Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D05-0013
Parcel: 11006014K

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D05-0013
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/07/2005 FRODRIG2 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
04/08/2005 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Denied 1. An approved turnaround must be provided for dead-end fire access roadway.
2. Provide a note on the plan stating: "Additional fire hydrants shall be provided, by the developer, in accordance with the Tucson Fire Code."
04/12/2005 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved >>> "Douglas Kratina" <DKratina@azdot.gov> 04/12/2005 12:54:57 PM >>>

NO COMMENT
D05-0013
CORONADO ENGINEERING
SWIERGOL PROPERTY
04/18/2005 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approv-Cond * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development.
Service can be provided as shown provided there is access to the property parking area as shown to the west. This will require an access agreement so the vehicles can exit out onto Ft. Lowell Rd. (Masonry wall presently blocks the connecting parking area.)
05/02/2005 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied May 2, 2005

TO: Paul Nzomo
Coronado Engineering

THRU: Craig Gross
City of Tucson, Development Services Department

FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Pima County Development Services Department
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: Swiergol Property
Development Plan – 1st Submittal
D05-0013


The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility and the Ina Road Water Pollution Control Facility via the South Rillito Central Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter.

Based on the evaluation the project site, this project would qualify for Non-Participating sewer connection fee rates.

ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D05-0013, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.

SHEET 1. Add the following General Note and fill in the blanks appropriately

THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E).

SHEET 1. Add the following General Note

MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER.

SHEET 1. Replace General Note 9 with

ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS.

SHEET 1. Show the length, size and slope of the proposed private sewer.

SHEET 1. Show the rim and invert elevations of any proposed cleanouts.

SHEET 1. Show the existing public sewer to which this project will be connecting, along with its size and corresponding Pima County plan number.

SHEET 1. Show any sewer easements along with their recording information that may be currently existing for the proposed project area.

We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.

If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely,





Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Telephone: (520) 740-6947

Copy: Project
05/02/2005 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved 77 estimated daily trips in 24 hr period.
05/05/2005 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: SWIERGOL PROPERTY
D05-0013


Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan
submitted for review April 7, 2005.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location
of the existing facilities.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department
at (520) 770-2062. Submit a final set of plans including approved site,
offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of
the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate
instrument.

Liza Castillo
Right of Way Agent
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Co.
(520) 917-8745
lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com>
05/06/2005 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No comment.
05/09/2005 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Craig Gross DATE: May 9, 2005
Planning Administrator

SUBJECT: 3958 E. Fort Lowell Road
Development Plan D05-0013 (First Review)
T13S, R14E, Section 34

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement.

The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Development Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP.
2. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
3. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5. Clarify the distance for the East property line.
4. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10.
5. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation for Columbus Wash per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15.
6. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16.
7. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
8. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
9. Show Development plan number (D05-0013) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
10. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Please contact John Clark, Environmental Services at 791-5543 x1136 for approval of the refuse containers location.
11. Provide a detail of the dumpster showing the 10'x10' clearance between bollards.
12. Placement of fill in excess of 2' above existing grade at any location in the outer 100' of the developing site is not allowed and/or shall meet the requirements per D.S. 11-01. Show all pad elevations.
13. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
14. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
15. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
16. List the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information.
17. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".


Drainage Statement:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS.
2. A Drainage Statement is required for a site not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……..per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.3.
3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2.
4. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on the DS data.
5. Show the project address on the cover of the Drainage Statement.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 791-5550 x1193 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/Swiergol Property Site
05/09/2005 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Provide landscape plans for the entire development.
LUC 3.7.1.2.B.1.b

2) Reference the CDRC case number and related cases in the lower right corner of the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.1.B

3) Provide additional trees or revise locations in order to demonstrate compliance with LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a and condition 9 of case #9 C9-03-16.

4) Show the pedestrian crossing of the p.a.a.l. on the landscape plan. DSC 2-07.2.0

5) Revise the plans to demonstrate compliance with condition #8 of case # C9-03-16 and LUC 3.7.4.3.B. Show drainage patterns, locations of downspouts and curb openings. etc.

6) Revise the plans to comply with rezoning condition #9. Provide trees along the south and east property lines with a maximum spacing of 30 feet.

7) Revise the plans to comply with rezoning condition #9. Provide a microclimate with canopy trees and shrubbery, especially along pedestrian walkways and vehicular parking areas.
05/10/2005 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

1.) Label suffix of Road for Fort Lowell.

