Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0037
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2006 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approv-Cond | DATE: January 3, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D05-0037 Offices for Caylor Construction: Development Plan(12-8-05) Conditionally approved provided the Houghton Greenway Trail is repaired. |
| 01/09/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 9, 2006 Robert Caylor Robert Caylor Construction Company 6711 East Camino Principal Tucson, Arizona 85715 Subject: D05-0076 Offices for Caylor Construction Corp. Development Plan Dear Rob: Your submittal of December 8, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Recorded Cross Access and Parking Agreement (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plans (Landscape DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 290-6014 |
| 12/06/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/08/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved December 08, 2005. |
| 12/12/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: December 12, 2005 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: 8235 S. Houghton Road, Caylor Construction Ofc. Development Plan D05-0037 (First Review) T15S, R15E, Section 25 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: None. Development Plan: 1. The DP has been accepted conditionally upon the revision that the refuse enclosure have a min. of 10'x10' clear from side to side and front to back. Drainage Report: 1. The DR has been accepted by Engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/8235 S HOUGHTON RD CDRC 2 |
| 12/14/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape sheets to show the 5' high wall along the southern property boundary in the same locations shown on the development plan. DS 2-07.2.0 2) The native plant preservation plan should include the plant preservation methodology employed. LUC 3.8.6.1 The Plant Inventory methodology appears to be applicable. LUC 3.8.6.2 rather than the selective preservation methodology used in other jurisdictions. 3) Revise the landscape plan to show the locations for all of the Acacia constricta. The number shown on the plan should match the number indicated in the legend. 4) The landscape plans shall include a summary of plants, including quantities of PIP, TOS and mitigation plants their site location on the landscape plans. DS 2-15.3.4.B 5) Include an analysis of the native plant inventory per DS 2-15.3.3.A. The analysis should clarify how this phase of the preservation plan relates to the previous development. The plans should document how the preservation and mitigation requirements are met for both phases. The note added to the plan innaccurately states there is no relationship to the development to the north. There is a relationship in that the development to the north located transplanted protected native plants and required mitigation plants on the southern portion of the property. 6) Identify the landscape plan sheets and clarify. The irrigation legend appears on both sheets, although only L-1 includes irrigation information, both sheets include a planting plan but L-1 is only partially complete. 7) Use larger symbols for the irrigation plan. DS 2-05.2.1 8) The native plant inentory and preservation plan is to include an aerial photo per DS 2-15.3.4.A. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 12/14/2005 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: OFFICES FOR CAYLOR CONSTRUCTION D05-0037 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted December 8, 2005. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 770-2062. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Todd Stocksdale Design/Build - DB 102 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 12/14/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/30/2005 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul Planner Technician PROJECT: D05-0037 8235 South Houghton Road Medical Offices: Second review TRANSMITTAL: December 30, 2005 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. A maximum of one year is permitted, from the date of application, to obtain approval of a development plan. If at the end of one year the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations and codes in effect at that time, and it must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 18, 2006. LUC Sec 5.3.8.2, DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 2. Provide a copy of the last stamped approved development plan. You have provided copies of the last approved landscape plan and NPPO, but no development plan. Provide a separate response letter specifically addressing how each of the annexation conditions have been met or shall be met. Also provide any conditions for the last approved Development Plan. (See comment # 17.) DS 2-05.2.2.B.9, C9-84-84, Ordinance 6143 3. The plan shows a property line through the center of the property. A split of the existing 131,551 square feet, or approximately 3.02 acres requires a separate submittal for the lot split. Please provide the dimensions and square footage of each lot. In the General Notes identify the lot size in square footage and acres. It is necessary that all the boundary information reflect both the existing conditions for the site and the proposed conditions. DS 2-05.2.4.A & DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 4. A Scenic Corridor Zone overlay submittal and review is required for this development plan. Please contact Patricia Gehlen for information concerning the overlay process at 520-791-5608 extension 1179. Please be aware that there are several requirements specific to the SCZ review; these include colors and materials for all structures (including roofing) and signs. In addition to the separate SCZ review submittal you must demonstrate compliance with the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) on the development plan. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10, LUC Sec 2.8.2 & Sec 23A-50 5. Clearly depict the current and future right-of-way locations and the current and future curb locations for the entire site. The sidewalk width for the future ROW is twelve feet (12'-0"). DS 2-05.2.4.F, & LUC Sec 2.8.3 6. The number of required parking spaces is sixty-nine (69) for the identified use and square footage of the buildings. (See comments #9 and #10.) DS 2-05.2.4.P, LUC Sec 3.3.4 & LUC Sec 3.3.3.5 7. Please provide a dimensioned typical parking space for the angled parking along the east side of the plan. Also provide the angle of the parking spaces and dimension the parking area access lane (PAAL). DS 2-05.2.4.P, LUC 3.3.7.2 & DS 3-05.0 8. "Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning." This requirement also includes annexation conditions. DS 2-05.2.4.U 9. It appears that this project has also impacted the Pima Savings development to the north by reducing the existing parking. It may be necessary to submit these changes to the Pima Savings Development Plan. 10. Please provide copies of any recorded cross access agreements and if applicable across parking agreements. There may be enough parking with both sites together. As it is, there is not enough parking provided for the use of this development plan. LUC Sec 3.3.4 11. The Detectable Warnings (Truncated Domes) must be located at the edge of the nearest curb line, between six (6) to eight (8) inches and be twenty-four inches (24") deep. Please revise the handicapped ramp Detail # 8. DS 2-08.4.1.F, ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003; 501 & 406.13.1 & 13.2 12. It is difficult to read this print out of the plans submitted. It appears that all the layers were turned on when printed. 13. None of the items that were to be submitted by the owner have been provided. 14. Please by aware that there may be additional comments relative to requirements of the previous Development Plan, the SCZ review and any additional information provided on or with the next submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St Paul, (520) 791-5608. Resubmittal of this Development Plan, the previous Development Plan, a submittal for the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ) is required. Please contact Patricia Gehlen to begin the SCZ overlay review process. |