Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0030
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/24/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/24/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved August 24, 2005. |
| 08/29/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Dumpster enclosure as shown cannot be serviced at the angle shown. ( The 14' x 40' required clear area is in conflict with the parking to the N-E.) * No provisions shown or mentioned for recycling. |
| 08/29/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0030 STARBUCKS AT VALENCIA / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: August 29, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Approved with the following condition: 1: Correct Valencia Rd to Valencia Road (sheet 1) on mylar. NOTE: 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 09/01/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 09/01/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0030 Starbucks at Valencia 09/01/05 () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: n/a NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: n/a GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: n/a COMMENTS DUE BY: September 22, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: vf 791-4505 DATE: August 30, 2005 |
| 09/09/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D05-0030 ANTONY C. TSANG STARBUCKS AT VALENCIA |
| 09/15/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 620-6981 www.pagnet.org D05-0030 Starbucks at Valencia 9/14/2005 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Valencia (Tucson to Palo Verde) No 0 40,100 64,140 6 64,140 98,864 6 1,236 Route 11, 15 minutes, 0 miles; 180 Express, 2am trips, 2 pm trips Bike route w/stripe shoulder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 09/19/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: STARBUCKS AT VALENCIA D05-0030 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted for review August 24, 2005. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 770-2062. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 09/20/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: September 20, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D05-0030 Starbucks at Valencia: Development Plan(8-24-05) Staff has no comments. |
| 09/23/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. 2. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) Be sure to label the ROW as either existing or future or both. The recordation data for Valencia is not provided. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/26/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | no comments |
| 09/30/2005 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: September 30th, 2005 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Development Plan, Starbucks. The activity number is D05-0030. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on August 24, 2005. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or the Drainage Report. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DRAINAGE REPORT, SUBMITTAL REQUIRED: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (Soil's Report) GENERAL COMMENTS 1. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 2. A Grading Plan and Permit will be required. Proposed grading in excess of 5,000 yards is designated "engineered grading" and a soils engineering report is required with the Grading Plan submittal. Development Standard 11-01.4.1.C. The Soils Report must also address the requirements detailed in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.2.6. 3. Proposed developments exceeding 1 acre of disturbance are subject to NPDES requirements. The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that all lettering is legible when reviewed and will maintain that legibility when reproduced and photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record-keeping purposes. Most of the lettering and dimensions on the plan are (10") point of smaller. Revise the Development Plan to show all lettering and dimensions to be (12") point of larger. DS 2-05.2.1.C 2. It is acknowledged that a small location map has been provided on the first sheet in the upper right hand corner of the plan. However, conditions within one square mile must be identified such as watercourses. Rodeo Wash is within one square mile of the project. Revise the location map to show the location of Rodeo Wash. DS 2-05.2.1.D.2. 3. Applicable rezoning, annexation, or subdivision case numbers should be listed in the lower right corner, next to the title block. Revise the plan to show all applicable case numbers in the lower right hand corner. Provide a copy of the rezoning conditions. DS 2-05.2.1.K. 4. Section AA shows the 26' ingress/egress easement. The development plan labels the easement as a 26' ingress/egress pedestrian, public utility easement. The labels of the easements must match. DS 2-05.2.3.B. 5. Section AA shows the 6' pedestrian access outside the 26' dimension. Because the easement is labeled as an ingress/egress pedestrian easement, the 6' sidewalk area (pedestrian circulation) should be included in the dimension. Revise the dimension to show the pedestrian circulation and the PAAL width or clarify. 6. Label all easements as existing or proposed. DS 2-05.2.3.B. 7. Show and label the ROW width, recordation data, width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. Be sure to label the ROW as either existing or future or both. Show the location of the future sidewalks. Label the street as private or public. The recordation data for Valencia must be provided. DS 2-05.2.3.G. 8. Other significant conditions on the site, such as major rock outcrops, structures, fences, walls, etc., shall be shown on the development plan. These elements should be indicated in a different line weight than the proposed improvements and labeled to be removed or retained. The drainage report (page 2) indicates an existing wall located on the west perimeter of the site. The development plan does not show this. Which is correct the drainage report ort the development plan? Both documents must match. Revise either the development plan or the drainage report to indicate if the wall is existing or not. DS 2-05.2.3.G. 9. Show and label the location of the dry well that is indicated in the drainage report. Also specify closure or otherwise. If dry well is to remain, the dry well must meet all the city requirements found in SMDDFM 14.5 10. This project shows the retention/detention basin extending out into the adjacent parcel to the east. Show and label any improvements that may be needed to make the site function. A drainage construction and maintenance easement, legal documentation to assure legal use of the offsite property improvements is required. Provide the recording information for the drainage construction and maintenance easement. 