Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0048
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/21/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/03/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | *Project improvement is greater than 25%. DS requires full service compliance. If the building stands by itself where full service compliance is not required then separate refuse service should be designed for the new building. * Ltr. sent to BT Design Group requesting clarification. |
| 10/04/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | October 4, 2006 TO: John Taylor BT Design Group THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: R S Engineering (Contract Reviewer) Chandubhai Patel, P.E. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: ANEWCO ( New Warehouse Building ) Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D05-048 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as received by us on September 19, 2006. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval to Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality active permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating, or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any question regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Chandubhai Patel, P.E. Telephone: (520) 740-6563 Copy: Project File |
| 10/13/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0048 NEW WAREHOUSE BLDG FOR ANEWCO/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 10/13/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Approved with the following condition: 1.) Delete “Road” from Research Loop Road (sheet 2) on mylar. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 10/16/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Trees may be planted within SVT's provided that: The lowest branch of any tree must be at least six (6) feet above the grade of the street. provide specifications for trees in the SVT's. LUC 3.7.2.8 & DS 2-06 2) The Landscape plan submitted for permitting shall include irrigation design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. No permits will be issued unless the required plan is submitted and approved. 3) Add the development plan case number (D05-048) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the Landscape Plan. DS 2-03.2.2.B.1 4) Add the previous development plan case number (D99-005) to the reference numbers listed in the lower right hand corner of the landscape plan. Remove the incorrect reference number "CD95-85-95B" . 5) The approved development plan (D99-005) indicates an interior landscape border to be constructed adjacent to Pantano Wash. Revise landscape plan to show the landscape border as approved. 6) The Pantano Wash drainageway as determined by the City Engineer shall include the channel, the channel improvements, and a fifty-foot-wide area measured outward from the front face of the top of the bank protection, for the city or for county flood control district uses per TCC Sec. 26-8.f.1. Typical uses include river park improvements requested by the City and County Natural Resource and Parks departments. 7) A 5' high masonry screen wall is required to screen the site from the Pantano River Park. LUC Table 3.7.2-I |
| 10/17/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D05-0048 1677 S. Research Loop New Warehouse Building Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 10/16/06 DUE DATE: 10/19/06 COMMENTS: 1. Regarding comment #7 from the first review. After discussion with staff and the zoning administrator the requested pedestrian refuge between the loading zones and the east side of the existing building will not be required. Therefore the DSMR will not be required to be applied for. Please remove from plan references to a DSMR. 2. DS 2-05.2.4.K Zoning acknowledges your response regarding the sidewalks being flush with the pavement thus not requiring handicap ramps. Clearly indicate on the plans and details the location of the required truncated domes. When the sidewalk is flush with pavement adjacent to vehicular use areas (parking spaces) a strip of 24" in depth truncated domes will be required the entire length of the sidewalk. Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps (or sidewalks) where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. All truncated domes are to be a minimum 24" in depth. The reviewer missed the following item on the first review. The cross walk located near the southwest corner of the property is crossing behind a parking space. Relocation of the crosswalk to connect with the handicap access aisle will provide a much safer pedestrian path. 3. DS 2-05.2.4.Q The number of bicycle parking spaces indicated on the plan and in the calculations does not meet the requirements of LUC Sec. 3.3.3.5 and Secc. 3. The number of required bicycle parking spaces is based upon the number of provided vehicular parking spaces not the required number for each use. Therefore the number of bicycle parking spaces is 8% of 59 provided parking spaces for a total of 5. Class 1 being 90% of the required 5 spaces is 4.5 rounded up to 5 being required. Class 2 being 10% of the required 5 spaces is .5 rounded up to 1 being required. Provide revisions to the plan and calculations. Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. 4. DS 2-05.2.4.W If applicable, indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Provide a detail of the required handicap parking signage. A copy of the verbiage for the sign can be obtained here at DSD. The minimum distance from grade to the bottom of the sign is 7'-0". 5. Depending on responses to comments and changes to this plan further comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D05-0048-2dp.doc |
| 10/19/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: October 19, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D05-0048 New Warehouse Bldg for ANEWCO: Development Plan(9-21-06) Denied. Dedication of a corridor for future development of the Pantano River Park is required. See City of Tucson Code Sec. 26-8.f.1. Please contact Parks and Recreation to schedule a meeting to discuss the dedication. |
| 10/26/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: BT Design Group DATE: October 18, 2006 Architects 4268 W. Puracantha Drive Tucson, Arizona 85741 SUBJECT: 1677 S. Research Loop Site Development Plan D05-0048 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 21 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. As per your response letter, "we believe we are under no obligations to provide it (Site plan specs.), and have so stated", there will be required submittal for the site plan when the development plan is approved. Hence, it is advised to address the site plan comments at the development stage in order to avoid a submittal of the site plan when it is reviewed. Please take this comment for you consideration. 3. The Development Plan Standards includes all items from the "Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, therefore the comment concerning sidewalk scuppers and calculations still applies. 4. Per the Parks and Recreations request for a lineal park along the Pantano Wash; The Pantano Wash drainageway as determined by the City Engineer "shall include the channel, the channel improvements, and a fifty-foot-wide area measured outward from the front face of the top of the bank protection, for the city or for county flood control district uses" per TCC Sec. 26-8.f.1. Typical uses include river park improvements requested by the City and County Natural Resource and Parks departments. 5. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. This comment is meant to avoid any confusion the contractor may have when they apply for the grading permit and learn that a grading plan was never submitted. This is the reason we don't want the "contractor" to deal with the cut and fill a permit time. The grading plan should submitted and designed be a qualified person or company prior to the contractor seeking a grading permit. A separate grading permit will be required. 6. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 7. Complete the Development plan number (D05-0048) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. The elevation was listed, but list which datum was used. 8. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Provide a letter from John Clark at Environmental Services @791-5543 x1136, pertaining to the circulation of the service vehicle due to the proposed gates and the number of dumpsters provided. Show a detail of the refuse enclosure per the Cond-approval from John Clark. 9. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. This is where the material indications are called out i.e.: 2"AC over 4"ABC. 10. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4 and 2-08.5.1.E. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. Per previous comment 11. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". Per previous comment. 12. Due to the proximity of the Pantano Wash, an Erosion and Sediment control plan will be required. This requirement has been made by the discretion of the City of Tucson engineer. Per previous comment. Drainage Report: 1. The request for the retention waiver has been granted. 2. The DR has accepted by engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/1677 S. Research Loop Site2 |
| 10/27/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 27, 2006 John R. Taylor BT Design Group 4268 West Pyracantha Drive Tucson, Arizona 85741 Subject: D05-0048 New Warehouse Building for Anewco Products Development Plan Dear John: Your submittal of Septemer 21, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Environmental Services, Landscape, Parks and Recreation, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Parks and Recreation, Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 546-0250 |