Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0027
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/02/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/03/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved August 03, 2005. |
| 08/10/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D05-0027 MMLA PSOMAS SIERRA MORADO UNIT 2 |
| 08/12/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0027 SIERRA MORADO UNIT 2/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: August 12, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Sierra Morado Unit 2 (S05-088) will need to be recorded prior to approval of this Development Plan. Label Book and Page in Title Block. jg |
| 08/23/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * No provisions shown or stated for refuse service. |
| 08/24/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0027 Sierra Morado Unit 2 (Community Center) 08/23/05 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (NPPO) CROSS REFERENCE: Civano Master PAD-12 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan, Houghton Area Master Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: August 20, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 8/15/05 Per D-3.f, Permitted Principal Uses, Civic Uses, Commercial Uses, and Recreational Uses are permitted per LUC Sec. 2.3.5.2.C, D, and E. Please add notes to the development plan as noted in the subject to, in Recreation Use Group. LUC Sec. 3.5.13.2 - The principal use is restricted to hours of operation of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. LUC Sec. 3.5.13.3 – In addition to the requirements of Chapter 6, Section 6-101, Outdoor Lighting Code, of the Tucson Code, any outdoor lighting utilized in conjunction with the use shall be located and directed so as to eliminate glare toward streets and adjoining R-3 or more restrictive zoning. (In this case the R-3 zoning could be replaced with residential uses.) Per D-6.c, Off-Street Loading Requirements, the Sierra Morado PAD will comply with the LUC Division 4: Off -Street Loading requirements with exceptions to provisions made in the PAD-C2 and that the minimum size of the loading space shall be 8.5’x18’. Per LUC Table 3.4.5 and Table 3.4.5.3, one (1) off-street loading space is required for Gross Floor Area between 1,500-10,000 sq. ft. with overhead clearance of fifteen (15) feet. Please provide on the Development Plan. Please correct General Note 1. Existing zoning is PAD-12. Please identify the location of Trash and Recyclable dumpsters on the development plan. Please refer to Development Standard 6-01.0, Solid Waste Disposal for requirements. Screening and landscaping of the enclosures, including a solid opaque closing gate is required per the Master PAD. Per C-2.a.1, Master Developer Self-Certification, please provide proof that the development plan has been reviewed by the Civano Certification Committee for Revised IMPACT System criteria as identified in Sections 5.3.1. and 7.0 of the Revised MOU. A stamp on the Development plans or letter from the Committee may accomplish this. Per C-4.c.ii, Functional Open Space Areas, the Community Center shall include a turf area, and a ramada with picnic tables. Please identify the location of the ramada with picnic tables on the development plan. Please add note to landscape plan that water harvesting features will be incorporated into the design and that recycled or low environmental impact building materials will be used, per C-4.c.ii, Functional Open Space Areas. Per D-6.b Vehicle and Bicycle P Requirements, motor vehicle parking requirements for each Land Use Group/Class categories with the exception of the Residential Use Group permitted within the PAD-R2 and PAD-C1 districts may be reduced by 50% of the parking spaces as required by the LUC. Please revise the required parking calculations on the development plan. (This will provide room for dumpster placement and off-street loading space.) For the diagonal parking, please provide the a detail specifying motor vehicle area dimensions as defined by Development Standard 3-05.6.0 Table 1. Per D-6.d, Landscaping and Screening Requirements, canopy trees within common parking areas will be increased above the Code’s requirements such that one (1) canopy tree is required for each four (4) parking spaces. Please revise the Landscape Plan, landscape calculations. 106 parking spaces require twenty-seven (27) canopy trees, Provided must exceed twenty-seven (27). |
| 08/24/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Revise the landscape and native plant preservation plans to include the CRDC case number. DS 2-07.2.1.B.2 |
| 08/26/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: August 26, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: D05-0027 Sierra Morado Unit 2: Development Plan(8-20-05) CC: Craig Gross Patricia Gehlen Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/30/2005 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 08/30/2005 RECEIVED: Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on August 02, 2005 The subject project has been reviewed. We offer the following comments: Drainage Report: 1. The Drainage Report addresses only the parking lot of the Community Center, which appears to be only half of the proposed improvements. Revise the entire report to address the whole development. 2. The inlet calculations and the grated inlet design use equations that utilize the coefficient Cs, but the equation parameter definitions include CD instead. Revise as necessary. 3. Reference the inlets design calculations equation numbers from the Standard Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. 4. The proposed drainage structures construction information and dimensions should be shown and labeled on the drainage exhibit including invert elevations. 5. The driveway and P.A.A.L. capacity calculations should be included. Show on Figure 2 the locations of the cross sections. 