Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0030
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/10/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/13/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Subject to DSMR for basin slopes. ADD DSMR case number to the development plan. |
| 03/16/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: March 16, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Development Plan, Starbucks. The activity number is D05-0030. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on March 10th, 2006. Engineering has reviewed the received items and recommends CONDITIONAL APPROVAL of the Development Plan. The drainage report is APPROVED. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN MYLAR The next submittal must address the following items: DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Provide the dry well Arizona Department of Water Resources ADWR permit number / authorization number on the Development plan adjacent to the callout of the dry well. |
| 03/16/2006 | PATRICIA GILBERT | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator DATE: April 7, 2006 SUBJECT: Engineering review of the Development Plan, Starbucks. The activity number is D05-0030. SUMMARY: The Development Plan and Drainage Report were received by Engineering on December 15th, 2005. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: DEVELOPMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. A meeting was held 4.7.05 with David Rivera, Heather Thrall, John Clark, Elizabeth Eberbach, Loren Makus and myself regarding the maneuverability of the loading zones on the proposed developments, D05-0030 and D05-0044. It was decided the maneuverability for the loading zones on both developments is not approvable. Show the maneuverability for a suitable AASHTO design vehicle. Revise accordingly. |
| 04/04/2006 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/08/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D05-0030 Star Bucks at Valencia Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: April 8, 2006 DUE DATE: March 24, 2006 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is August 23, 2006 2. The previous comment was partially addressed. Please remove the subject to section listed after the General Merchandise uses. The subject to section 3.5.4.7 is not applicable to the General Merchandise use in the I-1 Zone. (Previous Comment left as reference for the zoning reviewer.) This comment was not completely addressed. Please revise or add the following. Revise general note two on sheet two as follows. In the land use code under the I-1 zone the Food Service use is subject to performance criteria section 3.4.5.6.C. List the subject to section next to the restaurant use. Also revise the words restaurant use to Food Service Use. The words retail use should be revised to the specific use such as General Merchandise, Food and Beverage Sales, etc and include if applicable the subject to section number. Revise as required. Previous Comment: Please clarify what the retail use is going to be i.e., general merchandise, food store, etc. Submit a dimensioned copy of the floor plan for the proposed building to verify square footage and design. General note number two must be revised to include any applicable subject to section numbers for each use. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 3. The Dumpster locations have been relocated to a location over an existing utility and access easement. Please get confirmation from the utility companies that the location of the enclosure is not and issue for them. Written approvals on the companies letter head ensuring that the companies have no objection to the placement of the enclosure over the utility easement should be provided. The previous comment has been left for the reference by the reviewer to ensure that the recordation information is listed on the plan prior to zoning approval unless other accommodations are made with the Zoning Manager Patricia Gehlen. Previous Comment: All existing and proposed easements must be drawn on the development plan. The existing easement location, purpose, width, and recordation information must be labeled. DS 2-05.2.3.C All proposed easements must be recorded by separate instrument and shown on the development plan along with the recordation docket and page number prior to approval of the development plan. DS 2095.2.4.G 4. All sidewalks for arterial streets are to be constructed at a width of six feet. Please revise the drawing to depict a future sidewalk of six feet wide. (Previous Comment left as reference for the zoning reviewer.) It does not appear that the future curb and sidewalk have been correctly depicted on the plan. Valencia Road is slated to be widened to a total 150 feet of right of way. The future curb is to be constructed 12 feet from the future right of way line. The plan is depicted with a sidewalk or curb location greater than depicted on the cross section in development standards 3-01. Please review the development standards and revise the plan as required. Also please consult with the Engineering reviewer for more information on this issue. Previous Comment: Draw, dimension, and label the future curb and sidewalk for Valencia Road. Add a building setback from the future back of curb location to the building. (It is acknowledged that the building meets the required building setback from the existing back of curb.) DS 2-05.2.4.F 5. Per a meeting with the Engineering staff the maneuverability into and out of the loading zones on both the Starbucks and Popeye's parcels must be demonstrated and must comply with the minimum radius used for Refuse trucks, 35-foot inside and 50-foot outside. (Previous Comment left as reference for the zoning reviewer.) The maneuverability has not been demonstrated on the plan. Please contact the Engineering reviewer for information on radius requirements for demonstration of maneuverability into and out of the loading zone. Previous Comment: Demonstrate maneuverability into and out of the loading zone. In the real world most loading zones are not utilized because the maneuverability is never realistically depicted on the plan and therefore never works on the site. Please ensure that the loading is accessible and useable. DS 2-05.2.4.O 6. Per our staff meeting additional issues came up that were not apparent due to fact that the same reviewer was not reviewing the adjacent development plans. The following have been noted as items that must be addressed. a. The location of the dumpsters on the Starbucks proposed due not appear to have adequate access to the enclosure area as required per the development standards. The maneuverability to service the Dumpster has not been demonstrated. Demonstrate compliance or approval of a development standard modification is required. b. The Starbucks and Popeye's developments will essentially function as one site and should have been submitted as such even if the developments are on separate properties. This development should have cross access, parking, and pedestrian agreements. c. The handicap access ramp next to the H.C. parking has not been drawn correctly. Please see ANSI standard Fig. 406.3 page 24. d. An access ramp has not been provided at the both ends of the sidewalks, which are along the north end of the building. Also add a detail depicting the proposed access ramps for the sidewalk from the property line to the front of the building. Label the truncated domes for both of the access ramps. e. A plan view of the bicycle parking detail has been provided. Include a vertical or elevation detail of the proposed rack and list the type, manufacturer and the number of bicycles the rack supports. f. Dimension the west PAAL area along the north side of the development. g. Per plat book 37 at page 50, a requirement for a 50-foot industrial easement and a 30-foot drainage easement is required. Discuss the drainage easement with the Engineering Reviewer. h. Clarify if the access from the Starbucks development will be provided to the development along the West Side of the site. It appears that PAAL area can and may be opened to provide cross access. If this is the case, provide a copy of the recorded cross access agreement document. i. Per Map and Plat 37/50 general note 9, "Signed sewer agreements for lots 1-46 are required prior to issuance of building permits by the Zoning Inspector." I'm sure that this agreement has been taken care but please provide the agreement document. 7. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on revisions to the plans and responses to the zoning comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D050030dp3.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents. |
| 04/14/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 14, 2006 Antony C. Tsang A.C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. 4626 East Fort Lowell, Suite S Tucson, AZ 85712 Subject: D05-0030 Starbucks at Valencia Development Plan Dear Tony: Your submittal of March 10, 2006 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 325-0979 |