Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0034
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/16/2007 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: January 16, 2007 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: World Savings Bank, 9484 E 22nd Steet Development Plan D05-0035 (First Review revision) T14S, R15E, Section 14 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. This project is subject to overlay zone of the W.A.S.H. Contact Patricia Gehland at 791-5550 x1179 for details and submittal requirements. 3. Adhere to re-zoning conditions 1-G, 3, 4, 8, 10 (listed twice on the TP), 11, 12, 13 and 20. Revise the TP as necessary. 4. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 5. Show how drainage is handled when storm water crosses ingress/egress on 22nd Street. 6. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. All SVT's are not shown or not they are shown properly. 7. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. See re-zoning condition 12. 8. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 9. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 10. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. Name all washes on plat. 11. Show Development plan (D05-0034) number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 12. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Dimension space between bollard and wall inside the refuse container. 13. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 14. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 15. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 16. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. Robb Wash is a W.A.S.H. designated watercourse and a xeroreparian intermediate habitat. A mitigation report is required for both. 3. The project has two City of Tucson floodplains, one adjacent to the property and one crossing the project. Both of the washes must be addressed in the DR. 4. A floodplain use permit is required. 5. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DR. 6. Show how drainage is handled when storm water crosses ingress/egress on 22nd Street. 7. Provide a developed condition drainage map. 8. Provide a map showing off-site drainage areas. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/9484 E 22ND ST CDRC REV |
| 01/17/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 17, 2007 Steve Miller World Savings 1901 Harrison Street Oakland, CA. 94612 Subject: D05-0034 World Savings Revised Development Plan Dear Steve: Your submittal of November 21, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Development Plan (Real Estate, Parks and Recreation, Tucson Police, Traffic, Landscape, Wastewater, Zoning, DUPD, Engineering, DSD) 6 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Parks and Recreation, Zoning, DUPD, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Color Elevations (DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, REAL ESTATE, AND PARKS AND RECREATION HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE RESUBMITTAL DUE TO CONDITIONS OF REZONING. Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 510-446-4509 & 292-6144 (attn: Pete Salonga) |
| 11/21/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/01/2006 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#148934 December 1, 2006 Dear Mr. Salonga: SUBJECT: WORLD SAVINGS BANK DP05-034 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 21, 2006 It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: F. Rodriguez, City (Email) N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power |
| 12/07/2006 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | A copy of the last approved Development Plan (DP) should be submitted to allow for cross-referencing of the revised DP against the approved DP. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/12/2006 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/14/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The following plants are required to be installed on the site as a result of the mitigation plan approved with the subdivision case S01-007 for Harrison Terrace and in accordance with the conditions of rezoning, refer to the approved plans for locations: Acacia constricta- 1 Celtis Pallida- 1 Opuntia engelmanii- 2 Opuntia leptocaulis- 2 Parkinsonia microphyllum- 15 Zizyphus obtusifolia- 8 Yucca elata- 5 Include these plantings on the landscape plan, adjacent to the Robb Wash. 2) Revise the plans to provide screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I for the southern portion of the vehicular use area. The addition of drive-through lanes modifies the previous approval. A partial screening waiver per LUC 3.7.3.6.D is no longer appropriate. 3) A 10' wide landscape buffer is required along Harrison Road adjacent to the right-of way per C9-00-03 (cond. 14) . 4) Provide screening for the electrical transformer proposed in the easement along 22nd Street, while locating the screening to eliminate conflicts. LUC Table 3.7.2-I, LUC 3.7.2.6.B 5) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers, such as rezoning, to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 6) Revise the loading calculation title on sheet 1 of the development plan. It should refer to On Site or Off Street Loading. LUC 3.4 7) Specify 6' high walls for the refuse storage area on the landscape plan and the development plan and associated details. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 8) Prepare the trail easement referred to on the plans. Obtain City of Tucson. acceptance prior to recording. 9) Revise the landscape plan to show water harvesting areas. Show the amount and disposition of flow and indicate drainage points from buildings and paved areas. DS 2-07.2.2.C The landscape plan shall be coordinated with the grading and hydrology plans and indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B RESUBMITTAL OF AL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 12/19/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | December 18, 2006 To: Peter Salonga, Otracle Engineering Group Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael J.Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: World Savings Development Plan – 4th Submittal D05-0034 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The 3rd submittal needed only minor changes and was conditionally approved. This (4th) submittal shows a redesign of the previously accepted private sewer, with the 6” private sewer being tapped into the existing manhole in a manor that is presently unacceptable. Sheet 1: Revise the Wastewater Management Notes block so that: The first note ends with, THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF THE PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. This language was asked for in the 1st and 2nd reviews. This is the 3rd request. The fourth note contains the fixture unit equivalent numbers, as was included in the 3rd review. Sheet 2: Item #9, of the first review letter form Subhash Raval, P. E., dated November 9, 2005, stated: “Connect the Building Connection Sewer (BCS) line to the existing public sewer in Harrison Road, 5' south of the edge of existing manhole, if possible. If a connection to the existing manhole must be made, you will need to obtain written authorization from Eric Wieduwilt, PCWMD's Chief Engineer to make this connection. His receptionist can be reached at 520-617-8203.” And Item #10, stated: “The cleanout in the Building Connection Sewer (BCS) line must be located on the site, outside of the public right of way, and the length of BCS line installed in the public right of way must be minimized, by having the BCS enter the right way as perpendicular to the right of way centerline as possible.” Submit written authorization from the PCWMD Chief Engineer, to connect the private BCS in the method shown, or redesign this plan in a similar manner to that which was acceptable in the third (3rd) submittal. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the fifth (5th) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 12/19/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0034 WORLD SAVINGS/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 12/19/2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ES |
