Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0036
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/14/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/15/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved September 15, 2005. |
| 09/21/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * No landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. Broadway North and Gateway landfill over 1000 feet away. * Approved for direct metal dumpster service. |
| 09/23/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0036 7350 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE COMP / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: September 20, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Label section corners on Location Map. 2: Label suffixes for all street names on Location Map. 3: Delete “East” from Speedway Boulevard on sheet 2. 4: Number buildings numerically on sheet 2. |
| 09/26/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) The loading area is required to be screened from adjacent properties per LUC table 3.7.2-I. 3) The site is required to be screened with a 5' masonry wall along the Pantano Wash and with a 5' wall where the vehicular use area is adjacent to the O-3 zoned property. 4) Revise the landscape plan to identify and show the locations of any proposed screen walls, including those required for loading and refuse storage areas. DS 2-07.A.3 5) Revise the landscape plans to include dimensions for all tree planting areas. Planters are required to be a minimum of four feet wide. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c 6) All plant material used for landscaping shall be selected from the Drought Tolerant Plant List in Development Standard 9-06. Exhibit III. An oasis allowance of up 2.5% of the site area is allowed in locations as described in the Development Standards. LUC 3.7.2.2.C.3 7) Any retention/detention basins are required to comply with the technical requirements and design criteria of DS 10-01.0. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 09/28/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D05-0036 SWAIN ASSOCIATES LTD 7350 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE COMP |
| 09/28/2005 | RBABBIT1 | LANDFILL | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approv-Cond | Environmental Services (COT, ES) has reviewed and conditionally approved Case Number D05-0036. Portions of the Professional Office Comp Development are subject to the City of Tucson Landfill Ordinance, Ordinance No. 10037. Any development located between 100 and 500 feet from the Broadway North landfill is subject to Sec. 29-24 of the Landfill Ordinance. The following modifications must be done to the drawing set · Identify the landfill and show the boundaries on the drawing sets where applicable. · Show the lines of 100 and 500 foot distances from the landfill where applicable on the drawing sets. · Add a note stating "All utilities and structures located within 500 feet of the Broadway North Landfill shall comply with the requirements of the City of Tucson's Landfill Ordinance No. 10037." If you have any questions please contact Robert Babbitt at (520) 791-5414. |
| 10/10/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN (1st Review) Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0036 7350 Professional Office Comp 10/01/05 ( ) Tentative Plat (ü) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment (ü) Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-11 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: October 12, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (ü) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (ü) No Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 10/10/05 |
| 10/11/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL OFFICE COMP D05-0036 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted for review September 14, 2005. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. The location of the existing underground electric cables should be determined by blue stake. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 10/13/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: October 17, 2005 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: 7350 E. Speedway Blvd, Prof. Ofc. Complex Development Plan D05-0036 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 08 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Because of the proximity of the Pantano Wash, perhaps consideration in asking for the waiving the Detention/Retention requirements and draining directly into the Pantano Wash would best for recharge and minimal disturbance to the environment. 4. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 5. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 6. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 7. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15. 8. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 9. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 10. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 11. Det./Ret. basin shall not be located in the 50' linear park easement. Revise as required. 12. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP. 13. Provide a cross-section of the proposed improvements for the river park per rezoning condition no. 12 on the plans. 14. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 15. Complete the Development plan number (D05-0036) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 16. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The service vehicle does not meet the turning radius standards and exceeds the max. "back-up" distance allowed. Also include a dumpster enclosure detail. 17. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 18. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 19. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 20. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. The information on the cover sheet does not match the information on the DR. 21. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 22. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Development plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Development Plan purposes only. Final review and acceptance will at the grading plan stage. 3. Because of the proximity of the Pantano Wash, perhaps consideration in asking for the waiving the Detention/Retention requirements and draining directly into the Pantano Wash would best for recharge and minimal disturbance to the environment. 4. Det./Ret. basin shall not be located in the 50' linear park easement. Revise as required. 5. Provide a detail of the Ret/Det basin. 6. Percolation tests are required prior to the issuance of the approval of the grading plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/7350 E. Speedway Blvd CDRC |
