Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0028
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2006 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D05-0028 Caylor Office Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: January 8, 2006 DUE DATE: December 27, 2005 COMMENTS: Submit a response letter indicating how all the zoning comments have been addressed. Include a separate response letter that states how all rezoning conditions have been or will be met as a result of this development plan drawing. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 13, 2006. 2. This comment was not completely addressed once again. Submit a copy of the authorized rezoning conditions along with a separate response letter explaining how all the conditions have been met or will be met. A response letter addressing zoning comments was not submitted with the development plan submittal package. I cannot verify response or compliance. Previous Comment: Please, be aware that the memo for case number C9-05-03 has a few errors. The first error is in the "Subject" title text block and the second error is in the following paragraph. The subject text block states that the rezoning is from R-1 to O-1 and the second error states that the rezoning is from R-1 to O-2. Please clarify what zoning was requested. Submit a revised authorized rezoning letter with the appropriate zone classifications and a cover letter indicating Mayor and Council approval. All rezoning conditions of case C9-05-03 must be listed on the plan and separate response letter must be submitted with the next submittal of the development plan package explaining how all rezoning conditions have been met. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 Please be aware that the development designator listed is incorrect and the plan cannot be reviewed for compliance until the correct zone is known. The development designator for the O-1 zone is DD 26 and DD 27 for the O-2 zone. The development designator listed on the plan is listed as DD 29. None of the development criteria was reviewed for compliance on this review. Review for compliance with the correct development designator will be done on the next review of the development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next submittal package. 3. Comment was not addressed. Also respond how this site will comply with the subject to section 3.5.4.11 conditions as listed in the Land Use Code. Previous Comment: Revise general notes 4 accordingly and add the applicable "subject to" sections that apply to the correct development designator. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 4. The note was revised as requested with exception of the addition of the development standard reference number, which should be removed. The D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 is the number used to reference a comment in the development standards manual. Previous Comment: Add the following to general note number 18, "LUC Section 2.8.3". DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 5. No response letter from consultant to verify compliance. If applicable all existing or proposed easements must be drawn, labeled, and dimensioned on the plan. Indicate on the plan if existing easements are to be abandoned or vacated. Existing easements are to be labeled with the recordation information, purpose, width, and recordation information. DS 2-05.2.3.B and DS 2-05.2.4.G 6. No response letter from consultant to verify compliance. This proposed development is to be constructed over three separate parcels. Zoning cannot approve the development plan until a Pima County Assessor's Tax Parcel combo has been completed and COT Lot Combo Covenant has been recorded. The COT Lot Combo recordation must be done prior to submittal of the Mylar copy of the development plan for stamps. DS 2-05.2.4.A 7. This comment was not addressed as requested. Previous Comment: Per DS 3-05.2.2.B.2, a minimum of one-foot must be maintained between a PAAL and an open structure, such as a carport and a PAAL. The one-foot setback is conditioned upon the pedestrian ways being designed at a location other than between the open structure and the PAAL. The distance is measured to the closest part of the structure, i.e., a roof overhang. This requirement must be addressed for the proposed carports along the south side of the site. The carports do meet the required as mentioned above. Please revise the plan as required. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 8. This comment was not addressed as requested. Previous Comment: Truncated domes must be provided at the sidewalk access ramp next to the access handicapped access aisle. Previous Comment: Please demonstrate that all access ramps along the street frontage and within the site will be provided with truncated domes. Add a detail drawing depicting the truncated domes for ramps including the access ramp next to the access aisle from the handicapped parking spaces. DS 2-05.2.4.K and .L 9. Revise the calculation to correctly list the correct percentages of class two spaces required. The correct percentage is 25%. Previous Comment: Revise the bicycle parking calculation requirements to correctly list the number of class one and two spaces based on the Office use. Previous Comment: The bicycle parking calculation must also be revised. The number of class one and two must be indicated. Both the class one and class two bicycle parking facilities must be fully dimensioned to ensure that the facility requirements have been met or individual detail drawings must be drawn and fully dimensioned based on the actual location. Indicate the type of security and lighting that will be provided. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 10. No response letter from consultant to verify compliance. Previous Comment: where possible and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning. DS 2-05.2.4.U 11. No response letter from consultant to verify compliance. Previous Comment: Indicate on the plan the location and type of postal service that will be provided. If the service is to be provided in the building add a general stating so. If the postal service will be provided elsewhere drawn ad label the type of pedestal and location. DS 2-05.2.4.V 12. As stated in several comments above, additional comments will be forthcoming due to many inconsistencies noted on the plan If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D050028dp3.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 01/12/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 12, 2006 Rob Caylor Robert Caylor Construction 6711 East Camino Principal Tucson, AZ 85715 Subject: D05-0028 Caylor Office Plaza Development Plan Dear Rob: Your submittal of December 12, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Engineering, Traffic, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 290-6014 |
| 12/12/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/22/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/28/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: December 14, 2005 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Caylor Office Plaza, 6422 E. Speedway Blvd. Development Plan D05-0028 (Third Review) T14S, R15E, Section 07 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan. The Development Plan (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP 2. Final grading approval will not be issued prior to the percolation test results have been submitted. 3. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Include a detail of the refuse container on the DP. The enclosure must be 10'Wx10'D inside clear area. According to the detail of the refuse container the inside dimension will be 9'-3". The min. depth is 10'. Perhaps lengthening the side wall to 11'-4" would suffice. Per previous comment. Drainage Report: 1. This DR has been accepted for Development plan purposes only. Final review and acceptance will at the grading plan stage. 2. Final grading approval will not be issued prior to the percolation test results have been submitted. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/6422 E. Speedway Blvd. CDRC 3 |
| 12/29/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | >>> Dale Kelch 12/27/2005 6:01:11 PM >>> Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Traffic is still not in receipt of an approvable Traffic Statement as required by rezoning condition3. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |