Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D05-0039
Parcel: 133095070

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D05-0039
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/12/2005 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
10/14/2005 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Denied Provide a General Note on the plan stating" Additional fire hydrants shall be provided by the Developer in accordance with the Tucson Fire Code".
10/18/2005 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans.
DS 2-07.2.1.B

2) Revise the landscape plan to include slope ratios for any required or proposed retention and detention basins. Basin slopes in most instances are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths exceed three feet, 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. DS 10-01.4

3) Any required storm water detention/retention basins shall be landscaped to enhance the natural configuration of the basin. Design criteria are set forth in Development Standard 10-01.0. LUC 3.7.4.3.A

4) An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four
(4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. Revise the development plan and landscape plan to show details for planters located within the parking lot. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c

5) Trees that are located in areas of required landscaping will be a minimum fifteen
(15) gallon container size per DS 2-06.3.5.C. Revise the landscape plans.

6) The site is required to include screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise as necessary.

7) Gated openings of refuse enclosures are required to meet the screening standards of LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Include details or other information regarding refuse screening.

8) All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution. Revise landscape plan to identify inert ground cover materials. A minimum two-inch layer is required. LUC 3.7.2.7.,
DS 2-06.5.2.C

9) Revise the landscape plan to include provisions for dust control in disturbed portions of adjacent right-of-way areas per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4

10) Trees required within street landscape borders and vehicular are required to be "canopy trees" as defined in LUC 6.2.3 "A woody plant, other than a palm tree, with a mature crown diameter of at least fifteen (15) feet and having a trunk that, at maturity, is kept clear of leaves and branches at least six (6) feet above grade". Revise the landscape to ensure that canopy trees are provided in sufficient numbers and in the proper location to meet code requirements. Acacia greggii would not be considered a canopy tree.

11) The street landscape border along Speedway must include a minimum of one "canopy tree" for every thirty-three linear feet. LUC 3.7.2.4

12) Canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk).
The northeast parking area does not comply with the requirement. Revise the landscape plan as necessary. LUC 3.7.2.3.A

13) Revise the landscape plans to include the square footage of all street landscape borders and the percentage of vegetative coverage. Fifty percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.g, LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5

14) Submit an irrigation plan. LUC 3.7.4.5.C

15) Clarify the note on the landscape plan regarding the existin mesquite tree. The NPP Exception Application indicates that the tree will be preserved in place. Fencing is required during construction for all undisturbed natural desert
areas and individual Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place. The area to be fenced shall be beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius. DS 2-15.6.0

RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED
10/21/2005 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
D05-0039
STANLEY ENGINEERING & DRAINAGE
AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTER
10/24/2005 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved * Vincent-Mullen landfill over 1000 feet from this development. No action required per the landfill ordinance.
* Refuse enclosure and access OK for service.
* No provisions shown or mentioned for recycling.
10/31/2005 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Denied SUBJECT: AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTER

D05-0039



Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted
October 12, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time.
There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this
project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and
easement recording information must be depicted on the plans.



Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate
location of the existing facilities. There are possible conflicts with
the junction cabinet, transformer and underground cables. All cost
associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be
billable to the developer.



Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's
review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions.


Liza Castillo
Right of Way Agent
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Co.
(520) 917-8745
lcastillo@tep.com
11/02/2005 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D05-0039 Automotive Service Center 11/01/05

( ) Tentative Plat
(XXXX) Development Plan
(XXXX) Landscape Plan
( ) Revised Plan/Plat
( ) Board of Adjustment
( ) Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-98-34

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: 11/9/05

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
( ) See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(XXXX) Resubmittal Required:
( ) Tentative Plat
( ) Development Plan
( ) Landscape Plan
(XXXX) Other - Elevations

REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 10-21-05

Urban Planning and Design
D05-0039 Automotive Service Center

Development plans for the Automotive Service Center are subject to rezoning requirements as part of the rezoning approval (C9-98-34); therefore, plans must be in substantial compliance to said conditions.

1. Rezoning condition #6 states "architectural elevations submitted at time of development plan review shall demonstrate four-sided architecture and visually interesting roof and parapet lines." This condition has not yet been met. Please submit elevations showing compliance with this condition.
11/04/2005 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D05-0039 AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE CENTER / DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: November 2, 2005



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:


1: Add recording Book and Page for Pantano Sur in Title Block.

2: Correct Pantano Rd. to Pantano Road on sheet 2.
11/04/2005 DBELL1 LANDFILL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved
11/09/2005 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: November 9, 2005
CDRC/Zoning Manager

SUBJECT: Automotive Service Center, 7855 E SPEEDWAY
Development Plan D05-0039 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 05

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report.

