Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0021
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/06/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/07/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | 1. Loading zone cannot be located in Fire Lane. Remove parking spaces located in turnaround. 2. Minimum 20 ft. radius required where "20.51' " PAAL and "24.71' " PAAL intersect. 3. Remove fire hydrant location from plan. General Note #20 is adequate at this time. |
| 06/15/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development. * Cannot turn the truck around after servicing the dumpster enclosure with a standard three point turnaround if the stripped area is a loading zone. (Recommend a "Y" type of turnaround. A "Y" type of turnaround superimposed on the drawing could work and would allow the stripped area to be the loading area. The four parking spaces could be relocated along the north property line.) * With out a clear turnaround there are questions with the refuse collection the for the existing building at the NW corner of the building. How is the collection and the loading for this building susposed to work? |
| 06/17/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0021 WEST ORACLE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: June 16, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 06/17/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | No additional access to Oracle Road (SR77) will be permitted. |
| 06/22/2005 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/22/2005 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 22, 2005 TO: Pattie Davis MMLA Psomas THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Oracle West Development Plan – 1st Submittal D05-0021 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the South Rillito West (North Line) Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on the evaluation of project CD9-82-48OO, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D05-0021, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Revise General Note 12 to read as shown below and fill in the blanks appropriately THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET 1. Add the following General Note MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. SHEET 2. Show the size of the existing public sewer to which the proposed project is connecting. Additionally, show a section of existing public sewer which will show if the connection is being made at 90 degrees or more. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 06/28/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: WEST ORACLE D05-0021 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted for review June 6, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. The development plan shows a new Wall is to be built over an existing underground primary line, blue stake will be required for locating the line. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 06/30/2005 | BLANCA ESPINO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Indicate the property address, 4848 N. Old Oracle Road. 3. Indicate a brief legal description/parcel code as per the Assessor's Office. DS 2-05.2.1.G.2 4. The north arrow, contour interval, and scale should be placed together on each sheet, preferably in the upper right corner of the plat. DS 2-05.2.1.H 5. The following information shall be provided on the development plan drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within fifty (50) feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of fifty (50) feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. DS 2-05.2.3 Correct and revise. 6. If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. DS 2-05.2.3.B Correct and revise. 7. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. DS 2-05.2.3.C Indicate existing and future right-of-way information. 8. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. The purpose of this requirement is to assure that all lettering is legible when reviewed and will maintain that legibility when reproduced and photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record-keeping purposes. D.S. 2-05.2.1.C 9. The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. 10. Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction. DS 2-05.2.3.D 11. Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). DS 2-05.2.3.E Sheet 1 General Note 11, identify Datum used. 12. Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown. DS 2-05.2.3.F Indicate Bank Protection area. 13. Indicate those that apply, other significant conditions on the site, such as major rock outcrops, structures, fences, walls, etc., shall be shown. These elements should be indicated in a different line weight than the proposed improvements and labeled to be removed or retained. DS 2-05.2.3.G 14. Conditions on adjacent land significantly affecting the design of the project will be shown, such as the approximate direction and gradients of ground slope; character and location of adjacent development; and drainageways, arroyos, ditches, and channels, including their existing conditions. DS 2-05.2.3.H 15. All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two (2) or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. DS 2-05.2.4.B Indicate zoning classification across Oracle Road. 16. Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. DS 2-05.2.4.D.2 Correct for Old Oracle Road (Oracle Road). 17. If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Sec. 3.3.0 of the LUC and Development Standard 3-05.0. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 The 19-foot PAAL area that is south of the proposed building does not meet PAAL requirements. Correct and revised. 18. Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development plan has been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. DS 2-05.2.4.E 19. If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, etc.) DS 2-05.2.4.F 20. All proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. DS 2-05.2.4.G All text and symbol height shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. Correct and revise. 21. In conjunction with a drainage report or statement, as applicable, prepared in accordance with the City Engineer's instructions and procedures, the following information will be indicated on the development plan. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. DS 2-05.2.4.H 22. Verification will be provided that any drainage solutions which occur outside the boundaries of the development plan area are constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the drainage report.) DS 2-05.2.4.H.5 23. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points. DS 2-05.2.4.H.7 24. Indicate existing and future sight visibility triangles. DS 2-05.2.4.I 25. Preliminary sewer layout, including points of connection to existing sewers, proposed rim and invert elevations at all manhole locations, length and percent of grade between manholes, size of pipe, and proposed flow-thru locations, should be shown if applicable. DS 2-05.2.4.J.1 26. Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. DS 2-05.2.4.K Comply with comment 28. 27. Show existing or proposed sidewalks along abutting right-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled. DS 2-05.2.4.L Comply with comment 28. 28. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the Truncated Domes instead of the standard grooves shown on City of Tucson Standard Detail 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, the wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with Standard Detail 207. 29. Show all loading zones and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned. DS 2-05.2.4.O 30. Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. DS 2-05.2.4.Q 31. Show sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. DS 2-05.2.4.R 32. Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. DS 2-05.2.4.S 33. Show refuse vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned. 34. Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning. DS 2-05.2.4.U 35. Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. DS 2-05.2.4.V 36. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. DS 2-05.2.4.W 37. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. 38. Indicate in drainage report if sidewalk scuppers and roof downspouts are to be a part of the drainage design. 39. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points. Indicate cfs quantities. 40. The specific maintenance notes specified in the Standard Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, SMDDFM.14.3 must be included on the Development Plan: The Covenants, Conditions and Restriction (CC&Rs), Final Plats or Development Plans shall have a note stating (a) that, "The owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at least once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and detention/retention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with maintaining the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities.". Indicate only what applies to site condition. 41. The certified annual inspection report shall contain the following summaries: (a) either a statement that no maintenance work is needed at that time, or a list of repairs and work to be done to correct deficiencies or potential problems and/or to restore the aesthetics, followed by a letter of certification from an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer stating that the recommended work has been satisfactorily completed; and (b) a statement either indicating that watershed conditions have not changed since the previous inspection report, or stating that specific changes have occurred which alter or eliminate some of design features and affect the level of service of the drainage and detention/retention systems. The City Engineer is to be notified if watershed conditions have changed to the extent that drainage and detention/retention systems no longer satisfy the requirements of the Floodplain Regulations found in the Tucson Zoning Code. Indicate only what applies to site condition. 42. As part of the drainage report submitted in conjunction with the Development Plan a detailed inspection list and basin-performance criteria shall be included for subsequent reference by the Engineer responsible for annual and as-needed maintenance inspections of the basins and drainageways. SMDDFM 1.5.2 Indicate only what applies to site condition. 43. If applicable, include Maintenance checklist in drainage report. SMDDFM 14.03 |
| 07/01/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R). D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/04/2005 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D05-0021 Oracle West Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 07/04/05 DUE DATE: 07/5/05 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 07/04/06. 2.. List as a general note the proposed use of the new building on the property. The note should state the use as follows. "The proposed use is for Food and Beverage Sales DD 34". Provide also the use of the existing building. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 3. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 Requires the listing the proposed use of the property. There is a conflict between the development plan, indicating a Food and Beverage Sales use, and the landscape plan, which indicates a Restaurant use. Please clarify which use will apply to this project. A. LUC Sec. 6.3.10.3 Food and Beverage Sales. Food and Beverage Sales is the retail sale of food and beverages for consumption off the premises, such as bakeries, butcher shops, grocery stores, and liquor stores. B. A restaurant is under the Food Services land use group as per LUC Sec. 6.3.5.13 Food Service is the preparation and sale of food primarily for consumption as a meal on premises; however, the Food Service use may also offer the sale of food for consumption off premises. Typical uses include restaurants, coffee shops, cafeterias, and fast food establishments. To differentiate between a Food Service use (restaurant) which serves alcoholic beverages and an Alcoholic Beverage Service use (bar) which serves food, refer to the definition of restaurant. (Ord. No. 8666, §1, 3/25/96) If the use is a restaurant, further comments may be forth coming. 4. DS 2-05.B.10 Requires if one (1) or more of the following special overlay zones are applicable to the property, add a note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 5. The expansion of the floor area for this site is greater than 25%, thus requiring full code compliance for the entire site as per LUC Sec. 3.3.3.12. Clearly indicate how the existing portions of this site, as well as the new development, meet all of the requirements of the Land Use Code and the Development Standards. For example: sidewalk widths, all handicap criteria including truncated domes, landscape borders, PAAL widths, loading zones, future curb and sidewalks, sight visibility triangles, bicycle parking, pedestrian circulation, etc. 6. Clearly indicate the future and existing right of way, curb, sidewalks, distance from future curb to property lines and existing and future sight visibility triangles for Oracle Road and Old Oracle Road. DS 2-05.2.4.D.2 and DS 2-05.2.4.F 7. Provide dimensions for all PAAL areas. The PAALs near the northeast area of the existing building do not appear to be the required 24'. If the "painted striped area" is a loading zone it cannot be used as part of the PAAL. The PAALs located near the handicap parking spaces at the south side of the existing building and the south side of the proposed structure are less than the required 24'. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 8. This project has been assigned the case number D05-0021. List the case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including the Landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 9. Existing and proposed easements must be drawn labeled and dimensioned on the plan. The sidewalk indicated along Old Oracle Rd. at the southern most corner of the property is required to be located in the right of way or be provided with an easement for the sidewalk. Indicate the size and location of the easement and provide on the plan the recordation data of the easement. DS 2-05.2.3.B 10. For clarity purposes remove all elevation blocks from the development plan. If required for other purposes provide a separate plan. 11. Indicate the height from grade and dimensions of the foot print for the proposed structure as well as the required setbacks from adjacent zoning and MS&R on Oracle Rd. The setback from Oracle Rd. is 21' or the height of the structure from the back of the future curb, which ever is greater. The required setback to the north, adjacent to RX1 zoning is a min. of 20' to the property line. Provide dimensions clearly indicating setbacks. DS2-05.2.4..I and DS 2-052.4.N 12. Please define clearly, label and dimension the sidewalk areas around the existing and the proposed building. The sidewalks must have a clear width of four feet throughout the development. The sidewalks on the site must be constructed in a manner that creates a continuous circulation path within the development and must connect to the sidewalk in the right-of-way. The sidewalk from the right-of-way on Old Oracle Rd connecting to the depicted cross walk has not been shown on the plan. The required sidewalk must be provided from the street right-of-way area to the building or must connect to the onsite sidewalk circulation. The development plan is indicating an existing sidewalk between the parking spaces located in the southern section of the development. The aerial photos of this site do not indicate a sidewalk as being there. Clarify if this is to be a new sidewalk. The side walk indicated at the east side of the proposed building cannot be located with in the required landscape border. See landscape reviewers comments All sidewalks must be constructed of concrete and must be physically separated from the vehicular use area (PAAL) except at crosswalks. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. DS 2-05.2.4.K 13. Show and label all loading zones, fully dimensioned and clearly demonstrate maneuverability in and out of all loading zones. See engineering comments for additional information regarding maneuverability. DS 2-05.2.4.1.K 14. Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. DS 2-05.2.4.P. Clearly detail and locate the required van accessible parking space. One van accessible space is required for every six provided handicap space. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to the International Building Code. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Development Standard 3-05.0. The parking spaces located west of the existing building and facing Old Oracle Rd. cannot be located in the required landscape buffer. See landscape reviewers comments. Parking spaces must be provided with a means of preventing the vehicle from over hanging sidewalks and reducing the required minimum sidewalk width to less than 4', over hanging into the required landscape buffer areas, and from damaging any walls. All of the perimeter parking spaces as well as a portion of the parking spaces abutting sidewalks (depending on width of the sidewalk) will require wheel stops. The parking spaces located at the rear of the existing building will also require wheel stops to prevent damage to the wall. The parking space at the rear of the existing building nearest the dumpster is at the end of a row of parking spaces thus requiring a backup spur. The dumpster will not be allowed to be located in a backup spur. See DS 3-05 for design information. 