Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D05-0028
Parcel: 133200180

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D05-0028
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/16/2005 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
08/18/2005 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Development Plan is approved August 18, 2005.
08/22/2005 RBABBIT1 LANDFILL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved
08/23/2005 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approv-Cond * No landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. (Broadway North and Gateway landfills over 1000 feet away in Section 8)
* Dumpster enclosure shall comply with Section 6 of the Development Standards, 10 feet clear between side wall protection and between the rear wall protection and the front gates.
* Complex does not show any proivisions for recycling. Recycling is not mandated for commercial bussinesses but if a firm has a sufficient amount of recycling it is more economical.
08/23/2005 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D05-0028 CAYLOR OFFICE PLAZA/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: 08/23/05



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project with the following condition:

1.) Add Lot 14 to Legal description (Title Block) on approved mylar.

A: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved
Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima
County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses.

B: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.
08/25/2005 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved NO COMMENT
D05-0028
ROBERT CAYLOR CONSTRUCTION
CAYLOR OFFICE PLAZA
08/29/2005 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) An irrigation plan shall be submitted together with the landscape plan required in Sec. 3.7.7.2.

2) Revise the landscape plan to clarify provisions for dust control in disturbed portions of adjacent right-of-way areas per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4

3) Vegetation or structures higher than thirty (30) inches must be located outside of the sight visibility triangle per LUC 3.7.3.4.

4) Landscaping proposed in right-of-way areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect.

5) Revise the landscape plan to show the locations of any proposed screen walls. DS 2-07.A.3

6) Any required landscape plans shall include a summary of plants required for mitigation and show their site location, as well as the location of transplants, on the landscape plans. DS 2-15.3.4.B

7) Revise the numbering of the landscape sheets, two L-1 sheets were received. Submit the number of copies requested by CDRC.

8) Revise the plans to ensure that any screening located within the street landscape border comply with the locational requirements of LUC 3.7.3.2.C.

9) Revise the plans so that parked vehicles will not contact screen walls. Provide wheel-stop curbing or other suitable barrier as necessary. DS 2-15.2.3.C

10) Revise the plans to specify a tree other than Rhus lancea, this tree is no longer on the approved plant
list. DS 9-06.7.0 Exhibit II

11) Add the CDRC case number to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1

12) Revise general note 9 on the development plan to state the tree/parking space ratio as 1/10. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1


RESUBMITTAL OF PLANS IS REQUIRED.
09/01/2005 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D05-0028 Cayor Office Plaza 09/01/05

( ) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
( ) Revised Plan/Plat
( ) Board of Adjustment
() Other (NPPO)

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-03

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Sewell/Hudlow Neighborhood Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A

COMMENTS DUE BY: September 14, 2005

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
() Resubmittal Required:
( ) Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
( ) Other

REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 8/26/05


Please add all conditions of rezoning on the development plan.

Per rezoning condition 5, please provide a typical of the proposed perimeter screen walls, and the proposed color palette for the buildings and walls.

Per rezoning condition 9, please provide a detail of how the mechanical equipment is screened. The detail must include material that is similar or complementary to those of the principal structure.

Please provide a copy of the “Covered Parking Location” exhibit dated May 5, 2005 for staff to verify location of the covered parking as required by rezoning condition 10.

Please demonstrate on the landscape plan how landscaping that is proposed along Barbara Worth Avenue exceeds what is required per the Land Use Code. It appears that the landscaping provided currently meets the requirements but does not go above minimal requirements.

Please indicate compliance to rezoning condition 14 by being graffiti resistant and incorporating one or more visually appealing design treatments by a wall detail. Those wall abutting residential development at 6432 E. Speedway and 6421 E. Martha Hillgrove are to be treated with graffiti-resistant stucco including an accent treatment similar to the rest of the new walls. The detail should indicate that 4” fence block shall not be used for perimeter walls.

Please indicate that all outdoor lighting complies to rezoning condition 17 and 18. Location of all outdoor lighting must be shown on the development plan.
09/09/2005 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Denied SUBJECT: CAYLOR OFFICE PLAZA
D05-0028

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted August
16, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are
existing electrical facilities within 100' of the project. In order for TEP
to approve the plans, the facilities and must be depicted on the plans.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map and the development plan showing
the approximate location of the existing facilities. Pole unit #26 may be
in conflict, the existing underground facilities should be located by Blue
Stake. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in
conflict will be billable to the developer.

Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's
review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions.


Liza Castillo
Right of Way Agent
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Co.
(520) 917-8745
lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com>
09/14/2005 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: September 14, 2005
CDRC/Zoning Manager

SUBJECT: Caylor Office Plaza, 6422 E. Speedway Blvd.
Development Plan D05-0028 (First Review)
T14S, R15E, Section 07

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report.

