Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0006
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/01/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/02/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development plan is approved, February 2, 2006. |
| 02/15/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * Broadway North and Gateway landfill within 1000 feet of this development. Clear project with David Bell of Environmental Services for Landfill Ordinance (520-791-5414). * Enclosure requires side wall protection per the Development Standards. * No provisions shown or discussed for recycling. |
| 02/22/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0006 US BANK/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 2/22/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: To legal description or Title Block add: Lot 3 of Broadway Pantano Center, Book 56, Page 84. Delete 7685 E. Broadway Blvd. (This is the administration address of Book 56, Page 84). |
| 02/27/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) A 10' wide street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4.A is required along the entire Broadway Boulevard street frontage. The border is measured from the right-of-way line. Revise the plans as necessary. 2) Dimension the length and width of landscape borders on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f. 3) Locate required screening in accordance with LUC 3.7.3.2.C. Revise the plans to meet the criteria for locating screens in the landscape border. 4) Revise the landscape plan to show the locations and note the height and materials used to construct any proposed or required screen walls. DS 2-07.A.3 The screen height is measured from the finished grade of the parking lot. The minimum height is thirty inches. 5) Vegetation or structures higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle. Add the sight visibility triangles to the development/landscape plan and make any necessary revisions. DS 3-01.5.0 6) Note that surface materials will also be installed adjacent to the property in the right-of-way along Broadway if necessary. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 |
| 02/27/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 25, 2006 TO: Maurita Walker RSP Architects THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: US Bank Development Plan – 1st Submittal D06-006 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D06-0006, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. This project proposes connecting to an existing public sewer line 12 inches in diameter or larger. This existing public sewer line conveys high volumes of wastewater, therefore the owner, engineer and contractor shall be aware that a flow management plan may be required. The owner, engineer and contractor shall also be aware that Pima County Wastewater Management Department may require review of this project. SHEET 1. Add the following General Note and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET 1. Add the following General Notes THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES OF PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4. NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES (I.E., MASONRY WALLS, FENCES, ETC.) MAY BE CONSTRUCTED ON OR THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. SHEET 1 & 2. Keep General Notes 11, 12 and 13, however, delete all other wastewater related notes shown on these sheets. SHEET 4. Show the Pima County plan number for the existing public sewers. SHEET 4. Show the six-digit Pima County manhole number for all existing public manholes shown on this sheet. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 03/06/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0006 US Bank 03/03/06 (XXXX) Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-00-39, SE-01-28, D02-0041, D02-0034 & S02-011 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Broadway and Pantano COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/02/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan () Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other – Elevations and Color Board REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: February 27, 2006 URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMENTS D06-0006 US Bank February 27, 2006 This project is to comply with conditions of Rezoning Case No. C9-00-39 and Special Exception Case No. SE-01-28. Please address the following: As part of the Development Plan, please add sheets to show the elevation drawings of the proposed US Bank building, clearly labeling the height, materials and colors (rezoning condition #1). On the drawing of Sheet C3 of the Development Plan, please illustrate and dimension the width of the sidewalk. This sidewalk is to be a six-foot sidewalk along the Broadway frontage along with appropriate transitions to any existing sidewalks (rezoning condition #5). On the drawing of Sheet C3 of the Development Plan, please provide a “no left turns permitted” of the proposed access opening onto Broadway Boulevard (rezoning condition #6). On the drawing of Sheet C3 of the Development Plan, please clearly indicate the location of public pedestrian amenities that are to be provided along the pedestrian circulation system and provide details of those amenities. Amenities can include plazas and courtyards, pedestrian seating areas, public art and fountains, pocket parks and play areas, shaded transit stops, and information kiosks (rezoning condition #30). |
| 03/06/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. While the SVTs are shown for the western access, they are not labeled as to wether they are existing or future or both. There are no SVTs shown for the eastern access. 2. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) There is no recordation data for Broadway shown. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/07/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DDATE: April 17, 2006 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: US Bank Development Plan D06-0006 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 08 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan The development plan has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following comments must be addressed: 1. Provide sufficient spot elevations and dimensions to demonstrate that the proposed project meets the requirements of the development standards. Provide dimensions for PAALs, drive-thru lanes, landscape areas and buildings. 2. The Development Plan indicates a proposed storm drain in the Broadway alignment at the south edge of the project. Clarify whether the storm drain is existing or proposed. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 03/20/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: US BANK D06-0006 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted February 1, 2006. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Nancy DiMaria Design/Build - DB 102 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 520-918-8267 Please call me at (520) 918-8271, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Kathy Clark Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build kc Enclosures cc: P. Gehlen, City of Tucson (Via e-mail) -----Original Message----- |
