Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0027
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/17/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/24/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/24/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0027 SIERRA MORADO UNIT 2/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: October 24, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: PROVIDE COPY OF RECORDED DEED FOR BLOCK A PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT. jg |
| 10/24/2005 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 10/24/2005 SUBJECT: Sierra Morado Unit 2, Block A D05-0027, T15S, R15E, SECTION 12 RECEIVED: Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on October 17, 2005 The subject project has been reviewed. The Drainage Report is acceptable for Development Plan purposes and it is hereby approved. The Development Plan is recommended for approval pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain. The Landscape Plan is acceptable for Engineering and Floodplain purposes. |
| 10/24/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0027 SIERRA MORADO UNIT 2/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: January 9, 2006 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 10/27/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0027 Sierra Morado Unit 2 (Community Center) 10/27/05 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (NPPO) CROSS REFERENCE: Civano Master PAD-12 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan, Houghton Area Master Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: October 31, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached, Resubmittal not Required ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: Resubmittal to the Department of Urban Planning and Design for the remaining outstanding comments is not required. Zoning review at Development Services Dept. for these comments is required prior to approval. REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 10/18/05 Please add required calculations for off-street loading to sheet 1 of 3 of the development plan. Please correct the required number of canopy trees for the parking area to ‘27 trees required’ in the landscape plans calculations. |
| 10/31/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/31/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/08/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/08/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | November 16, 2005 TO: Pattie Davis MMLA Psomas THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Sierra Morado Unit 2, Block A Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D05-0027 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. As previously requested on September 6, 2005, provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. SHEET 2. Move the proposed public manhole 25’ into the public right-of-way. This will avoid the necessary public sewer easement you are currently proposing and also provide potential access to that manhole should sewers ever be proposed on Metropolitan Drive. SHEET 2. As previously requested on September 6, 2005, show the size and Pima County plan number of the existing public sewer to which this project is connecting. You must show the proposed sewers all the way to their point of connection to the existing public sewer network. SHEET 2. Show the rim and invert elevations for the second proposed public manhole. SHEET 2. Show the length, size and slope of the proposed public sewer. SHEET 2. The proposed public manhole for which rim and invert elevations are shown does not provide the necessary cover. Be aware that four feet of cover are required for PVC pipe, however, three feet of cover is allowed with DI pipe. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 3rd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |