Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0022
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/07/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org D05-0022 Commercial Lot/Block C: Development Plan 6/29/2005 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Congress St (Grande to I-10) No 0 20,400 42,560 4 42,560 66,368 4 2,291 Route 22, 30 minutes, 0 miles None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 07/11/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | 1) Design Criteria. Development within the Rio Nuevo and Downtown (RND) Zone shall meet the design principles set forth in Sec. 2.8.10.1 by complying with the following Design Criteria (see Development Standards 9-05. LUC 2.8.10.5 Applications for projects within the Rio Nuevo and Downtown (RND) Zone shall be reviewed in accordance with the Administrative Design Review Procedures, 23A-32. The application must include a Design Context and Compatibility Report in conformance with Development Standard 9-05.2.2. 2) Submit revised plans following the review described above. |
| 07/11/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0022 COMMERCIAL LOT-BLOCK C / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Calle De Los Sapos is unacceptable (per letter dated 2/15/05 for S04-053). 2: Correct Calle De Los Hijos to Calle De Los Higos (per S04-053). 3: Provide Spanish review for all street names prior to approval of this project. 4: Legal description needs to reflect Commercial Block “C” of Menlo Park Mercado (S04-053) which will need to be recorded prior to approval of this Development Plan. 5: If this plan is to be the approved Development Plan for the proposed building, please include building layout for all floors and label dwelling units per Pima County Code. |
| 07/13/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: COMMERCIAL LOT, BLOCK "C" D05-022 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted for review June 16, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 07/14/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/15/2005 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Rio Nuevo Mercado Block C Submittal Engineering Review LOCATION: T14S R13E Section 14 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: D05-0022 SUMMARY: The Development Plan, drainage report for the overall Mercado project, and some supplement plan sheets were received by Engineering on June 16, 2005. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.2-05.1.1: Graphically show how the projected development will comply with applicable regulations and any special conditions that may have been required by Mayor and Council. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.F: Since the project is located within the boundaries of the Rio Nuevo Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD District on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.H: Provide contour interval. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.J: Provide a legend which shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing, including dotted hatching, Landfill buffer lines, and utility symbols used. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.1.b: Revise Drainage Note 2 to use the verbiage from this section of the standards: "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this development plan." 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.3: On the development plan address the following comments regarding the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. a) Regarding boundary information, provide the following: i) Provide crow's feet or other clarification to clarify distances along west boundary. ii) Provide legible text for boundary information; some text is overlapping other information. iii) All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. There are easements indicated on the approved Tentative Plat as abandoned by separate instrument, which are not shown on the Development Plan. Explain discrepancy in response letter and provide a docket and page indicating whether they are vacated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. b) There is a note stating that the sewer is private and is existing, however some portions of the sewer line shown on the Development Plan are not indicated on the recently approve Tentative plat. Revise note or explain in response letter. c) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.D: Provide location and size of existing utilities including sanitary sewer pipe diameter with invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. For sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction. d) Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned if existing. e) Specifically, label dkt/pg for: vacation/abandonment of the "Existing 30' Public Utility Easement and Sewer Easement", and any existing electrical easement. f) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.E.1: Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). For land that slopes less than approximately one percent, contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than one foot. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.E: Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. Dimension and provide dkt/pg for "108' R.O.W." for Avenida Del Convento. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.4: Since the project has adjacent residential use and mixed use phases, the phase under consideration shall be designed so that other phases are assured legal access. If such access is provided through the phase under consideration, access easements must be delineated and dedicated for such use. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access and incorporation of future phases into this project are required. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.P: Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Provide design vehicle, with maneuverability delineations within parking area and show on the Development Plan. Provide design of the loading / commercial access showing width of access areas, turning radius for the design vehicle, and other design factors. Accommodate for bicycle (parking for bicycles is in basement area as stated on plan notes), truck, residential vehicles, and (if applicable) pedestrian access to the basement. 