Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0045
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/20/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Please submit a revised landscape plan and include a copy of any correspondence from the City Engineer. corrections based on the following comments form the previous review could not be verified, no landscape plans were received. 1) Revise the landscape plans to locate canopy trees within the street landscape border. The trees are required to be planted on the property or in portions of the right-of-way approved by the City Engineer for code required landscaping. LUC 3.7.2.4 2) Fences or walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. LUC 3.7.3.2 Revise the plans to locate any screen walls behind or at the back of the street landscape border. The proposed locations are accepatble only if the City Engineer grants approval of use of the public right-of-way for landscaping. 3) Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. 4) Vegetation or structures higher than thirty (30) inches that interfere must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle (svt). Plant materials located within SVT's should consist of ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than (30) inches. None of the shrubs proposed in the Ajo Way landscape border are acceptable in the sight visibility triangle due to size. Revise the planting plan for Ajo Way and Pandora Avenue. LUC 3.7.2.8 |
| 03/23/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/28/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/30/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 30, 2007 Chris Brozek Christopher Brozek, AICP, PE 1212 North Sawtelle Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85716 Subject: D05-0045 Struble-Ajo Way Development Plan Dear Chris: Your submittal of February 28, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 2 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Landscape, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 326-4280 |