Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0045
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill within 1000 feet of this development. * No front doors and side wall protection. Per Development standards 6-01.4.2, refuse enclosure 10' x 10' clear area between the steel pipe wall protection (Side walls and the rear wall and the front doors. * Access is OK for service. |
| 01/06/2006 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D05-0045 STRUBLE - AJO WAY ********************************************************************* Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. ********************************************************************* |
| 01/13/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0045 Struble – Ajo Way 01/19/06 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (NPPO Exception) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-81-63, C9-98-38 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Ajo Way (Gateway) COMMENTS DUE BY: January 19, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 1/13/2006 |
| 01/17/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) If a new development is using an existing screen on an adjacent property to meet screening requirements, a copy of the recorded covenant locating the existing screen(s) on adjacent property is required. DS 2-04.2.1.A.15 2) Fences or walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. LUC 3.7.3.2 Revise the plans to locate any screen walls behind the street landscape border. 3) Dimension the MS&R right-of-way on the development and landscape plans. The street landscape border is measured from the this right-of-way line. LUC 3.7.2.4 4) Screening is required for the loading area along Pandora Avenue. The height of the required screen is six feet per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 5) The plans include revisions to the parking layout and to wall locations for the existing development in the eastern portion of the site. Revise the landscape plan to provide all required content per DS 2-07.0 for the entire site. 6) The required screen height along Pandora Avenue is 5 feet per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise as necessary. 7) Vegetation or structures higher than thirty (30) inches that interfere must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle (svt). Show the svt based on the MS&R right-of-way on the development plan and landscape plans. 8) Note the scale of the landscape plan. DS 2-05..2.1.B 9) Revise the landscape plan to include the grading information required in DS 2-07.2.2B. 10) Dimension the length and width of landscape borders on the landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f. 11) An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. Dimension/revise the planters north of Building 3. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c 12) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B 13) Provide details or specifications for the proposed walls. Per conditions of rezoning walls are required to be constructed with decorative materials and include graffiti resistant materials or finishes. |
| 01/18/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: STRUBLE - AJO WAY D05-0045 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted for review December 20, 2005. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 01/19/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Estimated daily traffic in 24 hr period - 495 |
| 01/19/2006 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 19, 2006 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Struble - Ajo Way Development Plan D05-0045 (First Review) T14S, R13E, Section 35 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, Revised Drainage Report, Soils Report. GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 2. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Development Standard 11-01.4.1.C. 3. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be submitted with the grading plan and permit application. Submit a completed Construction SWPPP Checklist with the SWPPP. The checklist is available from the ADEQ stormwater web site. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 3. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve point (0.12 inch) or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that all lettering is legible when reviewed and will maintain that legibility when reproduced microfilmed for record-keeping purposes. Revise the Development Plan so all lettering and dimensions are 12 point or larger. DS 2-05.2.1.C 4. Show and label the ROW with the following information: future width, recordation data and MS&R designation. Show the location of the future sidewalks. DS 2-05.2.3.G. 5. Specify that truncated domes will be provided at all access ramps and any locations where pedestrian areas meet vehicle use areas and there is no vertical separation. 6. 18. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10-yr. event. Add a note on the plan, "All roof down spouts on all structures must be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." Show location of all sidewalk scuppers. DS 2-08.4.1.E DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 7. The drainage report is accepted for the development plan review. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 01/19/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Legal description and sketch for the right of way dedications, to include the area that is granted as a right of way easement to ADOT and the spandrel shown in key note 17. As always please include a title report dated within 30 days. |
| 01/30/2006 | RICHARD WILLIAMSON | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Conditioned upon meeting Tucson Water requirements for water service. |
| 01/31/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. Also, show the near side SVT at the access from Pandora. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/02/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: February 2, 2006 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D05-0045 Struble – Ajo Way: Development Plan Staff has no comments. |
| 02/03/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D05-0045 Struble - Ajo way Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 02/03/06 DUE DATE: 1/19/06 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 1/18/07. 2. DS 2-05.2.1.C All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that all lettering is legible when reviewed and will maintain that legibility when reproduced and photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record-keeping purposes. 3. DS 2-05.2.2.A.1 List the name, address, and telephone numbers of the developer of the project. 4. DS 2-05.2.2.B.1 List as a general note: "Existing zoning is C2 and R1." 5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 This development plan has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is C-2." 6. DS 2-05.2.2.3 List the existing and proposed uses and subject to sections as per the Land Use Code section 2.5.4. General Merchandise Sales "31" subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2 and Automotive Minor Service and Repair "30" Subject to: Sec. 3.5.13.5 7. DS 2-05.2.2.10 Add a note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone 8. DS 2-05.2.2.11 List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.A As per the County Assessors records this development has two parcel numbers indicating two separate properties. Clearly indicate the location of the interior lot line. If the two parcels are to remain a cross parking and cross vehicular and pedestrian access agreement must be provided. If the lots will be combined provide recording documentation of the lot combination. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Clearly indicate by dimensions the required 24' width of all PAALs. Clearly dimension the backup spur located in the southeast corner of the development. Minimum 3' radius with 3' clear space behind the backup spur and a clear width of 24'. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.E Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. This development plan has been prepared in conjunction with the required condition of approval of the review process for rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan are required by this process. The indicated 45' ADOT easement is not the same as a dedication of right of way to the City of Tucson. Contact Jim Rossi with the City of Tucson Real Estate Division for procedures on right of way dedication. Clearly indicate on the plan the area to be dedicated to the City of Tucson as well as recordation information. Clearly indicate the new property line along the northern border of this site. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.F Clearly indicate, with dimensions, the future MS&R right of way lines, future sidewalk, future sight visibility triangles and future curb location along Ajo Way. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.I All applicable building setback lines will be shown. On zoning setbacks, if the building is proposed for location at a greater distance from the property line than the required setback, show only the dimension of the distance between the building and the property line. If the setback's point of measurement is not the property line, include the distance from the property line to the point of measurement. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.K Clearly indicate the location of all handicap ramps. Provide a detail of a typical handicap ramp, showing width, slope, truncated domes, etc. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. At the southeast corner of the proposed building does the sidewalk stop or does it continue around the east side of the building? Please clarify. 15. DS 2-05.2.4.M Provide, as a note, the square footage of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed. The indicated square footage for the existing convenience store does not match the square footage indicated in the parking calculations. Provide a copy of the last stamped and approved development plan in order that the reviewer can complete this review. 16. DS 2-05.2.4.N On the drawing, label the heights and dimensions of all structures. Provide as a note the maximum allowed height and the proposed height of the structure. 17. DS 2-05.2.4.O For your information the indicated loading zone is larger than what is required. See LUC Sec. 3.4.5. Clearly indicate the maneuverability for vehicles in and out of the loading zone. Please note that Pandora Avenue is a residential street and as per LUC Sec. 3.4.4.2.A it may not be used as an access for maneuvering of a delivery vehichle into or out of a loading zone. 18. DS 2-05.2.4.P The parking spaces located along the north side of the proposed structure next to the apparent tree wells may not meet the requirements of a parking space. Provide a typical detail of this type of parking space showing how it meets the minimum requirements for width and length for a parking space. The parking spaces along the west side of the structure has a key note indicating 9 parking spaces and only 8 are graphically shown. Please clarify. 19. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Provide a detail on the drawing showing , off-street bicycle parking, materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. 20. DS 2-05.2.4.U Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning. See comment #11 regarding dedication of right of way. Please respond to all rezoning conditions for C9-98-38 numbers 1 thru 7. 21. DS 2-05.2.4.V Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 22. DS 2-05.2.4.W IF applicable, indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D05-0045dp.doc |
| 02/06/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 5, 2006 TO: Chris Brozek Christopher Brozek, AICP, PE THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Struble – Ajo Way Development Plan – 1st Submittal D05-045 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D05-0045, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed private sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard sewer connection fee rates. Revise General Note 4 as follows and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). Revise General Note 1 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. Add the following Permitting Note A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. In the legend, use two different symbols for existing public sewers and existing private sewers, so that these symbols are clearly differentiated in the sewer design layout. Use these symbols in the layout so that they match exactly those in the legend. If there are any proposed private sewers, use a third symbol to differentiate the proposed private sewers from the existing public sewers and the existing private sewers. If there are any proposed private sewers, show the length, size and slope. Show the Pima County manhole number, rim elevation and invert elevation of the manhole to which the private sewers are connecting. Delete the invert elevations shown for the other existing public sewer manholes. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 02/16/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 16, 2006 Chris Brozek Christopher Brozek, AICP, PE 1212 North Sawtelle Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85716 Subject: D05-0045 Struble-Ajo Way Development Plan Dear Chris: Your submittal of December 20, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Environmental Services, Real Estate, Landscape, Traffic, Zoning, Engineering, Wastewater, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape and NPPO Plans (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Soils Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Legal description and Title Report (Real Estate, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 326-4280 |
| 12/19/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/21/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved December 21, 2005. |
| 12/27/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0045 STRUBLE-AJO WAY/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: December 27, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |