Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0015
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/03/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/05/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved May 05, 2005. |
| 05/09/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/10/2005 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D05-0015 RELIASOFT / DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: MAY 10, 2005 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1: Delete direction from street names on Location Map. 2: Add recording Book and Page to Eastside Research / Commerce Center in Title Block. |
| 05/10/2005 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | NO COMMENT D05-0015 GDA SOUTHWEST, LLC RELIASOFT |
| 05/13/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0015 Reliasoft 05/13/05 ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment () Other (NPPO) CROSS REFERENCE: C9-85-95 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: June 1, 2005 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 5/13/2005 Per annexation condition1.d of Section 2, Ordinance 6503, please provide a site specific traffic access study as deemed necessary by the City Transportation Department. Per annexation condition 2.a of Section 2, Ordinance 6503, please provide a complete hydrologic drainage report as deemed necessary by the Floodplain Engineer. Per annexation condition 1 of Section 5, Ordinance 6503 and Ordinance 9441 condition 1, height of all structures except for proposed satellite antennae dishes, which can be a maximum of fifty (50) feet, are restricted to a maximum height of thirty-five (35) feet. The phase 1 building is indicated to be seventy-five (75) feet in height. Please revise. Calculations for FAR, parking, and off street loading will need to be revised as well. Per annexation condition 5 of Section 5, Ordinance 6503 and Ordinance 6750 Section 1 condition 5, indicates that uses within the I-1 project area are to conform to the Park Industrial (P-I) zone, except as may be modified by the Mayor and Council. This would require office use to meet development designator “33” and not development designator “34”, as indicated on the proposed development plan. Please revise plan accordingly to meet the requirements of development designator “33”. Required FAR and building height must be revised. |
| 05/26/2005 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | SUBJECT: RELIASOFT OFFICE D05-0015 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plans submitted for review May 4, 2005. TEP is unable to approve the plans at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plans, the facilities and easement recording information must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map and the development plan showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. The location of the underground electric cables is to be determined by blue stake. All cost associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to the City of Tucson for TEP's review. You may contact me at (520) 917-8745 if you have any questions. Liza Castillo Right of Way Agent Land Management Tucson Electric Power Co. (520) 917-8745 lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com> |
| 05/26/2005 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 25, 2005 TO: Kevin Morrow GDA Southwest, LLC THRU: Patricia Gehlen City of Tucson, Development Services Department FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Pima County Development Services Department Development Review Division (Wastewater) SUBJECT: ReliaSoft Office Development Plan – 1st Submittal D05-0015 The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on the evaluation of project C12-83-34, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D05-0015, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET DP1. Revise General Note 13 to read as shown below and fill in the blanks appropriately THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). SHEET DP1. Add the following General Note MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. SHEET DP1. Add the following Permitting Note A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. SHEET DP1. Delete General Note 9. SHEET DP2. Show the length, size and slope of all proposed private sewers, including HCSs. SHEET DP2. The sewer layout shows a section which is curvilinear. Please revise the design to show a rectilinear sewer line. SHEET DP2. Show rim and invert elevations for any proposed private cleanouts. SHEET DP2. Show the size, length and slope for the sewer reach between existing public manhole 2820-04 and proposed private manhole 1. We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely, Dickie Fernández, E.I.T. Telephone: (520) 740-6947 Copy: Project |
| 05/27/2005 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 27, 2005 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC Coordinator FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Reliasoft Development Plan D05-0015 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 20 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan The Engineering Division has reviewed the Development Plan and Drainage Report for Reliasoft and does not recommend approval at this time. Development Plan Comments: 1. Confirm that the basis of bearing and basis of elevation are those used by the surveyor for this project. It appears that they are a large distance from the site. 2. Show on the development plan and in the drainage report how the stormwater will be discharged from the project. Show how that the sidewalk and all pedestrian routes will be kept floodfree for up to a ten-year event. Provide details for any required drainage structures. 3. Show how that water harvesting will be maximized. Show how that roof and parking area discharges will be directed to landscape areas to the maximum amount practicable. 4. Make sure that all type is at least 12 point. The contour labels are much smaller and will not reproduce sufficiently when photoreduced. 5. Show existing storm drains and culverts across and adjacent to the project site. A complete grading permit submittal and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan will be required for this project. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1161 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 06/01/2005 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 06/02/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise sheet LD-1, note #9. The Williams Center PAD list would not be appropriate for this site. 2) Revise the Native Plant Preservation Plan aerial photo to include all plants listed on the inventory. 