Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0007
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/03/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/03/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved, February 3, 2006. |
| 02/10/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * Catus is in the same section but over 1000 feet away. * No detail for the refuse enclosure. * Refuse enclosure cannot be serviced at the angle shown without backing out onto Allen Road. (Violates DS 6-01.4.0) * No provisions shown or discussed for recycling. |
| 02/10/2006 | RICHARD WILLIAMSON | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 02/10/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D06-0007 TERA TECH INC RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE ********************************************************************* Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. ********************************************************************* |
| 02/21/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0007 RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: February 21, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 02/27/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 26, 2006 TO: Dave Martin, P.E. Tetra Tech, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: The Ronald McDonald House Development Plan – 1st Submittal D06-007 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D06-0007, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 11 as follows and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET 1. Add the following General Note ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). SHEET 1. Add the following General Note MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. SHEET 2. Show the six-digit Pima County manhole numbers for the existing public manholes shown on this sheet. SHEET 2. Show the Pima County plan number for the existing public sewer shown on this sheet. SHEET 2. Show the length, size and slope for the proposed private sewers. SHEET 2. Show the proposed private sewer all the way to its point of connection with the existing public sewer, including the size and Pima County plan number of the existing public sewer to which the proposed private sewer is connecting. SHEET 2. A private sewer easement needs to be created for the private off-site sewer portion of this project. Provide an 8 ½ x 11 legal description of the proposed easement and label it on the layout as XX’ PRIVATE SEWER EASEMENT BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT, replacing the “XX” with the corresponding dimension. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 03/01/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Calculate the percentage of oasia area and note on the plan. PAD 11 3.5.3.1.b 2) Revise the plans to provide a 10' street landscape border adjacent to the right-of-way line. The vehicular use area should be located behind the border. PAD 11 3.5.3.2.b 3) Revise the NPPP to clarify the limits of grading. The lines on the plan do not correspond with the line legend. DS 2-15.3.4.A 4) Revise the NPPP to incorporate the new sewer line and asphalt path shown on the development plan. DS 2-15.3.4.A |
| 03/06/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. 2. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 3. The curb returns at the parking lot appear to be undersized. Label the dimension of the curb return. 18' minimum is required. 4. Allen Road section is labeled as section "B" on sheet 3/3 but labeled as section "A" on sheet 2/3. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/07/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | March 7, 2006 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D06-0007 PROJECT NAME: Ronald McDonald PROJECT ADDRESS: 3838 N CAMPBELL AVE PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Civil Engineer Resubmittal Required: Development Plan The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. If applicable, existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown. DS 2-05.2.3.F 3. Floodplain information, including the location of the 100-year flood limits for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more with 100-year flood water surface elevations, shall be indicated. DS 2-05.2.3.I 4. Where natural floodprone areas, such as washes, channels, drainageways, etc., exist within the development plan boundaries of the drawing, water surface contours for the 100-year flood with water surface elevations indicated must be shown and clearly labeled. DS 2-05.2.3.I.1. Therefore, please illustrate the Regulatory Floodplain Boundary shown in the drainage report. 5. The 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more will be drawn on the development plan. DS 2-05.2.4.H.6 6. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points. DS 2-05.2.4.H.7 7. Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 8. Show sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. DS 2-05.2.4.R 9. A grading plan/permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading plans and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. Subsequent comments to the development plan or grading plan may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". 10. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. Any modifications to the grading plan may require modifications to the drainage report. 11. Proposed developments exceeding 1 acre of disturbance are subject to NPDES requirements. The NPDES submittal must accompany the Grading Plan submittal. 12. As per Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the Truncated Domes instead of the standard grooves, which are shown on City of Tucson Standard Detail 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, the wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with the Standard Detail 207. 13. Callout 5' sidewalks in plan view. 14. Ensure that the asphalt pedestrian walkway leading to the overflow parking lot is strategically placed to prevent conflicts with vehicles. Is a wheel chair ramp required at the end of the walkway? 15. Sheet 3 of 3; the Allen Road typical section appears to be mislabeled. 16. The handicap ramps along Allen Road cross the property line. If the ramps cannot be reconfigured then they either need to be dedicated or an easement needs to be provided. 17. Notes 9 and 16 are redundant. After approval of this development plan this document will serve as a site plan. Therefore, this document must address all development standards for a site plan. The following comments are based on site plan review comments 1. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 2. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 3. Show Development plan number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 4. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5640 x1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/07/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0007 Ronald McDonald House 03/06/06 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: UMC North Medical Park (PAD-11) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Northside Area Plan GATEWAY-ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: 3/6/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 3/06/06 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments D06-0007 – Ronald McDonald House – Development Plan March 6, 2006 Issue #1: The Ronald McDonald House is proposed within the southeast area of the UMC North Medical Park PAD. The SWCA (Environmental Consultant) identified this area of the PAD as archaeological site AZ BB:9:391 (ASM). SWCA recommends the site of the Ronald McDonald House to be a National Register eligible under Criterion (D). At the time of the PAD process, the University Medical Center planned to avoid the site (Don Cutman, personal communication, 2004). The PAD states, if plans should change, and the site cannot be avoided, SWCA recommends that a site-specific testing plan be developed and implemented. Prior to a development plan approval for the Ronald McDonald House site, documentation is required that confirms a site specific testing plan has been developed and implemented, as recommended in the UMC Medical North Plaza PAD-11, under Cultural Resource Section: Archeological Summary and Management Recommendations, page 25. Issue #2: PAALS are not required to be signed or striped, except for pedestrian crossings, which shall have some markings or surface treatments to alert vehicular traffic of pedestrian areas. Please revise development plan to provide striping at the three pedestrian crossings located within the Ronald McDonald House site PAALS. Two pedestrian crossing are located at the vehicular access points where the two on-site PAALS intersect with Allen Road. The third pedestrian crossing is located within the western parking area (PAAL), at a point where the two handicap parking spaces align with the five foot wide pedestrian asphalt path, which is located to the west of the site. Issue #3: Per phasing requirements, Section 3.9, page 24, prior to a development plan submittal UMC will hold a neighborhood meeting with representatives of the Campus Farms and Tucson-Prince neighborhood and give a presentation of the proposed development plan phase and its compliance with the PAD. Documentation of these neighborhood meetings will be provided on each of these meetings along with the development plan submittal. Please provide the above documentation as part of Ronald McDonald phase development. Issue:#4: Per PAD, Section 3.2.2.d, requires sidewalks adjacent to the streets to be located as shown in the Allen and North PAAL Street Section on the public right-of-way, figure 8, & 9. Based on this requirement, the sidewalk along the northern edge of Allen Road, adjacent to the Ronald McDonald House site needs to extend the full length of the Ronald McDonald House site. This includes the area along Allen Road; up to the where Allen Road intersects with Wilson Avenue right-of-way. Issue #5:Pedestrian connectivity The concept of the PAD is to have a continuous pedestrian and vehicular connectivity as phases get built out, assuming phases are contiguous. However, the PAD permits phasing to occur as needed, therefore, approved Phase 1 and proposed Phase II are not contiguous. This leaves a gap of an unapproved/under-developed area and disconnects pedestrian connectivity between major uses. In this case there is a disconnect between the clinic and the Ronald McDonald House. It seems there may be two options by which to provide a continuous pedestrian connectivity between the two phases. Construction as part of phase II, a continuous sidewalk system along Allen Road from Campbell Avenue to Wilson Avenue alignment or construction as part of phase II, an ADA approved pedestrian path designed on-site which internally connects the two phases. Please revise development plan to provide as part of phase II requirements, a continuous pedestrian link between Phase I and Phase II, as outlined above, or equivalent in design and standards. Issue #6: Wilson Avenue At the time Wilson Avenue is constructed to City street standards, as may be agreed upon between the City of Tucson and adjacent property owners, the western edge of Wilson Avenue, located next to the UMC North Medical Park PAD-11, shall include a five feet wide sidewalk along the full length of the site. |
| 03/08/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: March 7, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D06-0007 Ronald McDonald House: Development Plan(2-30-06) Staff has no comments. |
| 03/13/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | |
| 04/11/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D05-035 Ronald McDonald House A portion of the UMC Medical Park PAD District TRANSMITTAL: April 11, 2006 DUE DATE: March 6, 2006 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one year expiration date for this development plan is January 17, 2006. 2. Place the development plan number (D05-001) on each sheet of the development plan, landscape plan and NPPO plans in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.1.K 3. Add a legal description of the subject property to the development plan. DS 2-05.2.1.G.2 2. Add sight visibility triangles at the exit from the parking lot along the north side of Allen Rd per the legend. DS 2-05.2.4.I 3. To demonstrate compliance with Section 3.4.2.6 of the PAD document, dimension all building setbacks on the drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.I DS 2-05.2.4.U 4. The location, type, size and height of any proposed free-standing signage must be labeled on the development plan. Also, detail any proposed free-standing outdoor lighting on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.W 5. Dimension the width of the entrance drive on the drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 6. Show the location of bicycle parking on the plan and add a calculation of bicycle parking required and provided. DS 2-09 7. Add a vehicle parking calculation to the plan, including handicap spaces, indicating the number of spaces required and provided. DS 2-05.2.4.P ANS/IBC PAD Sec. 3.4.3 8. Show the wheelstops on the drawing in the spaces where they are to be located. DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 9. Label and dimension the required loading zone on the plan and add a calculation of the number of loading spaces required and provided. DS 2-05.2.4.O 10. The configuration of the parking lot and its access is not the same in the PAD conceptual plan on sheet 1 of 3 as it is on the development plan drawing on sheet 2 of 3. Revise. 11. Add the proposed square footage, building height, and number of stories to the UMC PAD overview drawing on sheet 1 per general note 6. Specify that the figures already given on the drawing are the maximum allowed, not proposed. PAD Sec. 3.4.2.7 DS 2-05.2.4.N 12. All sidewalks must be ADA compliant with the required truncated domes rather than the grooves indicating grade changes and pedestrian crosswalks. Indicate the truncated domes on the development plan as required. IBC/ANS 13. All lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of twelve point (0.12 inches) in size. Revise all text in the maps on sheet 1 of 3 to meet this minimum archiving standard. DS 2-05.2.1.C If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. |
| 04/17/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Dear Mr. Martin: SUBJECT: RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE D06-0007 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted February 3, 2006. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Warren McElyea Design/Build - DB 102 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 918-8268 Please call me at (520) 918-8297 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Denise Tellez Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build dt Enclosures cc: Patricia Gehlen/Fern Rodriguez, City of Tucson (by e-mail) Denise Tellez 918-8297 DB102 |
| 04/17/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 04/18/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 18, 2006 Ray Brown Tetra Tech Inc. 33 North Stone Avenue, Suite 1500 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1413 Subject: D06-0007 Ronald McDonald House Development Plan Dear Ray: Your submittal of February 3, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Environmental Services, Community Planning, Wastewater, Traffic, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape and NPPO Plans (Zoning, Community Planning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plans (Landscape, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 623-7980 |