The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Development Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP
2. Only under extreme and rare circumstances will the City of Tucson allow an underground tank(s) in lieu of a surface Det./Ret. basin to be used. We will no longer approve sub-surface basins when design has taken precedence. Revise DR as necessary.
3. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Show pad elevation.
4. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. Include this info. on the detail call out.
5. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. It appears that lot 14 was left out of the property description.
6. Please label lot dimensions and bearings including curve information per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5
7. Provide all existing and proposed buildings and structures, including location, size, height, overhangs, canopies, and use per D.S. 2-02.2.1.6.
8. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles at both ingress/egress per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
9. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20.
10. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
11. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22.
12. Show Development plan (D05-0028) number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
13. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Include a detail of the refuse container on the DP.
14. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
15. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
16. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
17. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information.
18. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans".

Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR.
2. This review was performed for Development plan purposes only. Final review and acceptance will at the grading plan stage.
3. Only under extreme and rare circumstances will the City of Tucson allow an underground tank(s) in lieu of a surface Det./Ret. basin to be used. We will no longer approve sub-surface basins when design has taken precedence. Revise DR as necessary.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/6422 E. Speedway Blvd. CDRC
09/15/2005 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved estimated daily trips in 24 hr period - 231
09/15/2005 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: September 15, 2005

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov



SUBJECT: D05-0028 Caylor Office Plaza: Development Plan(8-16-05)



Staff has no comments.
09/15/2005 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No comment
09/15/2005 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP:

1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x345) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. While some SVTs are shown they are not labeled as to whether they are existing or future. Only near side SVTs are shown at the access points and they are incorrectly sized and only one is labeled.

2. Show and label as above the required pedestrian SVTs at the access points.

3. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6)

4. The symbol used for handicap parking signs is not correct in accordance with Standard Details for Public Improvements, SD100, 2003 edition.

5. Submit the Traffic Statement as required by rezoning condition 3.

6. The detail for the Handicap Parking sign has the incorrect fine indicated.

7. "Private" is misspelled in the handicap parking sign detail.

8. "Officer" and "the" are misspelled in general note 13.



D. Dale Kelch, PE
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
09/27/2005 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: D05-0028
Caylor Office
Development Plan

TRANSMITTAL: September 25, 2005

DUE DATE: September 14, 2005

COMMENTS: Submit a response letter indicating how all the zoning comments have been addressed. Include a separate response letter that states how all rezoning conditions have been or will be met as a result of this development plan drawing.

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 13, 2006.

2. Revise the legal description in the title block of all plan sheets to include lot 14 of the Harold Bell Wright Estates subdivision. DS 2-05.2.1.G

3. A legend, which shows and describes all applicable symbols used on the drawing, is to be placed on the plan. DS 2-05.2.1.J

4. List in the lower right corner next to the title block of all development plan sheets, including all landscape and NPPO sheets the rezoning case number C9-05-03 and the development plan case number D05-0028. DS 2-05.2.1.K and DS 2-05.2.2.B.2

5. Revise general note number 2 to the following: "Proposed Zoning is O-1 per rezoning Case C9-05-03." This comment is based on the fact that the rezoning is to O-1 if not revise the general note accordingly.

Please be aware that the memo for case number C9-05-03 has a few errors. The first error is in the "Subject" title text block and the second error is in the following paragraph. The subject text block states that the rezoning is from R-1 to O-1 and the second error states that the rezoning is from R-1 to O-2. Please clarify what the proposed zoning was requested. Submit a revised authorized rezoning letter with the appropriate zone classifications and a cover letter indicating Mayor and Council approval.

All rezoning conditions of case C9-05-03 must be listed on the plan and separate response letter must be submitted with the next submittal of the development plan package explaining how all rezoning conditions have been met. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2

Please be aware that the development designator listed is incorrect and the plan cannot be reviewed for compliance until the correct zone is known. The development designator for the O-1 zone is DD 26 and DD 27 for the O-2 zone. The development designator listed on the plan is listed as DD 29. None of the development criteria was reviewed for compliance on this review. Review for compliance with the correct development designator will be done on the next review of the development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next submittal package.

6. Revise general note 4 accordingly and add the applicable "subject to" sections that apply to the correct development designator. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3

7. Add the following to general note number 18, "LUC Section 2.8.3". DS 2-05.2.2.B.10

8. List the site area by square footage and acreage. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11

9. Provide the site boundary information including bearings in degrees, minutes and seconds for all property including the curve data for the spandrel at the northwest corner of the site and the curve data for the radius at the southwest corner. DS 2-05.2.3.A

10. If applicable all existing or proposed easements must be drawn, labeled, and dimensioned on the plan. Indicate on the plan if existing easements are to be abandoned or vacated. Existing easements are to be labeled with the recordation information, purpose, width, and recordation information. DS 2-05.2.3.B and DS 2-05.2.4.G

11. This proposed development is to be constructed over three separate parcels. Zoning cannot approve the development plan until a Pima County Assessor's Tax Parcel combo has been completed and COT Lot Combo Covenant has been recorded. The COT Lot Combo recordation must be done prior to submittal of the Mylar copy of the development plan for stamps. DS 2-05.2.4.A

