Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0043
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/06/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0043 Western Financial Partners (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-21 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arcadia Alamo GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: January 17, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: (XXXX) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other – DRB Review Comments REVIEWER: D. Estolano 791-4505 DATE: 12/29/05 Please add the rezoning conditions to the development plan. Rezoning Condition #14 states “to ensure compatibility with adjacent development, building architecture, site, and landscape design shall be submitted for review and comment by the Development Review Board (DRB) prior to submittal of the development plan. DRB review comments shall be included with the Community Design review committee (CDRC) submittal”. Please submit DRB review comments. |
| 01/10/2006 | RICHARD WILLIAMSON | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Applicant must comply with all provisions of Chapter 27 of the Tucson City Code, and those special conditions placed on the project by the Tucson Water Department. This approval is void after a period of one (1) year from the date of this approval. |
| 01/13/2006 | PMCLAUG1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section does not recommend approval at this time. Revise all plans as necessary. Resubmittal of all plans is required. 1. The building walls are shown extending into the required 10-foot street perimeter yard along the south property line. Building walls may not extend into the landscape border. Revise plans. 2. A 30" continuous screen along MS&R street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise plan to show the required screen along the Craycroft Road frontage in the area to the north of the entrance drive. 3. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 4. One canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape borders. If this can not be achieved than an equivalent number of trees must be planted elsewhere on the site between the building(s) and the property lines, trees must be evenly distributed over the site. To demonstrate compliance provide a calculation of the length of all landscape borders and the number of canopy trees per length. LUC 3.7.2.4, DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f 5. Refer to DS 2-07.2.2.A 2 for all other required calculations. Add the site squre footage to the landscape plan. Add a calculation stating the square footage of all landscaped areas and the percentage of vegetative cover. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.g 6. In areas where a required landscape border falls within the vehicular use area, up to 50% of the canopy trees may be counted towards both the minimum parking lot canopy tree requirement and the landscape border canopy tree requirement per LUC 3.7.2.3.b 6. The statement on sheet L-1 that the property is exempt from NPPO requirements is inconsistent with the photos included in the General Site Inventory/Design Compatibility Report, which show mature native trees on the site. Revove this note from the landscape plan and submit an NPP plan or an Appliation for Exception along with all submittal requirements. Refer to DS 2-15.3 for submittal requirements. 7. It is indicated under the "Vegetation" heading in the Inventory Report that efforts will be made to preserve vegetation occurring at the eastern edges of the lot. Indicate which plants are to be preserved in place. Refer to DS 2-07 for plan content, which includes the requirement to show the location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 8. Revise the landscape plan to show the minimum width and square footage measured from the inside edge of the tree planter located in the parking area. The information shown on the Development Plan measures this area from its outside edge only. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e 9. Written approval from the City Engineer must be provided to the Landscape Review section to allow landscaping in the right-of-way per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3. 10. Refer to DS 2-07.2.2 and DS 2-06.5.4 for the specific content required in the following elements of the landscape plan: Maintenance Schedule, Grading Information, Irrigation Plan, Construction Details. Revise landscape plan to include required content and specifications. Grading information on the landscape plan shall include contour lines, spot elevations, percent slope across the site and direction of slope of paved areas, existing grades on adjacent rights-of-way and adjacent sites, and the methods by which water harvesting/ storm runoff is used to benefit planting areas on the site. DS 2-07.0 11. Add the Development Plan case number (D05-043) to all sheets. 12. Add rezoning conditions to the Development Plan. |
| 01/17/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: January 17, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Development Plan. The activity number is D05-0043. SUMMARY: The Development Plan were received by Engineering on D05-0043. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN GENERAL COMMENTS 1. Submittal of the City of Tucson stamped approved Development Plan is required for Site plan approval. A site plan application (yellow card) must be submitted with the City of Tucson stamped approved Development Plan. 2. The Grading Plan was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 3. A Grading Plan and Permit may be required. The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that all lettering is legible when reviewed and will maintain that legibility when reproduced and photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record-keeping purposes. Revise appropriately. DS 2-05.2.1.C. 2. Add a legend which shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be placed on the plan. DS 2-05.2.1.J. 3. If applicable blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. DS 2-05.2.3.B. 4. Provide the recordation data for Lester Street and Craycroft Road. DS 2-05.2.3.C. 5. Indicate the datum used for the City of Tucson benchmark. DS 2-05.2.3.E. 6. The Department of Transportation Mapping Site (TDOT) indicates a storm drain facility with in Craycroft Road. Show the type and size of the storm drain. Refer to the following web site, http://tdotmaps.transview.org/mapguide_mwf_tsms.htm. 7. Indicate if Lester Street and Craycroft Road is public or private. DS 2-05.2.3.D.2. 8. From the street centerline of Craycroft Road and Lester Street dimension to the existing curb and sidewalk. DS 2-05.2.3.D.2. 9. Indicate the general direction of drainage on the plan. Indicate symbol in the legend. DS 2-05.2.4.H.2. 10. Handicap curb access ramps are required to be constructed with truncated domes, per recent a Federal ADA requirement. Show a detail or add a general note to the site plan indicating all public and private handicap curb access ramps will have truncated domes. DS 2-05.2.4.L. 11. Show the site distance (length) for the sight visibility triangles (SVT). DS 2-05.2.4.R. 12. The 6' wall to screen the loading zone is encroaching into the near side SVT. Revise to shoe the wall outside the near side SVT. DS 2-05.2.4.R. 13. It is acknowledged that John Clark of the Environmental Services Department accepts the current design solid waste proposal. However the current proposal does not meet Development Standard 6-01 and will require a Development Standards Modification Request (DSMR). Please contact Patricia Gehlen, Community Design Review Committee (CDRC) Manager for DSMR submittal criteria. 14. Include cut and fill quantities (in cubic yards) on the Development Plan. If the cut and fill quantities equal zero, indicate on the Development Plan. 15. Place a note on the plan, "All roof downspouts shall be routed under any adjacent sidewalk". Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the ten year event. DS 2-08.4.1.E. 16. This project is subject to intersection widening per the MS & R Map. Refer to the diagram located on the lower left hand corner of the MS & R Map found on the following web page, http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/planning/maps/city/msr.pdf. Label the development plan accordingly and show dimensions. |