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Show existing or proposed sidewalks along abutting right-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled. 12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned. 13) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow from the roof. 14) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.J.1: Show points of connection to existing sewer lines on planview. 15) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.A: Proposed units shall be drawn on the development plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each unit. 16) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.J.1.b: A note must be added to the plan which states the following. "No permits will be issued for any structures proposed to be built within a sewer easement." 17) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.N: Clarify the footprints of the structure(s) on the Development Plan. 18) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.W: Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with SVT's. 19) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.V: Indicate location and type of postal service. 20) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.A: Submit copy of current complete geotechnical report. Submit revised Development Plan which incorporates supplemental sheet information, geotechnical report, and comprehensive response letter. If you have any questions on the comments, please call me at 791-5550 extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 07/15/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * Project near Rio Nuevo South, Nearmont, and 'A' Mountain landfills. Contact David Bell @ Environmental Services 791-5414 for clearance. (Sept. 29,05 received letter that ES David Bell does dot need any other certification from the consultant.) * Concerned with the stated refuse service and if there will be adequate capacity for the stated building. * Concerned with the collection in that the containers has to be taken to anf from the collection area every day. This is a labor intentsive solution for refuse service. |
| 07/18/2005 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 15, 2005 TO: Gallagher Witmer Gallagher Witmer, Architect LLC THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Commercial Lot/Block “C” Development Plan – 1st Submittal D05-0022 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Northwest Outfall Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on the evaluation of project S04-053, this project would qualify for 140 wastewater fixture unit equivalents of Participating sewer connection fee rates and 674 wastewater fixture unit equivalents of Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D05-0022, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 5 to read as shown below and fill in the blanks appropriately THIS PROJECT HAS ___ PROPOSED AND ___ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). Show the sewers (including BCSs) for the entire project area and all the way to their point of connection with the existing public sewer network. If there are any proposed private sewers, please show the length, size and slope. Show the size and Pima County plan number for the existing public sewer to which this project is connecting. Differentiate between existing public sewers, existing private sewers and any proposed private sewers by using different line types that are easily identified. A private Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents has been sent to your office. After three original Sewer Service Agreements have been signed by the Owner of Record, the three originals should be returned to Pima County Wastewater Management in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the development plan. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 07/18/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D05-0022 GALLAGHER WITMER, ARCHITECT LLC COMMERCIAL LOT/BLOCK "C" |
| 07/18/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No Comment |
| 07/19/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: July 19, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D05-0022 Commercial Lot/Block "C": Development Plan CC: Craig Gross Patricia Gehlen Staff has no comments. |
| 07/20/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-022 Menlo Park Mercado District July 19, 2005 Commercial Lot/Block “C” (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-07, Menlo Park Mercado District PAD-10 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan GATEWAY ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: 07/15/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan (X) Other – Elevations and Color Palette REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 07/13/05 Urban Planning and Design Comments D05-0022 Menlo Park Mercado District Commercial Lot/Block “C” July 13, 2005 Staff offers the following comments: Please provide a written verification that the development plan/tentative plat for Commercial Lot/Block “C” is in compliance with the Mercado District Master Plan, as approved by the Mercado District Design Review Committee. Please revise Development plan/tentative plat, sheet C-1, to include in the general notes that this plan is subject to Rezoning Case C9-04-07, Menlo Park Mercado District PAD-10. Please revise Development plan/tentative plat, sheet C-1, to include in the general notes that this development plan/tentative plat is subject to S04-053. Please revise Development plan/tentative plat, sheet C-1, to include in the general notes that advertisement/signs for tenant improvements shall be reviewed by a separate review and not part of this development plan/tentative plat review. Please provide five sided architectural elevations of Commercial Lot/Block “C.” Elevations shall be drawn in color and to scale, using the approved color palette scheme. Please revise development plan/tentative plat to provide dwelling unit floor plans, one per proposed dwelling unit (total of 48 dwelling units). In addition some “unit” spaces seem to have no access. Please indicate how these dwelling units will be accessed or combined in the floor plan details. Its seems that sheet C-1, under Site Calculations, USE: Section B, that the development plan/tentative plat is only requesting for Lot/Block “C” to permit Commercial Service Use Group as permitted in PAD-10, Town Center. This seems to exclude the other uses allowed under the “Town Center. ” Uses, such as Retail Trade Use Group, Civic Use Group, Recreational Use Group, Utilities Use Group, and Industrial Use Group. Is this the objective? Development plan/tentative plat, sheet C-1, under Site Calculations, Loading zones:, non-residential, reads: One on site for every commercial “lot” as labeled on the development plan irregardless of land use mix, 12 X 35’ minimum size, located off-street or on site. Please address the following issues: Please provide location of central refuse collection area, include the required 8 foot high masonry wall as required on page 40 of the PAD. Sheet C-1 shows the loading zone on the north edge of the Lot/Block “C.” Sheet A102, ground floor plan seems to indicate a loading zone on the south edge of Lot/Block “C?” The proposed language seems to be a scrivener’s error. Please correct language to read as intended and confirm correction as outlined below on comment # 9. Mr. Duarte, Development Services Director, forwarded a letter to Ms. Marsland, dated July 14, 2005, in which he indicated a scrivener’s has been found on the Menlo Park Mercado District PAD10 – Congress Street and it is under review to correct. Please provide written documentation of this review being completed, prior to development plan/tentative plat approval. |
| 08/15/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/15/2005 | FRODRIG2 | LANDFILL | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Denied | Environmental Services request the following modifications be done to the drawing set in order to complete the review: Identify the landfill and show the boundaries on the drawing sets where applicable. Show the lines of 100 and 500-foot distances from the landfill where applicable on the drawing sets. Add a note stating "All untilities and structures located within 100 and 500 foot zones of the Rio Nuevo South Landfill shall comply with the requirements of the City of Tucson's Landfill Ordinance No. 10037." If you have any questions please contact Robert Babbitt at (520) 791-5414. |
| 08/15/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D05-0022 Commercial Lot Block "C" Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 07/30/05 DUE DATE: July 15, 2005 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 16, 2006. 2. All text height must be a minimum of 12 point (.12). Revise all text height to meet this requirement. DS 2-05.2.1.C and DS 2-03.2.1.C 3. On the location map please label the street name Starr Pass. Also label the scale of the location map. DS 2-05.2.1.D and D.2 Reference recorded subdivision plats within the location map by book and page. DS 2-03.2.1.D.2 4. If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, such as Williams Addition, Gateway Center, Tucson Community Center, Rio Nuevo, La Entrada, or Civano, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD District on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. DS 2-05.2.1.F and DS 2-03.2.1.F 5. Add the plat name and the book and page number to the title block as part of the legal description. The title block must be revised to include the type of development proposed on this property. Keep in mind that this project includes commercial, residential condominium development, and a parking garage. The title block must be specific about the commercial uses and must include the garage use and the residential condominium use and list the number of condominium units proposed. DS 2-05.2.1.G.2 and DS 2-03.2.1.G.2 and .3 6. A legend, which shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing, is to be placed on the plan, preferably on the first sheet. DS 2-05.2.1.J and DS 2-03.2.1.J 7. This project has been assigned the development plan case number D05-0022. Please list the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets including landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 and DS 2-03.2.2.B 8. If applicable, list zoning variances or modifications that are applicable to the project, such as a Board of Adjustment (B/A) variance, a Lot Development Option (LDO) modification, or a Project Design Option (PDO) modification, by case number, date of approval, what was approved, and conditions of approval. DS 2-05.2.2.B.6 and DS 2-03.2.2.B.6 9. Under the Site Calculations text block include a note that states that the residential use is a condominium development. DS 2-5.2.2.B.9 and DS 2-03.2.2.B.5 10. Add a note stating that this project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. DS 2-05.2.5.B.10 and DS 2-03.2.2.B.7 11. List the site area in both square footage and acreage. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 and DS 2-03.2.2.B.8 12. Clarify if the 16-foot pedestrian easement is within of the building or is it an open area and not part of the structure. Per the ground floor drawing the easement appears to enter and exit through a set of double doors. I assume that easement is within the ground floor area only. The easement must be delineated in a surveyable manner, distance and bearing. DS 2-05.2.3.B an DS 2-05.2.4.D.2 and DS 2-03.2.3.C Also please clarify if the easement is for the residents of the building only or will the easement be a public access easement and will the doors remain open at all times or will the doors be closed at certain times of the day or night. 