| 10/14/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Please provide a legal description for the 50 foot river park corridor and a title report of the subject parcel to the Real Estate Division. Jim Stoyanoff Property Agent 791-4181 |
| 10/17/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: October 14, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D05-0036 Professional Office Complex: Development Plan(9-14-05) Denied Please indicate with a note the following on the plans: -The paved path shall be 2” of asphalt over 4” of compacted AB. -The paved path shall be all-weather and A.D.A. accessible. -The 8’ meandering trail shall be 2” of stabilized DG compacted to 95% over native subgrade compacted to 95%. The paved path should meet the sidewalk on Speedway rather than continuing north to the bridge. The trail should merge with the paved path. Indicate drainage structures crossing the trail corridor should be directed below pathway and trail. |
| 10/18/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 13, 2005. 2. Revise the second sentence under general note two (2) to the following: The proposed use for the rezoned parcel is Administrative and Professional Office "30". (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3) 3. If applicable, all existing and proposed easements and those proposed for abandonment, must be recorded and the docket and page noted on the plan prior to final approval of the development plan. (D.S. 2-05.2.3.B) (D.S. 2-05.2.4.G) 4. a) Dimension the width of the on-site pedestrian sidewalk. b) D.S. 2-08.4.1.A requires that at least one (1) sidewalk will be provided to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. c) The on-site pedestrian circulation system shall be connected to the dumpster area. (D.S. 2-08.3.1) d) Vehicle parking spaces that abut a sidewalk of less than six and one-half (6 ½) feet width shall be provided with wheelstop curbing. Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2, wheelstop curbing shall be located two and one-half (2 ½) feet from the front of the parking space. 5. Revise the vehicle parking calcualtions as follows: The two-story building shall be parked at a ratio of one (1) space per 200 square feet of gross floor area for the first floor and one (1) space per 250 sqaure feet of gross floor area for the second floor. (LUC Sec. 3.3.4 Administrative and professional office) 6. Under the single story vehicle parking calculation on sheet 2 of 2, the ratio used is for Medical Service Outpatient. If the intent is to allow this land use class please add the land use classification, development designator, and "subject to" section found in the LUC under general note two (2). (D.S. 2-05.2.4.P) 7. a) Accessible ramps are required for handicap parking spaces and accessible pedestrian sidewalk. Provide a detail of the ramp/s to be used. In addition, remove the curb shown on the handicap parking detail blocking accessibility from the access aisle. (ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Section 405 ramps) b) Where the accessible pedestrian path transitions to a vehicular use area, all wheel chair ramps shall have the Truncated Domes instead of the standard grooves, which are shown on City of Tucson Standard Detail 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, the wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with the Standard Detail 207. (ICC/ANSI A.117.1-2003 Section 705.5) 8. Provide a detail of the handicap parking sign. 9. Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.2, carport overhang shall be setback a minimum of one (1) foot from the edge of PAAL. Provide dimensions on drawing or provide a separate detail. 10. Provide a fully dimensioned detail of the bicycle parking facilities. Indicate on the drawing the location and the number of bicycles it supports. If necessary provide directional signage. Refer to D.S. 2-09 for design criteria. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q) 11. Label existing and/or future sight visibility triangles. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.R) 12. Submit a copy of the Mayor and Council authorized rezoning conditions. In addition, provide a separate response letter addressing how all rezoning conditions will be met. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.U) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. |
| 10/21/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. While the SVTs are shown, they are not labeled as to size or if they are existing or future or both. 2. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) Be sure to label the ROW as either existing or future or if they are coincident label ROW as both existing and future. 3. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) Please place dimension on curb returns. 4. TRAFFIC is in receipt of and concurs with the submitted TIA as required by rezoning condition 2. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/21/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. The consultant has personally delivered a set of revised plans for TRAFFIC's review and all comments from previous submittals dated 21OCT2005 have been addressed to TRAFFIC's satisfaction. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/24/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | estimated daily traffic in 24 hr period - 303 |
