Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0021
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/18/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/19/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development plan is approved August 19, 2005. |
| 08/23/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/24/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Based on the expansion of floor area on the site, the entire site must be modified to meet current Land Use Code requirements. A number of these code requirements must be demonstrated on the development plan and preliminary landscape plan. The following comments reflect the minimum amount of information required in order to receive approval the development plan. 2) A 10' wide minimum street landscape border is required along the entire length of Old Tucson Florence Highway. Neither the new parking spaces, nor the required sidewalk may be located within the required landscape buffer. Revise plans as necessary. LUC 3.7.2.4. 3) The sewer line proposed within the Oracle Road street landscape border should be relocated. The proposed location conflicts with required landscaping. LUC 3.7.2.6.B 4) Note 2 on sheet L1.01 should begin with " Prior to final site plan approval". 5) Add the following note to the landscape plan. Approval of a native plant preservation plan is required prior to site plan and building permit approval. LUC 3.8 RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 08/26/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D05-0021 MMLA-PSOMAS WEST ORACLE |
| 09/06/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | September 6, 2005 TO: Pattie Davis MMLA Psomas THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Oracle West Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D05-0021 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. SHEET 2. Show the correct manhole number of the existing public manhole to which this project is connecting. SHEET 2. Show the Pima County plan number of the existing public sewer to which this project is connecting. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the tentative plat. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 09/06/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/06/2005 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: WEST ORACLE D05-0021 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted for review August 18, 2005. As you are aware there are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. The underground primary line should be blue staked, if the facilities are in conflict with the proposed structures and require relocation, all costs will be billable to the developer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 770-2062. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Gil Bravo Design/Build - DB 102 Tucson Electric Power Company P. O. Box 711 Tucson, AZ 85702 Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 09/09/2005 | JOSE ORTIZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | September 9, 2005 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D05-0021 PROJECT NAME: West Oracle - Dev Plan PROJECT ADDRESS: 4848 N Old Oracle Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz, Civil Engineer Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised or added to the plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Per new City of Tucson codes all sidwalks on local roads need to be 5 feet wide therefore along Old Oracle Road the width needs to be 5 feet. Is the labeled 4-foot sidewalk existing? If it is, what kind of condition is it in? 3. It is difficult to determine if maneuverability for all vehicles in loading zones will work, please provide all dimensions or provide an exhibit that will confirm proper maneuverability for all vehicles. In the exhibit include fire circulation, and refuse vehicle circulation. 4. Please update the legend to include any missing items such as SVT hatching. It is normal practice for Development Services to provide applicants with the same reviewer throughout the review process, but Blanca Espino has transferred to a different department, therefore I will complete this review. If you have any questions, or concerns in regards to this review please feel free to contact me at 791-5640 x1191 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/15/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: September 14, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D05-0021 West Oracle: Development Plan(2nd submittal) CC: Craig Gross Patricia Gehlen, Development Services The design of this development fails to incorporate the Rillito Riverpark into the design - see comments from Urban Planning and Development regarding previous submittal. Comments on Landscape Plan: Remove the existing oleanders. Replace oleanders with Hop Bush or similar desert shrub and add irrigation. Graphic - slope is shown in the wrong direction from pad to Oracle. It slopes down from Oracle Rd. Comments on Development Plan: Graphic - slope is shown in the wrong direction. It slope down from Oracle Rd. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/16/2005 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D05-0021 Oracle West Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 09/16/05 DUE DATE: 07/5/05 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 07/04/06. 2.. This comment has not been addressed. List as a general note the proposed use of the new building on the property. The note should state the use as follows. "The proposed use is for Food Services DD 33". Provide also the use of the existing building. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 3. All sidewalks must be constructed of concrete and must be physically separated from the vehicular use area (PAAL) except at crosswalks. Provide a detail of flared handicap ramps indicating slope, width and truncated domes. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. DS 2-05.2.4.K 4. Show and label all loading zones, fully dimensioned and clearly demonstrate maneuverability in and out of all loading zones. See engineering comments for additional information regarding maneuverability. DS 2-05.2.4.1.K 5. Graphically indicate the following. Parking spaces must be provided with a means of preventing the vehicle from over hanging sidewalks and reducing the required minimum sidewalk width to less than 4', over hanging into the required landscape buffer areas, and from damaging any walls. All of the perimeter parking spaces as well as a portion of the parking spaces abutting sidewalks (depending on width of the sidewalk) will require wheel stops. In the standard parking space typical detail indicate the required 2'-6" distance from the wheel stop to curb. A general note indicating all spaces except as noted to have wheel stops has in the past created to much confusion for the inspectors and builders, please indicate on the site plan the location of each wheel stop. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.Q. Show, on the drawing, specific type of rack, manufacturer and the number of bicycles it supports. Architectural drawings have not been provided detailing types and sizes of bicycle racks. The details must be provided on the development plan for both types of bicycle racks. 7. Provide the allowed, existing and proposed floor area ratio (FAR) calculations in the development criteria block. 8. Provide the last stamped and approved development plan for this site. It is needed in order to see what had been previously approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D05-0021dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, tentative plat, final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 09/17/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 17, 2005 Pattie Davis MMLA Psomas 800 East Wetmore Road Tucson, AZ 85719 Subject: D05-0021 West Oracle Development Plan Dear Pattie: Your submittal of August 18, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (wastewater, zoning, landscaping, parks and recreation, engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (zoning, landscaping, parks and recreation, engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 292-1290 |