Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0026
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/20/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/21/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x345) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R). This plan as submitted has only the near side SVT shown and their dimension is not shown. It should be 345'. The required far side pedestrian SVT are not shown. Please ensure that the pedestrian SVT is dimensioned. 3. Locate on plan the distance to the next adjacent curb cut on both sides of the subject property. Minimum separation is 80'. (AMG section 5.4) 4. The SVT in the legend has a distance of 125'. This measurement is not applicable in this project. Please remove the distance in the legend. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/21/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved July 21, 2005. |
| 08/01/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a 6' screen wall to screen the loading area from 22nd Street. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 2. A 5' wall to screen the parking lot from office zoned property is required per LUC 3.7.2-I. 3. Identify the location of all screening elements and note the height per DS 2-07.2.2.A.3.a. 4. A 15' foot minimum height clearance, free of any overhead obstructions (wires, branches, etc.), shall be provided above the refuse collection site per DS 6-01.4.1.B. Relocate Cercidium floridum a sufficient distance away from the refuse collection area. 5. Revise note regarding decomposed granite to indicate: All disturbed areas including adjacent right of ways shall be treated with ground cover such as decomposed granite to help reduce dust pollution per LUC 3.7.2.7. RESUBMITTAL OF PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 08/03/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Location of refuse enclosure violates the development standards for back-up of service vehicle (40'). * Refuse enclosure doesnot have sidewall protection, doors, 10 foot concrete slab infront and the enclosure will require a 10 foot clear area between the sidewall protection when designed. |
| 08/04/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x345) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R). This plan as submitted has only the near side SVT shown and their dimension is not shown. It should be 345'. The required far side pedestrian SVT are not shown. Please ensure that the pedestrian SVT is dimensioned. 3. Locate on plan the distance to the next adjacent curb cut on both sides of the subject property. Minimum separation is 80'. (AMG section 5.4) 4. The SVT in the legend has a distance of 125'. This measurement is not applicable in this project. Please remove the distance in the legend. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/04/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: July 27, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: D05-0026 Tucson Veterinary Surgical Ser: Development Plan(7-20-05) CC: Craig Gross Patricia Gehlen Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/08/2005 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 8, 2005 TO: Kim Acorn Acorn Associates Architecture Ltd. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Tucson Veterinary Surgical Service Development Plan - 1st Submittal D05-0026 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. 2. Based on the evaluation of the project area, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. 3. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D05-0026, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. 4. It appears that this project is connecting to an existing private sewer line. If that is the case, a Joint Use And Maintenance Agreement is required. Please contact Pima County Wastewater Management Department's Planning Division to obtain this agreement. Contact Ilene Deckard at (520) 740-6544. 5. SHEET DP3. Revise General Note 4.4 to read as shown below and fill in the blanks appropriately THIS PROJECT HAS ___ PROPOSED AND ___ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). 6. SHEET DP3. Add the following General Note MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. 7. SHEET DP3. Add the following Permitting Note A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 8. SHEET DP3. Show the length, size and slope of the proposed private sewer. 9. SHEET DP3. Show the sewer all the way to its point of connection with the public sewer network. Additionally, show the size and Pima County plan number of the existing public sewer to which this project is connecting. 10. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 08/08/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x345) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R). This plan as submitted has only the near side SVT shown and their dimension is not shown. It should be 345'. The required far side pedestrian SVT are not shown. Please ensure that the pedestrian SVT is dimensioned. 3. Locate on plan the distance to the next adjacent curb cut on both sides of the subject property. Minimum separation is 80'. (AMG section 5.4) 4. The SVT in the legend has a distance of 125'. This measurement is not applicable in this project. Please remove the distance in the legend. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/08/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0026 Tucson Veterinary Surgical Serv. 08/05/05 ( ) Tentative Plat (ü) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment (ü) Other (Irrigation) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-72-12 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: August 17, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (ü) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (ü) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat (ü) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 8/3/05 1. Per rezoning condition b, the development plan must identify the location, size, height, and lighting of all signage within the development. Please denote on plan. 2. Per rezoning condition c., A covenant must be provided for a minimum of 5% perpetually maintained landscaping coverage of the site area. Please provide a copy of such covenant and provide the calculations on the landscaping plan. |
| 08/09/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0026 TUCSON VETERINARY SURGICAL SER / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: AUGUST 4, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Approved with the following condition to be corrected on Mylar: 1: Correct Tax Code 135-07-330H to 135-07-330L. NOTE: 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 08/16/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: August 16, 2005 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: 7660 E. 22nd St., Tuc. Vet. Surgical Svcs. Development Plan D05-0026 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 20 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. Show the pedestrian SVT to also. 4. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. Provide documentation as to the approval of the ingress/egress location with Tucson Dept. of Transportation @ 791-5100. 5. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. This comment is pertaining to the refuse enclosure. 6. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 7. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 8. Complete the Development plan number (D05-0026) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 9. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The service vehicle's maximum reverse distance is 40.00' (forty feet). The trash enclosure may have to be moved. Revise as required. 10. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 11. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information. 12. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that may occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Development Plan purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be done at the grading plan stage. 3. The Southern portion of the project traditionally sheets flows to the South. The proposed drainage scheme concentrates the flow to one point. An even distribution of flow would be preferred. Address as required. 4. Show or describe the existing drainage accommodations to the south where conc. pt. C will drain. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/7660 E. 22nd St. CDRC |
