Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D05-0013
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/08/2005 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/09/2005 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Identify existing shrubs in the Fort Lowell street landscape border. DS 2-07.2.2 2) Note the 50% coverage requirement for the Fort Lowell street landscape border. LUC 3.7.2.4 3) Note the dust control requirement between the property line and Fort Lowell Road. 4) The loading space is required to be screened from adjacent properties with a 6' masonry wall. Revise as necessary. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 5) If a new development is using an existing screen on an adjacent property to meet screening requirements, a copy of the recorded covenant locating the existing screen(s) on adjacent property is required. Prior to issuance of building permits the recording information for the covenant will be required on the site plan. A copy of the covenant will also be required. DS 2-04.2.1.A.15 |
| 11/10/2005 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved November 10, 2005. |
| 11/21/2005 | JCLARK3 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | * Design exceeds backup distance of 40 feet and the required service area is in conflict with the east parking off the PAAL, (Section 6-04.1C and B). * Service truck would have to backup over 100 feet to attempt to turnaround in the existinp PAAL parking area to the north. |
| 11/23/2005 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen November 24, 2005 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: 3958 E. Fort Lowell Road Development Plan D05-0013 (Second Review) T13S, R14E, Section 34 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 3. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Please contact John Clark, Environmental Services at 791-5543 x1136 for approval of the refuse containers location. The 10'x10' clear area for the refuse enclosure also relates to the rear bollards. Obtain a letter from John Clark approving the location of the refuse enclosure and include the letter with the next submittal. Drainage Statement: 1. The DS has been accepted by engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/3958 E Ft Lowell Site2 |
| 11/28/2005 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0013 Swiergol Property 11/28/05 () Tentative Plat (xxxxx) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C07-00-17, C09-01-24, C9-03-16 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant-Alvernon Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 11/23/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (XXXX) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 5/05/05 () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other: REVIEWER: DCE 791-4505 DATE: 11/23/05 DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D05-0013 Swiergol Property 05/12/05 () Tentative Plat (xxxxx) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C07-00-17, C09-01-24, C9-03-16 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant-Alvernon Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 5/5/05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (xxxxx) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (xxxxx) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan (xxxxx) Landscape Plan (xxxxx) Other: Pedestrian Connectivity REVIEWER: VF 791-4505 DATE: 5/6/05 Department of Urban Planning and Design - Comments D05-0013 Swiergol Property Development plans for the Swiergol Property are subject to rezoning requirements as part of the rezoning approval (C9-03-16); therefore, plans must be in substantial compliance to said conditions. Please add rezoning conditions to development plan. Rezoning condition #9: Provide microclimate, with canopy trees and shrubbery throughout the development site, especially along pedestrian walkways and vehicular parking areas. Provide increased dense landscaping along eastern and southern property lines, to include canopy trees located every 20 to 30 feet. This condition has not yet been met. Landscaping/canopy trees are absent along the length of the southern property line – approximately 80’ (along parking stalls across from building-c). Please submit new landscape plans. Rezoning condition #10: The developer shall agree to vehicular and pedestrian cross-access and is encouraged to secure a vehicular and pedestrian cross-access agreement with the adjoining property to the west. Also, condition 7 requires that developers provide safe and convenient pedestrian circulation systems throughout development site (raised or textured pedestrian crosswalks), and to be aligned with onsite and offsite pedestrian crossings. Plans do not satisfy this condition. Designs do not address pedestrian connectivity with existing commercial development to the north of proposed development. Please provide pedestrian cross access with existing buildings to the north of development, and if required, with adjoining property to the west. |
| 12/01/2005 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Lead Planner PROJECT: D05-0013 Swiergol Property Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 12/01/05 DUE DATE: November 23, 2005 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is April 6, 2006. 2. Comments 3-6 are for this review. The remaining comments refer to prior requested corrections, which could not be verified for completion at this review due to the amount of information missing from the submittal. The following items are needed on the resubmittal to ensure all corrections are addressed: A) revised building elevation plans with all dimensions and building directional views labeled B) letter from West neighbor: no objection to location of loading zone 35' from residentially zoned site to west C) response letter advising how all conditions of rezoning have been met 3. (Per this review.) Please note, per condition 2 of rezoning case C9-03-16, all loading zones must be located 50 feet from adjacent residential uses. The loading zone proposed at the west side of the site is 35 feet from an adjacent MH-1 residentially zoned parcel to the west. It is staff's understanding the parcel to the west is being rezoned to a "P" Parking zoning classification. Given this information, staff will accept written confirmation from the adjacent property owner to the west indicating no objection is made to the proposed location of the loading zone, as shown on the submitted development plan. 4. (Per this review) Per ANSI Ch. 4, 5 & 7, handicapped ramps with truncated domes (early warning systems) are required where transitioning from sidewalk areas to all vehicular use areas (i.e. at Parking Area Access Lanes and parking spaces). 