| 12/20/2006 | KAROL ARAGONEZ | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Karol Aragonez Planner PROJECT: D05-0034 World Savings Development Plan Resubmittal TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 19, 2006 DUE DATE: December 20, 2006 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Please include the contour interval on each sheet of the development plan with the north arrow. DS 2.05.2.1.H 2. Please add to the land use block on sheet 1 of 5 the "subject to" LUC sections 3.5.4.5.A & C. 3. Please provide a separate response letter detailing compliance to applicable rezoning conditions of C9-00-03. DS 2-05.2.4.U 4. Please add note that reads "The project is designed to meet the overlay zones criteria: Sec. 2.8.3 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone and Sec. 29-12 through 29-19 Watercourse Amenities, Safety, and Habitat (WASH) Ordinance of the Tucson Code". DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 5. Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. Also if easements are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. If none exist provide response to reviewer's comments. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G 6. The minimum drive-through lane width leading to the window is eleven (11) feet and must be clearly delineated. The minimum drive-through lane width at the window is nine (9) feet. No more than two (2) car lengths may be less than the minimum width of eleven (11) feet. The lanes must be clearly dimensioned on the development plan meeting this requirement. The stacking capacity of each lane is four (4) spaces, eighteen (18) feet in length, including the spaces at the windows. DS 3-05.2.1.C.2.b, c, and d 7. A minimum of one (1) foot must be maintained between a structure and a drive-through lane. Please provide this dimension. DS 3-05.2.2.B.4 8. The drive-through lane is shown on elevations as being covered. A minimum distance of one (1) foot must be maintained between any open structure and the PAAL, measured from the closet part of the structure to the PAAL. Please dimension the PAAL abutting the drive-through lane. If one-way, please indicate direction of traffic and provide a minimum width of at least twelve (12) feet. DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 & DS 3-05.2.2.B.2 9. Please indicate one (1) of the drive-through lanes as being serviced by an ATM only as per requirement of LUC Sec. 3.5.4.5.A. 10. It appears that the PAAL providing a by-pass around the drive-through will not be a minimum of twelve (12) feet once the stacking spaces are provided. Reconfiguration of this portion of the site may be required. DS 3-05.2.1.C.1 11. Please revise the required street setbacks on sheet 1 of 5 from Twenty-second Street and Harrison Road as the greater of 21 feet or height of exterior building wall measured from back of future curb and provide the proposed setbacks based on this requirement. Add the required setback as one and one-half (1 1/2) height of the exterior building wall from R-1 zoned property. Correct spelling of the word "interior". LUC 3.2.6.5.B & 3.2.6.4 12. Please revise the typical parking details dimensioning the wheel stop curbing two and one-half (2 1/2) feet from the front of the parking space. DS 3-05.2.3.C.2 13. The pedestrian connection into the site adjacent to the PAAL at the southeast corner of site is at an extreme angle. The pedestrian connection to the north from Harrison Road meets the requirement of DS 2-08.4.1.A. Staff suggests removing the southeast connection to Harrison Road for safety concerns. Please provide detail of curb ramps connection to crosswalks. Curb ramps shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in width, exclusive of flared sides. The curb ramp flares shall not be steeper than 1:10. Counter slopes of adjoining gutters and road surfaces immediately adjacent to the curb ramp shall not be steeper than 1:20. The adjacent surfaces at transitions at curb ramps to walks, gutters and streets shall be at the same level. ANSI 406.2, 3, & 4 14. Please revise bicycle detail 1 showing proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The type of rack proposed does not provide two-point support for bicycles. Please review DS 2-09.8.0 Figure 2 - 7 for acceptable and unacceptable rack designs, Figure 8 for rack location, and Figure 9 for dimensional requirements. DS 2-09.5.1, DS2-09.5.2, DS 2-09.5.4, & DS 2-09.6.2 15. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirement can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. DS 2-05.2.4.W & LUC 3.5.4.26 16. The Robb Wash is a WASH Ordinance wash. Please verify if the WASH review and compliance was done as part of subdivision plat S01-007. If not a special application must be completed for WASH Ordinance review. 17. Correct wording in rezoning condition 9 it should read "maintained as open space" instead of "maintained s open space". 18. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Karol Aragonez, (520) 791-5550, ext. 1197. KAA S:\zoning review\karol\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D05-0034dpr.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 12/28/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0034 World Savings 12/26/06 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-00-03 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: December 20, 2006 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: December 20, 2006 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments D05-0034 World Savings: Development Plan December 20, 2006 1. Revised development plan, sheet 2 of 5, provides a loading zone not in compliance with rezoning case C9-00-03, condition number 19 which reads: New dumpster and loading zone spaces shall be plac3d at least fifty feet from residentially zoned or developed property. 2. I believe western edge of commercial Block A, abuts the Robb Wash which is zoned R-1. At its closest point, the loading zone seems to forty (40) feet from the western property line. The western property line abuts R-1 zone. Please revise development plan to be in compliance with rezoning condition number 19. 3. Rezoning case C9-00-03, condition number 15 reads: Commercial structures, walls, and residential units shall be constructed of building materials that are muted desert colors, or painted muted dessert colors which will blend with the local desert environment. Brighter colors shall be limited to accent use. Since this resubmittal has revised building, parking layout and drive-thru bays, please provide four-sided (color renderings) building elevations to document compliance with rezoning condition number 15. |
| 12/28/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved |