Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0025
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/05/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/06/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved July 06, 2005. |
| 07/11/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Refuse enclosures cannot be service at the angle that the enclosure is shown. A 14' x 40' clear area i srequired in front of the enclosure. (DS Sec.6.01.4) * No provisions shown or stated for recycliing. * No detail of the dumpster enclosure provided. |
| 07/11/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D05-0025 DCC COMPANY DESERT LINKS RETAIL |
| 07/13/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0025 DESERT LINKS RETAIL/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: July 12, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: COMPLETELY SPELL THE SUFFIX FOR ALL STREET NAMES (SHEET 2) ON MYLAR. DELETE DIRECTION FROM STREET NAMES (LOCATION MAP) ON MYLAR. CORRECT DESERT LINKS RD TO DR. (LOCATION MAP) ON MYLAR. NOTE: 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 07/21/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plan to ensure that screening is located in accordance with LUC 3.7.3.2.C, "Hedges and other vegetative screens shall not extend more than three (3) feet into the street landscape border". 2) Ensure that the screening proposed will provide an opaque barrier along the entire street frontage. Plantings are required to provide a continuous screen. Plants shown in the bottom of the retention basin may not achieve the required screening height within 2 years as required. LUC 6.2.19 3) The proposed retention basin is required to comply with the slope depth requirements of DS 10-01.IV. Page 78 of the manual requires that slopes for basins in excess of three feet be no steeper than 4:1, less than three feet 2:1. Note the slope ratio and show any slope treatments on the development and landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.2.B, DS 2-05.2.4.H 4) Plantings proposed in retention basins are required to be tolerant of periodic flooding. Review the plants proposed in the basin area to ensure that plants have suitable tolerance. DS 10-01.4.3.2 5) Revise the site and landscape plan to demonstrate required screening for the opening of the refuse enclosure. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 6) Revise the site and landscape plans to note the height and show the location of required loading zone screen walls. DS 2-07.2.0 7) Revise the landscape border descriptions on sheet 2 of the landscape plans to correct the required screen height and the number of trees provided for each segment. RESUBMITTAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND LANDSCAPE PLANS IS REQUIRED. THE NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION IS APPROVED. |
| 07/29/2005 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | July 29, 2005 TO: Kevin Hall DCC Company THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Desert Links Retail Development Plan – 1st Submittal D05-0025 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the North Rillito Interceptor Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity request form may be found at http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. Based on the evaluation of the project site, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D05-0025, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Add the following general note and fill in the blanks appropriately THIS PROJECT HAS ___ PROPOSED AND ___ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET 1. Add the following Permitting Note A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 07/29/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: DESERT LINKS RETAIL D05-0025 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted for review July 5, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within Desert Links Drive and Super Chicken Drive. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 08/02/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: July 27, 2005 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Desert Links Retail, 2478 N. Desert Links Drive Development Plan D05-0025 (First Review) T13S, R15E, Section 32 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. All SVT's are not shown correctly. Revise as required. 5. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 6. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the TP/DP. 7. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 8. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. Call out which bench mark is used i.e.: NVGD1929 or NAVD1988. 9. Show Development plan (D05-0025) number on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 10. Show refuse container detail, location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. A minimum 30 degree angle perpendicular to the P.A.A.L. is required. 11. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Please address. 12. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 13. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L., call out the percentage of slopes and show paving material. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 14. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 15. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 16. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Development Plan purposes only. Final review and acceptance will be done at the grading plan stage. 3. Include an existing condition map with existing drainage patterns shown. 4. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, add a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers (per COT/SD) will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed. 5. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DR. 6. Add the project administration address on the cover sheet of the DR. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/2478 N. Desert Links Dr. CDRC |
