Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0034
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0034 World Savings 01/03/06 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-00-03 (*) Time Extension request, before MC on November 1, 2005 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Pantano East Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: December 29, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: December 23, 2005 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments D05-0034 World Savings: Development Plan October 6, 2005 The rezoning time extension went before Mayor and Council on November 1, 2005. The existing 26 rezoning conditions remained and rezoning conditions # 27 & 28 were added. Upon staff’s review for compliance on rezoning conditions staff finds the development plan not in compliance with rezoning condition # 15 which reads as following: Commercial structures, walls, and residential units shall be constructed of building materials that are muted desert colors, or painted muted desert colors which will blend with the local desert environment. Brighter colors shall be limited to accent use. The proposed building elevations depict external building material to be of sun screen perforated steel sheet – milled finish woven between pipe columns that are painted silver, which then includes aluminum curtain wall. Please revise development plan to be in compliance with rezoning condition # 15. |
| 01/04/2006 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: January 4, 2006 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: World Savings Bank, 9484 E 22nd Steet Development Plan D05-0035 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 14 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan. The Development Plan (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please provide North arrow and scale per D.S. 2-02.2.1. 2. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 3. This project is subject to overlay zone of the W.A.S.H. Contact Patricia Gehlan at 791-5550 x1179 for details and submittal requirements. Submit the approved W.A.S.H. mitigation plan that was implemented by Harrison Terrace. 4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. The SVT at corner of 22nd St. and Harrison shall also be shown. The SVT for the 22nd St. entrance is not shown correctly, the future face of curb location for a 150' ROW is 12' from the property line. Revise as required. 5. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Correct the Basis of Elevation description and add the elevation and datum. 6. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. Per the response comment, note 6 does not correspond with roof drainage. Perhaps note 7 is intended to be used, however the number 7 is used at the SE portion of the property. Revise as required. 7. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 4 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". The number of grading plans needed to submit is now 4. Drainage Report: 1. The DR has been accepted for Development Plan purposes. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/9484 E 22ND ST CDRC 2 |
| 01/06/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. The pedestrian SVTs on Harrison are not labeled. Show SVTs at the intersection of 22nd/Harrison. 2. The submitted TIA is dated October 2000 and is severely outdated. Please provide an updated TIA. Extensive improvements and development have occurred in the immediate area in the past 5 years. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/10/2006 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planner Technician PROJECT: D05-0034 9484 East 22nd Street World Savings Second review TRANSMITTAL: January 9, 2006 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 7, 2006. 2. The addresses are also required for all the consultants. Please add the addresses to the consultant information under "project directory" on Sheet DP1.0 (DS 2-05.2.2.A.2). 3. Following "Designator '28' " add the phrase "subject to Section 3.5.4.5.A" in "land use" under "project information" on Sheet DP1.0. 4. It appears; from the dimensions provided on the elevation drawings, that the wall heights measured from design grade do not exceed twenty-five feet (25'). Therefore, the required setback for the building is twenty-five feet (25') from the back of the future curb along both Harrison Road and 22nd Street. The twenty-seven feet (27') and the thirty-seven feet four inches (37'-4") appear to be correct for the 22nd Street setback, but thirty-six (36'-0") is not to the edge of the building, nor is it the required setback. The seventy-five feet four inches (75'-4") identified as a maximum setback along 22nd Street makes no sense. Please remove these two dimensions. In addition, please remove the ten foot (10'-0") dimension that is identified as a required setback along Harrison Road. The other setback dimensions along Harrison Road appear to be correct. 5. Please remove the heavy dashed grading limits line from Sheet DP2.0 and place it on the grading plan. 6. Please go through the "descriptive notes." There are several things that do not match up or do not make sense. For example; number 10 points to the bus stop and the trash dumpster, and number 34 point to the southwestern edge of the property and identifies it as a sidewalk. There are more. 7. Please do not use the "net square footage" of the building for any calculation on the site. Please recalculate the FAR and the parking requirements using the square footage from the outside of the building walls. 8. Please revise the parking detail. The wheel stops must two feet six inches (2'-6") from the front of the parking space (DS 3-05.2.3.C.2). 9. The truncated domes are incorrectly located on the handicapped accessible transition ramps for the van accessible parking space. The detectable warning (truncated domes) should be located within six (6") to eight (8") inches of the edge of the nearest curb (ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec 406.13.2) and be twenty-four inches (24") deep and the full width of the curb or flush surface (ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec 406.13.1). So, the truncated domes do not go on the sloped portion but rather where the sidewalk begins from the van accessible aisle nest to the parking space. 10. Please be aware that there may be more comments relative to the revisions and additional information provided with the next submittal. It may be advantageous to meet before the next submittal. Please call me at (520) 791-5608 x1184. |
