Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0022
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/06/2006 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/09/2006 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0022 COMMERCIAL LOT/BLOCK “C”/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 1/09/06 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Calle DeLos Zanjero to Paseo De Los Zanjeros on sheets 2 and 4. |
| 01/11/2006 | RBABBIT1 | LANDFILL | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | |
| 01/17/2006 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: COMMERCIAL LOT, BLOCK "C" D05-022 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan dated submitted for review January 6, 2006. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 770-2062. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Mike Kaiser Design/Build - DB 102 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com |
| 01/18/2006 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/23/2006 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: January 23, 2006 TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator SUBJECT: Rio Nuevo Mercado Block C Re-submittal Engineering Review LOCATION: T14S R13E Section 14 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: D05-0022 SUMMARY: The revised Development Plan, a copy of the geotechnical engineering report, fax copy of PAD from Architect, and the response letter were reviewed by Engineering. Engineering has reviewed the received items and does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.2-05.2.4.N: Clarify in response letter and on plan view the maintenance areas or common areas that will be the responsibility by condominium owners and/or which areas will be the responsibility of the owners of the commercial units. CC&R's for the residential units will be necessary at final plat review stage. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: The alignment of the offsite pedestrian pathway does not align with the corridors reflected on plan views. Explain in response letter. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.3: Provide copies of documentation of abandoned easements for the Development Plan file for any easements that have been abandoned. Add docket page for those easements shown on Development Plan, including the following: a) 4) DS Sec.2-03.3.1.E: Submit updated title report, copies of easement abandonment documentation, or a copy of approved final plat. Assure planviews reflect the current status of easements. As stated in the response letter, provide all docket page information once data is available. Also, clarify all delineations shown on planviews, including what appears to be an easement line near MH#7. Label any remaining easements with dimensions and type of easement. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.E.1: Explain reference and actual finish floor elevations provided on sheet C-3. 6) Entrance to the basement parking area on sheet C-2 does not align with the south two-way aisle shown on plan view on sheet C-3. Correct locations. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Provide clarification in response letter and/or plan view for the following: a) Provide design vehicle, with maneuverability delineations within parking area and show on the Development Plan. b) Width of the south section of the PAAL indicates less than 20 feet. A minimum of 20 feet is required for one-way drives. c) Provide design of the loading / commercial access showing width of access areas, turning radius for the design vehicle, and other design factors. d) Accommodate for bicycle (parking for bicycles is in basement area as stated on plan notes), truck, residential vehicles, and (if applicable) pedestrian access to the basement. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: For refuse collection areas, add notation regarding enclosures. Bollards within dumpster areas will need a minimum of 10-ft for the inside dimension, add dimension or notation. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow from the roof. A roof drainage plan shall be provided at grading plan review stage that matches the approved drainage report. For Development Plan resubmittal, provide drainage report that indicates direction of roof drainage and location of where the stormwater will be directed to offsite. Submit revised Development Plan which incorporates supplemental sheet information, drainage report, and comprehensive response letter. If you have any questions on the comments, please call me at 791-5550 extension 2204. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 01/26/2006 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | * Have to ensure that the loading dock hoist will depress all the way to be flush with street. |
| 01/28/2006 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | Thank you for the revisions and response letter. The responses were well done and easy to follow. The following comments need to be addressed before Zoning can approve the plan: 1. All easements must have recording data provided on development plan or be identified as :by separate instrument". No blank recording fields can be on development plan. 2. Add final plat recoding data in all appropriate blanks on development plan 3. Add zone to adjacent property on east side of development on sheet C-2. 4. All one-way traffic aisles in parking garage are required to be a minimum 20 foot per approval of Traffic Engineering. A reduced width will require approval of traffic Engineer (Vince Catalano). 5. Compact parking spaces cannot be utilized without revision to PAD document. Space widths are determined by LUC not PAD so adminiatrative revision to PAD cannot be done. 6. Two-way traffic aisles must be a minimum 24 foot. 7. Wheel stops are not required in parking structures per D.S 3-05.2.3.C.1. Use is optional. Please remove from plan if not being used in final construction. 8. Turning Radii in parking garage needs to be reviewed and approved by Traffic Engineer. 9. Administrative clarification to PAD will allow up to 50% of required type 2 bicycle parking spaces to be provided on street in front of building. All required type I spaces must be located withing building or parking garage. Resubmittal is required. |
| 03/02/2006 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-022 Menlo Park Mercado District 01/26/06 Commercial Lot/Block “C” (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-04-07, Menlo Park Mercado District PAD-10 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan GATEWAY ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: 01/23/06 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (X) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 7/13/05 REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 01/23/06 DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN |
| 03/02/2006 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | March 2, 2006 TO: Gallagher Witmer Gallagher Witmer, Architect LLC THRU: Debbey Marchbanks, Subdivision Coordinator Pima County Development Services Department FROM: R S Engineering (Contract Reviewer) Subhash Raval, P.E. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Commercial Lot/Block “C” Development Plan/Tentative Plat – 2nd Submittal D05-022 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This submittal includes six sheets, five more than the first submittal, therefore, $250.00 will be due for the review of these additional five sheets, regardless if they contain sewer information or not. Refer to the last review comment of this letter to find the total amount due for the next review. Due to the newly amended ordinance, this project will not qualify for any sewer connection fee discounts and thus all wastewater fixture unit equivalents will be assessed the Standard sewer connection fee rate. As the number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents has changed, a revised sewer service agreement is being sent. After three original Sewer Service Agreements have been signed by the Owner of Record, the three originals should be returned to Pima County Wastewater Management in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve of the development plan. SHEET 2. Show the six-digit Pima County manhole numbers for all existing public manholes shown on this sheet. SHEET 2. Show the recording information for the public sewer easement. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $250.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Subhash Raval, P.E. Telephone: (520) 740-6586 Copy: Project |
| 03/03/2006 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 17, 2005 Revised September 1, 2005 Gallagher Witmer Gallagher Witmer, Architect, LLC. 320 East Speedway Blvd. Tucson, AZ 85705 Subject: D05-0022 Commercial Lot/Block "C" - Menlo Park Mercado Development Plan Dear Gal: Your submittal of June 16, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Wastewater, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 882-4022 |