Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0038
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/24/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/26/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: April 26, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Development Plan. The activity number is D05-0038. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on April 24th, 2006. Engineering has reviewed the received items and recommends approval of the Development Plan and the Drainage Report. In the response letter indicate how each comment was addressed and where the correction was made on the plan or in the drainage report. CONDITIONALLY APPROVED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED: DRAINAGE REPORT ANDTHE AMENDMENT TO THE DRAINAGE REPORT The mylar submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT 1. All easements must be recorded prior to final development plan approval and signature from the CDRC manager. Provide the recordation information (docket and page) for the new water easement (easement number 7), the new electrical easement (easement number 9) and new public sanitary sewer easement (easement number 10). DS 2-05.2.3.B. |
| 04/28/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 27, 2006 TO: Richard Cordova DOWL Engineers THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Center For Neurosciences Development Plan – 3rd Submittal D05-038 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. As previously requested on November 23, 2005, and on March 15, 2006, please provide the letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. Submitting other plans as reference is not acceptable. All pertinent information shall be included in the drawings belonging to this specific development plan. Please address the following review comments on the specific development plan being reviewed. SHEET 2. The symbol used for existing infrastructure is not clearly visible. Please use a darker symbol that is clearly different to the symbol used for proposed sewers, so that when these drawings get microfilmed for future reference, they can be viewed withtout. SHEET 2. Show the manhole numbers for the proposed public sewer to which this project is connecting. If no six-digit Pima County manhole number has been assigned, please label it with the number used on the sewer improvement plans. SHEET 2. The proposed public sewer easement around the proposed private sewer is not necessary. Please delete this proposed easement. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 4th submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 05/03/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plan to show the locations and note the height and materials used to construct any proposed or required screen walls. Note the height and materials of existing walls proposed to meet the screening requirements. LUC 3.7.3.3 The development plan is required to demonstrate compliance with the above requirement. Provide spot elevations or other information as necessary. The screen for the parking lot is required to measure 5' from the finished grade of the parking lot. The screen wall is required for all sides of the vehicular use area, even properties with the same zoning, unless walls on adjacent properties are allowed as indicated below. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 2) If a new development is using an existing screen on an adjacent property to meet screening requirements, a copy of the recorded covenant locating the existing screen(s) on adjacent property is required prior to permit approval. DS 2-03.2.1.A.15 3) The loading areas are required to be screened from the property to the south per LUC table 3.7.2-I. Identify the required screen wall and note the height on the development and landscape plans. The loading area is approximately 68' from the south property line. 4) SCZ approval is required prior to development plan approval. Applications for projects within the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) shall be reviewed in accordance with the DSD Full Notice Procedure, Sec. 23A-50 and 23A-51. The decision to approve or deny the project will be based on the purpose, intent, and specific regulations of LUC 2.8.2. 5) Revise the native plant preservation and landscape plans to show easements. Revise the grading limits as necessary for utilities that cross the scenic route buffer area. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 07/07/2006 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D05-0038 Center for Neurosciences Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 07/07/06 DUE DATE: 5/8/06 COMMENTS: This review has been conducted from the plans submitted for the SCZ review. The plans submitted for the development plans are an earlier dated set of plans with out the SCZ information. Zoning will conditionally approve the Development Plan once the SCZ has been approved. The conditional approval will be based on the following comments. 1. All easements must be recorded prior to development plan approval. Provide the recordation information (docket and page) the new water easement (easement number 7) and the new electrical easement (easement number 9). DS 2-05.2.3.B. 2. The following comment regarding the SCZ will remain as a reminder to the reviewer. The Development Plan cannot be approved until the SCZ application is completed and approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D05-0038dp.doc |
| 07/12/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 12 2006 Don Buchanan DOWL Engineers 166 West Alameda Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D05-0038 Center for Neurosciences Development Plan Dear Don: Your submittal of April 24, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Wastewater, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plans (Landscape, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-0384 |