The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Development Plan:

1. Please provide North arrow and scale per D.S. 2-02.2.1.
2. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP.
3. Adhere to the rezoning conditions: 9, 10, 11, 12, 15 and 16. Show and detail the areas being used for water harvesting per the DR.
4. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207.
5. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
6. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
7. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. A cross access agreement is required prior to the approval of the DP.
8. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
9. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
10. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
11. Show Development plan number (D05-0039) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
12. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0.
13. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. It appears the building's FFE is excessively high, justification will be required to maintain that elevation. Show existing and proposed grades along the east property line.
14. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
15. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
16. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
17. List the consulting engineer on the plans with the pertinent information.
18. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
19. "A grading permit will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading when the DP has been approved

Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR.
2. This review was performed for DP purposes only. Final review and acceptance will at the grading plan stage.
3. Adhere to the rezoning conditions: 9, 10, 11, 12, and 15. Show and detail the areas being used for water harvesting along dimensioning the areas and including the capacities.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/7855 E SPEEDWAY BL CDRC
11/09/2005 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: D05-0039
Automotive Service Center
Development Plan - Rezoning C9-98-34

TRANSMITTAL: 11/09/05

DUE DATE: 11/09/05

COMMENTS:

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is October 11, 2006.

2. Add the following items to the location map. Draw and label the Pantano Wash and label the sections corners at the center of the map. Ds 2-05.2.1.D

3. Add the subdivision book and page number to the title block following the lot number. Ds 2-05.2.1.G

4. The existing zoning of the lot to be developed has not been rezoned to C-2 as noted in note one. Revise general note 1 to state the following; "The existing zoning is C-1, the proposed zoning is C-2 per rezoning case C9-98-34 (Change of Conditions)." DS 2-05.2.1.A.1

5. This project has been assigned the development plan case number D05-0039. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all development plan sheets and landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-05.2.1.A.2

6. Add to note 2, the LUC subject to section number 3.5.13.5, which applicable to the proposed use. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3

7. Add to note 8, the LUC section number 2.8.3. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10

8. If applicable all existing or proposed easements must be drawn and labeled on the plan, including any recorded cross access/parking agreements must be listed. The docket and page numbers of all easements must be labeled and copies of the documents for cross access must be submitted for review. DS 2-05.2.3.B and DS 2-05.2.4.G

9. The future right-of-way line and curb location must be depicted correctly on the plan. This property is within the taper area of the roadway widening. Please review the distances from the center of the Pantano/Speedway intersection to the west property line of the property and draw the future right of way line and curb line accordingly. The future curb must be dimensioned to the future property line. Also the location of the future curb location is essential because the street perimeter building setback is measured from the back of future curb location. Check with engineering section reviewer for more information on the right of way taper. DS 2-05.2.4.D

10. A five-foot wide pedestrian refuge area with a four-foot wide sidewalk is required between a PAAL and a building. The pedestrian refuge in question is to be provided adjacent to the east building and the PAAL. Draw, label and dimension the required sidewalks. Label and dimension the sidewalk along the East Side of building 1. Both required sidewalks must connect to the on site pedestrian circulation and to the sidewalk in the right of way.

If the general public will not be accessing these areas next to the bays, the requirement for the concrete sidewalk can be eliminated and a five-foot wide painted pedestrian refuge area is required. The pedestrian refuge must still connect to the on site sidewalk system. The employees and not the general public must only access the area. Revise as required based on the actual use.

Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the response comments and the revised drawing. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3

11. Add an overall building setback dimension from the existing and future back of curb locations to both buildings. DS 2-05.2.4.J

12. Provide a detail drawing for the access ramps depicting the required truncated domes. All access ramps that transition onto the vehicular use area must be designed with truncated domes. The pedestrian circulation system must connect all elements of the development as indicated in DS 2-08.4.0. In addition, the sidewalk must be physically separated from the vehicular use areas by providing a raised concrete sidewalk. All pedestrian refuge areas, which are proposed or provided, that are flush with the pavement must be delineated by painted stripes and must transition to the sidewalk system with access ramps. Please review the plan and revise as required. DS 2-05.2.4.K

13. The heights and dimensions for both building one and two must be labeled on the plan (building footprints). Please draw and label the front door or main entrance to both buildings. DS 2-05.2.4.N

Please clarify if both buildings are for the Brake Masters or are two separate uses proposed in this development. If so please revise any notes and calculations accordingly for each use. Please be aware that the automotive service repair and the trade service repair are two different types of uses and additional or different criteria may apply to one but not the other. Also the use "Trade Service and Repair Major is not an allowed principal use in the C-2, clarify clearly the uses to insure compliance. Additional comments may be forth coming on this issue based on you response to this comment and revisions to the plan.

14. Please indicate on the plan which spaces will be provided with the wheel stops. If all spaces are to be provided with a wheel stop please indicate on the plan or on the parking space details with a note.

