Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0043
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/21/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/25/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D05-0043 Western Financial Partners Development Plan Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 25, 2006 DUE DATE: October 19, 2006 COMMENTS: The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D05-0043dpr.doc |
| 09/28/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: September 28, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Western Financial Partners Development Plan. The activity number is D05-0043. DEVELOPMENT PLAN S CONDITIONALLY APPROVED GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Submittal of the City of Tucson stamped approved Development Plan is required for Site plan approval. A site plan application (yellow card) must be submitted with the City of Tucson stamped approved Development Plan. 2. The Grading Plan was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 3. A Grading Plan and Permit may be required. The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. The response to providing cut and fill quantities is still not acceptable. Provide on the Development Plan Mylar the following verbiage, "Cut = (provide the quantity in cubic yards) Fill = (provide the quantity in cubic yards)." It should like this, "Cut = 246 cubic yards, Fill = 234 cubic yards." |
| 10/13/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Correct the following: 1. Refer to DS 2-07.2.2.A 2 for required calculations. Add the correct site square footage to the landscape plan. Add a calculation stating the correct square footage of all landscaped areas. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.g The plans submitted do not correspond with the information on sheet DP. On sheet DP under Lot Coverage the site square footage is listed as 11,567, on the same sheet under General Note 3 the gross area of the site is listed as 12,783, and the gross site area is listed as 13,595 on sheet L1. 2) Revise the Landscape Area total on sheet L1. The value listed (11,4878) appears to be incorrect. |
| 10/18/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0043 Western Financial Partners 10/17/06 (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-21 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arcadia Alamo GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 10/19/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (XXXX) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 06/27/06 () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other – DRB Review Comments REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 10/17/06 |
| 10/25/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | D05-0043, Western Financial, right of way dedication complete, no further comment. |
| 10/27/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 27, 2006 Kelsi Montgomery Randel Jacob Design Group, PLLC 2980 North Swan Road, Suite 222 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D05-0043 Western Financial Partners, LLC Development Plan Dear Kelsi: Your submittal of September 21, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) DUE TO THE FACT THAT THERE ARE INCONSISTENCIES IN THE LOT SIZE LISTED ON THE DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS, THE CDRC MANAGER IS ASKING FOR ANOTHER SUBMITTAL FOR CLARIFICATION. PLEASE INCLUDE A RESPONSE LETTER THAT DETAILS THE CHANGES MADE TO THE PLANS SO THE REVIEWERS MAY EXPIDITED THEIR REVIEWS. IF THIS DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS NOT APPROVED BY 12/14/2006, A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR A REVIEW EXTENTION MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE CDRC OFFICE. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 321-0152 |