| 08/18/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x345) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R). This plan as submitted has only the near side SVT shown and their dimension is not shown. It should be 345'. The required far side pedestrian SVT are not shown. Please ensure that the pedestrian SVT is dimensioned. 3. Locate on plan the distance to the next adjacent curb cut on both sides of the subject property. Minimum separation is 80'. (AMG section 5.4) 4. The SVT in the legend has a distance of 125'. This measurement is not applicable in this project. Please remove the distance in the legend. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/18/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: TUCSON VETERINARY SURGICAL SERVICES D05-0026 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted for review July 20, 2005. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. The Designer for this project is Juan Valenzuela. He can be reached at (520) 917-8714. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 08/18/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 08/18/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x345) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R). This plan as submitted has only the near side SVT shown and their dimension is not shown. It should be 345'. The required far side pedestrian SVT are not shown. Please ensure that the pedestrian SVT is dimensioned. 3. Locate on plan the distance to the next adjacent curb cut on both sides of the subject property. Minimum separation is 80'. (AMG section 5.4) 4. The SVT in the legend has a distance of 125'. This measurement is not applicable in this project. Please remove the distance in the legend. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/18/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned with of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. (DS 2-05.2.2.D) 2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x345) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R). This plan as submitted has only the near side SVT shown and their dimension is not shown. It should be 345'. The required far side pedestrian SVT are not shown. Please ensure that the pedestrian SVT is dimensioned. 3. Locate on plan the distance to the next adjacent curb cut on both sides of the subject property. Minimum separation is 80'. (AMG section 5.4) 4. The SVT in the legend has a distance of 125'. This measurement is not applicable in this project. Please remove the distance in the legend. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/22/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | no comments. |
| 08/22/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | no comments. |
| 08/27/2005 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D05-0026 7660 E. 22nd St. Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 08/27/05 DUE DATE: 08/17/05 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 08/16/05. 2. According to the County Assessors records this parcel has been recently split. Provide documentation indicating that the City of Tucson has approved the split. Documentation will include a approved and stamped plan by the City of Tucson, recording documentation and addressing documentation for both lots. The development plan will not be approved until proper documentation is provided. 3. Per DS 2-05.2.1.D The project-location map provided on the first sheet of the development plan, is preferred to be located in the upper right corner of the sheet. 4. Per DS 2-05.2.1.G,.1 & .2 The following title block information is to be provided, preferably in the lower right corner of the sheet. 1. The proposed name of the project or, if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name or the property address. 2. A brief legal description. 5. Per DS 2-05.2.1.H The north arrow, contour interval, and scale should be placed together on each sheet, preferably in the upper right corner of the plat. 6. Per DS 2-05.2.1.K Applicable rezoning, annexation, or subdivision case numbers should be listed in the lower right corner, next to the title block. 7. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 List as a general note the proposed use (Animal Services) , The development designator (30) and the subject to sections (LUC Sec. 3.5..4.1.A, .B, .C, &.D). Include in the notes the code requirements of the subject to sections.( A. Overnight confinement for clinic treatment is permitted for a maximum of five (5) animals, B. No boarding of animals is permitted, C. The activity must be within a completely enclosed building, D. An outpatient clinic is permitted for small animals only). 8. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.7 List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-72-12 and D05-026 file numbers in the lower right corner of the plan or in that vicinity. 9. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 Add a note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria for Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 10. Per DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Sec. 3.3.0 of the LUC and Development Standard 3-05.0. The backup spur located at the southwest corner of the project is required to have a minimum 3' radius for the curb. The plan notes indicate all radii are to be 2' unless noted otherwise. The backup spur located northeast of the proposed structure requires curbing as per Development Standards 3-05.2.2.D and Figure 2. See comment # 12 regarding sidewalk location. 11. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K & DS 2-08 The crosswalk located adjacent to the backup spur north of the proposed structure is required to be a sidewalk physically separated from vehicular use area. Striped asphalt is allowed for pedestrian circulation only when crossing a PAAL. The pedestrian circulation path would be better served relocated to the east between the islands because of "overhanging "the sidewalk with a vehicle when using the backup spur thus limiting the required 4' sidewalk width. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. 12. Per DS 2-05.2.4.O Clearly indicate the maneuverability for vehicles in and out of the loading zone. 13. Per DS 2-05.2.4.V Indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian circulation, utilities, and landscaping. 14. Per DS 2-05.2.4.W Indicate the location, size , and type of all proposed freestanding signage including any existing or proposed billboards 15. Depending on changes to the plan and responses to the comments, additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D05-026dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, tentative plat, final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 08/29/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 29, 2005 Kim Acorn Acorn Associates Architecture, Ltd. 4400 East Broadway Blvd., Suite 505 Tucson, AZ 85711 Subject: D05-0026 Tucson Veterinary Surgical Services Development Plan Dear Kiml: Your submittal of July 20, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Community Planning, Wastewater, Zoning, Landscaping, Environmental Services, Engineering, Traffic, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Landscaping, Community Planning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-0995 |