5. (Per this review) Per DS2-05.2.4.Q, please revise the plan to show bicycle parking to meet LUC section 3.3.4, (Administrative Professional Office category) and DS 2-09. In particular, the dimension between racks is needed. 6. (Per this review.) Provide (post) sign details and locations for handicapped accessible spaces on the revised plan. 7. (Per last review.) Please label the elevation plans to the appropriate building (i.e. Building C and Building D). In addition, please revise the elevation drawings to indicate either the building face shown (directionally) or indicate notes such as "view looking/facing west." 8. (Per last review.) Please revise comment 2 on the "permitting notes" to list the maximum building heights for each building. Please be sure these heights are taken from grade. 9.(Per last reivew.) PerDS.2-05.2.4.I, please provide setback measurements for all buildings to all property lines. (i.e. Building D to north property line.) 10. (Per last review.) Until the adjacent site is developed to a parking lot, and a recorded cross access agreement to access this lot is provided to the city, a barrier must be provided at the intended west access point. A back up spur meeting section DS.3-05.2.2.D of the Development Standard is required at this same point. 11. (Per last review.) Please dimension all building footprints, including the cupola and garage parking spaces on the revised plan. Be sure to show the extending façade of building D on the revised plans, in accordance with DS3-05.2.4.N 12. (Per last review.) Per the Land Use Code (LUC), sections 2.4.2.2, 3.2.3.2.B. Designator 27, and 3.2.6.4 BB, a setback equivalent to the height of the exterior building wall is required for building C where abutting an adjacent C-1 zoned property. The setback provided to the north, 12.34 feet, is insufficient, given the provided building wall height from grade is 15'10". Please revise the development plan to show the building meeting setbacks. The alternative is to obtain a Lot Development Option (LDO) for a reduced setback (see comment 32 for further details). 13. (Per last review.) Please provide the distance from the north wall of building C to the curb north of the building. 14. (Per last review.) Per the LUC, sections 2.4.2.2, 3.2.3.2.B. Designator 27, 3.2.6.4 BB, a setback equivalent to the height of the exterior building wall is required for building D where abutting an adjacent C-1 zoned property. The setback provided to the north, 2 feet, is insufficient, given the provided building wall height from grade is 10'8". Please revise the development plan to show the building meeting setbacks. The alternative is to obtain an LDO for a reduced setback (see comment 32 for further details). 15. (Per last review.) Per the LUC, sections 2.4.2.2, 3.2.3.2.B. Designator 27, 3.2.6.4 BB, a setback the greater of 10' or ¾ of the height of the exterior building wall is required for building D where abutting an adjacent MH-1 property. The setback provided at the east side, 12 feet, is insufficient, given the provided building wall height of 17'4". Please revise the development plan to show the building meeting setbacks. The alternative is to obtain an LDO for a reduced setback (see comment 32 for further details). 16. (Per last review.) Please provide cross access agreements to the properties to the north and west. Please provide location and dimension of any easements on the revised plan, in accordance with DS 2-05.2.3.B. Be advised, if the adjacent parcel to the west is not currently developed commercially, no cross access can be allowed until such development is completed per city standards. 17. Should you have any questions on this review please contact me via email at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-791-4541x1156. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\developmentplan\D05-0013.3958e.fort.lowell.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents. |
| 12/01/2005 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | December 1, 2005 To: Paul Nzomo, Coronado Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Project Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Michael Harrington (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Swiergol Property Development Plan - 2nd Submittal D05-0013 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Our office has received the required Capacity Response letter, No. 05-205. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #6 so that; Everything that comes after the first sentence is deleted. This is a duplicate statement of General Note # 9. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me at the telephone number shown under my signature on the first page of this letter CC: Project File |
| 12/08/2005 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 8, 2005 Paul Nzomo Coronado Engineering 1010 Finance Center Drive Tucson, AZ 85710 Subject: D05-0013 Swiergol Property Development Plan Dear Paul: Your submittal of November 8, 2005 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter for each agency explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLUELINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (environmental services, engineering, landscaping, zoning, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (engineering, zoning, landscaping, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Cross access agreement (zoning, DSD). Should you have any questions, please call me at 791-5608, ext. 1179. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 571-1961 |