| 01/18/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Please submit legal description with a sketch and a title report dated within 30 days for any right of way dedication along Craycroft. |
| 01/18/2006 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: WESTERN FINANCIAL PARTNERS D05-0043 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted December 15, 2005. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. There is an existing overhead service that appears to be in conflict with the new proposed building. In order to apply for electric service and or to upgrade the service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 01/18/2006 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Center Plans Coordination Office FROM: Peter McLaughlin Senior Planner FOR: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D05-043 Western Financial Partners 1816 N. Craycroft Road Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: January 18, 2006 DUE DATE: January 17, 2006 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for full CDRC review. The one year expiration date for this development plan is December 14, 2006. 2. Place the development plan number (D05-043) on each sheet of the development plan, landscape plan and NPPO plans in the lower right hand corner near the title block. DS 2-05.2.1.K 3. Continuous pedestrian circulation must connect the building to sidewalk within the Craycroft Road right-of-way. Revise to show direct connection. Dimension width of all pedestrian sidewalks clearly on the drawing. DS 2-08 4. Revise the concrete wheelstop dimension in the typical parking detail to be 2-1/2 feet from the front of the parking space. DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 5. A small portion of the screen wall for the loading zone is located within the future sight visibility triangle. Revise plan. DS 3-01.5.1.A.1 6. Add a handicap parking calculation stating the number of h/c spaces required and provided. ANS/ IBC DS 2-05.2.4.P 7. Provide a detail showing a fully dimensioned layout of class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking (including width and length of spaces and a 5-foot clear area for bicycle maneuverability per DS 2-09). DS 2-05.2.4.Q 8. Where not directly visible and obvious from the public right-of-way, project entry and directional signage shall be provided to direct bicyclists from the public right-of-way to the bicycle parking area. Show the location of directional signage on the development plan. DS 2-09.5.1 9. Add a loading zone calculation stating the number of loading spaces required and provided. DS 2-05.2.4.O 10. Dimension curbs from centerline, both along Craycroft Road (existing and future) and along Lester Street. Dimension setback distance from existing curb along Lester Street to the south wall of the proposed building. DS 2-05.2.4.I 11. List the rezoning conditions on the development plan. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 12. Add the development designator ("26") to the general notes and add a general note detailing the restrictions which the proposed uses are subject to. In the O-1 zone, the administrative/professional office use is subject to LUC 3.5.4.11. Demonstrate compliance on the plan with all applicable restrictions. LUC 2.4.1.2.A.1 13. Add a general note stating that the proposal meets the criteria of LUC Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets & Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. DS 2-05.2.B.10 14. Indicate the location, height, and dimensions of any proposed freestanding signage. Also, indicate if any freestanding lighting is proposed to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 20. DS 2-05.2.4.W 15. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition by adding a detail of screening for loading zone to the development plan or landscape plan. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 16. The title of the project must be consistent on all sheets of the development plan and landscape plan. Revise. 17. All requested changes must be made to the Development Plan and Landscape Plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Peter McLaughlin, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IS REQUIRED: revised development plan |
| 01/19/2006 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Estimated daily traffic in 24 hr period - 25 |
| 01/31/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. While the SVTs are depicted, there is no size associated with them. 2. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D). There is no recordation data (book & page) for either Craycroft or Lester. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/06/2006 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 4, 2006 TO: Kelsi Montgomery Randel Jacob Design Group, PLLC THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Western Financial Partners, LLC Development Plan – 1st Submittal D05-043 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D05-0043, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. Based on the evaluation of the proposed sewer design, this project qualifies for Standard connection fee rates. SHEET 1. Add the following General Note and fill in the blanks appropriately. THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET 1. Replace General Note 9 with ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. SHEET 1. Add the following General Note MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. SHEET 1. Show the building connection sewer (BCS) from the building all the way to the point of connection with the public sewer network. Additionally, label this BCS as existing or proposed, include the length, size and the slope. SHEET 1. Show the existing public sewer to which this project is connecting, including the size and Pima County plan number. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 02/16/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 16, 2006 Kelsi Montgomery Randel Jacob Design Group, PLLC 2980 North Swan Road, Suite 222 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D05-0043 Western Financial Partners, LLC Development Plan Dear Kelsi: Your submittal of December 15, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Real Estate, Community Planning, Landscape, Traffic, Zoning, Engineering, Wastewater, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape and NPPO Plans (Zoning, Landscape, Community Planning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies DRB Review Comments (Community Planning, DSD) 2 Copies Legal Description and Title Report (Real Estate, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 321-0152 |
| 12/15/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/16/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved December 16, 2005. |
| 12/20/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Due to the land restriction there is not sufficient space for a on site centralized service area. This project approved for APC curb side service. APC's will be placed and removed from the curb side collection area on the service day. |
| 12/22/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D05-0043 RANDEL JACOB DESIGN GROUP, PLLC WESTERN FINANCIAL PARTNERS ********************************************************************* Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. ********************************************************************* |
| 12/23/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0043 WESTERN FINANCIAL PARTNERS/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 12/23/05 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 12/23/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: December 22, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D05-0043 Western Financial Partners: Development Plan Staff has no comments. |