11. In effort to ensure the handicap curb access ramp is constructed with truncated domes remove "gridlines" from the detail found on sheet 2. DS 2-05.2.4.L. 12. The current solid waste enclosure location is not acceptable. Fourteen (14) feet by forty (40) feet area must be provided for the collection vehicle. The current location results in a conflict with parking spaces located to the northeast. Demonstrate vehicle maneuverability, be aware refuse vehicles required 36' inside radius and 50' outside radius. Revise as necessary. DS 6-01. 13. Section BB, the 15' concrete walkway only scales to 13.5 on the plan. Revise to show 15' or clarify. 14. Show and label both existing and future SVTs. If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. DS 2-05.2.4.R. 15. Clarify on plan review, which lots are combined or proposed to be split or otherwise. 16. Provide on sheet one easement delineations with bearings, distances and dimension the easement. 17. The specific maintenance note specified in the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM, 14.3.2.a-d, must be included on the development plan or the CC and R's. 18. Sidewalks must be flood free for up to the 10-yr. event. Add a note on the plan, "All roof down spouts on all structures must be routed under any adjacent sidewalk." Show location of all sidewalk scuppers. DS 2-08.4.1.E 19. Basin access is shown from adjacent property; if basin is partially or wholly the responsibility of Starbucks then maintenance access must be from subject property unless an easement is provided to Valencia Road or Starbucks. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A. 20. There appears to be conflict with the access ramp and the rock rip rap outlet, clarify. 21. Provide basin section information: widths of top and bottom of basin. Show existing berm located to the north of the property, dimension the berm and dimension the distance from the property line to the building location adjacent to the property. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A. 22. Show recommended ponding limits and setbacks from the soil's report on the plan. SMDDFM14.2.6. DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENTS 1. Provide basin section information: widths of top and bottom of basin. Show existing berm located to the north of the property, dimension the berm and dimension the distance from the property line to the building location adjacent to the property. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A. 2. Show recommended ponding limits and setbacks from the soil's report in the report. SMDDFM 14.2.6. 3. Basin access is shown from adjacent property; if basin is partially or wholly the responsibility of Starbucks then maintenance access must be from subject property unless an easement is provided to Valencia Road or Starbucks. R evise the report to show the easement. SMDDFM 2.3.1.6.A. |
| 10/06/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D05-0030 Star Bucks at Valencia Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 10/06/05 DUE DATE: 08/24/05 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 21, 2005. 2. Within the one square mile location map draw and label the following items. The COT/County limits, the streets, Transcom Way and Hemisphere Loop to Palo Verde Road, label all section corner numbers adjacent to the section nine, remove map and plat numbers. DS 2-05.2.1.D 3. List for reference in the lower right corner next to the title block the annexation case number C15-88-01. DS 2-05.2.1.K 4. This project has been assigned the development plan case number D05-0030. Please list the case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all the development plan sheets including the landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 5. Please clarify what the retail use is going to be i.e., general merchandise, food store, etc. Submit a dimensioned copy of the floor plan for the proposed building to verify square footage and design. General note number two must be revised to include any applicable subject to section numbers for each use. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 6. If applicable, list zoning variances or modifications that are applicable to the project, such as a Board of Adjustment (B/A) variance, a Lot Development Option (LDO) modification, or a Project Design Option (PDO) modification, by case number, date of approval, what was approved, and conditions of approval. DS 12-05.2.2.B.6 7. If the property is subject to annexation requirements, provide the Planning Department's applicable C9-__-__ or C15-__-__ annexation file number, preferably in the lower right corner of the plan. Also list the conditions of development as a note. List the annexation case file number C15-88-01 and list the conditions of rezoning applicable to this site. DS 2-05.2.2 8. Add the following to general note number 20, " LUC section 2.8.3". DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 9. This development appears to me to include a portion of the adjacent parcel to the east. Therefore the adjacent properties boundary should be described in distance and bearings. DS 2-05.2.3.A 10. All existing and proposed easements must be drawn on the development plan. The existing easement location, purpose, width, and recordation information must be labeled. DS 2-05.2.3.C All proposed easements must be recorded by separate instrument and shown on the development plan along with the recordation docket and page number prior to approval of the development plan. DS 2095.2.4.G 11. Draw, dimension, and label the future curb and sidewalk for Valencia Road. Add a building setback from the future back of curb location to the building. (It is acknowledged that the building meets the required building setback from the existing back of curb.) DS 2-05.2.4.F 12. Per review of the legal descriptions, it appears that lot splits have occurred on both properties depicted on this drawing. Please clarify when the lot splits occurred and were the splits approved through the DSD lot split process. If so please provide the COT stamped and approved documents for the splits. The lot-split process may be an issue if the lot splits are determined to have been done without COT approval. Additional Comments may be forthcoming on this issue. DS 2-05.2.4.A 13. Please clarify if the adjacent property is to be developed with a similar use in the future or anytime soon or possibly a phased development. A lot combo covenant of the parcel with the proposed development and the east parcel will be required, to assure that the required elements, parking spaces and PAAL provided on the east parcel will always be accessible to the proposed development. 