12. Revise the Zoning designation for the parcel adjacent to the west property line (across the Barbara Worth Drive) from C-1 to C-2 DS 2-05.2.4.B

13. Rezoning condition number four requires that the developer design and construct curb and sidewalk along the site frontage on Barbara Worth Drive. Please add a cross section fully dimensioned that depicts the proposed design. Also dimension the street on the plan. The following dimensions must be added for both Barbara Worth and Speedway Blvd.: Center line to property line. Center line to curb and curb to property lines. DS 2-05.2.4.D.2.1 and .2

14. Per DS 3-05.2.2.B.2, a minimum of one-foot must be maintained between a PAAL and an open structure, such as a carport and a PAAL. The one-foot setback is conditioned upon the pedestrian ways being designed at a location other than between the open structure and the PAAL. The distance is measured to the closest part of the structure, i.e., a roof overhang. This requirement must be addressed for the proposed carports along the south side of the site. The carports do meet the required as mentioned above. Please revise the plan as required. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3

15. If applicable draw, label, and, dimension the location of the future curb and sidewalk along Speedway Boulevard. DS 2-05.2.4.F

16. Please demonstrate that all access ramps along the street frontage and within the site will be provided with truncated domes. Add a detail drawing depicting the truncated domes for ramps including the access ramp next to the access aisle from the handicapped parking spaces. DS 2-05.2.4.K and .L

17. Please clarify what the actual building square will be. The square footage listed on the building footprint is 21,000 square feet and is listed as 21,100 square feet in general note ten. Please provide a copy of the preliminary development plan to compare proposal with actual plan used for the rezoning case. (The parking requirements will be affected.) DS 2-05.2.4.M

18. The parking calculation must be revised to correctly list the number of parking spaces required for a medical outpatient use, which is parked at a ratio of one space per every 175 square feet of GFA. This site must be provided with a minimum of 121 parking spaces. DS 2-05.2.4.P

19. The bicycle parking calculation must also be revised. The number of class one and two must be indicated. Both the class one and class two bicycle parking facilities must be fully dimensioned to ensure that the facility requirements have been met or individual detail drawings must be drawn and fully dimensioned based on the actual location. Indicate the type of security and lighting that will be provided. DS 2-05.2.4.Q

20. Please verify with the Engineering reviewer if the required or applicable sight triangles have been drawn on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.R

21. Indicate graphically, where possible and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning. DS 2-05.2.4.U

22. Indicate on the plan the location and type of postal service that will be provided. If the service is to be provided in the building add a general stating so. If the postal service will be provided elsewhere drawn ad label the type of pedestal and location. DS 2-05.2.4.V

23. Indicate the type, location, and, size of freestanding signage including existing signage and billboards. DS 2-05.2.4.W

24. See the landscape reviewer related to landscape borders, screening and NPPO requirements. DS 2-05.2.4.X

25. As stated in several comments above, additional comments will be forthcoming due to many inconsistencies noted on the plan


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D050028dp.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents.
10/03/2005 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approv-Cond September 30, 2005

To: Rob Caylor, Robert Caylor Construction Co.

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

____________________________________
From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County
Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality

Subject: Caylor Office Plaza
Development Plan - 1st Submittal
D05-0028

The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.



This project will be tributary to the both the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Pantano Interceptor and the Tucson Boulevard Flow Control Facility.. Sufficient treatment and conveyance system exists in the downstream sewerage system to serve this development. A capacity assurance letter for this project will not be required. The small amount of additional wastewater discharged to the public sewerage system from this project should not cause any flow or effluent quality limits to be exceeded.

Based on the existing improvement district, drawn on the PCWWM Maps and Records Section basemaps, this project will qualify for the Participating sewer connection fee rate.

All Sheets: Add the development case number, D05-0028, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross reference numbers. No wastewater review fees will be charged for sheets where this is the only required revision.

Sheet DP-1: If the 4" HCS is existing, revise General Note 16 to read:

THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED.

Sheet DP-1: Revise General Note 22 so that it reads:

THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E).

with the blanks filled appropriately.

Sheet DP-1: No new off-site public sanitary sewer is proposed for construction with this development. Delete General Note #23.

Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the Development Plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars.

Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality.

Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution.


If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter

CC: Project File
10/05/2005 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

October 5, 2005

Rob Caylor
Robert Caylor Construction
6711 East Camino Principal
Tucson, AZ 85715

Subject: D05-0028 Caylor Office Plaza Development Plan

Dear Rob:

Your submittal of August 16, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED

9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, TEP, Community Planning, Wastewater, Zoning, Environmental Services, Engineering, Traffic, DSD)

5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, Community Planning, DSD)

2 Copies Revised NPPO Plans (Landscape, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engneering, DSD)


Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179.

Sincerely,


Patricia Y. Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/
Via fax: 290-6014