15. DS 2-05.2.4.Q. Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack, manufacturer and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. 16. DS 2-05.2.4. V. If applicable, indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 17. DS 2-05.2.4.W. If applicable, indicate the locations and types of proposed and existing signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal, billboards) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. 18. DS 2-0.2.4.X. See landscape reviewers comments regarding landscape borders, screening and NPPO requirements. 20. Provide the allowed, existing and proposed floor area ratio (FAR) calculations in the development criteria block. 21. Provide the last stamped and approved development plan for this site. It is needed in order to see what had been previously approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 791-5550 ext. 2000. TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D05-0021dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, tentative plat, final plat, CC&R's and additional requested documents. |
| 07/06/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans to retain all landscaping as approved for the "Just for Feet" development plan, see C9-82-48. Landscape plans approved on 05/02/96 provide information on the required landscaping. 2) Parking area expansions are subject to the current landscape regulations. See LUC 3.7.2.3. for tree requirements. 3) The approved plans for the site include 10' wide minimum landscape borders around the perimeter of the site. Revise the current proposal to include these borders. Replacement of any missing plants for the site will be required. Add notes and dimensions as necessary. 4) Submit revised plans as requested by other agencies. Ensure that the landscape plans reflect any changes made to the development plan. Additional comments may apply. |
| 07/06/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 07/06/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0021 West Oracle 07/05/05 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 07/05/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (X) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 07/05/05 Department of Urban Planning and Design D05-0021, Oracle West Development Plan July 5, 2005 Staff offers the following comments: The proposed site is within an area that was annexed into the City on October 12, 1982, with conditions as outlined in Ordinance No. 5651. Conditions required a development that addresses building setbacks that may effect the Rillito Corridor study, which was under way at the time of annexation. Since the annexation, the Rillito Linear Park has been established and developed along the border of this site. In addition, Oracle Road is a Gateway Route and therefore this site is at an intersection of two corridors, the Rillito River Linear Park and the Gateway design of Oracle Road. The applicant, in the design of this development should take this combination into consideration. Staff encourages the applicant to consider the value of the Rillito River Linear Park. The City of Tucson encourages business located adjacent to the park to bear in mind connectivity and services to patrons of Rillito River Linear Park. Staff believes such accessibility may increase business and enhance the River Park. To attract such patrons staff believes four-sided architecture design along with appropriate landscaping, along with provision of direct pedestrian connectivity and access onto the business site. This may also include an outdoor sitting area(s) that would take in the views of both the Rillito River and the Catalina Mountains as the back drop. Similar façade treatment and landscaping along Oracle Road should considered. Such considerations could help make this business a landmark destination along the Rillito River Park and Oracle Road. |
| 07/07/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org D05-0021 West Oracle: Development Plan 6/29/2005 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” Oracle Rd (Wetmore to River) No 0 52,800 64,140 6 64,140 112,510 6 1,081 Route 16, 15 minutes, 0 miles None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 07/13/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: July 11, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D05-0021 West Oracle: Development Plan CC: Craig Gross Patricia Gehlen, Development Services Please contact Glenn Hicks in Parks and Recreation to set-up a meeting with Pima County Natural Resources Parks and Recreation to discuss impacts to the Rillito River Park. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/14/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 14, 2005 Pattie Davis MMLA Psomas 800 East Wetmore Road Tucson, AZ 85719 Subject: D05-0021 West Oracle Development Plan Dear Pattie: Your submittal of June 6, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 11 Copies Revised Development Plan (fire, ADOT, wastewater, zoning, landscaping, parks and recreation, environmental services, TEP, engineering, traffic, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plans (zoning, landscaping, parks and recreation, engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (enigneering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 292-1290 |