Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0016
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/26/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/27/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Show and label required screen walls on the landscape and development plans. 5' masonry screen walls are required for the unscreened portion of the south property lines. The wall is required along the entire length of the southern property line. The building cannot serve to provide the required screening, unless a street landscape border abuts the building wall. LUC Table 3.7.2-I, LUC 3.7.3.6.B 2) Revise the landscape and development plans to provide a 6' high screen wall for the south side of the loading areas. LUC Table 3.7.2-I RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED, INCLUDING THE NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN. |
| 09/29/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/11/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DATE: October 11, 2005 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Hazen Office Building Development Plan D05-0016 (Third Review) T14S, R15E, Section 15 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan and Revised Drainage Report The Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan and Drainage Report for Hazen Office Building and recommends approval at this time. A complete grading permit submittal will be required for this project. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 10/18/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/19/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D05-0016 Hazen Office Building Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 10/19/05 DUE DATE: 10/10//05 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 24, 2006. 2. After reviewing the consultant's responses to my last set of zoning comments and after consulting with Patricia Gehlen, Zoning Manager, it has been determined that the number of splits without counting the well site has exceeded the number of splits allowed for a lot recorded as part of a subdivision. In short, a tentative plat and final plat will be required. As indicated before please consult with Patricia Gehlen on this issue and the tentative and final plat process. This comment will remain until a determination has been made. Previous Comment: The brief legal description in the title block must be revised to state that this site is a resubdivision of lot 116 of Hermosa Hills Estates. The original lot as platted in book 15 Page 74 appears to have been split several times within the past one to ten years. Provide all documentation related to the lot splits that has been submitted to and approved by the City of Tucson. As of this review it is the determination that a tentative plat and a final plat will be required due to the number of splits that have occurred with the time frame mentioned above. If you have any questions related to this comment please feel free to call Patricia Gehlen DSD Zoning Manager to discuss this matter. I will review the plan for compliance with Development Standards 2-05 for development plan format and content. Additional comments related to a tentative plat may be forthcoming. DS 2-05.G.2 Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the development plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) 3. Please insure that the development plan case number is listed on the landscape and NPPO plan sheets. Previous comment: The case number must be added to the landscape and NPPO plan sheets. 4. This comment will remain until determination has been made. Previous Comment: The gross area of the lot under review has been noted. The gross area of the entire subdivision may be required based on the decision Patricia Gehlen on whether a tentative plat and final plat will be required. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 5. This comment will remain until the abandonment data is listed on the plan. Previous Comment: Existing easements must be drawn labeled and dimensioned on the plan. Per the plan the existing sewer easement must be abandoned prior to approval of the development plan. List on the plan the recordation data of the abandonment of the existing easement. DS 2-05.2.3.B 6. The type of surface material for the bicycle parking facilities was not provided. Please label or add a note to the bicycle facility details what surfacing material is to be used. Previous Comment: Show on the drawing, for both the class one and class two off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. 7. Please submit a copy of the recorded document docket 12465 page 695. Previous Comment: Demonstrate the maneuverability into and out of the loading zone. Also it appears that two way traffic is proposed via an east/west drive. The PAAL must meet the same requirements as the onsite PAALs. The PAAL must be a minimum of 24 feet in width and paved from the new development to Harrison Road. Provide a drawing that demonstrates that the drive has been approved as part of another project and has been developed according. The plan must also demonstrate requirements for pedestrian access and how many developments the PAAL services. Include with the next submittal a copy of the documents related to this 30-foot PAAL/drive and how it grants the use of this PAAL for the proposed development. The recordation data for the drive must be listed on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.O If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D050016dp3.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 10/20/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | October 20, 2005 To: Bruce Wilson, Landmark Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Hazen Offices Buildings Development Plan - 3rd Submittal D05-0016 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This office has received the capacity response letter No. 05-209, dated July 6, 2005. Sheet 1: Revise the table reference in General Note #18 to read 13.20.045(E)(1) and the code reference to read 13.20.045(E). Sheet 1: Add the existing sewer line type entry in the Legend that is used on sheet 2, to identify the existing sewers. Sheet 2: Revise the plan to label the NEW PAAL PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT, DKT_____, PG_____, BY SEPETATE INSTRUMENT that appears on this plan and the sewer construction plan G-2005-041. Sheet 2 Revise the plan so that it identifies the three parking stalls, by new MH #2, that will be signed so that parking will be prohibited between the hours of 5pm to 5am. The sewer construction plan G-2005-041 has an adequate description that says SIGNS PER PCWWD, NO PARKING AFTER 5 P.M. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, the developer or prime contractor must secure air quality activity permits from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity, which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 10/27/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 27, 2005 E. Bruce Wilson, P.E., R.L.S. Landmark Engineering, Inc. 3845 North Business Center Drive, Suite 107 Tucson, AZ 85705 Subject: D05-0016 Hazen Office Building Development Plan Dear Bruce: Your submittal of September 26, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Development Plan (waste water, zoning, landscaping, traffic, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (zoning, landscaping, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (landscaping, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 628-1392 |