13. Dimension the roadway width, curb to property lines, sidewalk areas, on-street parking dimensions and angles. The requested information must be added to all three streets that surround this project. The dimensions must match the cross section data as approved in the PAD document and the approved tentative plat. DS 2-05.2.3.C and DS 2-03.2.3.D Label the streets as private or public. DS 2-05.2.4.D.1 and DS 2-03.2.4.F All street access ramps must be provided with truncated domes (early warning system devices). Add a detail drawing demonstrating the access ramps and the truncated domes. DS 2-05.2.4.L 14. Label the adjacent zoning to the property. The zoning should be labeled as PAD-10. DS 2-05.2.4.B and DS 2-03.2.4.D 15. Provide, as a note, the square footage of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed. The sheets with the floor plans must be labeled with the proposed use on each specific floor of the building. The commercial uses must also be listed. All plan sheets must be fully dimensioned. DS 2-05.2.4.M The building footprints must be fully dimensioned in order to verify building heights and square footages. This requirements assists in verifying the calculations as well as allowable floor area ratios, lot or site coverage and compliance with allowable building heights. DS 2-05.2.4.N Include the as a note on the building foot print the site area of the Block "C" in square footage and acreage. Also because the building footprint encompasses the entire block label the building foot print square footage. DS 2-03.2.4.B and DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 16. The parking garage structure must be fully dimensioned. The vehicular use area must be fully dimensioned and must meet Land Use Code parking space and PAAL dimensions and angles. In addition all vehicular use areas must meet all applicable development standards found in section 3-05, (PAAL widths 24', parking spaces-8.5'x18', wheel stop bumpers, ten-foot wide spaces when adjacent to a vertical object six inches or taller in height etc.). Will the patrons or workers of the commercial uses be allowed to park in the additional parking spaces over the 48 required for the residential units? Define or delineate clearly on the plan the spaces that will be reserved for the residential units. Indicate how the spaces will be assigned to the residential owners. The number of vehicle parking spaces required for the residential units proposed in this development, is 48, one per unit or lodging unit as listed in the pad document. Per the parking data on the plan a total of 48 vehicle-parking spaces has been listed as required for the residential use and the parking calculation indicates that 104 + 4 H.C. parking spaces have been provided. Per the parking garage floor plan it appears that 115 parking spaces which includes four (4) H.C. parking spaces have been provided. Please review and revise the parking data accordingly. Also the number of H.C. parking spaces required is five (5) when providing 101 up to 150 vehicle parking spaces. One additional H.C. parking space is required. In addition one of the H.C. parking spaces must be designated as a van accessible space. A van accessible space must be provided with and eight-foot wide access aisle all other H.C. spaces can be provided with a five-foot wide access aisle. DS 2-05.2.4.P All items not in compliance if not addressed in PAD document are subject compliance with the applicable land use code and development standards sections. All items not addressed in the PAD and do not comply with the requirements as listed in either the land use code or development standards must be re-designed or will require approval through the Board of Adjustment. 17. A detail drawing must be added to the plan that demonstrates that the bicycle parking facilities will meet the development standards for bicycle parking as listed in DS 2-09. Clearly define on the plan the location and dimensions of the bicycle parking facility locations. Label the facilities reserved for the residents and the facilities reserved for public use. Also include the type of security and lighting that will be used for both the private and public facilities. Directional signage is required to direct the cyclist to the facility locations. Ds 2-05.2.4.Q 18. Draw, label, and dimension the sight visibility triangles as approved per the PAD document. DS 2-05.2.4.R 19. It is not clear on the ground floor plan where the location of the refuse containers is proposed. Also, what type and where will the refuse containers for the upper floors be located and how will refuse pickup be accomplished? DS 2-05.2.4.T 20. Indicate on the plan graphically, where possible and by notes, in all other instances how this development has been designed to meet the approved development criteria of PAD document. DS 2-05.2.4.U 21. Indicate the location and type of postal service that will be provided for this specific development. DS 2-05.2.4.V 22. Indicate the type of freestanding signage proposed for this development. The location size and type must be labeled. DS 2-05.2.4.W 23. Revise the loading zone note to state that the loading has been provided on street as shown on the plan and per the revised scrivener's error. The pad document as written does not allow for on-street loading zones. The scrivener's error was intended to correct the typo on page 11, Loading Zones - Town Center note 3. Confirmation of scrivener's error approval must be provided to the Zoning Review Section with the next submittal of the plan. 24. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Plan D.S.2-05 and Tentative Plat D.S. 2-05 standards. This plan does not meet the minimum requirements for review of the condominium development additional information is required. Additional comments may be forthcoming on subsequent reviews of this development. Provide any documents that indicate that the DRB committee has approved the proposal as submitted. Submit all documents presented to the DRB which may include color renderings, complete building plans, proposed signage etc. A final plat will be required for this project because of the condominium development. A subdivision case number will be assigned at final plat submittal stage. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D050022dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 08/15/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved June 21, 2005. |
| 08/17/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 17, 2005 Gallagher Witmer Gallagher Witmer, Architect, LLC. 320 East Speedway Blvd. Tucson, AZ 85705 Subject: D05-0022 Commercial Lot/Block "C" - Menlo Park Mercado Development Plan Dear Gal: Your submittal of June 16, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Community Planning, Wastewater, Zoning, Landfill, TEP, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Community Planning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Elevations and Color Palette (Community Planning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 393-3974 |