Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D05-0009
Parcel: 12510006A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D05-0009
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/22/2005 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/23/2005 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved The Development Plan is approved March 23, 2005.
03/25/2005 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D05-0009 EL CON PAD 2/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: 3/25/05



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project with the following condition:

1.) Label Broadway Boulevard (sheet SP1.2) on approved mylar.

NOTE:

1. Submit a 24 x 36 Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to the assignment of addresses.

2. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.
04/04/2005 JCLARK3 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approv-Cond * No known landfill with in 1000 feet of this development.
* Single enclosure can be serviced as shown. Require detail of enclosure.
* No provisions shown or stated for recycling.
04/08/2005 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied April 7, 2005

TO: Pattie Davis
MMLA Psomas

THRU: Craig Gross
City of Tucson, Development Services Department

FROM: Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Pima County Development Services Department
Development Review Division (Wastewater)

SUBJECT: El Con Mall, Pad 2
Development Plan – 1st Submittal
D05-0009


The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.


This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Aviation Corridor to Santa Cruz Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter.

Based on the evaluation of project D03-044, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates.

ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D05-0009, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers.

SHEET SPT.1A. Revise General Note 44 to read as shown below and fill in the blanks appropriately

THIS PROJECT HAS ____ PROPOSED AND ____ EXISTING WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS, PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E).

SHEET SPT.1A. Add the following General Note

MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER TO ITS POINT OF CONNECTION TO THE PUBLIC SEWER IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER.

SHEET SP 1.3. Show the length and slope of the proposed private sewer.

We will require a revised set of drawings and a response letter addressing each comment. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

For any questions regarding the fee schedule, please go to http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/Fees.PDF where you may find the appropriate wastewater review fees at the bottom of page 1. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.

If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me. Sincerely,





Dickie Fernández, E.I.T.
Telephone: (520) 740-6947

Copy: Project
04/11/2005 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: EL CON, PAD 2
D05-0009

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan
dated March 15, 2005. It appears that there are no conflicts with the
existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department
at (520) 770-2062. Submit a final set of plans including approved site,
offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of
the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate
instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:

Mike Kaiser
Design/Build - DB 102
Tucson Electric Power Company
P. O. Box 711
Tucson, AZ 85702

Please call me at (520) 917-8745, should you have any questions.


Liza Castillo
Right of Way Agent
Land Management
Tucson Electric Power Co.
(520) 917-8745
lcastillo@tep.com <mailto:lcastillo@tep.com>
04/11/2005 BLANCA ESPINO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied The following items must be revised or added to the Development Plan.

1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

2. Submit a copy of the original approved Development Plan and Drainage Report for reference.

3. Indicate the property address and Case number D05-0009. D.S. 2-05.2.1.G.1

4. Indicate a symbol in the legend which shows and describes the six rectangle objects between the 15 parking spaces and the building for Pad 2. D.S. 2-05.2.1.J

5. List the following note on all development plans: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0." D.S. 2-05.2.2.D.2

6. All development plans are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." D.S. 2-05.2.2.E

7. All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B

8. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C Indicate the 30' Pedestrian SVT.

9. The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property.

10. Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction. D.S. 2-05.2.3.D

11. For land that slopes less than approximately one (1) percent, contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than one (1) foot. Spot elevations shall be provided at all breaks in grade and along all drainage channels or swales and at selected points not more than one hundred (100) feet apart in all directions. D.S. 2-05.2.3.E.1

12. Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown.D.S. 2-05.2.3.F

13. Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.2

14. If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, etc.) D.S. 2-05.2.4.F

15. If applicable, indicate all proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. D.S. 2-05.2.4.G

16. In conjunction with a drainage report or statement, as applicable, prepared in accordance with the City Engineer's instructions and procedures, the following information will be indicated on the development plan. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. D.S. 2-05.2.4.H

17. Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. D.S. 2-05.2.4.V

18. Proposed developments exceeding 1 acre of disturbance are subject to NPDES requirements. Contact Patricia Gilbert @ 791-5550 for submittal requirements. The NPDES submittal must accompany the Grading Plan submittal.