List as a note based on the parking ratio for each use the number of parking spaces required and provided including require handicapped parking spaces. Per ANSI standards 503.3.3 handicapped parking spaces must be 20 feet in length. Revise the handicapped parking space length to 20 feet and insure that the PAAL width adjacent to the handicapped parking spaces is 24 feet for two-way travel. DS 2-05.2.4.P

15. Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with the rezoning conditions per case C9-98-34 (revised). Submit a separate response letter that states how all the rezoning conditions have been met based on the proposed development plan. DS 2-05.2.4.U

Submit for review and as reference with the next submittal package a copy of the preliminary development used for the rezoning case process.

16. Indicate on the plan the type of postal service proposed for this development. If the postal service is to occur within the building indicate by adding a general note. If the service is to be provided via a central location or freestanding pedestal, please draw on the plan and label the location and type of service proposed. DS 2-05.2.4.V

17. Indicate the location and type of freestanding, pedestal, or monument signs proposed for the new development including existing or proposed billboard signs. DS 2-05.2.4.W

18. See the landscape reviewer comments related to landscape borders, screening, and NPPO requirements. DS 2-05.2.4.X

19. Add a matrix table that provides all the development criteria that is required, allowed and provided or proposed for the proposed uses. The information that must be provided includes the following items; allowed and proposed floor area ratios, the allowed and proposed building heights, the required and proposed building setbacks from adjacent property lines and street, the number of required and provided parking spaces for each use, the number of required and provided handicapped parking spaces, the number of required and provided bicycle parking spaces, and the number of required and provided loading spaces. I acknowledge that some of these items are listed on the plan. Please consolidate the information under a heading of land use code data.

20. Provide copies of any recorded documents related to cross access and cross parking. The recordation information must be listed on the plan and the areas delineated and dimensioned where applicable.






If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D05-0039dp.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents.
11/09/2005 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No comments
11/15/2005 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved 27 estimated daily trips in 24 hr period.
11/15/2005 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP:

1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future.

2. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) There is no recordation data provided.


D. Dale Kelch, PE
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
11/15/2005 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: November 10, 2005

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov



SUBJECT: D05-0039 Automotive Service Center(10-12-05)

Staff has no comments.
11/28/2005 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied November 25, 2005

To: Jeff Stanley, Stanley Engineering and Drainage

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

____________________________________
From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County
Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality

Subject: Automotive Service Center
Development Plan - 1st Submittal
D05-0039

The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.



This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Tanque Verde Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at:

http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf.

The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office.

Based on the Pantano Sur subdivision project, S98-061,, this project will qualify for the Non-Participating sewer connection fee rate.

All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D05-0039, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision.

All Sheets: Add the appropriate cross-reference numbers for any previous plats or development plans to the title block of each sheet.

Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states:

THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E).

And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values.

Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states:

THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES OF PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4.

Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states:

A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT.

Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states:

NO PERMITS FOR PERMANENT STRUCTURES (I.E., MASONRY WALLS, FENCES, ETC.) ON OR THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT WILL BE ISSUED WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT.

Sheet 1: In the Legend block the symbol that you are using for the PROPERTY CORNERS is the symbol that is normally used for a MANHOLE, SAINTARY SEWER. Also there is no sanitary sewer manhole shown in the legend and a different symbol is used on sheet 2 where a manhole is existing. To avoid confusion, refer to STANDARD DETAILS FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, 2003 EDITION, CITY OF TUCSON/ PIMA COUNTY, Standard Details, Detail No. 100, to develop an acceptable legend.

Sheet 2: Revise the plan to show the existing sanitary sewer manhole and sewer pipe. Show the pipe size. Show the existing manhole IMS numbers. These are the 6 digit (usually) numbers found on PCDOT Mapguide and PCWMD basemaps and Mapguide. Show any existing inverts at the existing manhole.

Sheet 2: Revise the site plan to show any existing Public Sewer Easements that allow legal access to the existing public sewer manhole.

Sheet 2: Revise the site plan to show any existing and proposed private sewers that will serve the existing or proposed buildings 1 and 2. Provide inverts at the point of connection to the public sewer and at any proposed clean outs. Show the pipe length and slope of the proposed private sewer.

We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.


If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter

CC: Project File
11/29/2005 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

November 29, 2005

Jeff Stanley
Stanley Engineering and Drianage
PO Box 1888
Tucson, Arizona 85702

Subject: D05-0039 Automotive Service Center Development Plan

Dear Jeff:

Your submittal of October 12, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED

10 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, TEP, Community Planning, Addressing, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, Traffic, Wastewater, DSD)

5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Community Planning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Elevations (Community Planning, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Drainage Reports (Engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Recorded cross access and parking agreements (Zoning, DSD)




Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179.

Sincerely,


Patricia Y. Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/


Via fax: 792-3302