Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D05-0037
Parcel: 141170140

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D05-0037
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/21/2005 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/26/2005 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Denied Provide a General Note on the plan stating: "Additional fire hydrants shall be provided by the developer in accordance with the Tucson Fire Code"
09/26/2005 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approv-Cond 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D05-0037 OFFICES FOR CAYLOR CONSTRUCTION / DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: September 26, 2005



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.

Approved with the following condition:

1: Correct Rita Ranch Rd. to Rita Ranch Road on mylar.


NOTE:

1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved
Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima
County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses.

2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.
09/29/2005 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Denied * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development.
* Access from the refuse enclosure is to tight. Refuse serfice trucks have a rear wheel turning radius of 35' and a front bumper clearance radius of 50'.
* No provisions shown for recycling.
* Shown trash enclosure does not show doors.
10/04/2005 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
D05-0037
ROBERT CAYLOR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
OFFICES FOR CAYLOR CONSTRUCTION
10/04/2005 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) The loading area is required to be screened from the adjacent properties per LUC table 3.7.2-I. A 6' masonry wall is required.

2) The parking areas are required to be screened from adjacent properties to the east and south per
LUC table 3.7.2-I. A 5' high masonry wall is required.

3) Show all required screen walls on the development plan and the landscape plan. DS 2-07.A.3

4) Add the following note to the landscape plans: A permit from the City Engineer is required prior to any excavation or construction, including landscaping in the public right-of-way.

5) Revise the landscape and native plant preservation plans so that plant identification numbers to meet the minimum font size requirements. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. DS 2-05.2.1.C

6) Submit the Native Plant Inventory list as part of the native plant preservation plan in 24"X 36" format.
DS 2-05.2.1.C

7) Within the 30' scenic route buffer area and the adjacent right-of-way area along Houghton Road indigenous plant material is to remain. If any disturbance occurs during construction or prior to permit application, the buffer area is to be re-vegetated with native plants indigenous to the site and the area reconstructed to look as natural as possible per DS 2-06.7.1.B. A native seed mix is required In order to assist with restoration. To determine which seeds to use on a project when native seeds are required, a comprehensive list (as discussed in Sec. 9-06.4.1) of native plants must be submitted. Refer to DS 9-06.4.2.

8) The adjacent right-of-way area along Houghton Road should also be revegetated with a native seed mix LUC 3.7.5.2.D.1

9) Note 1 on the landscape plan, regarding decomposed granite does not apply to the scenic route buffer area. Decomposed granite will not be allowed in the buffer. Clarify as necessary. LUC 3.7.5.2.A

10) The development plan indicates a monument sign in the 30' scenic route buffer area. This is not permitted improvement per LUC 3.7.5.2.C. Revise as necessary.

11) Include the Scenic Corridor Zone in note 18 of the development plan. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10

12) The native plant preservation plan should include the plant preservation methodology employed. LUC 3.8.6.1

13) The native plant preservation plan should be titled as such. LUC 3.8.4.1

14) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B

15) Revise the legend on sheet L-1. The first two items do not appear on the plan. DS 2-07.2.2

16) Add notes to the NPP plan regarding the required on-site monitoring. LUC 3.8.6.7.D

17) General note 3 on sheet L-1 indicates that the landscape plan is for the southern property only, but the plan shows plantings on the property to the north. Clarify if these plans include new plantings for the property to the north.

18) The number of Acacia constricta proposed in the legend does not meet the mitigation requirements of the native plant preservation plan. Revise as necessary. LUC 3.8.6.2.C

19) The calculations of preservation credit for Acacia constricta must be clarified. Preservation of 14 shrubs could not result in credit value of 42. DS 2-15.3.5.B

20) The landscape plans shall include a summary of plants, including quantities of PIP, TOS and mitigation plants their site location on the landscape plans. DS 2-15.3.4.B

21) The plans indicate preservation of #151 in the driveway area. Revise the landscape and native plant preservation plans as necessary.

22) Include an analysis of the native plant inventory per DS 2-15.3.3.A. The analysis should clarify how this phase of the preservation plan relates to the previous development. The plans should document how the preservation and mitigation requirements are met for both phases.

23) The landscape plan must include the following grading
Information per DS 2-07.2.2.B:
A. Grade changes across the site indicated by one (1) foot interval contour
lines or by spot elevations.
B. Percent slope across the site and the direction of the slope of paved areas.
C. Existing grades on adjacent rights-of-way and adjacent sites and propsed finish grades.
D. Limits of grading. Indicate natural contours of undisturbed areas.
E. Areas of detention/retention, depths of basins, and percentage of side
slope or slope ratio.
F. Water harvesting areas.
G. Percent side slope or slope ratio of berms.

