Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0016
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/03/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/05/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Show and label required screen walls on the landscape and development plans. 5' masonry screen walls are required for the unscreened portion of the south property lines. The wall is required along the entire length of the southern property line. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 2) Revise the landscape and development plans to provide a 6' high screen wall for any loading areas. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 3) A 5' screen is required along Magdalena Street. LUC Table 3.7.2-I RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 08/05/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved August 05, 2005. |
| 08/08/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0016 HAZEN OFFICE BUILDING/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 8/08/05 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. 1: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2: All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 08/12/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 11, 2005 TO: E. Bruce Wilson, P.E., R.L.S. Landmark Engineering, Inc. THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: Hazen Office Building Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D05-0016 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. As previously requested, please provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. SHEET 1. Add the following two General Notes THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN ALL PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANTING GUIDELINES OF PC/COT STANDARD DETAIL WWM A-4. NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES (I.E., MASONRY WALLS, FENCES, ETC.) MAY BE CONSTRUCTED ON OR THROUGH THE PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS SHOWN HEREON WITHOUT SEPARATE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. SHEET 2. Pima County Wastewater Management Department’s maintenance vehicles will require continuous access to all public sewer manholes within this development plant, therefore, please propose a ingress/egress easement to Pima County for the entire width of the Parking Area Access Lane throughout the project site. SHEET 2. There are easement limits on the southeast area of the project that are not labeled or defined. Please clarify if these easement borders belong to an easement or delete them if they are not supposed to be there. SHEET 2. As discussed on August 11, 2005, revise the design of the parking area next to proposed manhole 2 in order to provide adequate and safe access to Pima County Wastewater Management Department’s maintenance vehicles. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 08/18/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. The access point for Magdalena shall be a minimum of 24' wide. A one-way access is not acceptable. 2. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs at the access from Magdalena (DS 2-05.2.4.R). The SVTs are shown but not dimensioned. D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/18/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: August 18, 2005 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Hazen Office Building Development Plan D05-0016 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 15 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan and Revised Drainage Report The Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan and Drainage Report for Hazen Office Building and does not recommend approval at this time. Development Plan Comments: 1. The lot split procedure creating this lot has not been completed (S04-191). Contact the Zoning/Landscape review section to complete the process. The Development Plan will not be approved until the lot split issues have been finalized. 2. Revise note 22 to say: "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this development plan." DS 2-05.2.2.C.1.b 3. Show how that water harvesting will be maximized. Show how water will be directed from buildings and parking areas toward landscaped areas to the extent feasible. (LUC 3.7.4.3 and LUC 3.7.4.5.B) 4. Show on the Development Plan how retention requirements will be met. The requirements can be met with substantial water harvesting. Water will need to be directed from parking areas and rooftop areas to the water harvesting areas. Show depressed curbs or other conveyance means. The water harvesting areas must be designed to maximize the harvested volume. 5. Revise the PAAL at Magdalena Road to be at least 24 feet wide. Drainage Report Comments: 6. Since this lot was created after September 4, 1984, five-year threshold retention is required by the Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management in Tucson Arizona (Drainage Manual), Section 14.2.1. As discussed in emails and in person, show how water will be directed to the water harvesting areas. Provide flat-bottomed areas (with mini terraces, if necessary) to provide maximum water harvesting capacity and usage in lieu of a retention basin. 7. Provide for the Long Term Maintenance Responsibilty as described in the Drainage Manual Section 2.3.1.2.E. A complete grading permit submittal and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required for this project. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 08/23/2005 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D05-0016 Hazen Office Building Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 08/23/05 DUE DATE: 06/22/05 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 24, 2006. 2. Please add the following names to the location map, Gollob Road, Kenynon Drive, 29th Street, and Bonanza Avenue. Previous Comment: The following items must be addressed. Identify conditions within the location map square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses. It is preferable that the location map drawing not include all lots as depicted on the drawing. A stick drawing that includes all major and collector streets/names as well as the streets/names adjacent to the subject parcel be drawn and labeled. The recorded book and page data of the subdivisions within the square mile area of the location map are not required on a development plan drawing. Please revise the location map as requested. DS 2-05.2.1.D.2 3. This comment will remain until a determination has been made. Previous Comment: The brief legal description in the title block must be revised to state that this site is a resubdivision of lot 116 of Hermosa Hills Estates. The original lot as platted in book 15 Page 74 appears to have been split several times within the past one to ten years. Provide all documentation related to the lot splits that has been submitted to and approved by the City of Tucson. As of this review it is the determination that a tentative plat and a final plat will be required due to the number of lots splits that have occurred with the time frame mentioned above. If you have any questions related to this comment please feel free to call Patricia Gehlen DSD Zoning Manager to discuss this matter. I will review the plan for compliance with Development Standards 2-05 for development plan format and content. Additional comments related to a tentative plat may be forthcoming. DS 2-05.G.2 Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the development plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) 4. The case number must be added to the landscape and NPPO plan sheets. Previous Comment: This project has been assigned the case number D05-0016. List the case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including the Landscape and NPPO sheets. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 It is not clear why this project has been submitted for review as a development plan. I could not find any requirement for this project to be reviewed as a development plan. Please clarify what triggered the development plan requirement. 