Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0003
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/29/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/06/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | * Enclosures requires doors. Please put them on the construction drawings. |
| 04/11/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: April 11, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Village Square, 1010 S. Harrison Rd Development Plan D06-0003 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 15 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Provide a letter from Gary Oaks indicating that the ROW, future curb locations and intersection widening will not occur. 3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. If applicable. 4. Show the pedestrian access ramps in the retention basins for maintenance purposes per S.M.D.D.F.M. 14.3.4. 5. Submit the Soils report and indicate on the plans the recommended setback from the soils report from a building or wall, in particular, the basins. 6. Re-number the sheets to include the detail sheet as part of the development plan, for example: Sheet 3 of 3. Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. Provide details of the retention basins for comparison to the DP. 3. Add the basin(s) maintenance checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. 4. Show the pedestrian access ramps in the retention basins for maintenance purposes per S.M.D.D.F.M. 14.3.4. 5. Indicate on the plans the recommended setback from the soils report from a building or wall, in particular, the basins. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax, C:/1010 S. Harrison Rd CDRC 2 |
| 04/12/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 11, 2006 To: Gary Cretcher, Cretcher Designs LLC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Northwest Corner of Harrison & Old Spanish Trail 1010 S. Harrison Road Development Plan - 2nd Submittal D06-0003 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. I understand that the capacity letter has been requested and will be emailed or faxed to our office when obtained. This project proposed to connect to the public sewerage collection system at manhole (IMS #9634-01 Plan G-73-67) which has been abandoned and removed as part of the sewer realignment project G-2005-041 (permit #55818) for development plan D05-016, the Hazen Office Building. The engineer for the Hazen project is Edwin Bruce Wilson of Landmark Engineering. The phone number of Landmark is (520) 628-1382. The next review of this project will need to show the point of connection for the 6” pipe at the recently constructed manhole #2 of sewer improvement plan G-2005-041. Sheet 1: Revise the 4th Utility Note so that it states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. Sheets 1& 2: Your plan shows the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different linetypes in the legend on Sheets 1 & 2. And add the manhole and cleanout symbols that are shown. Sheet 2: Revise the plan so that it shows: Flow arrows on each reach of public sewer pipe. Sheet 2: The PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT recording information, shown at the top of the site plan, is incorrect. Revise the plan so that it shows: The recording information for the new public sewer easement and any vacated or released public sewer easements that are adjacent to and affecting the construction of this project is provided. This information is available from Landmark, the PC Recorders office and our office under file G-2005-041. Sheet 2: The proposed private sewer seams to terminate into what appears to be a cleanout. Revise the site plan so that: Cleanouts are identified and rim and invert elevations provided and Building Connection Sewers are labeled or identified with the initials BCS. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third (3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 04/13/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Clarify the locations of existing landscaping in adjacent right-of-way areas by showing individual plants or by delineating groups of plantings. The "landscaped by City call-out" may be confused with landscaping required by rezoning condition 27 without the clarification. 2) Revise the landscape plan to correct vegetative coverage calculations for the street landscape borders. The 50% coverage calculation is to only include groundcovers, shrubs, and accent plants. Trees, plants located outside of the 10' buffer, and plants located in adjacent right-of-way areas are not included. Revise as necessary. 3) Identify and note the height of any walls required to screen loading areas on the landscape plan. LUC 3.7.2-I A 6' screen wall is required for the loading area on the west side of the site. 4) Revise the landscape plan to show the locations of individual plants, rather than groups, and the minimum container size for new plantings. Trees must be a minimum of 15 g. size. Use symbols that approximate the ultimate size of each groundcover plant. DS 2-07.2.2.A 5) Revise keynote 12 on sheet 2 of the development plan to refer to the correct detail and sheet number. 6) Revise the landscape plan to include a summary of the native plant preservation requirements and identify the PIP"s and transplants on the planting plan. DS 2-15.3.4.B 7) Identify the species for the yucca proposed for use on the site. Plants located in sight visibility triangles should grow no more than about 30" in height. DS 2-06.3.8.G 8) Protected plant #36 may be impacted due to the installation of lighting and paving activities. In order to qualify as preserved-in place the root zone of the tree should remain undisturbed. DS 2-15.6.0, DS 2-06.2.2.J Revise the plans as necessary and note the requirement for grading limits and fencing for preserved plants. |
| 04/21/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/26/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: April 26, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D06-0003 Village Square: Development Plan Review(3-30-06) Approved. |
| 05/03/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D06-0003 Village Square Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 05/03/06 DUE DATE: 3-30-06 COMMENTS: 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. For clarity purposes, renumber all sheets to include the rezoning conditions page, detail page, and elevation page. (1of 5, 2 of 5, 3 of 5, etc.) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0003dp.doc |
| 05/06/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 6, 2006 Gary Cretcher Cretcher Designs LLC 12031 East Quesada Place Tucson, Arizona 85749 Subject: D06-0003 Village Square Development Plan Dear Gary: Your submittal of March 30, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed. The resubmittal requirements listed below include the review agencies needed to review the proposed relocation of one of the outdoor patio areas. Please include a detailed letter explaining the proposed revisions to the plans. ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Environmental Services, Wastewater, Community Planning, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape and NPPO Plans (Community Planning, Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 760-4539 |