14. Per the plan it appears that a drive-through lane is proposed along the north and west sides of the building. If this in fact is a drive-through, please demonstrate that the drive-through lane has been designed to accommodate six 18-foot long vehicle spaces (ea.). Also indicate on the plan if the drive-through lane is for the Starbucks Restaurant or the Retail use. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 The following items must be addressed. The driveway and PAAL encroach onto the adjacent parcel to the east. And one and one-half of the required vehicle parking spaces also encroach onto the adjacent parcel. Provide documents that cover the ingress/egress easements as well as pedestrian and vehicular access over both lots. If this document has not been recorded it must be recorded prior to approval of the development plan. Also the cross access between the proposed development and the development or parcel to the west must be provided. Add the recordation, docket and page and provide a copy of the recorded document on the next submittal. If pedestrian connectivity is proposed between the two parcels the recorded document must include this information. Add notes stating that access to the vacant lot to the east will not occur and demonstrate how it will be accomplished. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 and .G 15. Demonstrate maneuverability into and out of the loading zone. In the real world most loading zones are not utilized because the maneuverability is never realistically depicted on the plan and therefore never works on the site. Please ensure that the loading is accessible and useable. DS 2-05.2.4.O 16. Depict on the plan the existing and future sight visibility triangles. DS 2-05.2.4.R 17. Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. DS 2-05.2.4.V 18. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal location requirements can be met. DS 2-05.2.4.W 19. Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. For submittal with a development plan, a conceptual landscape plan showing typicals of proposed planting areas is sufficient. A detailed landscape plan is required at the time of application for permits. For more specific information, refer to Development Standard 2-07.0. DS 2-05.2.4.X 20. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on revisions to the plans and responses to the zoning comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D050030dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents. |
| 10/17/2005 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | October 7, 2005 To: Tony Tsang, A. C. Tsang Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Starbucks at Valencia Development Plan - 1st Submittal D05-0030 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available, and provide a copy of that letter to this office. PCWWM Planning Services may be contacted regarding this matter at 520-740-6500. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Based on Co12-83-114, Tucson international Business Center, this project would qualify for the Participating sewer connection fee rate. All Sheets: Add the development plan case number, D05-0030, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. Add the appropriate cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision. All Sheets: Show C09-82-106 and Co12-85-114 as cross reference numbers near the title block on each sheet. Sheet 1: Label the existing sanitary sewer lines with pipe size, and sewer plan numbers. Sheet 1: On the Location Plan show the boundary of the existing subdivision that this project is a part of. Label the existing subdivision. Sheet 1: On the Location Plan show the section numbers at the section corners. Sheet 1: A portion of the word, INTERNATIONAL has been omitted in the legal description in the Title Block of this sheet. Revise as necessary. Sheet 1: Show the full IMS number (the manhole numbers shown on PCMWD's sewer maps and on the PCDOT's Mapguide website.) for the existing public sewer manholes in Valencia Road. Sheet 2: Change General Note # 21 to state: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). with the blanks filled in appropriately. The subdivision plat, Tucson International Business Center, Lots 1-46, Bk 37 of M & P, Pg 50, requires a Sewer Service Agreement prior to the issuance of building permits (per plat note # 9). This project is a portion of lots 34 and 35 of this plat. When the number of proposed wastewater fixture unit equivalents has been shown, this office will prepare a Sewer Service Agreement, if the number of proposed wastewater fixture unit equivalents exceeds 144. If the number of proposed wastewater fixture unit equivalents is less than 144, this requirement will be met via a letter agreement 12. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER ) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 10/19/2005 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/20/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 20, 2005 Antony C. Tsang A.C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. 4626 East Fort Lowell, Suite S Tucson, AZ 85712 Subject: D05-0030 Starbucks at Valencia Development Plan Dear Tony: Your submittal of August 24, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Wastewater, Zoning, Environmental Services, Engineering, Traffic, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engneering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 325-0979 |