Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D06-0003
Parcel: 13405118Q

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN

Permit Number - D06-0003
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/09/2007 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied November 27,
2006



TO: Gary Gretcher

Gretcher Designs LLC



THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager

City of Tucson, Development Services Department



FROM: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E.

Pima County Development Services Department

Development Review Division (Wastewater)



SUBJECT: Tutor Time Day Care (fka: Northwest Corner of Harrison &
Old Spanish Trail)

Development Plan - 4th Submittal

D06-0003







The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced
project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of
Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management
Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining
to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered
for your use.






1. SHEET 4. Label the existing MH as existing manhole # 2,
and show the flow direction in the existing sewer line.



2. SHEET 4. Label the proposed 6-inch sewer line as New
BCS.



3. SHEET 4. You are proposing to connect the new BCS into
the existing public manhole. Please note that an approval from the PCWMD
will be required for such a connection..



4. SHEET 1. In the General Note 16, show the proposed
wastewater fixture unit equivalents. Whether you will need to sign a
Sewer Service Agreement with the PCWMD or not depends on the number of
the proposed FUE for this development.



5. SHEET 1. Show in the LEGEND a symbol for the proposed
sewer line.



6. We will require a revised set of drawings and a
response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made
during the review of these documents.



The next submittal of this project will be the 5th submittal. A check
for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 made out to
PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and
the response letter.



For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to
http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may
find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If
the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.








If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not
hesitate to contact me.



Sincerely,







Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E.

Telephone: (520) 740-6563



Copy: Project File
01/10/2007 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

January 10, 2007

Eduardo Gonzales
Rick Engineering Company
1745 East River Road
Tucson, Arizona 85718

Subject: D06-0003 Village Square Development Plan

Dear Eduardo:

Your submittal of November 1, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed.

DUE TO THE CHANGE OF REZONING CONDITIONS REQUIRED, RESUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS MAY NOT BE DETERMINED AT THIS TIME. ONCE THE REZONING CONDITIONS HAVE BE CHANGED, PLEASE SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH THE CDRC MANAGER TO DETERMINE THE RESUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS.





Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179.

Sincerely,


Patricia Y. Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/
Via fax: 322-6956
760-4539 ATTEN: Gary
11/01/2006 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
11/01/2006 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
11/03/2006 GLYNDA ROTHWELL UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: TUTOR TIME DAY CARE

D06-0003



Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted for review November 1, 2006.



In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction
Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including
approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the
AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be
secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:



Tucson Electric Power
Company

Attn: Ms. Mary Boice

New Business Project
Manager

P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)

Tucson, AZ 85702

520-917-8732



Please call the area Designer, Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should
you have any questions.


Liza Castillo
Right of Way Agent
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Co.
(520) 917-8745
lcastillo@tep.com
11/15/2006 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved * Previously approved 5-25-06
11/17/2006 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
11/28/2006 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Submit a native plant preservation plan per DS 2-15.
& LUC 3.8

2) Provide response letter indicating how each of the conditions of rezoning are met with this proposal.
C9-01-19

3) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B


4) The site is required to include screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise as necessary. Show all proposed screen walls on the development plans and landscape plans. DS 2-07.2
Note the height and materials used to construct walls and document compliance with conditions of rezoning.

5) Provide screening for the commercial services land use and specific land uses such as parking areas and loading zones.

6) Landscape plans shall include a summary of plants required for mitigation and show their site location
on the landscape plans. Show the total PIP, TOS, required mitigation for each species. DS 2-15.3.4.B

7) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site
storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of
all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. The general note is not sufficient. LUC 3.7.4.3.B
Identify specific water harvesting areas on the landscape plan. Revise the landscape plan to show the extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area provided by water harvesting methods. Show the amount and disposition of flow and indicate drainage points from buildings and paved areas. DS 2-07.2.2.C

8) Revise the grading plan to show specific depressed areas including finish grades. LUC 3.7.4.3.B

9) Show required sight visibility triangles on the landscape plan. Plant materials located within SVT's should consist of ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than (30) inches. However, trees may be planted within SVT's provided that: A) The trunk caliper, at maturity, will not exceed twelve (12) inches in diameter; B) The lowest branch of any tree is at least six (6) feet above the grade of the street, and C) Trees are not planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect when viewed from an angle. LUC 3.7.2.8 & DS 2-06

10) Remove the Front yard/Street tree note from sheet 3 of the landscape plan.

11) Canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk).
Revise the landscape plan as necessary. LUC 3.7.2.3.A

12) Dimension the length and width of landscape borders on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f.
Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two (2) years from the date of planting. Revise the landscape plan to include the border coverage calculations. Plantings used to meet screening requirements are not calculated for coverage calculation. DS 2-06.3.7,
LUC 3.7.2.4.A.