| 08/04/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: July 27, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: D05-0025 Desert Links Retail: Development Plan(7-5-05) CC: Craig Gross Patricia Gehlen Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/04/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this TP: 1. Dimension the width of all ingress/egress points (Tucson City Code, Chapter 25, section 39 & 40) 2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R) If the existing and future SVTs are coincident, label it as both existing and future. While the SVTs are shown, their size isn't labeled. 3. Check the near side SVT at Tanque Verde. It appears that the stem may be originating at the wrong location. See DS 3-01.5.2.B.4 for guidance. It also appears that the length may be inadequate. Tanque Verde is an arterial road. Desert Links Drive is a local street. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/08/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0025 Desert Links Retail 08/05/05 () Tentative Plat (ü) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-91-19 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Sabino Canyon-Tanque Verde GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: n/a OVERLAY ZONE: Major Streets and Routs (MS&R) Setback Zone COMMENTS DUE BY: August 02, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (ü) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (ü) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: vf 791-4505 DATE: August 1, 2005 Urban Planning and Design Comments D05-0025 Desert Links Retail August 2, 2005 Staff Comments: The proposed zoning for the Desert Links Retail project is C-1, but it appears that the incorrect designation of C-2 was used instead (comments in the Landscape Plans). Please correct Landscape Borders comments on Landscape Plans, pages 1 & 2, to read "Proposed C-1 (Commercial)", instead of C-2. |
| 08/10/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 08/12/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D05-0025 Desert Links Retail Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 08/12/05 DUE DATE: 08/02/05 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is July 4, 2006. 2. Include in the title block the legal description as noted in the Pima County Assessor's parcel information sheet. DS 2-05.2.1.G.2 3. This project has been assigned the Development Plan case number D05-0022. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets including the landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 4. Please include in general note number 3 that the retail use is for "General Merchandise Sales". DS 2-05.2.B.3 5. Please add to general note 5 the applicable MSR LUC section number, "LUC 2.8.3." DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 6. Please dimension the curb to property line along all street frontages. The future curb locations must be drawn and labeled to the present and future right-of-way based on Major Streets and Routes cross sections. These dimensions are necessary to verify applicable building setbacks. DS 2-05.2.3.C 7. All parking spaces must be a minimum of 18 feet long. A wheel stop barrier must be placed two and one-half feet from the front of the parking space. An extruded curb or sidewalk will serve the same purpose with the following exceptions. Parking spaces may overhang onto a landscape border where required vegetation is not placed within the front two and one-half foot area of the parking spaces. Draw a dashed line in front of the parking spaces, which are adjacent to landscape borders label and dimension the two and one-half foot space. When parking spaces abut a sidewalk the sidewalk must be constructed at a width of no less than six and one-half feet. Dimension all sidewalk widths and insure that the sidewalk is a minimum of six and one-half feet wide in areas where parking spaces abut the sidewalk. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Add the same information to the parking detail drawing. 8. It appears that a portion of the public sidewalk will be placed on private property. The area in question is next to the existing light pole along Tanque Verde Road. The portion of the sidewalk that has been jogged to clear the pole and as a result of the jog the sidewalk will be constructed on private property. If the sidewalk is to remain in the proposed location, the property owner must grant a pedestrian easement. Please contact Jim Rossi with the COT Real Estate Department (791-4181) for specifics related to these types of easements. DS 2-05.2.4.G 9. In addition to the 21 foot street perimeter building setback dimension as drawn and labeled on the plan add the actual building setbacks from all street frontages. Also please revise the 21-foot setback note to read the greatest of 21 feet or the height. A specific setback dimension is required at the southeast corner of the building to the back of the future curb of Tanque Verde. Also please clarify if the building height is measured from finish floor. The height of the building is measured from design grade along any given point of the building footprint. DS 2-05.2.4.I 10. Please correct the loading zone table noted in the loading zone calculation from 3.4.5.5 to "LUC Table 3.4.5.3". DS 2-04.2.4.O 11. Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. It is acknowledged that the location is clear on the plan. A fully dimensioned detail drawing should be drawn on the plan based on the proposed location. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 12. Existing and future sight visibility triangles must be drawn, labeled, and dimensioned on the plan. See engineering comments related to this comment. DS 2-05.2.4.R 13. Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning. Submit a separate response letter that states how all the rezoning conditions have been met or will be met as a result of this development. DS 2-05.2.4.U 14. Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. If service is to be provided inside the building add a note stating so. If other service is to be provided label the location and type. DS 2-05.2.4.V 15. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal, including billboards) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that the minimal location requirements can be met. DS 2-05.2.4.W 16. See landscape reviewer comments for information related to landscape borders, screening, and NPPO requirements. DS 2-05.2.4.X 17. Provide a development criteria matrix that includes the allowed or required criteria and the proposed. Examples of the data needed are building heights, floor area ratio, site area, etc. (Some of the required data has such vehicle and bicycle parking loading zones has been provided.) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D050025dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 08/12/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | 391 ESTIMATED DAILY TRIPS IN 24HR PERIOD. |
| 08/12/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 12, 2005 Thomas L. Fraser DCC Company 2828 North Country Club, Suite 100 Tucson, AZ 85716 Subject: D05-0024 Desert Links Retail Plan Dear Bill: Your submittal of June 28, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Zoning, Landscaping, Environmental Services, TEP, Engineering, Traffic, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Landscaping, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 829-7856 |