24) Submit an irrigation plan. LUC 3.7.4.5.C


RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED.
10/18/2005 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Denied SUBJECT: OFFICES FOR CAYLOR CONSTRUCTION

D05-0037



Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted for
review September 21, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this
time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of
this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and
easement recording information must be depicted on the plans.



Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map and the development plan
showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. It appears
that the electrical line may actually be located through the center of
the project. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities
in conflict will be billable to the developer.



Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's
review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions.


Liza Castillo
Right of Way Agent
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Co.
(520) 917-8745
lcastillo@tep.com
10/19/2005 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D05-0037 Offices for Caylor Construction 10/18/05

() Tentative Plat
(XXXX) Development Plan
(XXXX) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
(XXXX) Other - NPPO

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-84-84

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: 10/19/05

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
(XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
() Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 10/18/05
10/20/2005 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No comment.
10/24/2005 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved 434 estimated daily trips in 24 hr period.
10/24/2005 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP.

D. Dale Kelch, PE
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
10/25/2005 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Michael St.Paul FOR: David Rivera
Planner Technician Principal Planner

PROJECT:
D05-0037
8235 South Houghton Road
Medical Offices
TRANSMITTAL: October 25, 2005

COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.
CODE SECTION/
DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD

1. A maximum of one year is permitted, from the date of application, to obtain approval of a development plan. If at the end of one year the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations and codes in effect at that time, and it must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 18, 2006. Please place the Development Plan number (D05-0037) on all sheets including, landscaping and NPPO.
LUC Sec 5.3.8.2, DS 2-05.2.2.B.2
2. Provide a copy of the last stamped approved development plan. You have provided copies of the last approved landscape plan and NPPO, but no development plan. Provide a separate response letter specifically addressing how each of the annexation conditions have been met or shall be met. Also provide any conditions for the last approved Development Plan. (See comments # 16 and # 17.) If applicable, list any Board of Adjustment variances, Design Development Option modifications or Project Design Option modifications.
DS 2-05.2.2.B.9, C9-84-84, Ordinance 6143
3. The plan shows a property line through the center of the property. A split of the existing 131,551 square feet, or approximately 3.02 acres requires a separate submittal for the lot split. Please provide the dimensions and square footage of each lot. In the General Notes identify the lot size in square footage and acres. It is necessary that all the boundary information reflect both the existing conditions for the site and the proposed conditions.
DS 2-05.2.4.A & DS 2-05.2.2.B.11
4. A Scenic Corridor Zone overlay submittal and review is required for this development plan. Please contact Patricia Gehlen for information concerning the overlay process at 520-791-5608 extension 1179. Please be aware that there are several requirements specific to the SCZ review; these include colors and materials for all structures (including roofing) and signs. In addition to the separate SCZ review submittal you must demonstrate compliance with the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) on the development plan.
DS 2-05.2.2.B.10, LUC Sec 2.8.2 & Sec 23A-50
5. Please enlarge all lettering and dimensioning to a minimum of 12 point type.
DS 2-05.2.1.C
6. Please add the phone number to the owner's name and address. Also place a brief legal description in the title block. In addition, the legal description in the upper left of the sheet appears to be incomplete. In addition, add the reference "LUC Sec 3.5.4.8.B" to "General Notes" number 4.
DS 2-05.2.2.A.1, DS 2-05.2.1.G.2
7. Delineate all easements of record on the plan. Provide the location and width of each easement with the purpose along with the docket and page number. Also show all proposed easements with dimensions, proposed uses and whether they are to be public or private.
DS 2-05.2.3.B & .G
8. Depict all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site on the plan. Dedications of right-of-way may be required or may have been completed. Please provide this information on the plan.
DS 2-05.2.4.E
9. Clearly depict the current and future right-of-way locations and the current and future curb locations for the entire site.
DS 2-05.2.4.F, & LUC Sec 2.8.3
10. Delineate and dimension the future curb location on the plan. Also delineate, dimension and identify the required thirty-foot SCZ buffer area on the plan. The setback for the building along Houghton Road must be measured from the portion of the building that is closest to Houghton Road. It appears that proposed location may not meet the required three-to-one setback for the SCZ.
DS 2-05.2.4.I, LUC Sec 3.2.6.5.B.1 & LUC Sec 2.8.2.4.A LUC Sec 2.8.2.5.B

11. Please provide two (2) loading spaces on the plan. One (1) loading space is required for each building. Also demonstrate maneuverability for the loading space on the site plan.
DS 2-05.2.4.O, LUCSec 3.4.4.1.B.2 & LUC Sec 3.4.5.4

