Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D05-0048
Parcel: 13507463C

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D05-0048
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/04/2006 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approv-Cond The Development Plan is approved with the condition the the new structure be provided with fire sprinklers as noted on plan. Emergency ingress devices (lock boxes) will be required for gates installed across fire access roadway.
01/10/2006 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
D05-0048
BT DESIGN GROUP
NEW WAREHOUSE BLDG FOR ANEWCO
*********************************************************************
Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission
and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies)
named above and may contain confidential/privileged information.
Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus
attachments.
*********************************************************************
01/13/2006 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D05-0048 NEW WAREHOUSE BLDG FOR ANEWCO/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: 01/11/06



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

Label numeric section numbers at section corners on Location Map.

Delete “Road” from Research Loop Road (sheets 1 and 2).

Correct “Northeast ¼ of section 21” to “Northwest ¼ of section 21” in Legal Description.








es
01/19/2006 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D05-0048 New Warehouse Bldg for Anewco 01/18/06

() Tentative Plat
(XXXX) Development Plan
(XXXX) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-85-95 - Annexation

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: 1/31/06

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
(XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
() Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 1/17/06
01/23/2006 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved Estimated daily traffic in 24 hr period - 89
01/30/2006 PMCLAUG1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Add a calculation of percent building area expansion and percent vehicle use area expansion. On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is ten thousand (10,000) square feet or less, expansions in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows:

If the expansion is less than 50%, the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B

If the expansion is 50% or greater, or if expansions as of February 15, 1991 cumulatively result in a 50% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site per LUC 3.7.1.2.B. If this is the case, detail existing landscaping in the area of adjacent to the existing manufacturing building. Additional comments may apply.

2. Dimension the width of the proposed street landscape border along Research Loop. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress.

3. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and provide a calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4

4. Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material must be listed. It is not clear from the abbreviations given what types of plants are proposed. For clarity provide a legend with names and with plant symbols to match those on the landscape plan.
Plants located within SVT's should consist of ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than (30) inches. However, trees may be planted within SVT's provided that: A) The trunk caliper, at maturity, will not exceed twelve (12) inches in diameter; B) The lowest branch of any tree is at least six (6) feet above the grade of the street, and C) Trees are not planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect when viewed from an angle. LUC 3.7.2.8 & DS 2-06

5. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation

6. Add the development plan case number (D05-048) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan and NPPO Plan.
DS 2-03.2.2.B.1

7. Refer to DS 2-07.2.2 and DS 2-06.5.4 for the specific content required in the following elements of the landscape plan: Maintenance Schedule, Grading Information, Irrigation Plan, Construction Details. Revise landscape plan to include required content and specifications. Grading information on the landscape plan shall include contour lines, spot elevations, percent slope across the site and direction of slope of paved areas, existing grades on adjacent rights-of-way and adjacent sites, and the methods by which water harvesting/ storm runoff is used to benefit planting areas on the site. DS 2-07.0, LUC 3.7.4.3.B

8. All lettering and dimensions must be a minimum of 12 point (0.12") in size for microfilming purposes. Revise all text within the location map to on sheet L-1 to meet this minimum archiving standard.
DS2-03.2.1.C

9. Some of the text which labels the whitethorn acacia near the east corner of the site is struck with other text making it difficult to read. Revise for legibility.

10. Add the previous development plan case number (D99-005) to the reference numbers listed in the lower right hand corner of the development plan and landscape plan. Revise reference number "CD95-85-95B" to read "CD9-85-95B".

11. The approved development plan (D99-005) indicates an interior landscape border to be constructed adjacent to Pantano Wash. Revise landscape plan to show the landscape border as approved.
01/30/2006 RICHARD WILLIAMSON TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approv-Cond Conditioned upon meeting Tucson Water requirements for water service.
01/30/2006 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approv-Cond * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development.
* Plans show an existing enclosure at the NE corner of the project. Enclosure has a 10' by 10' inside dimension with no doors or sidewall protection. If site is susposed to be brought up to todays standard then the enclosure requires modifications.
* No mention of recycling or an enclosure shown for recycling.
* Access to shown enclosure mets the standards.
02/01/2006 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No comment
02/01/2006 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: BT Design Group DATE: January 30, 2006
Architects
4268 W. Puracantha Drive
Tucson, Arizona 85741

SUBJECT: 1677 S. Research Loop Site
Development Plan D05-0048 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 21

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan.

The Site Plan (SP) and Hydrology Report (HR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP.
2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207.
3. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5. Bearings are not correct per plat. Revise as required.
4. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11.
5. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12.
6. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14.
7. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15.
8. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
9. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. A separate grading permit may be required.
10. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. The ½ r/w for Research Loop Rd. is not 19.17' wide per the recorded plaise as required.
11. Sidewalks, curbs and wheelchair ramps are required where applicable per D.S. 3-01.3.0 and installed with "Detectable Warnings" per ADAAG.
12. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
13. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
14. Complete the Development plan number (D05-0048) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
15. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Provide a letter from John Clark at Environmental Services @791-5543 x1136, pertaining to the circulation of the service vehicle due to the proposed gates and the number of dumpsters provided.
16. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
17. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
18. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
19. List the consulting engineer on the plans with the pertinent information.
20. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
21. Due to the proximity of the Pantano Wash, an Erosion and Sediment control plan will be required.