6. According to D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3. and D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when the runoff crosses any sidewalk/walkway. This also applies to roof drainage. Show the roof drainage direction on the drainage exhibit and demonstrate compliance with this requirement including design calculations. 7. Address drainage structures maintenance responsibility and provide the maintenance checklist. 8. Address water harvesting. Development Plan: 1. Provide the correct D(yr)-______ subdivision case number as required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2. 2. Show the Basis of Bearing and how the proposed subdivision ties into it (D.S. 2-05.2.3.A.). 3. On August 1, 2004, the new overlay zone procedures went into effect. All plans submitted after this date, which are in any overlay zone (i.e. SCZ, HDZ, ERZ, and W.A.S.H.), are required to go through the new procedure. Reference the applicable overlay zone in the general notes as required by D.S. 2-03.2.2.B.7. and submit an application for the overlay zone(s) that is/are applicable to this project. Contact Patricia Gehlen at 520-791-5550, Extension 1179 for additional information. Please be advised that as part of the overlay zone procedure, a public notification may be required. 4. As per Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the Truncated Domes instead of the standard grooves, which are shown on City of Tucson Standard Detail 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, the wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with the Standard Detail 207. 5. Keynote #5 should include filter fabric underneath the riprap. 6. Show the proposed angle and width of the angled parking spaces to verify compliance with D.S. 2-05.2.4.P. and D.S. 3-05.0. 7. The proposed cul-de-sac radius should be determined under commercial criteria requirements. Accordingly, the required radius shall be 52 feet. 8. Provide the radii for the curved one way P.A.A.L. in the angled parking area. Additionally that the curved P.A.A.L. does not appear to accommodate Trash collection trucks and fire trucks. Revise as necessary. 9. According to D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3. and D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when the runoff crosses any sidewalk/walkway. This also applies to roof drainage. Show the roof drainage direction on the drainage exhibit and demonstrate compliance with this requirement including design calculations. 10. Show the sight visibility triangle setback lines as required by D.S. 2-05.2.4.I. and D.S. 2-05.2.4.R. 11. Verify compliance with D.S. 2-05.2.4.S. regarding fire circulation. 12. Show refuse collection areas as required by D.S. 2-05.2.4.T. 13. The required slope treatment and setback lines from the existing and proposed slopes shall be based on the Soils Report recommendations. This information shall be clearly shown on the Development and Grading Plans and the Soils Report shall be submitted with the Grading Plan. 14. Revise the Development Plan according to the Drainage Report revisions. Landscape Plan: 1. Show water-harvesting basins. 2. Show and dimension sight visibility triangles to ensure that the proposed landscaping will not obstruct sight at street intersections. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Development Plan where the revisions were made. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report |
| 09/01/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is August 1, 2006. 2. Correct the existing zoning under genera note one (1). Existing zoning is PAD-12. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.1) 3. This project has been assigned development plan case number D05-0027. The development plan case number must be noted near the title block in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2) 4. This project is affected by the Watercourse Amenities, Safety, and Habitat (WASH) overlay zone. An overlay zone application is required to be filed with the Development Services Department. If the project encroaches into the W.A.S.H. boundaries a full application review, which includes a public meeting and notification will be required. If the project does not encroach into the W.A.S.H. boundaries, the completed overlay zone application will suffice. For additional information regarding the WASH overlay zone please contact the Engineering reviewer for this project. A copy of the overlay zone application may be obtained online at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/Overlay_Zone_Application.pdf 5. If applicable, all existing and proposed easements on this site must be shown on the plan, including the type, width, recordation information, and whether they will be private or public. (D.S. 2-05.2.3.B) (D.S. 2-05.2.4.G) 6. Existing zoning classification (PAD-12) on and adjacent to the project shall be indicated on the drawing. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.B) 7. Is the circular drive proposed for two-way travel? Will there be a drop off area? If so, delineate travel lanes and drop off lane/s including dimensions of lanes and direction of travel lane. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3) 8. The back-up spur requires a minimum three (3) foot radii. Dimension as required. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3) 9. Fully dimension angle parking spaces on the drawing or provide a typical detail. Include the angle degree. Refer to LUC Table 3.3.7-I and LUC 3.3.7.2 for dimensions required. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.P) 10. Indicate on the drawing the direction of the one-way travel lane. A "do not enter" sign shall be located at the egress point. 11. Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2, when wheelstop curbing is used, it shall be located two and one-half (2 ½) feet from the front of the parking space (e.g. face of curb). The plan currently shows a two (2) foot overhang and a six (6) inch wide curb totaling 2 ½ feet. Revise keynote 13 and the overhang dimension on the drawing to be measured from the face of curb to demonstrate the required 2 ½ feet of overhang. 12. As per Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the Truncated Domes instead of the standard grooves, which are shown on City of Tucson Standard Detail 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, the wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with the Standard Detail 207. Provide a fully dimensioned detail of the access ramp provided along the pedestrian path out to Metropolitan Drive. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.P) 13. The on-site pedestrian circulation system shall be connected to the sidewalk located in Metropolitan Drive. Show the connection on the drawing. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.K) (D.S. 2-08.4.1.A) 14. Provide the floor area ratio (FAR) calculation. Per Sierra Morado PAD Table 5, maximum allowed FAR is .5 15. Per 2003 International Building Code (IBC) Table 1106.1, a total of five (5) accessible parking spaces are required for this project based on the total number of spaces provided (101). In addition, provide the van accessible parking space and access aisle dimensions on the drawing or detail. 16. Provide a fully dimensioned detail of the Class 2 bicycle parking facility. Refer to DS 2-09 for design criteria. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q) 17. Per D-3.f, Permitted Principal Uses, Civic Uses, Commercial Uses, and Recreational Uses are permitted per LUC Sec. 2.3.5.2.C, D, and E. Please add notes to the development plan as noted in the subject to, in Recreation Use Group. LUC Sec. 3.5.13.2 - The principal use is restricted to hours of operation of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. LUC Sec. 3.5.13.3 - In addition to the requirements of Chapter 6, Section 6-101, Outdoor Lighting Code, of the Tucson Code, any outdoor lighting utilized in conjunction with the use shall be located and directed so as to eliminate glare toward streets and adjoining R-3 or more restrictive zoning. (In this case the R-3 zoning could be replaced with residential uses.) 18. Per D-6.c, Off-Street Loading Requirements, the Sierra Morado PAD will comply with the LUC Division 4: Off -Street Loading requirements with exceptions to provisions made in the PAD-C2 and that the minimum size of the loading space shall be 8.5'x18'. Per LUC Table 3.4.5 and Table 3.4.5.3, one (1) off-street loading space is required for Gross Floor Area between 1,500-10,000 sq. ft. with overhead clearance of fifteen (15) feet. Please provide on the Development Plan. 19. Please identify the location of Trash and Recyclable dumpsters on the development plan. Please refer to Development Standard 6-01.0, Solid Waste Disposal for requirements. Screening and landscaping of the enclosures, including a solid opaque closing gate is required per the Master PAD. 20. Per D-6.b Vehicle and Bicycle P Requirements, motor vehicle parking requirements for each Land Use Group/Class categories with the exception of the Residential Use Group permitted within the PAD-R2 and PAD-C1 districts may be reduced by 50% of the parking spaces as required by the LUC. Please revise the required parking calculations on the development plan. (This will provide room for dumpster placement and off-street loading space.) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. |
| 09/01/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Estimated daily trips in 24 hr period - 68 |
| 09/01/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 09/01/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R). SVTs are shown in the legend but aren't on sheet 2. 2. Are there sidewalks on the east side of Metropolitan Drive? If so, show access ramps at the access point to this development. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/06/2005 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | September 6, 2005 TO: Pattie Davis MMLA Psomas THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Sierra Morado Unit 2, Block A Development Plan – 1st Submittal D05-0027 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. Based on the evaluation of project S97-035, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D05-0027, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 15 to read as shown below THIS PROJECT HAS ___ PROPOSED AND ___ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET 1. Add the following General Note MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. SHEET 1. Add the following Permitting Note A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 9 to read ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS. SHEET 2. Show the size and Pima County plan number of the existing public sewer to which this project is connecting. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 09/30/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: SIERRA MORADO, UNIT 2 D05-0027 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted for review August 2, 2005. The electric service to this project will be designed when the subdivision is design. Additional plans necessary are electrical load plans. Submit those along with the Approved tentative plat for the subdivision. Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> lcastillo@tep.com |
| 09/30/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 30, 2005 Pattie Davis MMLA Psomas 800 East Wetmore Road Tucson, AZ 85719 Subject: D05-0027 Sierra Morado Unit 2 Development Plan Dear Pattie: Your submittal of August 2, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Community Planning, Wastewater, Zoning, Environmental Services, Engineering, Traffic, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Engineering, Community Planning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engneering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 292-1290 |