Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D06-0003
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/19/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/20/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved January 20, 2006. |
| 01/26/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Menium dumpster enclosure 14' x 40' clear area is in conflict with curb to the south. Service trucks cannot enter or leave the clear area with out affecting the curb. Recommend that the enclosure be at a 30 degree angle to the PAAL. * No detail shown that shows the size, rear and side wall protection, and the enclosures doors. |
| 01/27/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D06-0003 CRETCHER DESIGN LLC VILLAGE SQUARE ********************************************************************* Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. ********************************************************************* |
| 01/30/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D06-0003 VILLAGE SQUARE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 1/30/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project with the following conditions: NOTE: Correct TWN 14.0, RANGE 15.0 to TWN 14S RANGE 15E (Location Map) on mylar. 2.) Correct Tax Code 134 05 118P to 134-05-118Q on mylar. 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 02/10/2006 | RICHARD WILLIAMSON | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Conditioned upon meeting Tucson Water requirements for water service. |
| 02/15/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org D06-0003 Village Square 2/9/2006 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Widen to 4 lanes, divided Harrison (Old Spanish Trail to Magdalena) Yes 2006 8,319 22,160 2 44,320 9,552 4 876 Route 7, 30 min, 500 feet; 180 Express, 2 am, 2 pm trips, 500 feet Planned improvement Old Spanish Trail (Harrison to Brown) 0 16,605 22,160 2 27,240 22,160 2 Route 7, 30 min, 500 feet; 180 Express, 2 am, 2 pm trips, Shared use path and bike route with striped shoulder |
| 02/16/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: March 20, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Village Square, 1010 S. Harrison Rd Development Plan D06-0003 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 15 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 4. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 5. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 6. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 7. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 8. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 9. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 10. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 11. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP/DP. 12. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 13. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. 14. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 15. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 16. Show Development plan (D006-0003) number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 17. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 18. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address. 19. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 20. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 21. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 22. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 23. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 24. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Development Plan purposes only. Final review and acceptance will done at the grading plan stage. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/1010 S. Harrison Rd CDRC |
| 02/16/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Include a legend on the landscape plan for any keynotes used. DS 2-07.2.0 2) Basin slopes are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths exceed three feet, 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. Up to 35% of the basin perimeter may be constructed with structural materials, such as retaining walls. Revise the development plan and landscape plan as necessary to comply. DS 10-01.4 3) Revise the landscape plan to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 27. The trail and all landscaping is required to be complete prior to occupancy. C9-01-09 4) Revise the landscape plan to include the following required calculations: A) Length and width of landscape borders and number of canopy trees per length. B) Square footage of all landscaped borders and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage. 50% coverage is required. 5) Indicate the reference points for measurement of the required screen walls. All walls must meet the required height as measured from the finished grade at development side of the wall. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3, DS 2-06.3.7.A 6) Identify and note the height of any walls required to screen loading areas and refuse storage areas on the landscape plan. LUC 3.7.2-I 7) Revise the landscape/development plan to comply with rezoning condition 34. C9-01-09 8) Submit an irrigation plan. LUC 3.7.4.5.C |
| 02/17/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 02/17/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN (Second Review) Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application (see D03-0016) CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D06-0003 Village Square 02/16/06 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other – Elevations, Color Renderings CROSS REFERENCE: C9-01-19, D03-0016 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Old Spanish Trail is a Gateway Route west of Harrison; it’s a Scenic Route east of Harrison COMMENTS DUE BY: February 16, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments - Submitted on 5/7/03 () No Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 2/10/06 |
| 02/21/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: VILLAGE SQUARE D06-0003 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted January 19, 2006. Attached is a pdf file of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. There may be a conflict with an existing anchor and the proposed drainage. All costs associated with the relocation of facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Nancy DiMaria Design/Build - DB 102 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. (The attached map is meant for general information use only, and does not necessarily depict the exact location or nature of any TEP facilities) Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 02/27/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 23, 2006 TO: Gary Gretcher Gretcher Designs LLC THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Northwest Corner of Harrison & Old Spanish Trail Development Plan – 1st Submittal D06-003 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D06-0003, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. The project indicates that there are five sheets, however only two sheets have been provided. If only two sheets are going to be supplied, please indicate so in the plans for accuracy purposes. SHEET 1. Revise the general note as shown below and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET 1. The following note is repeated, please only show it once. ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAYS, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. SHEET 1. The following note is repeated, please only show it once. A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. SHEET 2. The label for the existing public sewer easement should point to its boundaries, not to the sewer line. Revise as necessary and mention in the label the width of the easement in feet. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 02/27/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. While SVTs are shown, their size is not indicated except for pedestrian SVTs. The only location on this site where a pedestrian SVT is appropriate is the far side egress at Harrison. Stem leg for remaining SVTs is incorrectly placed. See DS 3-01.5.0 and DS 3-01.0 figures 16, 17 for guidance. 2. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) There is no recordation data for either street abutting this project. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/06/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approv-Cond | DATE: March 3, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D06-0003 Village Square: Development Plan Review Conditionally approved provided a native species of tree is used in place of Shoestring Acacia along Old Spanish Trail. |
| 03/15/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D06-0003 Village Square Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 03/15/06 DUE DATE: 02/16/06 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 02/15/07. 2. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 This project has been assigned the case number D06-0003. List the case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including the Landscape and NPPO sheets. 3. DS 2-05.2.1.D A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. 1. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. 2. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses. 3. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 4. DS 2-05.2.1.H The north arrow, contour interval, and scale should be placed together on each sheet, preferably in the upper right corner of the plat. 5. DS 2-05.2.1.K Applicable rezoning case number should be listed in the lower right corner, next to the title block. DS 2-05.2.4.U List all of the rezoning conditions on the plan. Provide a written response indicating how each of the rezoning conditions have been meet. 6. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 The uses listed do not match uses as listed in the LUC. The uses should be listed as "General Merchandise Sales "28 subject to: 3.5.9.2.C, Administrative and Professional Office "29", and Food Services "28" subject to: 3.5.4.6.A & .C." 7. Ds 2-02.2.2.B.10 In the note for overlay zones include the Sec. #. "Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone," and "Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone." 8. DS 2-05.2.3.B If applicable, All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.B Along the north property line the zoning of the adjacent properties is two different zones (C1 and R1). Clearly indicate where the dividing line is located along the north property line. The location of the zoning boundaries can be obtained from Harold Schwartz here at DSD at 791-5550 ext. 1162. 10. DS 2-05.2.3.C This project appears to be a phased project. Clearly indicate with heavier line weight the area to be phased. As indicated the phased area includes sidewalks, crosswalks, vehicular use areas, etc. If just the building is to be built at a later time clearly indicate how the rest of the site will work in matters of pedestrian circulation, bicycle parking, vehicular use, handicap accessibility, etc. 11. DS 2-05.2.3.F Clearly indicate the location of the future curb for both Old Spanish Trail and Harrison Road. Provide a dimension from the property line to the future curb If further widening of Old Spanish Trail is not to be completed and the multi use trail and curb indicated are to remain in lieu of future curb and sidewalk provide written verification from Gary Oaks of the Department Urban Planning and Design. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.I All applicable building setback lines, including sight visibility triangles (existing and future), will be shown. On zoning setbacks, if the building is proposed for location at a greater distance from the property line than the required setback, show only the dimension of the distance between the building and the property line. If the setback's point of measurement is not the property line, include the distance from the property line to the point of measurement. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.K Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. Clearly indicate the minimum required width of 4' for all sidewalks. Clearly indicate all cross walks as 4' wide striped walkways. Handicap ramps are missing at the crosswalks located in the northwest corner of the property and at the apparent cross walks near the entrance from Old Spanish Trail. The handicap ramp located near the detention basin should be located at the front of the access aisle not at the rear in the vehicular use area. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.N On the drawings provide the dimensions for all building foot prints. 15. DS 2-05.2.4.O Show all loading zones, fully dimensioned, and provide, as a note, the number of loading spaces required and the number provided. The loading zone located at the northwest corner of the west building must be clearly delineated by line weight. Indicate also vehicular maneuverability for in and out at this loading zone. See LUC Sec. 3.4.5 for the required number of loading zones. Based on the number and square footage of the structures 3 loading zones are required. See LUC Sec. 3.4.4.1.B.1, &.2 for location requirements. Based on the changes made to the loading zones and locations further comments may be forth coming. 16. DS 2-05.2.4.P In the parking calculations on page 1 of 5 clearly indicate how this project meets the requirements of a shopping center. The minimum requirement is square footage under 50,000 square feet with more than 50% of the square footage used for retail use. Indicate how many square feet are used for each use. The calculations on page one indicate 7 handicap parking spaces provided with 6 being van accessible. The plan indicates 8 handicap spaces provided. Clearly indicate which spaces are van accessible and which are not. Provide a detail of the handicap space and access aisle that is not van accessible. Provide as a detail the required handicap parking signage as well as the location of this signage. Provide wheel stops at the handicap parking spaces to prevent vehicles from overhanging the handicap ramps. The detail provided does not match the type of ramp indicated on the plan. 17. DS 2-05.Q Provide the location of directional signage for the location of the class 1 bicycle parking spaces. They must be visible from both streets or provide directional signage. 18. DS 2-05.2.4.V Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 19. DS 2-05.2.4.W The indicated monument sign appears to be located in the future sight visibility triangle which is not allowed. Depending on response from Gary Oaks and the location of future sight visibility triangles this comment may not apply. See engineering comments. 20. Provide a detail of the outdoor pole lighting indicating compliance with rezoning condition #15. (max. 20' in height) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D06-0003dp.doc |
| 03/20/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 20, 2006 Gary Cretcher Cretcher Designs LLC 12031 East Quesada Place Tucson, Arizona 85749 Subject: D06-0004 Rita Ranch Commerce Center Lot #36 Development Plan Dear Gary: Your submittal of January 19, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Environmental Services, Parks and Recreation, Wastewater, Traffic, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape and NPPO Plans (Parks and Recreation, Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 760-4539 |