Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0006
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/22/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/23/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the development/landscape plan to clearly show the future sidewalk location along Broadway Boulevard at the proposed turn lane. As shown, the future sidewalk appears to extend past the future curb into the turn lane and extends into the street landscape border, both are unacceptable. |
| 05/25/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/05/2006 | MARILYN KALTHOFF | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 5, 2006 TO: Maurita Walker RSP Architects THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Mike Henrich Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: US Bank Development Plan - 2nd Submittal D06-006 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. This submittal was compared to the previous review comments from this office dated February 25, 2006. The following summarizes the status of those comments in the same order: 1. Addressed, although a copy of the letter from PCWWM was not included as stated in the response letter. 2. Addressed. 3. Addressed. 4. Addressed. 5. Partially addressed. The requested note was added to the General Notes on page 1 of the development plan, but it was not completed. The note indicates that 0 fixture units are proposed. 6. Addressed. 7. Partially addressed. As previously requested, delete Engineer's Note 16 as well as the Manhole Notes on sheet 2. 8. Partially addressed. The plan numbers are shown. However, delete "COT" at the beginning of each. 9. Partially addressed. Delete the "COT" from the beginning of each. 10. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Mike Henrich Telephone: (520) 740-6832 Copy: Project |
| 06/11/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D06-0006 US Bank Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 11, 2006 DUE DATE: June 20, 2006 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is February 1, 2007. 2. The previous comment was not addressed as requested. See development standards requirements below. (Previous Comment:) A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. a. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one-(1) square mile area. b. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses. c. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. d. The City's jurisdictional limits will be shown, if within the mapped area. DS 2-02.2.1.D 3. The previous comment was not addressed as requested. (Previous Comment:) The future curb and sidewalk for Broadway Boulevard must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned. See related comments by the Engineering reviewer on this item. DS 2-05.2.3.C 4. I acknowledge that A DSMR was requested. Please list the DSMR case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets, list the date of approval, and any conditions of approval. Provide a copy of the approval memo with the next submittal package. 5. The previous comment was not completely addressed. Please add the requested information in paragraph two. (Previous Comment:) This development must be provided with bicycle parking at a ratio of eight percent of the number of vehicle parking spaces provided, 25 percent of the space must be class one and 75 percent class two. Per the bicycle parking calculation four class two spaces have been provided. Please draw, label and dimension on the plan the location for the bicycle parking facility. Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions,, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 6. Add a note stating that the postal service will be delivered inside. (Previous Comment:) Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. DS 2-05.2.4.V 7. I acknowledge that the signs will be permitted under separate permit. Key note 21 for the monument sign could not be verified on the plan. Please ensure that the sign is shown and labeled on the plan. (Previous Comment:) Indicate the locations of proposed freestanding and pedestal signs to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and those minimal location requirements can be met. Also if indicate the location of any existing billboards. DS 2-05.2.4.W If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D060006dp2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents. |
| 06/14/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering approves the proposed development plan. |
| 06/16/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0006 US BANK/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: June 16, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 06/16/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0006 US Bank 06/14/06 (XXXX) Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-00-39, SE-01-28, D02-0041, D02-0034 & S02-011 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Broadway and Pantano COMMENTS DUE BY: 06/20/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (XXXX) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 3/03/06 () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other – |
| 06/21/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: June 21, 2006 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: US Bank Development Plan D06-0006 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 08 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: None 1. The development plan has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we recommend approval at this time. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 06/24/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 24, 2006 Maurita Walker RSP Architects 502 South College Avenue, Suite 203 Tempe, Arizona 85281 Subject: D06-0006 US Bank Development Plan Dear Maurita: Your submittal of May 22, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Landscape, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (480)-889-2011 |