Drainage Report:
1. The request for the retention waiver has been granted.
2. The DR has accepted by engineering.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/1677 S. Research Loop Site
02/01/2006 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: NEW WAREHOUSE BLDG FOR ANEWCO

D05-0048



Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted January 3, 2006.



Enclosed is a copy of a TEP construction drawing showing the approximate
location of existing 4" duct which appears to be in conflict. The
developer can send in a written request for relocation of the duct and
release of easement. A new easement is required and to be secured by
separate instrument.



Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and
electrical load plans to determine if new facilities are necessary.

Liza Castillo
Right of Way Agent
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Co.
(520) 917-8745
lcastillo@tep.com
02/02/2006 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP.

D. Dale Kelch, PE
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
02/21/2006 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied February 20, 2006

TO: John Taylor
BT Design Group

THRU: Patricia Gehlen
City of Tucson, Development Services Department

FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Pima County Development Services Department
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: ANEWCO
Development Plan – 1st Submittal
D05-048


The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf.

ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D05-0048, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.

Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates.

SHEET 1. Revise General Note 12 as shown below and fill in the blanks appropriately.

THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E).

SHEET 1. Unless there actually are existing public sewers and existing public sewer easements within the proposed project boundaries, revise General Note 10 to read

ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS.

SHEET 1. Unless there are existing public sewer easements within the project boundaries, delete General Notes 14 and 15.

SHEET 1. Add the following General Note

MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER.

SHEET 1. Show the length, size and slope of the proposed private sewer.

SHEET 1. Show the six-digit Pima County manhole number for the existing public manhole closest to the point of connection between the private sewer and the existing public sewer.

We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.


If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely,





Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Telephone: (520) 740-6947

Copy: Project
02/21/2006 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Denied DATE: February 17, 2006

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov



SUBJECT: D05-0048 New Warehouse Bldg for ANEWCO: Development Plan

Please contact Glenn Hicks to arrange a meeting with the city and county parks departments to discuss the project’s relationship to the planned Pantano River Park.
02/22/2006 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: D05-0048
1677 S. Research Loop
New Warehouse Building
Development Plan

TRANSMITTAL: 02/22/06

DUE DATE: 01/31/06

COMMENTS:

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 01/30/07.

2. DS 2-05.2.1.C All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that all lettering is legible when reviewed and will maintain that legibility when reproduced and photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record-keeping purposes.

3. DS 2-05.2.1.D A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information.
1. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area.
2. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses.
3. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

The indicated location map is for the wrong township, range and section. Label all major streets and watercourses.

4. DS 2-05.2.1.H The north arrow and scale should be placed together on each sheet, preferably in the upper right corner of the plat.

5. DS 2-05.2.2.A.1 List the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the primary property owner of the site and developer of the project.

6. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 This project has been assigned the case number D05-0048. List the case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including the Landscape and NPPO sheets.

7. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Clearly indicate the widths of the PAAL between the two structures. The indicated asphalt ramps are not allowed to be within the required PAAL area.

For your information, a sidewalk is not required along the west side of the new building. A 5' paved/striped pedestrian refuge area is all that is required per DS 2-08.3.1. (Portions of certain Land Use Classes which by their nature will not be used for public pedestrian access, such as industrial uses, commercial storage uses, wholesale uses, contractor's yards, or similar uses, are not required to have sidewalks constructed in conformance with this Standard, as long as adequate pedestrian refuge areas are provided). If the pedestrian refuge area is provided then the indicated ramps may not be required.

A 5' pedestrian refuge will also be required between the loading zones and the existing building. For your information, it would be possible to make the vehicular use area into a one-way PAAL which would require a smaller width allowing the addition of the pedestrian refuge.

Clearly indicate the direction of all one-way PAALs.

8. DS 2-05.2.4.K Handicap ramps are required to connect both handicap parking access aisles to the sidewalk. A handicap ramp is required to connect from the south end of the crosswalk to the sidewalk at the front of the property. At the southwest corner of the proposed building a handicap ramp is required to connect the sidewalk to the crosswalk.

Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area.

9. DS 2-05.2.4.N Label the heights of existing and proposed buildings.

10. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage.
When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0.

Per LUC Sec 3.3.3.5 Bicycle Parking Requirements. The number of required bicycle parking spaces is calculated as a percentage of the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces provided. If the calculated number of required bicycle parking spaces is less than two (2), the minimum number of required spaces is two (2). For an explanation of Class 1 and Class 2 bicycle parking spaces, see Development Standard 2-09.0 and Sec. 6.2.3.

11. DS 2-05.2.4.W If applicable, indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met.

12. Depending on responses to comments and changes to this plan further comments may be forth coming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000.

TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D05-0048dp.doc
02/24/2006 MARILYN KALTHOFF START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/02/2006 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

March 2, 2006

John R. Taylor
BT Design Group
4268 West Pyracantha Drive
Tucson, Arizona 85741

Subject: D05-0048 New Warehouse Building for Anewco Products Development Plan

Dear John:

Your submittal of January 03-2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED

8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Environmental Services, Landscape, Parks and Recreation, Zoning, Engineering, Wastewater, DSD)

5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Parks and Recreation, Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD)









Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179.

Sincerely,


Patricia Y. Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/


Via fax: 546-0250