| 04/08/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D06-0006 US Bank Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 8, 2006 DUE DATE: March 2, 2006 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is February 1, 2007. 2. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the site content and requirements of development standards 2-05 as well as development requirements for the proposed use. It appears that information necessary to ensure compliance has not been added to the plan. Please review the development standards 2-05, for the site content requirements. Also please review the development standards 2-08 (pedestrian standards), 2-09 (bicycle parking standards), 3-01 (street standards), 3-05 (vehicular use area standards) and the development designator "28" criteria for the Financial Service use and the applicable Land Use Code subject to section 3.5.4.5.A. Please add a separate sheet that depicts the site without any of the grading information. The plan is extremely busy with all the grading information. The site plan should include the site drawing with dimensions, keynotes, easements, parking spaces, loading zones, landscape locations, drive-through lanes, bicycle parking, sidewalks with dimensions, easements, dimensioned building footprints, etc. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this issue based on the revised drawing. 3. All lettering and dimensions (text height) must be a minimum of 12 point (.12). Please revise all text and dimensions that do not meet this requirement. DS 2-05.2.1.C 4. A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. a. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one-(1) square mile area. b. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses. c. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. d. The City's jurisdictional limits will be shown, if within the mapped area. DS 2-02.2.1.D 5. The following title block information is to be provided, preferably in the lower right corner of the sheet. a. The proposed name of the project or, if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name or the property address. b. A brief legal description, i.e. "Lot 3, of Broadway Pantano Center, as recorded in Maps and Plats in book 56 at page 84, a re-subdivision of Blocks "A" and "B" of Centrepark (Book 56 Page 43 M/P P.C.R.) DS 2-05.2.1.G 6. Please verify with the COT rezoning section (Dan Castro) that the referenced rezoning case applies to the specific lot to be developed. Per the rezoning maps the rezoning case appears to a different case number. The case number may be correct on the plan and it may be that the online rezoning layer may have been labeled incorrectly. For consistency and correctness please verify this issue. DS 2-05.2.1.K 7. This project has been assigned the development plan case number D06-0006. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets including the landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 8. Under the "USE" note please revise the use from bank to Financial Services and remove the words "shopping center". It is acknowledged that use will occur on lot 3 but within the property boundaries of the shopping center development. DS 2-025.2.2.B.3 9. Please incorporate the sheet, which lists all the rezoning conditions into the new development plans set as the last sheet. Provide a separate response letter detailing how all the conditions of rezoning or the special exception that are applicable to this specific development (New Financial Services Use) have been or are addressed and met by this development plan. DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 and DS 2-05.2.4.U 10. The future curb and sidewalk for Broadway Boulevard must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned. See related comments by the Engineering reviewer on this item. DS 2-05.2.3.C 11. Add the zoning classifications adjacent to this parcel. (C-1 zoning to the north, east, and west). DS 2-05.2.4.B 12. Dimension all PAAL areas. The minimum width for a two-way PAAL is 24 feet. The drive through lanes must also be dimensioned and the stacking areas drawn and dimensioned. Each lane must be able to accommodate four stacking spaces, which includes the space at the window. Label the on the plan the teller lanes and the ATM lanes. Label the height of the drive through lanes canopy. Minimum height clearance is 15 feet. Indicate on the plan if any of the PAAL areas are to be one way. If so, label and add one way arrows depicting the direction of travel. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 13. All sidewalks must be constructed of concrete unless rezoning or special exception conditions dictate otherwise. All sidewalks must be physically separated from vehicular use areas (P.A.A.L. parking area access lanes). Crosswalks used as part of the continuous pedestrian circulation may striped for such purpose and may be flush with the PAAL areas. Please ensure that all sections of the sidewalk that must be concrete and physically separated from the vehicular use areas are drawn labeled as such. Please revise one of the access ramp details on sheet five to indicate that the truncated domes are to be placed on the flush section of the ramp which transitions onto the vehicular use area. The detail in question is drawn in the upper right hand corner of the sheet. DS 2-05.2.4.K 14. On sheet C-1 of 5 (in the building area text block) of the new development plan package, list the specific uses for the existing developed pads, i.e. retail, food service, personal service, office dental office etc. If pads have not been developed please list as vacant. DS 2-05.2.4.M 15. Label the building height of the proposed structure. Per the Land Use Code the height is measured from design grade to the mid point of a gable roof, top of a flat roof, deck of a mansard roof, see LUC section 3.2.7.1 for more information on measurement of the building height. I acknowledge that height is listed on the plan based on the elevation information. For review and consistency with the development standards please list on the building footprint the actual height from design grade. DS 2-05.2.4.N 16. One 12-foot by 35-foot loading zone is required for this development. The loading zone must be placed within close proximity to the use it serves. Draw, label, and dimension the loading zone as required. The loading zone may not be placed within a PAAL area, drive through lane, or as part of required vehicle parking space and the location of the loading zone may not interfere with landscape or pedestrian areas. Maneuverability into and out of the loading zone must be demonstrated on the plan. See related Engineering comments. The loading zone calculation must be revised to state that one loading zone is required and that one has been provided. DS 2-05.2.4.O 17. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both the standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled (the handicapped parking detail has been provided on the plan). The parking space adjacent to the landscape borders or landscape areas must be provided with wheel stops that are to be placed two and one-half feet from the front of the parking space. If the vehicle is to overhang into the landscape area all vegetation must placed two and one-half feet from the curb location. See the Landscape reviewer comments related to this item. For more information on vehicular use areas or design criteria for parking spaces and access refer to the Development Standard 3-05.0. DS 2-05.2.4.P 18. This development must be provided with bicycle parking at a ratio of eight percent of the number of vehicle parking spaces provided, 25 percent of the space must be class one and 75 percent class two. Per the bicycle parking calculation four class two spaces have been provided. Please draw, label and dimension on the plan the location for the bicycle parking facility. Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions,, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 19. Both existing and future sight visibility triangles must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned don the plan. See engineering comments related to this item. DS 2-05.2.4.R 20. Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. DS 2-05.2.4.V 21. Indicate the locations of proposed freestanding and pedestal signs to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and those minimal location requirements can be met. Also if indicate the location of any existing billboards. DS 2-05.2.4.W 22. See landscape reviewer comments related to landscape buffer, screening and NPPO requirements. 23. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the revised plan and responses to the zoning comments as well as the requested letter detailing compliance with all applicable rezoning conditions.. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D060006dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, tentative plat, final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 04/18/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 18, 2006 Maurita Walker RSP Architects 502 South College Avenue, Suite 203 Tempe, Arizona 85281 Subject: D06-0006 US Bank Development Plan Dear Maurita: Your submittal of February 1, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Environmental Services, Addressing, Community Planning, Wastewater, Traffic, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape and NPPO Plans (Zoning, Community Planning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Elevations and Color Boards (Community Planning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (480)-889-2011 |