| 10/31/2005 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | October 31, 2005 To: Aaron Katz, Swaim Associates Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: 7350 Professional Office Complex - 7350 E. Speedway Blvd. Development Plan - 1st Submittal D05-0036 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to both the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Pantaño Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacities for the project is available, and provide a copy of that letter to this office. PCWWM Planning Services may be contacted regarding this matter at 520-740-6500. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Based on the sewer layout shown and a review of historical sewer base maps, this project would qualify for the Non-Participating sewer connection fee rate. However, a final determination of this status cannot be made until approval of the sewer construction plans and/or preparation of a sewer service agreement. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D05-0036, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. Sheet 1: Revise the first sentence of General Note #10: So that after the words ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, and before the words ,WILL BE, you add the phrase , EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY,. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #12: So that after the words REQUIREMENTS OF, you complete the sentence with, THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). Sheet 1; Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES OF PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4. Sheet 1: General Note #11 is considered a Permitting Note. Add a Permitting Notes block to the plans and move General Note # 11 to the Permitting Notes block and renumber appropriately.. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: NO PERMITS FOR PERMANENT STRUCTURES (I.E., MASONRY WALLS, FENCES, ETC.) ON OR THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENT WILL BE ISSUED WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. On the SITE PLAN you have proposed two separate points of connection to the 30” (large diameter sewer line) Pantaño Interceptor. PCWMD will allow only one connection for this project to the public sewerage conveyance system unless special approval from PCWMD Systems Management – Engineering Section, is obtained. Contact Frank Luiz @ 520-617-8200 for any assistance with how to secure approval for this design or the variance approval process. The SITE PLAN shows the use of drop style manholes into the 30” Pantaño Interceptor. Due to the potential for turbulents and the subsequent creation of sewer gases, PCWMD currently does not allow the use of drop manhole connections to the public sewerage conveyance system unless there is no other viable alternative.. Again, contact Frank Luiz of the PCWMD Systems Management – Engineering Section, @ 520-617-8200, if you wish to pursue this type of design. Refer to PC/COT standard design WWM A-3.14.a. for drop manhole requirements. There is an existing 8” stub-out and plug at manhole #8034-01 that appears to have been constructed in consideration of service to this parcel. PCWMD will recommend that you provide a new private 8” sewer and manhole to accommodate two private 6” building BCS connections. Refer to PC/COT standard design WWM A-3.5.a. and WWM A-3.8.a., for odor control and corrosion control, when connecting to a large diameter (greater than 18” pipe) sewer. Sheet 2: Provide the sewer plan numbers of the existing public sewer mains shown on or within 100’ of the project site. Sheet 2: Revise the SITE PLAN to provide the existing IMS manhole numbers of the existing public sewer manholes shown on or within 100’ of the project site. These are the numbers found on the PCWMD base maps or the PCDOT Mapguide website. Sheet 2: Provide the pipe length and pipe slope for the proposed private 6” sewers that flow from the new single-story office building and the new two-story office buildings. Sheet 2: From the SITE PLAN and from the LEGEND, I am unable to identify the symbols with inverts over the proposed 6” sewer. Are these cleanouts? Show the unidentified symbol in the LEGEND on sheet 1. The SITE PLAN shows a relocated gas regulator station with a new screen wall structure being constructed over the existing public sewer within the existing public sewer easement. PCWMD Operations and Maintenance section will have to agree to this obstacle in the path of the public sewer easement. Contact Jeff Kreamer or Ivan Milenski of Richey Road Operations @ 520-326-4333 for approval of this design. The SITE PLAN shows curbs being constructed over and around an existing public sewer manhole and parking stalls being created over the existing sewer line, in the existing public sewer easement. PCWMD Operation and Maintenance section prefers that the manholes be under the driving lanes at the entrance to the site and that the sewer line be in the PAAL, not under the parking stalls. Again, Contact Jeff Kreamer or Ivan Milenski of Richey Road Operations @ 520-326-4333 for approval. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER ) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 11/01/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 1, 2005 Aaron S. Katz, AIA Swaim Associates Ltd. 3936 East Fort Lowell Road, Suite 202 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D05-0036 7350 Professional Office Complex Development Plan Dear Aaron: Your submittal of September 14, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Landfill, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, Real Estate, Parks and Recreation, Traffic, Wastewater, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Parks and Recreation, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Official Rezoning Conditions (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Reports (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 326-1148 |