5. This comment will remain until determination has been made. Previous Comment: The gross area of the lot under review has been noted. The gross area of the entire subdivision may be required based on the decision Patricia Gehlen on whether a tentative plat and final plat will be required. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 6. This comment will remain until the abandonment data is listed on the plan. Previous Comment: Existing easements must be drawn labeled and dimensioned on the plan. Per the plan the existing sewer easement must be abandoned prior to approval of the development plan. List on the plan the recordation data of the abandonment of the existing easement. DS 2-05.2.3.B 7. Dimension the back of the back-up spur. The radius has been dimensioned correctly and the back of the spur must also be dimensioned. A minimum width of three feet must be maintained when the back-up spur is adjacent to a vertical object taller than 6'inches or when next to a wall, fence, property line etc. Also a barrier is required at the back-up spur such as wheel stops or extruded curbing. Draw and label the extruded curbs. A portion of previous comment 12: Also a backup spur is required at the end of a row parking spaces. A backup spur has been depicted on the plan for parking area along the West Side of the building. The backup spur must be revised to correctly depict a backup spur as depicted in development standards 3-05.2.2.D 8. The sidewalks have been defined as requested. The issue with the minimum width of four feet is still a problem at several locations around the building footprint. At specific locations around the building footprint where the building jogs in and out the sidewalk areas have been reduced to less than three feet. The specific areas are as follows: at the northwest corner of the building, along the eastside of the at all jogs. Please verify the sidewalk width and dimension the areas in question Add to the plan, dimensioned and annotated details drawings depicting the access ramps with truncated domes and slopes. The access ramps as proposed along the northwest corner of the building should be redesigned. The two access ramps should be combined to one ramp and should be designed so that the ramp provides a clear four feet between the ramp and the building walls. Also the handicapped parking space and access ramp along the southeast side of the building should be relocated away from the jog and placed midway between the building jogs to allow for a clear four-foot walkway area around the ramp. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the revisions made to the sidewalk issues. Access ramps will be required at the intersection of the street sidewalk and the driveway entrance. The street sidewalk must be continued to the west property boundary. Previous Comment: Please, define clearly, label and dimension the sidewalk areas around the building. The sidewalks must have a clear width of four feet throughout the development. The sidewalks on the site must be constructed in a manner that creates a continuous circulation path within the development and must connect to the sidewalk in the right-of-way. The sidewalk from the right-of-way has not been depicted on the plan. The required sidewalk must be provided from the street right-of-way area to the building or must connect to the onsite sidewalk circulation. All sidewalks must be constructed of concrete and must be physically separated from the vehicular use area (PAAL) except at crosswalks. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. DS 2-05.2.4.K Draw and label existing or proposed sidewalks along Magdalena Road. The required sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled. DS 2-05.2.4.L 9. To be consistent with handicapped parking requirements, please revise the calculation as follows. Handicapped space requirements are based on the actual number of vehicle parking spaces provided on the site. Revise the H.C parking based on the following ratio, one H.C space required when providing 1-25 parking spaces, two H.C spaces required when providing 26-50 parking spaces, three H.C spaces required when providing 51-75 parking spaces etc see 2003 IBC Table 1106.1 for more info. Based on the number of vehicle parking spaces provided three handicapped parking spaces are and of the three has to be van accessible with an eight-foot wide access aisle. The revised plan now depicts the locations and type of bicycle parking facilities that will be provided. The number of bicycle parking spaces for this use is based on eight percent of the number of vehicle parking spaces provided. Two types of bicycle parking facilities are required at the following percentages, 75 percent must be class one and 25 percent must be class two. The plan only depicts the location of the class one spaces. Draw on the plan the location of the class two facility. Show on the drawing, for both the class one and class two off-street bicycle parking locations, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. For specifics, refer to Development Standard 2-09.0. Provide, as a note, calculations on the number of bicycle spaces required and the number provided. A portion of previous comment 16: Include in the parking calculation the number of Handicapped parking spaces required and provided. Also the number of van accessible parking spaces required and provided. 10. In reviewing the requirements for the loading zone location it does not appear that the loading space has been placed in close proximity to the service entrance of the use it serves. Also a sidewalk should be provided from the loading zone to the service entrance. The maneuverability must be depicted on the plan. The location of the loading zone should be placed or revised to within a closer proximity to the service entrance. As indicated in the previous comment, provide documentation that allows access through the east/west PAAL area. Provide a copy of the recorded ingress egress easement or the clarify if an easement is proposed over the ease/west PAAL. Previous Comment: Demonstrate the maneuverability into and out of the loading zone. Also it appears that two way traffic is proposed via an east/west drive. The PAAL must meet the same requirements as the onsite PAALs. The PAAL must be a minimum of 24 feet in width and paved from the new development to Harrison Road. Provide a drawing that demonstrates that the drive has been approved as part of another project and has been developed according. The plan must also demonstrate requirements for pedestrian access and how many developments the PAAL services. Include with the next submittal a copy of the documents related to this 30-foot PAAL/drive and how it grants the use of this PAAL for the proposed development. The recordation data for the drive must be listed on the plan. DS 2-05.2.4.O If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D050016dp2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 08/30/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | * Plan view shows a dumpster ewnclosure that scales 20 feet wide. Detail E shows a dumpster that is 10 feet between the bollards. (A single dumpster enclosure.) Request that the detail and the plan match. * Note: If the enclosure is for a single dumpster then there is conflict with the curb. (14 clear area is required.) If the enclosure is for twp dumpsters the curb is still is conflict and the parking bay to the west is in conflict. |
| 08/30/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 30, 2005 E. Bruce Wilson, P.E., R.L.S. Landmark Engineering, Inc. 3845 North Business Center Drive, Suite 107 Tucson, AZ 85705 Subject: D05-0016 Hazen Office Building Development Plan Dear Bruce: Your submittal of August 3, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (environmental services, waste water, engineering, zoning, landscaping, traffic, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (zoning, engineering, landscaping, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 628-1392 |