Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0042
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D05-0042 Joel's Pottery Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 9, 2006 DUE DATE: December 20, 2005 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 20, 2006. 2. Please ensure that all text height is 12 point or greater in height. It is important to meet this requirement to ensure legibility once the plans are microfilmed. Revise the text where required. DS 2-05.2.1.C 3. Please address the following items for the location map. It is preferable that the drawing be a stick drawing without the lots depicted. The major streets along with adjacent streets to the parcel must be labeled including the Pima County/COT jurisdiction limits, Rillito Wash, and the following street names, Roller Coaster Dr., and Cresta Loma Drive. Also, please darken the line work for the location map. DS 2-05.2.1.D 4. In the owner's text block, list the property owners' address and telephone number, which includes the area code if the owner lives out of state. Clarify if the owner of the property is also the developer. If so the title should be revised to state Owner/Developer. If the owner is not the developer add a developer's text block and provide the required information. Also list the name, address, and telephone number of the firm that prepared the development plan if different from Carolyn Laurie. DS 2-05.2.2.A List the proposed use along with applicable development designator ("28") and the applicable LUC subject to section for each use. The billboard is not an allowed use in the C-1 Zone but the development criteria may be determined by the DSD Zoning Administrator once he determines whether the billboard use can continue on this site. 5. Please revise general note 2 to list the only applicable overlay on this site, "LUC Section 2.8.3 Major Streets and Routes". LUC section 2.8.4.is not an overlay and the scenic route due to section 2.8.2.3.B does not affect the site. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 6. Add the distance and bearing for the property line (East Side) of the parcel along Oracle Road. DS 2-05.2.3.A Revise the legal description at the top of the sheet to match or include the description as listed in the Pima County Assessor's information sheet. See the Assessor's wed site for the legal description. Per the drawing it appears that a building adjacent to the south side of the parcel is within the parcel to be developed. Clarify how this issue will be rectified. Will the owner of the lot do a reconfiguration of the property in order to rectify the encroachment? Please provide clarification for any modification the owner proposes. It also appears that a block wall from the adjacent use may be encroaching into this parcel. Clarify if the wall was constructed between the two parties and if a joint use agreement between the two for maintenance of the wall was recorded. 7. Dimension the curb and sidewalk location. The building setback along the street frontage is based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure from the back of future curb. Also, please check with the engineering reviewer and transportation engineering for future widening of the Oracle Road roadway and placement of future curb and sidewalk. DS 2-05.2.3.C and DS 2-05.2.4.G 8. If applicable, any proposed easements must be drawn, labeled, and the width dimensioned. The recordation information for each proposed easement must be labeled. If the easement is to be recorded per a separate instrument please ensure to add a docket and page note for each easement. DS 2-05.2.4.G 9. The on-site pedestrian circulation must connect to the sidewalk in the Oracle Road right of way. The required on-site sidewalk is depicted on the plan but stops at the landscape buffer. The sidewalk must be drawn to connect to the sidewalk in the right of way, revise as required. The sidewalk is annotated as a pedestrian refuge. Please revise the note and label the sidewalk as five-foot wide concrete sidewalk. The sidewalk must be physically separated from the vehicular use area. Add a note that states that the sidewalk will be raised concrete and will be the accessible route with handicapped access ramps at key points as required. Depict the required access ramps and add a note that states that the access ramps will be constructed with truncated domes where the ramp transitions onto the vehicular use area. A detail drawing of the access ramp with the appropriate notes should be added. The access ramp drawn on the plan does not meet code. Please revise the ramp and draw a detail as reference. Per the plan a note has been added to indicate that a six-foot high chain link fence with 3-strand barbwire will be placed on the vehicular side of the sidewalk. If the chain link fence is to be provided it should be placed on the inside of the sidewalk next to the display area. By putting the fence on the vehicular side it places the pedestrian within the vehicular use area instead of the sidewalk. Revise, draw, and annotate the location of the fence and add a four-foot wide pedestrian gate for access to the display area and the tent. The Handicapped access aisle between the handicapped parking spaces must be eight feet wide. The handicapped parking space of which one is to be designated specifically for vans need only be eight feet wide. Please revise the handicapped parking spaces and the access aisle as requested. DS 2-05.2.4.K 10. The number of parking spaces required for this is use is based on the ratio of one parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area which includes in this case the sales display area. The number of parking spaces required for this use is 28. Per the plan 30 spaces have been provided and of the 30 spaces two must be handicapped spaces with one of the spaces reserved for vans. The access aisle for the van accessible parking space is eight feet wide. Revise the access as required. The minimum width for a handicapped space is eight feet. All standard parking spaces may be eight and one-half feet wide by eighteen feet long. The spaces may be greater in size if the applicant so chooses as long the number of spaces required is provided and all other vehicular use areas meet design standards and dimensions per development standards 3-05. Dimension the wheel stops and ensure that they are placed two and one-half feet from the front of the parking spaces. DS 2-05.2.4.P 11. Provide a dimensioned detail drawing for the class two parking facilities. The detail drawing should include the following items. Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 12. The future sight visibility triangles have been drawn in the wrong location. SVT's are to be drawn based the curb location. In order to ensure that the sight visibility triangles are in the right location the future curb must be determined, drawn, and dimensioned on the plan. Please contact the Engineering reviewer or DOT Engineering division for this information. Also, stretches of Oracle Road may be under State of Arizona regulations in which case the State may be contacted for information on future roadway widening, curb and sidewalk placement etc. DS2-05.2.4.Q 13. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned. If Dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Development Standard 6-01.0. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that Standard, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. Adherence to the Standard is to assure: o Minimum safety criteria are met; o Consideration of adjacent properties; o Provision for on-site collection and maneuvering to avoid on-street traffic conflicts; o Minimum conflict with pedestrian and vehicular traffic along streets and onsite. DS 2-05.2.4.T 14. Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. DS 2-05.2.4.V 15. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and those minimal location requirements can be met. Per the plan an existing billboard is drawn along the northeast corner of the site. Please provide documentation or sign permit for the billboard. (Contact the Signs Section for this information. 791-5550 x-1102) Billboards are not an allowed use in the C-1 zone and therefore the billboard was placed on this location prior to the new code or annexation which would make it a nonconforming use or the billboard was placed without a permit. If a determination is made by either the Signs Supervisor (or Craig Gross) as to the status of the Billboard please provide the supporting documentation. It may also be necessary to attain legal non-conforming status for the Billboard from the DSD Zoning Administrator in order to allow the continued use of the Billboard on this site. If Billboard use is allowed as nonconforming the requirements for the billboard use must be met on site. The requirements may include but not limited to, exclusive loading zone, landscaping and screening, as well as access to the billboard. Additional comments may be forthcoming on this issue based on the applicant's response and status determination on the billboard use. DS 2-05.2.4.W 16. A specific development criteria matrix table for each use should be added to the plan. The table should include the following information: Site area required and proposed, Floor Area Ratio allowed and proposed, building height allowed and proposed, building setbacks allowed and proposed, number of vehicle parking spaces required and number provided including the number of handicapped parking spaces required and provided (include van spaces), the number and type bicycle parking spaces required and number provided, the number of loading zones required and number provided for each use (includes the billboard use). The development criteria must be specific to each use. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D050042dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents. |
| 02/09/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: December 21, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D05-0042 Joel’s Pottery: Development Plan Staff has no comments. |
| 02/13/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 13, 2006 Carolyn Laurie Tierra Planning Services. 1575 East River Road, Suite 201 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: D05-0042 Joels Pottery Development Plan Dear Carolyn: Your submittal of November 21, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Community Planning, Landscape, Traffic, Zoning, Engineering, Wastewater, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Landscape, Community Planning, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 323-3326 |
| 11/21/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/23/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved November 23, 2005. |
| 11/25/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0042 JOELS POTTERY/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: November 25, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 1. CORRECT N. ORACLE RD. TO ORACLE ROAD ON MYLAR. NOTE: 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 11/29/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Requested by letter to utilize the refuse enclosure with the ownes adjacent property. Request approved for this bussiness. |
| 11/30/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT HAS NO COMMENT D05-0042 TIERRA PLANNING SERVICES JOEL'S POTTERY ********************************************************************* Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. Neither the State nor the Arizona Department of Transportation and/or its employees shall be liable for violations of law, or damages resulting from your dissemination or use of this email transmission if you are not the intended recipient. ********************************************************************* |
| 12/05/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0042 Joel’s Pottery 12/05/05 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-82-48 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway Route (Oracle Rd.) COMMENTS DUE BY: December 20, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other (Docket and page of Street Vacation) REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 12/1/05 The pedestrian sidewalk must extend across the landscape border and connect to the pedestrian path with Oracle Road. Please provide the recorded instrument that abandoned the Old Tucson Florence Highway. Pima County Assessor maps still identify this as public right-of-way. Additional landscaping and screening will be required and a pedestrian connection to the pathway within the Old Tucson Florence Highway unless it is legally abandoned. A billboard is shown on the development plan. The billboard must either be removed or comply with development criteria per Land Use Code (LUC) Sec. 3.5.4.26. and Table 3.7.2-I for landscaping and screening requirements for billboards. Please verify with Engineering if a concrete or asphalt drive and apron will be required to connect to Oracle Rd. for both ingress/egress. |