12. The number of required parking spaces is sixty-nine (69) for the identified use and square footage of the buildings. Only fifty-four (54) parking spaces are provided on the plan. The number provided is incorrectly identified in two locations in General Notes # 10. Seventy-seven (77) is identified as the number provided and the bicycle parking is based on seventy-nine (79) parking spaces provided. Please revise the plan for consistency and compliance.
DS 2-05.2.4.P, LUC Sec 3.3.4 & LUC Sec 3.3.3.5
13. Please provide a dimensioned typical parking space for the angled parking along the east side of the plan. Also provide the angle of the parking spaces and dimension the parking area access lane (PAAL).
DS 2-05.2.4.P, LUC 3.3.7.2 &
DS 3-05.0

14. "Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning."
DS 2-05.2.4.U
15. Indicate the locations and types of postal service." Please indicate by note if the postal service shall be inside or show the location if the service is to be outside.
DS 2-05.2.4.V
16. Indicate the location and types of all existing a proposed freestanding or pedestal signage. The proposed monument sign is partially located in the future right-of-way. Please move the location so that the entire sign is out of the future right-of-way. Also identify all billboards on or near the site.
DS 2-05.2.4.W
17. It appears that this project has also impacted the Pima Savings development to the north by reducing the existing parking. It may be necessary to submit these changes to the Pima Savings Development Plan.

18. Please provide copies of any recorded cross access agreements and if applicable across parking agreements. There may be enough parking with both sites together. As it is, there is not enough parking provided for the use of this development plan.
LUC Sec 3.3.4
19. Please move the van accessible parking places along the west side of the east building two spaces to the north, so that the crosswalk leading from the accessible loading space does not cross behind other parking spaces. Also add striping to the accessible loading space to the north of the west building. The Detectable Warnings (Truncated Domes) must be located at the edge of the nearest curb line, between six (6) to eight (8) inches and be twenty-four inches (24") deep. Please revise the handicapped ramp Detail # 8.
DS 2-08.4.1.F, ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003; 501 & 406.13.1 & 13.2
20. Please by aware that there may be additional comments relative to requirements of the previous Development Plan, the SCZ review and any additional information provided on or with the next submittal.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St Paul, (520) 791-5608.
Resubmittal of this Development Plan, the previous Development Plan, a submittal for the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) is required. Please contact Patricia Gehlen to begin the SCZ overlay review process.
11/01/2005 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Denied DATE: October 31, 2005

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov



SUBJECT: D05-0037 Offices for Caylor Construction: Development Plan(9-21-05)


Denied

Please show the following:
Actual location of existing Houghton Road Greenway paved path.
Location of Houghton Road Greenway - 8 ft wide trail.
Show the trail merging with the paved path at the curb ramp.
Indicate the trail is an 8ft wide meandering trail that shall be 2” of stabilized DG compacted to 95% over native subgrade compacted to 95%.
11/02/2005 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: October 31, 2005
CDRC/Zoning Manager

SUBJECT: 8235 S. Houghton Road, Caylor Construction Ofc.
Development Plan D05-0037 (First Review)
T15S, R15E, Section 25

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report.

The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Development Plan:

1. Please provide North arrow and scale per D.S. 2-02.2.1.
2. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP.
3. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207.
4. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
5. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14.
6. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15.
7. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
8. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20.
9. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
10. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22.
11. Complete Development plan number (D05-0037) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
12. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Diamension 10'x10' clear area.
13. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address.
14. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
15. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
16. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
17. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information.
18. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
19. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans".

Drainage Report:
1. The DR has been accepted by Engineering.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/8235 S HOUGHTON RD CDRC
11/08/2005 CRAIG GROSS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Completed
11/08/2005 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approv-Cond November 15, 2005

To: Robert Caylor, Roberty Caylor Construction Co.

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

____________________________________
From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County
Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality

Subject: Offices for Caylor Construction Corp.
Development Plan - 1st Submittal
D05-0037

The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.



This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastwater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available, and provide a copy of that letter to this office. PCWWM Planning Services may be contacted regarding this matter at 520-740-6500.

The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office.

Based on the previous development D01-0044, this project would qualify for the Participating sewer connection fee rate.

A Joint Use and Maintenance Agreement between this project and the one to the north (Pyramid Credit Union) will need to be recorded for the shared private sewer line, before this office will be able to approve this development plan. Prior to signature or recordation, this agreement must be reviewed and approved by Ms. Ilene Deckard of the PCWMD Development Services Section. Also, the property to the north, will need to grant a private sewer easement over the shared sewer line. Please contact Ms. Deckard about this matter as soon as possible. She can be reached at 740-6544.

Add the development plan case number, D05-0037, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision.

Sheet 1: Revise General Note #22 so that it states;

THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E).

And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values.

Sheet 1: Delete General Note #23 as no new public sanitary sewers are proposed.

Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars.

Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality.

Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution.


If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter

CC: Project File