3) Revise the native plant preservation plan to show the limits of grading. If grading is to be phased, include a phase line. All disturbed portions of the site will be required to comply with LUC 3.7.2.7. 4) Revise the landscape plan to locate the Acacia greggii in areas where they will pose no hazards to people. Make sure that other trees proposed in the vehicular use areas will not interfere with parking and pedestrians. DS 2-06.3.8.A 5) Multi-trunk trees are not to be planted in parking areas unless the planting area is sized to minimize interference. DS 2-06.3.3.E 6) Revise the landscape plan to ensure that the minimum vertical overhead clearance is provided in compliance with DS 6-01.4.1.B 7) Revise the landscape plan to ensure that the street landscape border meets the vegetative requirements of LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5 (50%), if necessary. Plants used for screening are not to be included in the calculations. DS 2-06.3.7 8) Show how the site will comply with the water harvesting requirements on the site, landscape and grading plans. Per LUC 3.7.4.3.B, Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. |
| 06/02/2005 | DAN CASTRO | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | COMMENTS 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 2, 2006. 2. Revise existing zone listed under code review note number three (3) from P-I to I-1and add the following note: "Per annexation condition, the proposed use shall conform to P-I zoning." (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.1) 3. This development plan has been prepared in conjunction with annexation conditions listed under zoning ordinance number 6503. List the annexation conditions under Section 5 as a general note. For a copy of the ordinance please contact me at the number provided. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2) 4. This project has been assigned development plan case number D05-0015. The development plan case number must be noted near the title block in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2) 5. Under code review note four (4), revise the proposed use to "Administrative and Professional Office." (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3) 6. All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the subject property must be revised from P-I to I-1 zoning. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.B) 7. Dimension the PAAL width located west of Building 1 between the loading space and the vehicle parking spaces. Minimum 24 feet required. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3) 8. Dimension the width of all ingress/egress points. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3) 9. Under code review note eight (8) building setbacks, revise the zoning from P-I to I-1 zoning. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.I) 10. Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.A, at least one (1) sidewalk (minimum four foot wide) shall be provided to each street the project has frontage. Provide sidewalk from on-site pedestrian circulation system to Eastside Loop. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.K) 11. Under code review note six (6), revise the maximum allowed F.A.R. from 2.0 to 1.50. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.M) 12. Under code review note five (5), revise the development designator from "34" to "33." (D.S. 2-05.2.4.M) 13. Under code review note seven (7), revise the maximum allowed building height from 75 to 50 feet. In addition, provide a note, stating that the maximum building height allowed per annexation condition is 35 feet. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.N) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180. |
| 06/04/2005 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Transportation Information for Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Review Requests File Number Description Date Reviewed E Pima Association of Governments Transportation Planning Division 177 N. Church Avenue, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Phone: (520) 792-1093 Fax: (520) 792-9151 www.pagnet.org D05-0015 Reliasoft: Development Plan 6/1/2005 1. Nearest Existing or Planned Major Street 2. Is improvement planned as part of the 5-Year Transportation Improvement Program Planned Action: STREET IDENTIFICATION 3. Existing Daily Volume – Based on Average Daily Traffic 4. Existing Daily Capacity- Level of Service “E” 5. Existing Number of Lanes 9. Estimated Traffic Generation for Proposed Development (Expressed in Average 24 Hr. Vehicle Trips) 8. Future Number of Lanes TRANSIT AND BIKEWAYS CONSIDERATIONS 10. Present Bus Service (Route, Frequency, Distance) 11. Existing or Planned Bikeway Remarks: Street Number 1 Street Number 2 Year Year Planned Action: VOLUME/CAPACITY/TRAFFIC GENERATION CONSIDERATIONS 6. Future Daily Volume - Adopted Plan System Completed 7. Future Daily Capacity - Level of Service “E” 22nd St (Kolb to Pantano) No 0 46,100 64,140 6 64,140 112,748 6 727 Route 7, 30 minutes, 0.1 miles None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
| 06/07/2005 | DALE KELCH | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | Traffic Engineering REJECTS this DP: 1. Show and label as to size (ie 20x110) both existing and future SVTs (DS 2-05.2.4.R). While the SVTs are graphically indicated, their size is not. 2. The symbol used for new street signs (planimetric view, detail 6, sheet 1) is not correct in accordance with Standard Details for Public Improvements, SD100, 2003 edition. 3. The fine for illegally parking in a handicap space is no longer $200. Please update. (detail 2, sheet 1) 4. Dimension the width of all ingress/egress points. 24' minimum, 35' maximum. These appear to be acceptable but need to be dimensioned. (Tucson City Code, Chapter 25, section 39 & 40) D. Dale Kelch, PE Senior Engineering Associate Traffic Engineering Division (520)791-4259x305 (520)791-5526 (fax) dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/07/2005 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: June 6, 2005 TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D05-0015 Reliasoft: Development Plan CC: Patricia Gehlen, Development Services Staff has no comments. Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/08/2005 | CRAIG GROSS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Completed |