| 01/19/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | January 19, 2006 To: Andy Timberg, Richard-Bauer Architects Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: World Savings Development Plan - 2nd Submittal D05-0034 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Item #1 of Tim Rowe’s first development plan review letter dated, November 9, 2005, has not been addressed. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. The response to your memorandum/facsimile to Subhash Raval, dated 12/21/05, is to correct the next submittal so that: The DESCRIPTIVE NOTES are aligned correctly and the corresponding keynotes on the site plan are correctly labeled. Sheet DP1.0: Item #4 of Tim Rowe’s first development plan review letter dated, November 9, 2005, has not been adequately addressed. Revise the WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES, 4th paragraph, so that the appropriate values are added to the condition that says: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the values found in the equivalents table. Sheet DP1.0: Item #5 of Tim Rowe’s first development plan review letter dated, November 9, 2005, has not been adequately addressed. Revise the WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES, 1st paragraph, by adding the words: OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. After the word SUBMITTAL. Sheet DP1.0: Revise the SYMBOL LEGEND so that where it says SEWER LINE and I-2003 009: The text is separated for clarification. Sheet DP2.0: Item #8 of Tim Rowe’s first development plan review letter dated, November 9, 2005, has not been adequately addressed. Revise the site plan so that it shows: The IMS number, 4164-07, and sewer construction plan number, G-2002-130, are used to identify the existing manhole that is 5’ north of the proposed point of connection. And provide the Rim and invert elevations for this manhole. Sheet DP2.0: Revise the site plan so that it will show: The rim and invert elevations of the 3 proposed CLEANOUTS on the private sewer line that will serve this project. Sheet DP2.0: Revise the site plan so that you DELETE: The Keynote #47 (descriptive notes) that appears next to the north cleanout, pointing to what appears to be a wall and having no relationship to the private sewer. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third (3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 02/09/2006 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | |
| 02/13/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 13, 2006 Steve Miller World Savings 1901 Harrison Street Oakland, CA. 94612 Subject: D05-0034 World Savings Development Plan Dear Steve: Your submittal of December 14, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Real Estate, Community Planning, Traffic, Landscape, Zoning, Environmental Services, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Community Planning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 510-446-4509 |
| 12/14/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/19/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * Refuse enclosure cannot be serviced as shown. The 14' x 40' clear area that is required in front of the enclosure is in conflict with the shown parking bays. (Recommend that the enclosure be positioned at a 30 degree angle to the PAAL.) * The detail does not show side wall protection as stated in the Development Standards. Ten feet is required between the side wall protection. * Note: There is some labeling discrepancies with the note call out on the plans. Label No. 10 at the enclosure is for a covered bus stop in the notes on sheet DP2.0. On DP3.0 the note number 9 is for the enclosure but it is not shown on the drawing. |
| 12/19/2005 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: WORLD SAVINGS D05-0034 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted December 14, 2005. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 770-2062. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Nancy DiMaria Design/Build - DB 102 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 12/22/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the site and development plans to screen the west side of the loading area due to the residentially zoned property within 100 feet. 2) Correct the alignment of notes on DP2. 3) The silver-leaf cassias located in the sight visibility triangle along Harrison Road will need to be relocated as they typically exceed allowed heights. 4) An seperate application may be required because the project overlaps the WASH study area. Contact Patricia Gehlen/Zoning Manager. The applicant should note that there will be no impact to the resource area due to the construction authorized by the previously approved plans. |
| 12/22/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: December 21, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D05-0034 World Savings: Development Plan(12/14/05) Approved. |