2.) Delete Building Letters.
05/10/2005 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP.

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
05/10/2005 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: May 10, 2005

TO: Ferne Rodriguez, Development Services

FROM: Glenn Hicks, Parks and Recreation

SUBJECT: CDRC Transmittal, D05-0013 Swiergol Property: Development Plan

CC: Craig Gross, Development Services



No comments.





Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov
05/12/2005 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D05-0013 Swiergol Property 05/12/05

() Tentative Plat
(xxxxx) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C07-00-17, C09-01-24, C9-03-16

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant-Alvernon Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: 5/5/05

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
(xxxxx) See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(xxxxx) Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
(xxxxx) Landscape Plan
(xxxxx) Other: Pedestrian Connectivity

REVIEWER: VF 791-4505 DATE: 5/6/05

Department of Urban Planning and Design - Comments
D05-0013 Swiergol Property

Development plans for the Swiergol Property are subject to rezoning requirements as part of the rezoning approval (C9-03-16); therefore, plans must be in substantial compliance to said conditions.

Please add rezoning conditions to development plan.

Rezoning condition #9:
Provide microclimate, with canopy trees and shrubbery throughout the development site, especially along pedestrian walkways and vehicular parking areas. Provide increased dense landscaping along eastern and southern property lines, to include canopy trees located every 20 to 30 feet. This condition has not yet been met. Landscaping/canopy trees are absent along the length of the southern property line – approximately 80’ (along parking stalls across from building-c). Please submit new landscape plans.

Rezoning condition #10:
The developer shall agree to vehicular and pedestrian cross-access and is encouraged to secure a vehicular and pedestrian cross-access agreement with the adjoining property to the west. Also, condition 7 requires that developers provide safe and convenient pedestrian circulation systems throughout development site (raised or textured pedestrian crosswalks), and to be aligned with onsite and offsite pedestrian crossings. Plans do not satisfy this condition. Designs do not address pedestrian connectivity with existing commercial development to the north of proposed development. Please provide pedestrian cross access with existing buildings to the north of development, and if required, with adjoining property to the west.
05/16/2005 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Heather Thrall
Lead Planner

PROJECT: D05-0013
Swiergol Property
Development Plan

TRANSMITTAL: 05/16/05

DUE DATE: May 5, 2005

COMMENTS:

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is April 6, 2006.

2. Per 2-05.2.1.G.1 of the Development Standard (DS), please provide the name, address and phone number of the lot owners and developers on the revised development plan.

3. Please revise the location map to show the following street names, Columbus Blvd., Glenn Street, Blacklidge Drive and Dale Avenue.

5. Per 2-05.2.1.K, please remove the Pima County rezoning case numbers listed. The rezoning case number for this property, C9-03-16, and the adjacent site to the north, C9-97-13, should be listed in the lower right hand corner of the title block.

6. Per 2-05.2.3.A, please provide property line boundaries, preferred as corner pins, on the revised drawing.

7. Please note, per condition 2 of rezoning case C9-03-16, all dumpsters and loading zones must be located 50 feet from adjacent residential uses. If the MH-1 zoned lot to the south of the subject parcel is currently developed, this condition must be met. Please indicate on the revised plan if this southern parcel is currently developed.

8. Please label the elevation plans to the appropriate building (i.e. Building C and Building D). In addition, please revise the elevation drawings to indicate either the building face shown (directionally) or indicate notes such as "view looking/facing west."

9. Please list the zoning of the lot to the west as "MH-1 current/proposed P". As of this date, the rezoning conditions for this western parcel have not been met to allow the official rezoning of the site to "P" zoning.

10. Please revise comment 2 on the "permitting notes" to list the maximum building heights for each building. Please be sure these heights are taken from grade.

11. If applicable, please provide types, locations and dimensions for any proposed free-standing lighting on the site. Please refer to rezoning condition 11 to ensure all lighting meets the required rezoning criteria.

12. Per DS.2-05.2.4.I, please provide setback measurements for all buildings to all property lines. (i.e. Building D to north property line.)

13. Dimension distances from the front of parking space to the wheel stop on the revised plan. The wheel stop must be located entirely within 2'6" of the front of the parking space, per DS 3-05.2.3.C.2. Please dimension all typical handicapped and non-handicapped parking spaces.

14. Without wheel stop barriers, a sidewalk abutting a parking space must be 6'6" wide on the revised plan to ensure uninhibited pedestrian access. (DS 2-08.5.0.5.1.A and DS 3-05.2.3.C.2.) Please revise the sidewalk along the west side of Building D to meet this requirement.