| 12/19/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the development plan to provide curbing or other suitable barrier for landscape areas within and adjacent to the vehicular use area. LUC 3.7.2.3.B 2) A 10' wide street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4.A is required along the entire street frontage for both Oracle Road and North Old Oracle Road. The landscape borders are required to contain one canopy tree for every thirty-three feet. 3) Trees that are located in areas of required landscaping will be a minimum fifteen (15) gallon container size per DS 2-06.3.5.C. Revise the landscape plans. 4) An irrigation plan shall be submitted together with the landscape plan required in Sec. 3.7.7.2. Submit an irrigation plan. LUC 3.7.4.5.C 5) The site is required to include screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise as necessary to provide a 30" screen along both streets behind the street landscape borders. Revise the plans to provide a 60' screen wall for the loading area. 6) The billboard on the site requires a 6' high screen. The billboard also requires an additional loading space that will also have to be screened. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 7) The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 8) An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width (inside dimension), must be provided for each canopy tree in the parking area. LUC 3.7.2.3 Provide dimensions for the planter areas. The native plant preservation application is approved. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL OTHER PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 12/19/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Estimated daily traffic in 24 hr period - 258 |
| 12/19/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 12/19/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. While the SVTs are shown they are not labeled as to their size. In addition, it appears that near side has been switched with the far side and the stem sides appear to be 15' long. Stem sides are required to be 20'. 2. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D). I can't find any recording data for Oracle Road. 3. Sheet 1 of this plan says there are 2 sheets. Traffic did not receive the 2nd sheet (if there is one). D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/21/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | December 22, 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D05-0042 PROJECT NAME: Joel's Pottery PROJECT ADDRESS: 4945 N Oracle Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz, Civil Engineer Resubmittal Required: Development Plan The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Provide bearing with distances in feet to tie down found BCSM with Oracle Road centerline. In addition provide bearing along Oracle Road centerline. DS 2-05.2.3.A 3. If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. DS 2-05.2.3.B 4. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. DS 2-05.2.3.C 5. If applicable, all proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. DS 2-05.2.4.G 6. Indicate all proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot to provide reference to future site drainage. DS 2-05.2.4.H.4 7. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points to confirm that there are no adverse drainage effects to adjacent lots due to this development. Adverse effects to adjacent lots include nuisance ponding, an increase in cfs, or changes to existing flow patterns such as sheet flow to a concentrated flow. DS 2-05.2.4.H.7 8. As per Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the Truncated Domes instead of the standard grooves, which are shown on City of Tucson Standard Detail 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, the wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with the Standard Detail 207. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5640 x1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/22/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: JOEL'S POTTERY D05-0042 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted for review November 21, 2005. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 12/30/2005 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | December 30, 2005 To: Carolyn Laurie, Tierra Planning Services Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Joel's Pottery Development Plan - 1st Submittal D05-0042 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the North Rillito Interceptor.There are no existing or proposed connections to the public sewerage collection system with this development plan and no capacity response letter will be required. 2. All Sheets: Delete the case number P12XX-XXX and in it's place add the development plan case number, D05-0042, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. 3. All Sheets: Add the cross-reference case numbers, CD9-82-48II, DRB-94-6 and DRB-94-73 to the list of cross-reference numbers on each sheet. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. 4. Sheet 1: A public sewer main exist, and runs south to north in the N. Old Tucson -Florence Highway right of way (abandoned), west of this project. Revise the site plan so that it shows: The existing public 39"sewer main, G-71-04, is labeled with it's pipe size and plan number. Add the linetype that will depict the existing public sewer to the Legend block on sheet 1. 5. Revise the site plan so that it shows: The existing Sewer Manhole, located near the southwest corner of the parcel will need to be labeled with the IMS number #6915-01 and sewer construction plan number G-95-011. These are the PCWMD manhole identifying numbers found at PCWMD Maps and Records Section basemaps or at PCWMD and PCDOT internet MapGuide websites. 6. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |