feet. PAD Sec. 3.4.2.7 DS 2-05.2.4.N If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791 |
| 07/13/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 13, 2006 Ray Brown Tetra Tech Inc. 33 North Stone Avenue, Suite 1500 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1413 Subject: D06-0007 Ronald McDonald House Development Plan Dear Ray: Your submittal of May 24, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Environmental Services, Wastewater, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plans (Landscape, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 623-7980 |