19. Sheet SP1.2, indicate refuse enclosure location.

20. Sheet SPT.1, indicate the original Tabulation and the last approved Tabulation.

21. Sheet SPT.1, Project Directory; indicates Address: Pad 8. Correct and revise.

22. Sheet SPT.1, Sheet Index, Sheet Numbers to Reference Numbers do not coincide with the submitted Sheets. Correct and revise.
04/13/2005 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D05-0009 El Con PAD 2 04/12/05

( ) Tentative Plat
(ü) Development Plan
(ü) Landscape Plan
( ) Revised Plan/Plat
( ) Board of Adjustment
( ) Other

CROSS REFERENCE: El Con Development Agreement, Ordinance 18489/18306

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Alvernon/Broadway Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Broadway Blvd. (gateway)

COMMENTS DUE BY: April 18, 2005

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies
(ü) See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(ü) Resubmittal Required:
( ) Tentative Plat
(ü) Development Plan
(ü) Landscape Plan
(ü) Other (color elevations and material listing)

REVIEWER: K. Aragonez 791-4505 DATE: 4/12/2005
1. Per conditions VII.a, an architectural design color scheme (theme) shall be developed for the entire Mall development, including out pads. This theme is to be compatible with the general area and to provide for continuity and consistency in the architecture of the site. Color elevations of the proposed project, which include material listings and photos of existing out-pads and main mall should be provided to staff for review. The designated architects for El Con Mall should also review these elevations. A letter of compliance from the architect should be included with this submittal to the City of Tucson Department of Urban Planning and Design.

2. Please dimension the sidewalk shown within Broadway Blvd. Per condition II.4.d, this sidewalk should be a minimum of six (6) feet in width.

3. Please dimension all pedestrian sidewalks and paths that encircle pad 2 to assure that minimum width of four (4) feet per DS 5.1.A are maintained.
04/18/2005 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Show any existing landscaping along Broadway Boulevard. Identify any existing trees, shrubs, etc. by genus and species.

2) Clarify if the wall shown in the Broadway Boulevard right-of-way area is existing or proposed. Identify the wall on the landscape plan. Typically, screening elements are located behind the street landscaping per LUC 3.7.3.2.C.
Seperate approvals and permits are required for construction in the right of way.

3) Submit LS-2 and LS-3.

4) Verify if keynote 15 on sheet SP1.3 applies. Show location.

5) Keynote 4 is used extensively on sheet SP1.3. Check for accurate use of this keynote.

6) Include a legend for all lines and symbols used on SP1.3.

7) The landscape plan dimensions a 60' half right-of-way for Broadway Boulevard, while sheet SP1.2 shows an existing 85' half and a 75' half per the Broadway corridor plan. Coordinate the plan information as necessary.

8) Show where and how stormwater runoff will be directed to landscape areas. LUC 3.7.4.3.B
Show, concentration points, any structures, and curb openings.


RESUBMITTAL OF PLANS IS REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPLY PENDING RECEIPT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
04/21/2005 DAN CASTRO ZONING REVIEW Denied PROJECT: El Con Pad 2
D05-0009 Development Plan (1st Review)
TRANSMITTAL: April 21, 2005

COMMENTS
1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is March 20, 2006.

2. This project has been assigned development plan case number D05-0009. The development plan case number must be noted near the title block in the lower right corner of each sheet on all plans. (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2)

3. Under general note five on sheet SPT.1A, D04-0038 shall be labeled as previous case number and D05-0009 shall be added as current development plan case number.

4. Label and dimension existing and future (MS&R) right-of-way and curb location along for Broadway way Boulevard. (D.S. 2-05.2.3.C) (D.S. 2-05.2.4.F)

5. Label the proposed maximum building height on the plan. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.N)

6. Handicap parking sign is incorrectly labeled as keynote 2.

7. Dimension the loading zone area. Keynote 2 is labeled as storage/loading zone and must be revised to state loading zone only. Loading areas may not be used for any other purpose other than loading or unloading. Loading zone size shall be a minimum 12' wide by 35' in length. (D.S. 2-05.2.4.O)

8. Provide a detail of the handicap ramps. (ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Section 405)

9. Label and dimension existing and future sight visibility triangles on sheet SP1.3.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Dan Castro, (520) 791-5608 ext. 1180.
04/25/2005 DALE KELCH COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved Traffic Engineering recommends APPROVAL of this DP.

D. Dale Kelch, EIT
Senior Engineering Associate
Traffic Engineering Division
(520)791-4259x305
(520)791-5526 (fax)
dale.kelch@tucsonaz.gov
04/27/2005 CRAIG GROSS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Completed