13) Revise the landscape plan to include slope ratios for retention and detention basins. Basin slopes are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths are three feet or greater, no steeper than 3:1 for unprotected slopes and no steeper than 2: 1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. Revise the basins to comply. DS 10-01.4


RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED
11/30/2006 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

(third review; 1st w/new configuration) Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application (see D03-0016)

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D06-0003 Tutor Time 11/29/06

( ) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan – new configuration
() Landscape Plan
( ) Revised Plan/Plat
( ) Board of Adjustment
( ) Other – Elevations, Color Renderings

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-01-19, D03-0016

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Old Spanish Trail is a Gateway Route west of Harrison; it’s a Scenic Route east of Harrison

COMMENTS DUE BY: December 1, 2006

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments - Submitted on
() Resubmittal Required:
( ) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other – Color Elevations

REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 11/27/06

Tutor Time Day Care
D06-0003


Thank you for listing the rezoning conditions. Please provide the month and year in which the rezoning conditions were amended (see General Note #4).

Rezoning condition #16 requires that all dumpsters be at least 50 feet from residentially zoned or developed property. Please relocate the dumpster at the southwest corner of the detention/retention basin at least 50 feet away from the residentially-zoned property to the west.

On the development plan (DP), please provide a detail of the 42-inch high security barrier around the basin (see keynote 26). The barrier should be designed to have clear visibility around the entire perimeter, yet be child-proof, for safety purposes.

As per rezoning condition #17, please provide a pedestrian connection between the alley at the northwest corner of the site and the onsite pedestrian circulation system.

On the DP, please provide screen wall details that demonstrate compliance with rezoning conditions #10, 11, 12 and 34.

As per rezoning condition #26, please provide color building elevations that show compliance with rezoning conditions # 12 and 22.
11/30/2006 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: D06-0003
Tutor Time Day Care (Village Square0
Development Plan

TRANSMITTAL: 11/30/06

DUE DATE: 12/01/06

COMMENTS:

1. The review of the revised Development Plan has been stopped due to a major change in the proposed use. Please read the following for more info.

This project as submitted does not comply with the Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) approved by Mayor and Council. Glenn Moyer (Development Services Department Planning Administrator) has determined that the proposed use as depicted on the revised development plan is considered a major change of use and must be re-approved through the rezoning process. The proposed development must be reviewed by rezoning staff and change of conditions will be generated based on the new use. Be aware that Mayor and Council may include additional conditions of rezoning.

Contact Glenn Moyer for more information on the rezoning process and Patricia Gehlen on the CDRC process.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000.

TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0003dp change.doc
12/13/2006 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Denied DATE: April 26, 2006

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov



SUBJECT: D06-0003 Tutor Time Day Care: Development Plan Review(11-02-06)

Denied. Please show Old Spanish Trail Pathway on landscape plans. Rezoning condition #27 calls for minimum 15 ft vegetative buffer between paved path and development. Standards for the Old Spanish Trail Pathway landscape buffer are: The entire buffer shall be naturally landscaped with native plants indigenous to the surroundng area and shall include irrigation. Decomposed granite shall not be used as a ground cover within the buffer. Tree size should be a minimum of 15 gallon. Trees should be spaced irregularly at 20 ft -30 ft apart(25 ft average spacing). Trees should be planted a minimum of 5 ft from the edge of the path. Maintain a 2 ft. area clear of vegetation along the sides of the path. Shrub density should exceed the density of naturally-occurring undisturbed vegetation in the surrounding area. The buffer shall be hydroseeded with native plant seed. The plant list for the corridor should include, but is not limited to:

Barrel Cactus
Brittlebush
Creosote
Desert Mallow
Desert Marigold
Desert Spoon
Fairy Duster
Foothill Palo Verde
Hedgehog Cactus
Paperflower
Parry’s Penstemon
Prickly Pear
Soaptree Yucca
Triangleleaf Bursage
Velvet Mesquite
12/15/2006 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: December 15, 2006
CDRC/Zoning Manager

SUBJECT: Tutor Time, 1010 S. Harrison Rd
Development Plan D06-0003 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 15

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report.

The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Development Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP.
2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207.
3. Adhere to re-zoning conditions 3, 7, 9, 16, 17 and 27.
4. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5
5. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
6. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14.
7. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
8. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Intersection widening is required for Harrison Road. Show the widening on the plans.
9. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
10. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. Provide a barrier at the entrance to the basin.
11. Show Development plan (D006-0003) number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
12. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The enclosure should not be skewed so that parking island would interfere with the refuse vehicle backing up. A clear dist. of 50' shall be provided for the vehicle to back up in a straight line.
13. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
14. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
15. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
16. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". Show on plan the arrows directing drainage to all depressed landscaped areas.
17. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans".

Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR.
2. This review was performed for Development Plan purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be at the grading plan stage.
3. List velocities of all drainage in channels and inlets.
4. Provide a barrier at the entrance to the basin for the maintenance ramp.
5. Provide rip-rap for the entire length of the drainage openings in all instances.
6. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/1010 S. Harrison Rd CDRC Tutor Time