15. Until the adjacent site is developed to a parking lot, and a recorded cross access agreement to access this lot is provided to the city, a barrier must be provided at the intended west access point. A back up spur meeting section DS.3-05.2.2.D of the Development Standard is required at this same point.

16. Per rezoning condition 7, pedestrian paths across parking area access lanes, etc., must be distinguished; either raised or textured. Please review the site plan and ensure notations are made to meet this rezoning requirement. In addition, please review the handicapped parking spaces along Building D, and provide ramps and notations how access to both Buildings C and D will meet ANSI standards.

17. Please dimension all building footprints, including the cupola and garage parking spaces on the revised plan. Be sure to show the extending façade of building D on the revised plans, in accordance with DS3-05.2.4.N

18. Per Development Standard 3-05.2.2.B.1, a minimum of 5 feet pedestrian refuge area inclusive of a 4' wide sidewalk must be provided between a building and a parking area access lane (PAAL). Please revise the development plan accordingly

19. Per Development Standard sections 3.4.4.1.B.2, 3.4.5 and 3.4.5.5, a minimum of two (2) loading spaces are required for this site. Please revise the plan accordingly. The alternative is to obtain a Board of Adjustment variance (see comment 32 for further details.)

20. Per the Land Use Code (LUC), sections 2.4.2.2, 3.2.3.2.B. Designator 27, and 3.2.6.4 BB, a setback equivalent to the height of the exterior building wall is required for building C where abutting an adjacent C-1 zoned property. The setback provided to the north, 12.34 feet, is insufficient, given the provided building wall height from grade is 15'10". Please revise the development plan to show the building meeting setbacks. The alternative is to obtain a Lot Development Option (LDO) for a reduced setback (see comment 32 for further details).

21. Please provide the distance from the north wall of building C to the curb north of the building.

22. Per the LUC, sections 2.4.2.2, 3.2.3.2.B. Designator 27, 3.2.6.4 BB, a setback equivalent to the height of the exterior building wall is required for building D where abutting an adjacent C-1 zoned property. The setback provided to the north, 2 feet, is insufficient, given the provided building wall height from grade is 10'8". Please revise the development plan to show the building meeting setbacks. The alternative is to obtain an LDO for a reduced setback (see comment 32 for further details).

23. Per the LUC, sections 2.4.2.2, 3.2.3.2.B. Designator 27, 3.2.6.4 BB, a setback the greater of 10' or ¾ of the height of the exterior building wall is required for building D where abutting an adjacent MH-1 property. The setback provided at the east side, 12 feet, is insufficient, given the provided building wall height of 17'4". Please revise the development plan to show the building meeting setbacks. The alternative is to obtain an LDO for a reduced setback (see comment 32 for further details).

24. Bicycle parking was not noted on the development plan. Per DS2-05.2.4.Q, please revise the plan to show bicycle parking to meet LUC section 3.3.4, (Administrative Professional Office category) and DS 2-09.

25. Please provide cross access agreements to the properties to the north and west. Please provide location and dimension of any easements on the revised plan, in accordance with DS 2-05.2.3.B. Be advised, if the adjacent parcel to the west is not currently developed commercially, no cross access can be allowed until such development is completed per city standards.

26. Please list all rezoning conditions of case C9-03-16 on the revised development plan. In addition, please submit a separate response letter indicating how all rezoning conditions will be met for this project.

27. Please provide a color rendering and color palette per comment 3 under rezoning case conditions.


28. Per Development Standard 3-05 and LUC section 3.3.7.2, the minimum size of a parking space is 8'6" wide by 18' in length. Please review the parking space provided at the west side of Building C and revise the space to meet standards.

29. Provide dimensions of the handicapped accessible parking spaces on the revised plan. Be sure to provide sign information for one van accessible space, and identify that space on the revised plan. A van accessible space must be a minimum of 8 feet in width, with an access aisle provided at a minimum of 8 feet in width adjacent, per ANSI Chapter 5, Section 502.2. Please revise the plan accordingly.

30. These comments are not official Lot Development Option or Board of Adjustment referral comments. To obtain such comments, please see comment 32.

31. Should you have any questions on this review or wish to make an appointment to obtain LDO or BA comments, please contact me via email at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-791-4541x1156.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608.


C:\planning\developmentplan\D05-0013.3958e.fort.lowell.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents.
05/19/2005 CRAIG GROSS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Completed